Co-op scraps policy allowing trans staff to use toilets they ‘feel safest’

2 days ago by TRAHR to c/unitedkingdom

The Co-operative Group has removed a policy that explicitly allowed trans and non-binary staff to use gendered toilets they felt “safest”.

The Co-operative Group has removed a policy that explicitly allowed trans and non-binary staff to use gendered toilets where they felt “safest”, following new UK guidance on single-sex spaces.

heliotrope 45 points 2 days ago

Reading the article, it seems that the Co-op are trying their best, in light of the government's shitfuckery.

The updated policy instead says that, wherever possible, the retailer will provide individual, lockable gender-neutral facilities, with decisions about access to gendered spaces made “sensitively and on a case-by-case basis,” as reported by The Sunday Times.

The change follows the UK Supreme Court’s April 2025 ruling on the legal meaning of “woman” and “man”, as well as new guidance from the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) stating that single-sex spaces should be provided based on biological sex.

A spokesperson for the Co-op, which has been a vocal supporter of trans rights, said it updated the policy following legal advice and consultation with its staff networks “to ensure compliance with our legal obligations and to support our trans, non-binary and intersex colleagues”, in a statement to The Sunday Times.

save

path: 0 25355697, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 8

yakko 34 points 2 days ago

That's a lot of nuance hidden by an upsetting headline.

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 6

Zedstrian 10 points 2 days ago

While the Co-op may not be transphobic itself, single occupant gender-neutral bathrooms are a solution presented by transphobes who want to continue misgendering trans men and women under the veneer of a discriminatory 'compromise'.

Trans people across the UK are having their rights marginalized.

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963 25358566, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3

yakko 2 points 2 days ago

Agreed

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963 25358566 25358825, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

Slashme 1 point 21 hours ago

How are gender-neutral bathrooms discriminatory? They seem to me to be the perfect solution.

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963 25358566 25374338, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1

Zedstrian 2 points 18 hours ago

Because requiring that trans people use them instead of the bathroom of the gender they identify as is still exclusionary and transphobic; it tells them that they do not belong to the gender they identify as and/or that they are a danger to cisgender individuals of that gender.

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963 25358566 25374338 25376361, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

TRAHR 7 points 2 days ago

It's segregation unless you meet some nebulous criteria.

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963 25356120, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1

yakko 8 points 2 days ago

I'm not saying it's good news, it's just more mixed than you'd expect. Just criticising the headline.

save

path: 0 25355697 25355963 25356120 25356388, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0

TRAHR 7 points 2 days ago

The retailer’s former CEO Shirine Khoury-Haq had told The Telegraph last May that she would “protect trans people to the end” following the Supreme Court ruling. The Co-op has since been hit by significant leadership changes, with Khoury-Haq leaving earlier this year after claims of a “toxic” culture in the workplace. Chair Debbie White also announced her resignation last Monday (10 August).

How much of this is leadership based.

save

path: 0 25355697 25356112, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0

motionofethre 16 points 2 days ago

Soooo. Why don't we just have all gender neutral bathrooms with locking stalls?

save

path: 0 25357811, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 4

fakeman_pretendname 9 points 2 days ago

That's one of the things that's no longer allowed (unless the "stall" is a complete self-contained bathroom with toilet and sink).

save

path: 0 25357811 25358062, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3

pega_sus 2 points 20 hours ago

There are toilets with sinks on the cistern, and while those cost money i think they'd be a great bandaid solution.

Sometimes you need a workaround

save

path: 0 25357811 25358062 25375135, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

motionofethre 2 points 21 hours ago

Being a politician isn't a protected class. How about separate bathrooms for politicians? Like outhouses

save

path: 0 25357811 25358062 25374097, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1

fakeman_pretendname 1 point 21 hours ago

Well, it depends if they voted for or against the plans. Those who argued and voted against can carry on as normal.

For those who argued, lobbied or voted for: They can use a bucket in the middle of the room, or they can not go at all.

save

path: 0 25357811 25358062 25374097 25374423, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

Arcane2077 7 points 2 days ago

People will see this and boycott co-op for complying (on paper) with the fascist law

save

path: 0 25357260, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2

SatansDaughter 3 points 2 days ago

Um, yes? People who comply with fascists are themselves fascist

save

path: 0 25357260 25358582, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1

Arcane2077 1 point 4 hours ago

That’s probably the dumbest thing anyone has ever said. By that logic, mugging victims are themselves robbers

save

path: 0 25357260 25358582 25387778, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

jdr 2 points 2 days ago

Danger toilets for all!

save

path: 0 25358000, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0