The French Are Very Worried, and That’s Making Things Worse

6 hours ago by CAVOK to c/europe

The belief that the country is on a downward slope fuels the appeal of radicalism.

A_norny_mousse 9 points 3 hours ago

And how did we (it's not only France) get there? Neo-fucking-liberalism. Cronyism. Legal corruption.

That's what needs to Change. Who has that in their political program? The neofascists just say it but it's noise to distract from the above. Which is why they're getting paid by industrialists and foreign actors that want to destabilise us.

Will the dissatisfied masses ever realise that? I think we can help them.

So who really has Change in their political program? That's who we need to boost.


Seriously I'm so sick of hearing this shit. It's been the same ever since practically every EU country ate the austerity narrative and the new right began to rise.

path: 0 26292463, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Buffalox 2 points 4 hours ago

The belief that the country is on a downward slope fuels the appeal of radicalism.

Because radicalism is good for the economy?
I don't think so, they should rather kick out Marine Le Pen and Front National.
That could do a great deal to create better stability and progress. Even if extremists manage to improve the economy in the beginning, they always end up ruining it, just look at Hitler and Putin, and then there are the ones like Trump that ruin it right from the beginning.

path: 0 26291840, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 9
killingspark 3 points 3 hours ago

This is only a valid argument if you still believe that anyone is able to improve the economic situation.

Without that believe everything becomes a fight for pieces of a decreasing pie.

Which explains increasing formation of tighter in- and outgroups and the increased support for the political ideology supporting this kind of thinking.

path: 0 26291840 26292209, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 4
Buffalox 1 point 2 hours ago

This is only a valid argument if you still believe that anyone is able to improve the economic situation.

No it isn't, because the radicals will destroy the economy way worse, and that is what will make it a fight for scraps.

path: 0 26291840 26292209 26293060, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
killingspark 1 point an hour ago

That argument only makes sense if you think the political centre would protect you from the fight for scraps that is already happening.

There is growing evidence that the political centre will throw even more parts of the population into poverty so that the rich can keep getting richer.

I am not saying the radical parties are necessarily the fix to that, certainly not the radical liberatarian and especially not the radical right.

I'm just saying the radical political centre is also not doing so great at making the economy work for everyone.

path: 0 26291840 26292209 26293060 26293378, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Buffalox 1 point an hour ago

the radical centre

That's an oxymoron.

path: 0 26291840 26292209 26293060 26293378 26293553, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
gian 0 points 3 hours ago

I don’t think so, they should rather kick out Marine Le Pen and Front National.

This only means that you are hiding the problems under the rug, it is like outlawing AfD: you maybe remove an immediate problem but you don't remove the people who think that Le Pen or Front National have the solutions, and more importantly, you don't solve the (supposed) problems that causes their rise.
And these people will come back to bite you sooner or later, and it will be far worse than whatever could happen trying to solve the problem now.

path: 0 26291840 26292201, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
rumschlumpel 2 points 3 hours ago

That's like complaining that putting murderers in prison doesn't stop people's murderous thoughts.

path: 0 26291840 26292201 26292534, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
HieroProtagonist 1 point 37 minutes ago

... it is like outlawing AfD: you maybe remove an immediate problem but you don’t remove the people...

Oh, you surely do: The radical elements who will take up arms after a ban of the AfD will be removed... one way or another. This leaves on the one hand the voters who voted for AfD because they thought they are a valid party - they will move towards other, less radical parties like the CDU or FDP where their beliefs will be watered down. On the other hand there are now those who will be put in a state of apathy after a ban - the "Politikverdrossenheit": Those will still rant online and in their inner circles, but they will have lost most will to engange in politics.

path: 0 26291840 26292201 26293702, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Buffalox 1 point 2 hours ago

it is like outlawing AfD

Although I agree that outlawing a party is not a good idea, this is a straw man argument, because I never claimed they should outlaw , but only that they should vote those fuckers way out of any influence.
But people are stupid, the average person is dumb, and 50% are even dumber. 🤷‍♀️

path: 0 26291840 26292201 26293099, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Cherry 1 point 42 minutes ago

Radical is used as a dirty word lately. It’s been used to imply wrongdoing or being associated with terrorism.

It’s not. Don’t listen to media language like this. Don’t be scared to think radically and support revolution.

Another aspect is other people acting like France shouldn’t do this. It’s like telling someone else to stop their momentum. Others might sit comfortable with being taken advantage of, but others don’t. They get up and do something.

path: 0 26293634, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
europe
europe

@feddit.org

login for more options
12165
12142
4780

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

go to feed...