New rule on hostility toward anarchism

4 years ago by Whom to c/anarchism

As a result of this community's existence on a site that is often hostile to its ideas, we'll be implementing a new rule:

4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your "epic dunks on the anarkiddies" is not. As a result of the instance's poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren't just looking to start a fight.

sascuach 3 points 4 years ago

Based. Finally a place on lemmy to address anarchists rather than being lemmygrad 2.0

path: 0 87641, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Whom 2 points 4 years ago

Contained and respectful debate on the topic can certainly be useful, though. If anyone creates a community specifically for that kind of thing, I'd be glad to pop it in the sidebar.

path: 0 73053, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
GuyDudeman 2 points 3 years ago

I think there needs to be a /Leftist_Infighting community made where people can go and argue with each other, and then come back to their safe places to vent and be amongst people of the same mind? I feel like that would be useful.

*edit: I just created it: https://lemmy.ml/c/leftistinfighting

path: 0 73053 213179, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
duskfall 1 point 2 years ago
path: 0 15049975, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
krolden -5 points 4 years ago

yo, fuck that shit.

banning should only be done for straight up trolling and/or spam. If you cant take an argument then what's the point of having discussion at all?

how long until I make a point that you disagree with and consider it a "dunk" on you?

path: 0 17612, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 10
w_ortiz 3 points 4 years ago

This sub is one of the only few anar subs, and it's surrounded by hostile people who hate us. that's not a nice feeling to have on a leftist instance.
And there is a lot of room in rule n°4 to still disagree and have discussions, no straight banning if you don't just wanna start a fight.

path: 0 17612 87683, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
sexy_peach 2 points 4 years ago

Who are you to make the rules?? A community can make their own rules, wtf...

path: 0 17612 17763, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
krolden -3 points 4 years ago

I'm not trying to make the rules, I'm just trying to make my point.

Why not start a poll for new rule ideas instead of the 2-3 mods making all the decisions? Wouldn't that be more in line with the philosophy?

path: 0 17612 17763 17764, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 2
sexy_peach 0 points 4 years ago

what philosophy? Online forums?

path: 0 17612 17763 17764 17765, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
krolden -2 points 4 years ago

No, anarchism. Thanks for being obtuse

path: 0 17612 17763 17764 17765 17766, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Whom 1 point 4 years ago

Yeah totally you're right, spaces should never be able to define a range in which discussion occurs and we should just all bend over to whoever wants to pop in and derail. Great suggestion.

path: 0 17612 213193, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
krolden -1 points 4 years ago

did i say bend over? use your words (and votes), not your modpower. this is one of the things that turned /r/anarchism to shit and you are perpetuating the same backwards discussion rules.

path: 0 17612 213193 213195, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
Whom 3 points 4 years ago

Arguing basic premises all day long keeps discussion from actually going anywhere. Actual discussion flourishes among a group who can agree on the basics and actually want to talk about something more substantive than "is authority bad or is it actually good??????"

This community has so far been garbage because it's just anarchists posting links then people (largely from lemmygrad) starting fights on them over and over and over. That doesn't get anyone anywhere.

path: 0 17612 213193 213195 227482, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
krolden -2 points 4 years ago

whatever dude. you're literally doing the same shit lemmygrad does by banning people you disagree with. not to mention DELETING their comments/posts which just makes you look more fragile. I can argue that doesn't get anyone anywhere either. If you really think your ideology is better then maybe you shouldn't parrot the actions of the ones you claim are hindering discussion.

path: 0 17612 213193 213195 227482 227493, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Anarcho_Mandalorian 1 point 3 years ago

Depends on the community. Some communities are for debate, some aren't.

path: 0 17612 213192, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
anarchism
anarchism

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
4786
342
78

Are you an Anarchist? The answer might surprise you!

Rules: 0. Post content that is thoughtful and relevant to social liberation from an anarchist, autonomous, antifascist perspective.

  1. Be respectful
  2. Don't be a nazi
  3. Argue about the point and not the person
  4. This is not the place to debate the merits of anarchism itself. While discussion is encouraged, getting in your “epic dunks on the anarkiddies” is not. As a result of the instance’s poor moderation policies and hostility toward anarchists by default, lemmygrad users are encouraged not to post here, though not explicitly disallowed if they aren’t just looking to start a fight.

See also:

go to feed...