Houston man pardoned by Trump arrested on child sex charge.

2 years ago by Cat to c/news

Andrew Taake received a six-year sentence for assaulting officers on Jan. 6. He was arrested Thursday on an outstanding charge of soliciting a minor.

solsangraal 112 points 2 years ago
path: 0 14940968, hotness: undefined, score: 112, children: 2
coyootje 30 points 2 years ago

New boss of Child protective services...

path: 0 14940968 14942202, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 1
hovercat 7 points 2 years ago

They'll be protected in his basement.

path: 0 14940968 14942202 14949752, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
ReanuKeeves 49 points 2 years ago

That's crazy that a pardoned criminal broke the law. No one saw this coming.

path: 0 14940789, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 8
Modern_medicine_isnt 23 points 2 years ago

If you read it, he broke the law before Jan 6th. They had asked the administration not to pardon him because of his previous crimes. They did anyway. So in the spirit of efficiency, resources had to spend two weeks trying to find him again.
And they claim the dems are weak on crime...

path: 0 14940789 14945893, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 7
DancingBear 11 points 2 years ago
path: 0 14940789 14945893 14951764, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 4
Modern_medicine_isnt 3 points 2 years ago

Well even if he didn't, it would have taken weeks to go through them all and make recommendations. They were in a rush to do lots of dumb things all at once, so it would be hard to continue caring.

path: 0 14940789 14945893 14951764 14954743, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
DancingBear 4 points 2 years ago
path: 0 14940789 14945893 14951764 14954743 14976617, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
ReanuKeeves 0 points 2 years ago

I did read it, and my statement is still the same, a criminal broke laws. I didn't say he did it after he was released.

path: 0 14940789 14945893 14946014, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
Modern_medicine_isnt 2 points 2 years ago

Using "no one saw this coming" implied an order to the events. I apologize for implying you didn't read it. You just used a catchphrase in the wrong context. Seems like your heart is in the right place though.

path: 0 14940789 14945893 14946014 14951696, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
tomi000 37 points 2 years ago

You mean to tell me the people that are willing to violently storm a government building riled up by an egomaniac with an inferiority complex were actually criminals to begin with? *surprised pikachu face*

path: 0 14943176, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 0
GooberEar 25 points 2 years ago

Gosh, this is so stunning and shocking. Never would have seen this coming, I mean, he doesn't even look like an antifa drag queen.

path: 0 14945610, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
Sanctus 23 points 2 years ago

Only their best and brightest, folks

path: 0 14947594, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
fluxion 19 points 2 years ago

"That's a pardonin'!"

path: 0 14941483, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
jagged_circle 16 points 2 years ago

"You just stormed the capital, got charged with felonies, and got exonerated by the criminal leader of the Executive. What are you going to do now?"

Guy one: buy a bunch of guns!

Guy two: suicide by cop!

Guy three: Rape a child!

path: 0 14952410, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 2
jagged_circle 9 points 2 years ago

Woman one: I'm not going to accept this pardon.

path: 0 14952410 14952439, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
FuglyDuck 4 points 2 years ago

Of the 1,600 that got pardons, 3 rejected them.

Good for them I guess. But there’s still 1,597 brown shirts.

path: 0 14952410 14952439 14956587, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
AllNewTypeFace 15 points 2 years ago

He was working undercover to take down the liberal deep state child trafficking conspiracy, on direct orders from Q himself

path: 0 14941364, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
ickplant 11 points 2 years ago

They’re not sending their best.

path: 0 14945150, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
FuglyDuck 1 point 2 years ago

Oh they are.

They best just objectively suck

path: 0 14945150 14955992, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
meowmeowbeanz 10 points 2 years ago

Justice isn’t blind—it’s just staggeringly inconsistent. Imagine getting a presidential pardon for beating cops on Jan. 6, only to pivot straight to preying on kids. Law and order, my ass. The same administration that fetishized ”draining the swamp” dredged up this clown, then set him loose to fail upward into darker crimes.

Democracy’s not broken—it’s a farce with enablers. Pardoning insurrectionists was always a gamble, but betting they’d not reoffend? Delusional. Now we’re stuck cleaning up the moral rubble.

path: 0 14976803, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Jericho_Kane 9 points 2 years ago

Does that mean kyle ritterman is allowed to execute him?

path: 0 14948023, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Kyrgizion 9 points 2 years ago

Might be the first, won't be the last.

path: 0 14940705, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
HikingVet 23 points 2 years ago

Not the first. Hell one of the 1600 got himself killed by cops.

path: 0 14940705 14941020, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 2
octopus_ink 10 points 2 years ago

I think it's the third I've heard of, the death by cop guy, this guy, and I can't remember the other but pretty sure there was.

path: 0 14940705 14941020 14941755, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
HikingVet 6 points 2 years ago

At least the third I have heard about.

path: 0 14940705 14941020 14941755 14942862, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
nimble 8 points 2 years ago
path: 0 14942030, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
obre 5 points 2 years ago

Does anyone else remember the willie horton case and the attack ads that h.w. ran against Dukakis?

path: 0 14951490, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
teamevil 3 points 2 years ago
path: 0 14951490 14957320, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Rhoeri 2 points 2 years ago

So… wasn’t Rittenhouse justified by these people for killing someone that was guilty of something similar?

path: 0 14976966, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
SculptusPoe -7 points 2 years ago
path: 0 14976788, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 2
PlainSimpleGarak 1 point 2 years ago

Save your breath. The vast majority just want to stroke it to rage bait. Rational thinking is not wanted.

Oh, and let us not forget these fine protesters:

path: 0 14976788 14977281, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
SwingingTheLamp 2 points 2 years ago

Problem with the last guy is that he didn't grease the shooter when he had a chance and it was justified.

path: 0 14976788 14977281 14977646, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39564
40372
9675

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...