LGBTQ+ people are far better off under Joe Biden than Donald Trump, HRC report shows
2 years ago by jeffw to c/politics
still an objective good.
if there is ever the need for, the will to call, the ability to pursue... human rights commission hearings in the future against this grotesque parady of a political party, I want as much evidence of premeditation available as possible.
I mean… sure? But this is about as obvious as noting that not being on fire feels better than being on fire.
PThis kind of stuff still needs to be enumerated. There are tons of people on Lemmy (mostly the usual trolls) who will show up in every thread and do the "both sides" song and dance. Unfortunately, a nontrivial number of people actually buy into this messaging. Counter programming is a necessary evil, which is something conservatives and foreign actors have figured out, but liberals and progressives are still stubborn about.
Well, MAGA is aching to send members of the LGBTQ community to concentration camps so this is a little bit of an understatement.
Literally ANYBODY standing on the street could have probably told you that.
I am going to have a difficult talk with one of my kids. they already understand whats happening, but avoiding uncalled for dangerous situations... thats what we need to work on. "the talk" is smashing social and economic boundaries like a whirlwind.
I always thought this was a given. Like- who in their right mind would think otherwise?
Also… Note the absence of the usual suspects here? Wonder why they never have anything to say on posts like this.
Yep. Them and the “anti-anyone the democrats have to offer.” crowd.
A charitable reading says that you should still research and verify the things that are "a given". I mean, YOU know it, I know it, we all know it here... But at least now we have an official report to point to when people try to downplay it?
Ah, who am I kidding? They wouldn't care anyway
No shit Sherlock
Duh????????
Considering Trump wants to define trans people out of existence and make our care illegal, outlaw gay marriage, and classify any queer person in public as a sex offender and put them in prison, yeah I'd think queer people are better under biden than they would be under trump.
"Might as well let donnie win because Genocide Joe and I'm not in the alphabet group so who cares anyway."
- tankies, probably
not a "tankie" here. supporting virtually any Democratic nominee up and down the ballot... and I still want the investigation, impeachment and removal of biden if appropriate. being human demands it and demanding accountability from your government requires it.
Yeah, if W was not investigated for Iraq war crimes, it's even less likely to happen for Biden.
Man who attacks Americans all the time is worse than someone who doesn't? Crazy.
Today, a bear shat in the woods, and more on duh-news.
My mind first went to Hillary Rodham Clinton report.
So we're just not going to talk about all the bullshit thrown at gender affirming healthcare, drag, queer media in general, etc. over the past few years? The federal government has been slightly better in the smallest scale ways possible, but because of state governments and the courts life for LGBTQ people has been worse over the past four years (especially if you're stuck in a red state), and the Biden administration and Congressional Dems haven't done nearly enough to try to stop those things.
So are you saying it will be better under trump?
That's a stupid question with an obvious answer, so I'm just going to pretend you asked a better one.
Besides having his justice department get more active on defending LGBTQ Americans civil rights under the federal constitution by joining in lawsuits against state laws instead of letting private organizations do all the work, one thing the Biden administration could do is speed up and expand the pardons for LGBTQ veterans who got bullied out of the military.
That's a stupid evasion from an answer. Why can't you just admit how much worse it would be under Trump and we can all get on with our lives without this silly both sidesism.
That's not what the article here is arguing, they're arguing that things have been better under Biden and that's just not true, that's like arguing reproductive healthcare has been better since 2020 and forgetting the whole Dobbs decision happened.
Things have been worse not because of but in spite of things the Biden administration have done and tried to do to make it better, but they could and should do more, and the basic argument that things are better is offensive.
So we are basically at:
"Eat this piece of shit or the insane guy with a gun behind you blows your brains out."
If you think Joe is a piece of shit, then yes!
The violent madman with a gun pointed at your head is about to become president and blow your brains out if people don't rally behind whoever runs against him.
Those are your current options, deal with it.
PLEASE! I beg you! Take every perceivable action to change what options you have in the future. Change the options you can choose from. Go be active in local politics, go do something, anything, to achieve better representation, maybe try to change the way your voting system works.
But in the meantime, ensure that voting will still be an option in the future and don't have your (and every vulnerable minorities) brains blown out.
And know that you are not alone, there are other people trying to expand your options, but they need help and time and they are generally convinced that the struggle for something better than shit will be lost or set back by DECADES if you allow the madman to blow your brains out.
I wouldn't say he's been a piece of shit for this community (unlike, for example, migrants and asylum seekers), he has done a few good things, it's just way less than what we need in the face of a Republican party that's decided that demonizing and terrorizing queer people is something their entire party will support. I hope he gets reelected because the alternative is going to be worse, but the notion that things are on the whole better for queer people than they were four years ago is bullshit you have to be really out of touch to believe.
I think you may be confusing the actions of a Republican Congress with those of Joe Biden's cabinet. The American political apparatus has many levers, and just because you're at the top doesn't mean you control the whole thing.
No, I'm mentioning there are more things the Biden's cabinet and the rest of his administration could be doing to push back on state level Republicans (mainly legislatures and AGs), to demonstrate my real point - the last four years have been fucking awful for the LGBTQ community, and seeing Biden supporters here pat themselves on the back for how it's gone frustrates me (and probably a lot of other people we want to vote for the Democratic party's candidates in the fall) a lot.
I think it would be a lot better politics for people who want (like I do) to see Republicans lose elections to forget the victory laps and focus more on (to paraphrase Bill Clinton) feeling the pain of their voters and telling us what you are going to do going forward instead.
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
In other news the Pope was seen wearing a hat.
save