WagnasT 53 points 3 years ago

we need laws that require companies to unlock boot loaders when they drop support, or at least provide the means to do so.

path: 0 3471919, hotness: undefined, score: 53, children: 2

JackGreenEarth 40 points 3 years ago

Or just always? I buy a device, I want full control over it.

save

path: 0 3471919 3477615, hotness: undefined, score: 40, children: 1

Lucidlethargy 15 points 3 years ago

That is not too much to ask.

save

path: 0 3471919 3477615 3484783, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0

rshalom 25 points 3 years ago

Not really true. Plenty of Linux distributions dropped 32bit support years ago and 32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years (last ones were some Intel Atoms released around 2010).

save

path: 0 3472418, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 13

jmcs 30 points 3 years ago

When talking about Linux desktops it includes distros like Debian, who will support i386 until, at least 2028. Even some fast moving distros like OpenSuse Tumbleweed still support i386.

save

path: 0 3472418 3472759, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 3

hellfire103 4 points 3 years ago

I'm running crunchbang++ on my i686 box.

save

path: 0 3472418 3472759 3473184, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0

roguetrick 2 points 3 years ago

Can I play command and conquer on all i386 Linux install? Otherwise I'm sticking with DOS.

save

path: 0 3472418 3472759 3473171, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1

umbrella 3 points 3 years ago

save

path: 0 3472418 3472759 3473171 3483533, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

hellfire103 5 points 3 years ago

I have Linux running strongly on two laptops from 2007. If I still had my old Dell from 2003, I'd bet I could get the latest Puppy Linux running on it. Maybe even something like Debian or Arch32, if I maxed out the RAM.

save

path: 0 3472418 3473161, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2

Reverendender 2 points 3 years ago

I’m inclined to do this with my old iMac and MacBook from 12 years ago, but I can’t think of anything to do with them after. Donate them maybe?

save

path: 0 3472418 3473161 3473193, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

notTheCat 2 points 3 years ago

I've tried Arch32 a while ago, the project isn't that well maintained (like I appreciate they're trying), I've had MX Linux before, worked great, just a bit outdated, I moved my 32bit machine to Void Linux, it seems to have the best support yet ! I'm running cutting edge kernel and dev tools on that old fart

save

path: 0 3472418 3473161 3483983, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

thejodie 4 points 3 years ago

"32bit systems are a lot younger than 20 years"

I don't follow. The i386 is almost 40 years old now. Can you elaborate?

save

path: 0 3472418 3481422, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4

vrighter 5 points 3 years ago

it may have began 4 decades ago, but what matters is that only one decade ago new hardware was still being released.

save

path: 0 3472418 3481422 3483261, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3

thejodie 2 points 3 years ago

And new processors stopped supporting x86-32 a decade ago?

save

path: 0 3472418 3481422 3483261 3497532, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2

KSPAtlas 2 points 2 years ago

Except with that new 64 bit only thing Intel is trying to do, all x86_64 processors have 16-bit and 32-bit mode for backwards compatibility reasons, the processors actually start at 16-bit mode and are raised by the UEFI (or previously, the OS/bootloader) to 64-bit mode. In fact, if your UEFI supports CSM, you can flash MS-DOS 6.22 onto a USB stick and boot from it, and it'll treat it as a floppy drive (many BIOS implementations use floppy disks to emulate usb mass storage devices).

save

path: 0 3472418 3481422 3483261 3497532 16417829, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

vrighter 0 points 3 years ago

nope, new processors still do. At least on intel/amd processors. it's only software that decided to drop support

save

path: 0 3472418 3481422 3483261 3497532 3515127, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0

Astroturfed 1 point 3 years ago

Ya, 64 bit was becoming more common/standard 16ish years ago with vista right? I remember I had to get vista even though I didn't want to because it had support for 64 but.

save

path: 0 3472418 3516125, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

tabularasa 22 points 3 years ago

Chromebooks, if they fit into the use case, are fantastic. All day battery life, boot instantly, seamless migrations to a new device. I got one of these for my parents, grandparents, etc, and I'll never look back.

save

path: 0 3482779, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 2

Astroturfed 3 points 3 years ago

And windows works fine for most tech illiterate people who just need to use the web and type up word docs/use Excel. Most normal folks aren't tech literate enough or have no reason to bother.

save

path: 0 3482779 3516052, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

dot 1 point 3 years ago

save

path: 0 3482779 3933850, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

chicken 12 points 3 years ago

I replaced ChromeOS with Linux forever ago when they dropped support for my hardware. It would be a brick if not for Linux.

save

path: 0 3484266, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0

SpaceNoodle 8 points 3 years ago

ChromeOS uses the Linux kernel ...

save

path: 0 3474649, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 5

hellfire103 11 points 3 years ago

So does Android. It's been torn apart and locked down so much, however, that it becomes a totally different OS.

save

path: 0 3474649 3475906, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2

loutr 4 points 3 years ago

The Android kernel is the upstream Linux LTS kernel with custom patches applied, like most desktop distros. The Android OS is an entirely different tech stack.

save

path: 0 3474649 3475906 3498124, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1

hellfire103 2 points 3 years ago

Thankyou.

save

path: 0 3474649 3475906 3498124 3503642, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

looz 1 point 3 years ago

I recall it being gentoo based at least early on.

save

path: 0 3474649 3479065, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1

theshatterstone54 1 point 3 years ago

Yes. Still is. Don't kniw why you were downvoted. Maybe some people are confusing the ChromeOS base with Crostini (a Debian container)

save

path: 0 3474649 3479065 3495512, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0

sloppy_diffuser 5 points 3 years ago

Forgot my laptop charger at the office for a week long event this past week and no time to recover it from the office. Had a 13 year old system76 laptop in the closet. Grabbed a spare external SSD (had an internal HDD), put the latest version of Ubuntu on it, and it worked flawlessly for the week without an issue. I maintain a dotfiles repo and keep backups of everything on b2 using rclone that encrypts/decrypts the files. Took less than hour to have my entire workflow ready to go on a new install without relying on proprietary spyware (icloud/one drive).

save

path: 0 3515824, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2

Astroturfed 7 points 3 years ago

That's great except that all sounds like some crazy complex jibberish to most folks. Unfortunately most of the public needs a no technical skills required workstation.

save

path: 0 3515824 3516012, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1

sloppy_diffuser 3 points 3 years ago

You make a solid point. I don't know shit about fixing cars and I am a decade behind on home repair skills after spending most of my life geeking out on Linux.

In the middle I suppose their is an argument to be made that software support doesn't need to stop after a few years. Point I was trying to convey, which I admit is just one anecdote, is that my modern setup worked flawlessly on hardware older than 10 years.

save

path: 0 3515824 3516012 3516514, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0

Kolanaki 4 points 3 years ago

This implies that LeapFrogs are better computers.

save

path: 0 3479085, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1

hellfire103 2 points 3 years ago

Well, LeapFrogs are for kids. Chromebooks are supposed to be for... students, I guess?

save

path: 0 3479085 3487303, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0

RIP_Cheems 3 points 3 years ago

At least our children may suffer a little less from those abominations.