Libertarian rule

3 years ago by RothyBuyak to c/196

qwamqwamqwam 68 points 3 years ago

Actual Facebook meme, but it confirms my biases, so upvote.

path: 0 587733, hotness: undefined, score: 68, children: 0
exohuman 30 points 3 years ago

We had libertarians popular for a while in Michigan. Then they lost popularity. They usually align themselves to the right wing. In practice, they basically tried to block the government from helping the people at all. No school funding. No health care. Private ownership of all the land. No parks, protected lands or sanctuaries. No real environmental protections (so no public protection of the largest freshwater supply in the world, a precious resource), only property owners can sue for pollution, no gun regulations, no helping the poor or any social programs whatsoever, and a stronger state’s rights take on government (so the state can say no to everything too).

The good parts to me were that they didn’t support drug war policies and they don’t believe in government discrimination against any groups (but the “government” part is important there so I guess that’s not that good).

path: 0 593457, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 2
Silinde 7 points 3 years ago

I mean, everything you described is exactly what Libertarianism is in the 21st century - placing the needs of the individual or business above the needs of society in general, which includes advocating for as little government interference as possible. It's why this meme, despite being Facebook cringe, is apropos.

path: 0 593457 597254, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Drewfro66 1 point 3 years ago

I think the big problem with Libertarianism is that they have good ideas and bad ideas, but the powers that be use them to get the bad bits passed while blocking the good bits because they hurt shareholder profits.

path: 0 593457 605898, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jerome 28 points 3 years ago

They're just republicans that smoke weed.

path: 0 592882, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
SlowNoPoPo 8 points 3 years ago

the libertarian party yes, because they literally took over the us national party

the actual ideology, no

path: 0 592882 603706, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
IntheMesh 24 points 3 years ago

libertarianism is when no one works together appararently.

path: 0 587321, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 27
outer_spec 38 points 3 years ago

Of course not, because that would be sharing, and communism is when sharing

path: 0 587321 587736, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 0
Something_Complex 28 points 3 years ago

They don't want to admit it but they are just a few steps away from anarchy.

Soo the, we got problems to big for one person alone to solve. If we let every fucker do whatever he wants we going down fast. We need inteligente population orientated to something good, organizerd trough democracy.

bUt i wANt mY GuNS AnD My moNEY.

They say while driving in public rodes with protection from a government that doesn't let companies poison their air, a gov that replaces the lead pipes, that conducts international policies needed for the survival of any contry....

Eddit:typos

path: 0 587321 589951, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 21
Omegamanthethird 27 points 3 years ago

The way Libertarians claim, in the broad sense, they are literally the same as anarchists.

However, most of the time when you get into the details, they just want the government to protect them doing whatever they want and oppress others. They're literally the same as conservatives.

path: 0 587321 589951 590114, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
iopq 6 points 3 years ago

I kind of get your post, but you should seriously proof read it. I don't even know what the last sentence means

path: 0 587321 589951 591137, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 8
1st 5 points 3 years ago

They say while driving on public roads provided by a government that doesn't let companies poison the air or install lead pipes for drinking water

path: 0 587321 589951 591137 594281, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 6
iopq 3 points 3 years ago

Poisoning the air or water is against the non-aggression principle of libertarianism. People who are okay with harming others are not libertarians, they are just LARPing Republicans.

Public roads is a difference of opinion. If there were private toll roads everywhere with a wireless chip for payment (to fund upkeep of the road) I would not be against that. The government has toll roads as well so I had to get the wireless chip anyway in California since I don't have exact change on me every time I drive on a bridge. If his higher cost of roads went to keeping them in better order and discouraged people from driving, that would be actually a benefit.

path: 0 587321 589951 591137 594281 604967, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 4
Something_Complex 2 points 3 years ago

Thank you for speaking my retarded form of English

path: 0 587321 589951 591137 594281 596387, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Something_Complex 2 points 3 years ago

Hahaha I have lost a battle with my auto corrector, he just keeps changing words to Portuguese

path: 0 587321 589951 591137 596333, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SneakyThunder 3 points 3 years ago

They don't want to admit it but they are just a few steps away from anarchy.

Pretty much everyone admits it. Minarchist (pro minimal govt) flag is literally ancap with black changed to blue.

Soo the, we got problems to big for one person alone to solve. If we let every fucker do whatever he wants we going down fast. We need inteligente population orientated to something good, organizerd trough democracy.

Free Market is essentially a "continuous democratic process". If what somebody does benefit people, he gets incentivised with profits. If people see no value in what he's doing – he gets losses. And if in the process of " doing whatever he wants" he does any harm to others ge gets sued.

