BREAKING: Pam Bondi Reportedly Asking Grand Jury to Consider Indictments in Obama-Clinton ‘Treasonous Conspiracy’ Case

a year ago by Redditsux to c/politics

Pam Bondi has directed a DOJ prosecutor to bring evidence before a grand jury to consider criminal indictments pertaining to the Trump-Russia investigation.
ccunning 204 points a year ago

Just release the Epstein files, Pam.

path: 0 18620036, hotness: undefined, score: 204, children: 3
pelespirit 59 points a year ago

Yep, total distraction. Why didn't they do this during his first term if this was a thing.

path: 0 18620036 18620433, hotness: undefined, score: 59, children: 2
meco03211 16 points a year ago

I have no hope that we will ever see those files. I do hope however, that this takes on a bit of meme status a la Hell in a cell/undertaker throwing mankind off a cage. Years from now seemingly innocuous sentences will suddenly diverge into a common refrain about the files not being released.

path: 0 18620036 18620433 18622011, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
phutatorius 3 points a year ago

It took them a while to fabricate the "evidence."

path: 0 18620036 18620433 18630176, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
jordanlund 99 points a year ago

I thought if the President does it, it wasn't illegal?

Wasn't that the entire argument since 2017?

path: 0 18621020, hotness: undefined, score: 99, children: 5
floofloof 34 points a year ago

Ah, but they didn't specify which President was "the President".

path: 0 18621020 18621680, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 1
Archer 12 points a year ago

President (R)

president (D)

path: 0 18621020 18621680 18623586, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
Asafum 11 points a year ago

It's the Republican motto:

"Fuck kids. Yes, literally."

Sorry, not that one.

"Rules for thee, but none for me."

path: 0 18621020 18624003, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
jordanlund 2 points a year ago path: 0 18621020 18624003 18624091, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Catma 5 points a year ago

Classic mistake. It isn"t illegal if the president does it and they are white/orange

path: 0 18621020 18624172, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Furbag 52 points a year ago

Trump is a pedo rapist. Release the files.

path: 0 18624247, hotness: undefined, score: 52, children: 0
satanmat 49 points a year ago

Hey everyone look at this!!

Don't talk about Epstein.

path: 0 18621147, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 0
capt_wolf 45 points a year ago

path: 0 18621505, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 1
b3an 8 points a year ago

Shiny! Ooo. But yeah, what about Epstein?

path: 0 18621505 18626956, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
just_another_person 30 points a year ago

No judge is going to allow this. There's also that nagging bit of the corrupt Supreme Court not allowing President's to be prosecuted, and also that you're a fucking moron trying to stretch and bend what little truth you see to appease a mentally ill old man.

I wonder if she's been told she's going into an incinerator if she doesn't .ake him happy or something. She's really trying to pull this bullshit.

path: 0 18620756, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent 43 points a year ago

No judge is going to allow this.

Plenty of magats would gladly lynch Obama. Just a question of how many high level bureaucrats firmly believe there will never be another Democrat in charge.

There’s also that nagging bit of the corrupt Supreme Court not allowing President’s to be prosecuted

For Official Acts. Of which the SCOTUS will decide in the end if something qualified

also that you’re a fucking moron trying to stretch and bend what little truth you see to appease a mentally ill old man.

This is America

path: 0 18620756 18620867, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 0
TwinTitans 28 points a year ago

Where’s the files Donald?

path: 0 18623612, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 0
PleaseLetMeOut 27 points a year ago

Do the DOJ even have a red-yarn budget?

path: 0 18619979, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
droopy4096 23 points a year ago

Aren't presidents immune from any charges/investigations thanks to POTUS47?

path: 0 18625428, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 1
phutatorius 13 points a year ago

it's SCOTUS, and only if they approve of that particular bit of lawlessness.

There is no rule of law with the Roberts "court." It's all arbitrary and rigged.

path: 0 18625428 18626738, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Wazowski 22 points a year ago
path: 0 18623213, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
someguy3 22 points a year ago

These Epstein distractions don't even make sense. Guess they never did, but still.

path: 0 18623134, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
RedPostItNote 22 points a year ago

path: 0 18627996, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
Zephorah 21 points a year ago

From the admin that tried to hang Mike Pence, then did pardon those directly responsible.

Also. Release the Epstein Files.

path: 0 18620553, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
madcaesar 21 points a year ago

Oohhhh no!! Not Obama!! Or Clinton!!! 🤣

What these morons don't understand is that liberals don't worship these rich cunts. If either of them did something illegal I don't give a shit if the law goes after them.

The sad thing is that, even IF they did something they are rich and nothing will happen.

If something did happen though, wouldn't that be a nice precedent to go after politicans / presidents?

Be careful what you wish for, you orange turd.

path: 0 18628358, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
Lucky_777 19 points a year ago

Tie up the courts with this bullshit so they can't release the Epstein files. Basic MAGA playbook. Makes you sick

path: 0 18620620, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
Jolly_Platypus 16 points a year ago

It's a civil war.

path: 0 18620882, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
Chainweasel 16 points a year ago

He's grasping at straws doing anything he can to get attention away from me Trumpstein files.

path: 0 18627857, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
devolution 14 points a year ago

It's not working, proud boy barbie.

path: 0 18624516, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Akasazh 10 points a year ago

Maybe the sub rules say you need to use the exact title, but I feel like the 'breaking' part met be omitted.

path: 0 18626705, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Kurious84 8 points a year ago

As they say in the circles of academia. Thats a big crock of horse shit.

path: 0 18623694, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
ComradeRachel 2 points a year ago

I guess this was the whole purpose of a grand jury is to stop fraudulent charges

path: 0 18625129, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
derry 1 point a year ago

The conspiracy is that they tried to tie Trump to Russia as part of the 2016 election. They're not bringing against Obama though because he was POTUS at the time and has immunity per scotus ruling.

Edit: release the Epstein files

path: 0 18620628, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
31405
34036
9426

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
  3. No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
  4. No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News

• World News

• Business News

• Political Discussion

• Ask Politics

• Military News

• Global Politics

• Moderate Politics

• Progressive Politics

• UK Politics

• Canadian Politics

• Australian Politics

• New Zealand Politics

go to feed...