The biggest problem people run into is a lack of thier niche communities here, and that's mostly due to a lack of overall numbers. Reddit, while a festering hellhole, still has that. I'd be thrilled to see that change one day, but it's definitely gonna be a while.

I don't disagree we need to prevent this situation in the first place, however Congress and the Senate don't really seem all too interested in actually fixing root problems.

How meta

Yeah, but it doesn't really benefit the automotive manufacturers to snitch on speeders.

Can't argue with science.

E

12-5, probably go 4-2 in the division.

According to the poll, Dallas and Boston ranked highest in perceived safety, with about three-quarters of participants viewing the cities as “safe.”

Did they only poll cowboys fans or something?

Now, it basically means racist bigotted asshole who simps for billionaires.

I've been wondering how to accomplish this lately. I'm looking to host a few Fediverse instances for me and my friends to use. It'd be really nice for everything I run on those to have an SSO via the main domain or a login domain.

My idea was:

• Lemmy.example.social
• Mastodon.example.social
• Pixelfed.example.social
• Matrix.example.social

Login via

• accounts.example.social

Is this possible, or in the realm of possible?

If you want to change this person's mind, perhaps you would have better luck providing actual evidence or examples of government waste, rather than insulting them.

Lemmy has been growing alot lately, so there's certainly reason to have optimism. It's really just a numbers game to get more niche communities here.

Well, tbf, creepy stuff does happen in nowhere.

Hiring Patricia is the one move I didn't like this off-season. I hope it doesn't bite us in the ass.

Would you put someone “just nuts” in front of a tv camera?

That's generally what happens because it draws in ratings.

I like the idea on paper. This feels like what the Fediverse needs. I'll have to tinker around with it.

bitsearch.to has alot of rargb links, plus more.

I don't think an additional UPS is really necessary here. I do have switches to other parts of my network, but they're just for TVs and game consoles, so I don't really think a UPS is needed there.

It's mostly a failsafe so I can poweroff my NAS properly rather than corrupting data. Since my server and router are on the same power strip, it makes sense that they're all on the UPS since they're the 3 main items interacting with each other.

Something with NUT as boothin@kbin.social mentioned might be a good option so it can send alerts when it's activated. I'll have to research that more.

Edit: figured out how to mention other users.

I didn't realize APC was going that route. I wanted to vomit after I saw what came up on Google.

I don't want a UPS to connect to anything outside my network. Pretty much goes against the principle of selfhosted.

Same, but only logged out. I don't really care to comment/interact over there anymore anyways.