Account created 3h ago and it's already a dumpster fire, that's wild lol
@slrpnk.net
Account created 3h ago and it's already a dumpster fire, that's wild lol
patriarchal societies will outbreed you
* checking my big-list-of-concerns-for-2027 *
Nope, being 'outbred' is not on it. We can check again next year.
how could that be implemented without a lot of coercion or just straight up rape?
There is no way to implement this without coercion, the measure itself is coercive. You're asking how to implement 'you should do what I want or you should starve and die' without coercion? It's just slavery with extra steps.
I sent you my syphilis, pls respond
I have never been less surprised in my life.
How soon should I have yesterday's dinner?
and the incredible lung capacity of wolves
Yes! It has always been a story about aerobic exercise and the importance of having a good VO2 Max. So you can use it to... *checks notes* destroy housing, I guess
Saw quite a few similar comments under the original post. Enjoying user interfaces is not equivalent to being tech-illiterate. Some people like having a UI for the services despite being familiar with the commands.
Yes, I can do docker container ls, but I like looking at a dashboard. Even better if I can apply different themes to it.
Every day we stray further from god's light.
Great explanation. Ashamed to say I would have thought it was another term for 'neckbeard' judging only by the sound of it lol
Checked the article, the study was funded by the American Beverage Association. Not an automatic disqualifier, but I had a hunch this might be the case, and this is, I think, something to keep in mind.
I... I thought it was an anti-joke for an embarrassingly long time (i.e. until now)
Smoke and mirrors. This is representative of Exxon's general strategy. There is a partial admission of the dangers of climate warming, followed by an absolute refusal to change trajectory. This has not changed, and as long as capital depends on it, it never will.
The headline is not necessarily misleading. It paints an incomplete picture, though. These paragraphs in the article are more relevant (to me) than Exxon's immaterial admissions concerning climate change:
ExxonMobil’s Energy Outlook typically shows strong demand for oil and natural gas for decades into the future even as the world attempts to reduce emissions.
“We are seeing clear signs that coal is sticking longer from an energy security and other perspectives, specifically in parts of Asia-Pacific, China, and others,” Joshi said.
In Exxon's Global Executive Summary, mentioned in the article, coal use is predicted to decrease by 30% by 2050 to be replaced by renewables and natural gas. This is, at best, replacing fossil fuels with fossil fuels.
The mention of including fewer emission-reduction technologies and fewer CCS projections was also interesting:
Other changes in ExxonMobil’s outlook include fewer emission-reduction technologies. Projections for carbon capture and storage, and use of low-carbon hydrogen, dropped by about one-third from last year.
It makes me believe there is no more budget for putting on an overshoot-and-return charade to justify our reliance on fossil fuels. None of this is surprising or remarkable, though. This is not the downfall of Exxon, as the headline might have you believe, this is still business as usual.
I agree that this is not out of the ordinary for Exxon.
Available documents show a discrepancy between what ExxonMobil’s scientists and executives discussed about climate change privately and in academic circles and what it presented to the general public.
This excerpt from one of the studies you posted shows that they were certainly not publicly vocal about it, though.
That’s not decades of time.
They did manufacture doubt about the scientific consensus, they did fund entities advancing climate denialism, they did lobby against regulatory measures. That is decades of time. Publishing climate change papers in the 70s does not absolve them of the crime of covering up the same information obtained through those papers.
I'm working on doing the same for my set-up, so that's encouraging! I like having a visual dashboard for my services, and Arcane seems like a good replacement.
In my experience, setting frequent alarms can help with time-blindess. Having an alarm or a pop-up go off every 20-30 minutes won't ensure you're focused on the right task, but it will build more awareness to the amount of time that has passed since you've been off-track/distracted/going on random rabbit holes.
Mounts and ports would also be in the compose files. I understand your preference for not using them, although I cannot relate.
That answers my question, though. It is a set-up that doesn't use docker compose, got it. Thanks for elaborating.
As the saying goes, you are what you eat
Oh, you think you're better than me for not complaining and arguing?
Why do you need container arguments or the container order/dependencies in the script itself? Is this a set-up that doesn't use compose files? Genuine question/curiosity. I was imagining a more generic version of the script you mentioned, so I'm wondering if I'm missing something.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...