Great, so now there's going to be younger people in charge of the machine that burns the world and makes life miserable for almost everyone. I'm sure they'll give it a dazzling new coat of paint!
@lemmy.ml
Great, so now there's going to be younger people in charge of the machine that burns the world and makes life miserable for almost everyone. I'm sure they'll give it a dazzling new coat of paint!
"Denazification" after WW2 was a farce. Only the Soviet-occupied territories actually purged Nazi officials (even they let some slip through or even get new roles), but the other Allied forces basically just got a bunch of Nazis to tone down that Nazi stuff and pretend to be liberal democrats.
The Prusa printers are nice enough, but very expensive for what you get. There are a lot of far better value options, especially the Prusa bedslingers are quickly becoming very noticably outdated.
If you want a reason to dislike them, they collaborated with an Israeli company called Filament2 not too long ago.
Just FYI, the 2 parent comments are completely wrong and you shouldn't remember these definitions.
Socialism = means of production are owned by society, but classes still exist (the working class rules over the former bourgeoisie)
When that process is finished and classes and contradictions that lead to them have been completely abolished, that's communism.
Which is the same society that Anarchists want to achieve, the only difference is that Anarchists don't have a coherent plan on how to get there.
This is completely wrong. Social welfare and shared infrastructure have nothing to do with Socialism. Socialism is an economic model where the means of production are owned by the workers, nothing more, nothing less.
You seem like you're suffering from a bad case of Dunning-Kruger. You've been explained very basic terms multiple times, but you keep repeating your completely wrong understanding undeterred, with brazen authority.
Literally the first sentence of your wikipedia article explains that these are different ideologies trying to achieve the same thing, a communist society.
"Journalist"? Du hast doch sicher gerade googlen müssen, wer Herzl ist lmao
Hinweis: ich finde ihn nicht aufgrund seines Glaubens problematisch, sondern aufgrund seiner völkischen, menschenverachtenden Ansichten, die ihn zur Grundidee des Zionismus getrieben haben.
The different types of Socialists disagree on how to achieve the classless society called Communism (including Anarchists, by the way), but the end goal of a classless society is the same. There is no seperate "Marxist" definition of communism, he just took an idea that was considered utopian before him and turned it into a science.
Yes, they may be state-owned, but you still live in a bourgeois state with capitalist ownership structure, so the state doesn't act in the workers interest, but to uphold the capitalist order.
By the way, would you mind telling me what country that is? Most EU countries with strong state-owned infrastructure that I'm aware of have been forced to liberalize, so for example in my country lots of former state enterprises are now private profit-bound businesses that are just 100% owned by the state.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...