someone teach them LaTeX

a year ago by BB84 to c/memes

A microblog post by @kareem_carr saying "as soon as i saw they were using asterisks for multiplication symbols, i knew we were in trouble", with an image from the "Office of the United States Trade Representative (Executive Office of the President)" showing the mathematical formula $\Delta \tau_i = \frac{x_i - m_i}{\varepsilon * \varphi * m_i}$. The formula show asterisks (*) instead of multiplication signs (×).

Mr_Fish 85 points a year ago

There's also the "0.25 × 4" thing. ε is set to 0.25, and φ is set to 4. No nuance, no thought about how the economy actually works. Just make it so they can pretend they're thinking about it how demand will change.

path: 0 16304064, hotness: undefined, score: 85, children: 3
HK65 30 points a year ago

I have a feeling that they made it up after the fact because the whole point of ε and φ there should be that they come with their own formulas that depend on the demand itself, instead of just being set to a constant value. I don't imagine a straight line is a good enough model for the world economy, especially when fucking around with stuff that can implode it.

But ChatGPT does not know that, and especially won't expand on that if you ask it "make my formula seem more scientific".

path: 0 16304064 16307571, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 1
nargis 6 points a year ago

So epsilon and phi are just constants that cancel each other out? Wow. This is legit the dumbest shit I've ever heard, narrowly beating Narendra Modi's (a+b)^2 debacle (he said that the 2ab was 'extra'). Fucking illiterate, aren't they?

path: 0 16304064 16307571 16320229, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
adempty 11 points a year ago

No way they pulled out the Greek letters for .25×4 lol

path: 0 16304064 16317822, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
WhiteOakBayou 37 points a year ago

I don't get the significance. How should the formula be represented?

path: 0 16302688, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 18
seeaya 132 points a year ago

Most mathematicians, engineers, and scientists don’t use the asterisk symbol for multiplication. Most don’t write any symbol as it’s implicit. If they do use a symbol they would use a dot or x symbol (though never an actual x). In mathematics, the asterisk is mostly only used to represent convolutions.

Most common:

abc

Less common:

abc

a × b × c

Never:

a * b * c

While to most people this doesn’t really matter (and should feel free using * for multiplication). It shows someone with minimal formal experience in mathematics using this formula

path: 0 16302688 16303094, hotness: undefined, score: 132, children: 7
sp3tr4l 63 points a year ago

Yeah, asterisk to indicate multiplication is much, much more common amongst coders.

... And script kiddie DOGE interns.

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16306129, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 0
argon 27 points a year ago

When I went to college the dot was used for the dot product (scalar product) of two vectors while the cross was used for the cross product (vector product) of two vectors.

Since in this case numbers (read: one-dimensional vectors) are multiplied, the dot product is used, which should be denoted by a dot.

(But really, if I were to write a formula in Latex I would just use the * symbol, too.)

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16303734, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
1rre 8 points a year ago

What if it's a convolution though 🤔

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16304963, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
Nurse_Robot 8 points a year ago

I would love to explain, but it's pretty convoluted

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16304963 16308929, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
mcteazy 4 points a year ago

I think this is true ONLY in formal writing, which this document clearly intends to be despite it's complete inanity. Asterisks are used in computer code for multiplication and shorthand messages/emails all the time. Not many scientists/engineers/mathematicians out there that can't write at least an excel formula

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16336877, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Pyr_Pressure 2 points a year ago

I don't know, to me a * b * c is basically just the exact same as abc but just easier to type on a computer. If you were writing it down on paper or a black board they would probably use dots. Coding often uses * because who wants to type in those dots would be a pain in the ass and the * basically looks the closest to a dot.

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16335535, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
UnityDevice 7 points a year ago

But they weren't just "typing it on a computer", they were typesetting it in latex, and trying to make it look grandiose. But they just showed to everyone in the know that they don't know what they're doing.

path: 0 16302688 16303094 16335535 16336566, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
BB84 38 points a year ago

The only times anyone would use the asterisk as multiplication symbol are

  • they are doing some fancy math and it's not the same kind of number multiplication we're familiar with
  • they are on a computer, the keyboard does not have a (×) key, and they don't know how to typeset it (\times in LaTex), so they just use the asterisk instead

The US government falls in the second category.

path: 0 16302688 16303002, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 2
nao 37 points a year ago

there is a third case:

  • they are using a programming language
path: 0 16302688 16303002 16303664, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 1
vaionko 1 point a year ago

Or me, doing math for school and being too lazy to type /cdot every time

path: 0 16302688 16303002 16303664 16304745, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
bamboo 25 points a year ago path: 0 16302688 16303608, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
otacon239 9 points a year ago path: 0 16302688 16303011, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Chocrates 9 points a year ago

Just guessing but real mathematicians would know how to properly build the formula. I guess in higher maths we use the 'x' rather than '*'.

Not a big deal but may show that the people doing it have no idea what they are doing.

path: 0 16302688 16303014, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
Robust_Mirror 4 points a year ago

Typically you'd use either nothing (just put the symbols next to each other) or in cases where that would be unclear, you'd use the centered dot ⋅

path: 0 16302688 16303014 16334884, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
WhatsTheHoldup 4 points a year ago

There really isn't any. It's just a huge nitpick. * is commonly used for multiplication, especially in online contexts in order to avoid confusing multiplication with the letter x when wider symbols aren't available.

path: 0 16302688 16333909, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Anomalocaris 1 point a year ago

no one who would have any experience in the field would write it like that.

it's just a sign that the people who did it have no idea what they are doing.

path: 0 16302688 16333909 16405523, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
WhatsTheHoldup 1 point a year ago

it's just a sign that the people who did it have no idea what they are doing.

We're in no shortage of those signs

path: 0 16302688 16333909 16405523 16430166, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ace_garp 25 points a year ago

That's no multiplication,

they just dereferenced the entire US economy.

path: 0 16334639, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
nargis 14 points a year ago

According to this article, even the value of epsilon is wrong. Epsilon stands for 'price elasticity', which seems to measure how much tariffs would affect the price of an item. 0.25 is the value used by the White House, but some economists have come out saying it is actually closer to 0.945, indicating that prices are affected far greater by tariffs than what these buffoons claim. But even with the correct value, the formula makes no sense.

Without the fancy shit, it's basically (exports/imports) - 1.

path: 0 16320621, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
missandry351 10 points a year ago

Anyone here speaks Greek ? What does it say?

path: 0 16308898, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
BB84 16 points a year ago

tariff = (export - import) / (<??? factor> × <another ??? factor that cancels the first one out> × import)

path: 0 16308898 16310735, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
ulterno 1 point a year ago

You might want to go with "multiplicative inverse".

path: 0 16308898 16310735 16338405, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Anomalocaris 1 point a year ago

direct translation: "you're fucked"

path: 0 16308898 16405535, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
iAvicenna 5 points a year ago

they used epsilon and phi all your arguments are invalid and all your base are belong to us

path: 0 16334772, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
davidagain 2 points a year ago

Bold of you to suggest that attempting to teach these people would change anything on the world.

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink.

path: 0 16334818, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
memes
memes

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
56688
14852
4822

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

go to feed...