BREAKING: Pam Bondi Reportedly Asking Grand Jury to Consider Indictments in Obama-Clinton ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Case
a year ago by Redditsux to c/politics
Yep, total distraction. Why didn't they do this during his first term if this was a thing.
I have no hope that we will ever see those files. I do hope however, that this takes on a bit of meme status a la Hell in a cell/undertaker throwing mankind off a cage. Years from now seemingly innocuous sentences will suddenly diverge into a common refrain about the files not being released.
It took them a while to fabricate the "evidence."
I thought if the President does it, it wasn't illegal?
Wasn't that the entire argument since 2017?
No judge is going to allow this. There's also that nagging bit of the corrupt Supreme Court not allowing President's to be prosecuted, and also that you're a fucking moron trying to stretch and bend what little truth you see to appease a mentally ill old man.
I wonder if she's been told she's going into an incinerator if she doesn't .ake him happy or something. She's really trying to pull this bullshit.
No judge is going to allow this.
Plenty of magats would gladly lynch Obama. Just a question of how many high level bureaucrats firmly believe there will never be another Democrat in charge.
There’s also that nagging bit of the corrupt Supreme Court not allowing President’s to be prosecuted
For Official Acts. Of which the SCOTUS will decide in the end if something qualified
also that you’re a fucking moron trying to stretch and bend what little truth you see to appease a mentally ill old man.
This is America
Where’s the files Donald?
Do the DOJ even have a red-yarn budget?
Aren't presidents immune from any charges/investigations thanks to POTUS47?
it's SCOTUS, and only if they approve of that particular bit of lawlessness.
There is no rule of law with the Roberts "court." It's all arbitrary and rigged.
Oohhhh no!! Not Obama!! Or Clinton!!! 🤣
What these morons don't understand is that liberals don't worship these rich cunts. If either of them did something illegal I don't give a shit if the law goes after them.
The sad thing is that, even IF they did something they are rich and nothing will happen.
If something did happen though, wouldn't that be a nice precedent to go after politicans / presidents?
Be careful what you wish for, you orange turd.
It's a civil war.
He's grasping at straws doing anything he can to get attention away from me Trumpstein files.
It's not working, proud boy barbie.
I guess this was the whole purpose of a grand jury is to stop fraudulent charges
The conspiracy is that they tried to tie Trump to Russia as part of the 2016 election. They're not bringing against Obama though because he was POTUS at the time and has immunity per scotus ruling.
Edit: release the Epstein files
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
Just release the Epstein files, Pam.
save