And all of this happens constantly instead of once in a couple of years, without almost any accountability from those who're in power as it works in republic.

path: 0 587321 589951 591185, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 10
anothercatgirl 12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 587321 589951 591185 597505, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 8
Something_Complex 2 points 3 years ago

Exactly it's not democratic. So what is wrong here would be the way we force our elected leaders to campaign, by having to accept donations you imediatly bring money into the table.

If all candidates had the same air time/publicity and couldn't do more outside of that budget the gov gave them. I believe it could improve, you could denounced oponets who are moved by money, and wouldn't be forced to accept non

path: 0 587321 589951 591185 597505 612793, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SneakyThunder 1 point 3 years ago

First of all lobbying and any other intrusion into fair competition is incompatible with free market.

As for the "rich" — without government enforced monopolies, their wealth is a representation of how much value they provide to society. Which roughly translates into their support by society. A bit like representative democracy, but more decentralized.

path: 0 587321 589951 591185 597505 598594, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 6
scroll_responsibly 4 points 3 years ago

Some people having exponentially more votes than others is not democratic.

path: 0 587321 589951 591185 611137, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
reverendz 10 points 3 years ago path: 0 587321 593448, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
exohuman 10 points 3 years ago

That was a fun read.

path: 0 587321 593448 593489, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
SneakyThunder 9 points 3 years ago

Of course, because "every organization is less effective than individual" :P

Additionally it's "literally socialism"

path: 0 587321 591229, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
HariSeldon_official 4 points 3 years ago

USSR

United States Socialist Republics

path: 0 587321 591229 593244, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
CurlyWurlies4All 15 points 3 years ago

“I don't want the Queen Mary,” he snapped back. “I plan to blow up the Queen Mary. I want speedboats.”

Jack Welch, CEO of GE and a cunt.

path: 0 590551, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
bandario 12 points 3 years ago

I'm not really a big fan of this facebook meme, because I'd take the solo boat and some basic paddles any day over a large ship full of idiots with no means to propel itself.

path: 0 593416, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
RaoulDook -1 points 3 years ago

I don't get why the activity of mocking Libertarians is so popular on Reddit and Lemmy. It's a 3rd party that never wins elections, and promotes individual freedom and fiscal responsibility. So what?

path: 0 593416 601576, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
The_Hideous_Orgalorg 4 points 3 years ago

Because they promote selfishness, and given their way, would benefit few at the expense of many. Humans are inherently stronger as a group than alone. We need to use that strength to do things for the common good, such as providing services such as fire fighters, libraries, and education. Libertarians would prefer to avoid helping anyone but themselves.

path: 0 593416 601576 684177, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Thteven 3 points 3 years ago path: 0 593416 601576 616297, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
danc4498 11 points 3 years ago

They look free to me

path: 0 587745, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Kantiberl 8 points 3 years ago
path: 0 593002, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Pixelologist 10 points 3 years ago

Identifying as either tells me you've already lost. (the government wins)

path: 0 593002 593112, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
MrMamiya 7 points 3 years ago

Jokes on all of us, there’s no true libertarian.

path: 0 614715, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
can 4 points 3 years ago

Test

path: 0 614314, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
MsPenguinette 4 points 3 years ago

They'll cause the problems then complain about the problems being the reason they needed to cause the problems

path: 0 612151, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
MelonTheMan 3 points 3 years ago

A proper libertarian would recognize benefits of cooperation and government intervention in a LOT more segments than the current party line tends to state.

path: 0 609129, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
MoltenHydrogen 3 points 3 years ago

what's wrong with liking books

path: 0 639718, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
hexadence 3 points 3 years ago

When someone is so dependent on you that your separation is seen as betrayal..

Senpai.. I..

(˵ ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°˵)

path: 0 607551, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
MiddleWeigh 2 points 3 years ago

Meanwhile I'm still in denial that I'm even alive (:

path: 0 588052, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
196
196

@lemmy.blahaj.zone

login for more options
19667
19250
2485

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

  • No bigotry (transphobia, racism, etc…)
  • No genocide denial
  • No support for authoritarian behaviour (incl. Tankies)
  • No namecalling
  • Accounts from lemmygrad.ml, threads.net, or hexbear.net are held to higher standards
  • Other things seen as cleary bad

Posting rules:

  • No AI generated content (DALL-E etc…)
  • No advertisements
  • No gore / violence
  • Mutual aid posts are not allowed

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

go to feed...