orenj 24 points 18 days ago

Just summon me instead. I'll tell you disinformation and my summoning circle uses way less material components.

path: 0 26020662, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0

Chl0r0f0rm_Angel 10 points 18 days ago

Is that fucking Mr Friendly?

save

path: 0 26015769, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1

ChicoSuave 4 points 18 days ago

My first thought was Verity

save

path: 0 26015769 26016203, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0

Grail 8 points 18 days ago

Fuck AI

save

path: 0 26024852, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0

pigup -4 points 18 days ago

Call deepseek enjoy llm hallucinations and it jumping to conclusions and misconfiguring everything because it never bothers to check whether it's just inventing bullshit, and there when it tries to solve the problem, it comes up with in correct theories and then further fucks everything up.

Call GLM instead.

save

path: 0 26018396, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 5

halcyoncmdr 13 points 18 days ago

You're describing literally every LLM at some point. It's why they can't be trusted, and why the user needs to already know how to accomplish what they're asking. The hallucination machine needs to only be used to try and make it faster, not relied on to blindly make decisions and changes without oversight.

save

path: 0 26018396 26019550, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1

pigup -3 points 18 days ago

Yea you better know what's at stake when you /yolo

Though progress is happening in the autonomy dept. Nearest models are more careful, and agent harnesses are improving. Maybe one day.

save

path: 0 26018396 26019550 26020511, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0

criticon 10 points 18 days ago

Same as claude?

We have to use Claude at my job, as in they check out token usage

The other day I had to build a prototype using some development boards and decided to leave everything to claude. I gave it the datasets and told it what I needed to do and it created completely incorrect schematics, like hallucinating a LED on the board, adding a serial interface to some pins that are not related, confusing tx and rx on another set of pins, saying that it needed 12V when it is 3-5V, it even added some capacitors to some pins that weren't even in use. I had to go thru maybe 10 iterations and burned a bunch of tokens, basically I had to do it manually

The only thing it surprises me every time is the code, that usually runs with no errors on the first try. It's just not very clean but it is ok for my needs

save

path: 0 26018396 26019272, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1

terranoid 6 points 18 days ago

As a engineer, I think these tools really are useful for coding, not perfect but useful... And it would make sense, because they robbed the open source community blind to make them.

There was a fuck ton of good training data of working code, and it is better at that than maybe more niche use cases where it's sometimes surprisingly okay at it. But you give it a ton of good code and it'll be decent at it... That shouldn't be too surprising.

I do see it make common mistakes like over engineering the shit out of a problem that could be simplified, but so do devs.

I honestly think we got AGI and people refuse to admit it because it's not the life changing technology that scifi made it out to be. I think there's "meh" level AGI and logarithmic requirements to improve it, not exponential, and now they're like "...it's gonna cure cancer any day now"?

Nah, it's not. I am pretty sure the fact that Trump is calling it super intelligence is the news I needed to hear to know it's never happening in our lifetime, and that it's the lie they all want us to believe.

save

path: 0 26018396 26019272 26019549, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0

zaphod 2 points 15 days ago

If I want hallucinations I'll drink some weird potion.

save

path: 0 26018396 26057045, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0