Trump biopic 'The Apprentice' hits theaters amid fury from his campaign

2 years ago by usernamesAreTricky to c/politics

“The Apprentice” charts Trump’s rise to the top of Manhattan real estate under the tutelage of notorious fixer Roy Cohn. Trump’s campaign says the film is “garbage.”
cyborganism 158 points 2 years ago

I can't believe they made that.

Although I'm sick of hearing about that turd, the fact that his campaign people are calling for it to go away kind of makes me want to see it.

path: 0 12832052, hotness: undefined, score: 158, children: 5
TachyonTele 65 points 2 years ago

Yeah i really have no intention at all of watching this. But the lead actors are great, and the pushback from Trump make it tempting.

path: 0 12832052 12832369, hotness: undefined, score: 65, children: 0
billiam0202 38 points 2 years ago

Reportedly, one of the financial backers kept it from being distributed because he thought it was going to portray Trump in a flattering light (edit: and was angry that it didn't). The only reason it's now being released is because his share was bought out.

path: 0 12832052 12833026, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 3
rustydrd 21 points 2 years ago

That's not what I've heard. The movie's creator recently gave an interview on the The New Yorker Radio Hour, where he cited as one of the difficulties the film faced with financial backers and distributors that it included a scene of Trump raping Ivana Trump (a claim she later recanted under pressure from Trump's lawyers).

path: 0 12832052 12833026 12834744, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 2
billiam0202 23 points 2 years ago

That's what I'm talking about, as well as scenes showing Trump using amphetamines.

Dan Snyder, who donated over $1 million to Trump's campaign and also backed this film, was reportedly angry about the negative portrayals of Trump. He kept fighting the release of the movie until his company's stake in the film was bought out, which is why it's being shown now.

Source.

path: 0 12832052 12833026 12834744 12835695, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 1
rustydrd 3 points 2 years ago

Ah, gotcha. The podcast doesn't make it sound so drastic, but it goes in a similar direction.

path: 0 12832052 12833026 12834744 12835695 12838900, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
style99 75 points 2 years ago

This does seem pretty on-point:

Vanity Fair journalist Gabriel Sherman, who wrote the screenplay, draws a direct line between Cohn’s bare-knuckle tactics and Trump’s modern-day political persona. Cohn (Jeremy Strong) instructs Trump (Sebastian Stan) to relentlessly attack, “deny everything” and “never admit defeat.”

path: 0 12832062, hotness: undefined, score: 75, children: 0
jpreston2005 45 points 2 years ago

I know that this movie will portray drumpf in a (rightfully) negative light, but even that isn't enough. I can barely stand this individual now, why on earth would I want to see him being portrayed by a handsome actor for an hour and a half or however long this movie is? I am sick of hearing him talk, I'm sick of people talking about him, I'm sick of hearing about him, I just want him to get locked away in a prison cell to rot away the rest of his intolerable existence.

I would need a movie to completely abandon portraying him in any light that could be construed as sympathetic or favorable. I would love to see a movie show drumpf in the same light that Inglorious Bastards portrayed hitler. Anything short of that is just giving this pathetic racist rapist more attention than he's worth.

path: 0 12836713, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 2
WeirdGoesPro 19 points 2 years ago

It’s been described as a monster movie, so I assume Trump grabbing a woman by the pussy and taking her to the top of the Empire State Building before being blasted to bits by helicopters is the reason to see it.

path: 0 12836713 12837579, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 1
Tyfud 6 points 2 years ago
path: 0 12836713 12837579 12840004, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
morphballganon 34 points 2 years ago

Sebastian Stan as Trump?

He's way too handsome for that role.

path: 0 12835794, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 0
hOrni 24 points 2 years ago

As weird as it sounds, the wig on Sebastian Stan looks realistically fake.

path: 0 12835793, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
homesweethomeMrL 18 points 2 years ago

His campaign can go fuck itself

path: 0 12835007, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
MeekerThanBeaker 15 points 2 years ago

I really don't know how well this will perform in theaters.

Are they trying to trick MAGAs into watching it? Get enough people who hate him to watch it?

Seems like a made for TV movie with better actors.

path: 0 12833123, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
ininewcrow 9 points 2 years ago

Great promotion ..... for Turnip

It's the age old thing about talking about people or trying to market the next big thing. As long as they're talking about you, that's a good thing.

Good news, bad news, stupid news, lies, truths, information, disinformation .... none of it matters as long as they're talking about you and the things you want to talk about.

It's modern day media manipulation .... you aggravate your followers, upset the opposition, piss off the sideliners, agitate the ignorant and get everyone fighting all the time ... as soon as they start trying to think for themselves, throw more shit into the fan to get everyone angry again and again and again. All they ever do is fight about things in front of them while you go off into the background to do whatever you want.

People then get divided into two camps .... those that continually fight without end or results ... and those who just give up, step away and willingly embrace ignorance.

path: 0 12832522, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
laverabe 2 points 2 years ago

Yes! Donald Trump is the mathematic equivalent of the absolute symbol. example: |-99| + |-594| = 693

A negative story is coverage, makes the left talk about him which riles up the right to fight back and vote because they feel oppressed. The right doesn't live in reality, so as long as they know Trump is being talked about that makes him their guy.

I realized this very quickly in 2017 that people were falling for the trap. I have no idea why anyone upvotes anything with Trump in it.

path: 0 12832522 12834925, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
ininewcrow 2 points 2 years ago

One of the ways I deal with it is by only referring to him as Turnip

path: 0 12832522 12834925 12836380, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
strawberry 2 points 2 years ago

personally prefer Donnie, but I'll add that to the collection

path: 0 12832522 12834925 12836380 12838178, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Carrolade 5 points 2 years ago path: 0 12832410, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
Uruanna 4 points 2 years ago

I knew it was Sebastian Stan, but then I watched this (without sound) and couldn't tell if it looked more like Jimmy Fallon or Bill Hader.

path: 0 12832410 12832598, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
reddig33 2 points 2 years ago path: 0 12832410 12832598 12834472, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ohellidk 4 points 2 years ago

please leak soon!

path: 0 12833773, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
erlend_sh 1 point 2 years ago path: 0 12837974, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
bunkyprewster 1 point 2 years ago

The fact that the ghost of Roy fucking Cohn still hangs over America is nauseating.

path: 0 12837663, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 2 years ago path: 0 12831651, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31387
33985
9405

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...