STAR TREK 4 Has Finally Been Scrapped As Paramount "Moves On" From Chris Pine-Led Franchise

a year ago by TheImpressiveX to c/movies

Paramount Pictures appears to have finally given up on making another Star Trek movie with Chris Pine and company, as Skydance has decided to move on from that era of sci-fi storytelling. Check it out!
ramble81 65 points a year ago

This is honestly expected. Paramount literally has a black list of people who they say are “anti-Semitic”. CBS has bent completely over to the Cheeto. The entire concept of Star Trek is an antithesis to their platform without completely changing what Star Trek is.

path: 0 20327325, hotness: undefined, score: 65, children: 6
WhatThaFudge 14 points a year ago

The pledge, organized by Film Workers for Palestine and published Monday, initially featured 1,200 signatories, including filmmakers and actors: Yorgos Lanthimos, Ava DuVernay, Boots Riley, Adam McKay, Olivia Colman, Mark Ruffalo, Riz Ahmed, Tilda Swinton, Javier Bardem, Emma Stone, Andrew Garfield, Harris Dickinson, Guy Pearce, Jonathan Glazer, Ebon Moss-Bachrach, Abbi Jacobson, Eric Andre, Elliot Page, Payal Kapadia, Joaquin Phoenix, and Rooney Mara.

1200 ppl "black listed" by Paramount.

path: 0 20327325 20335072, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
SaveTheTuaHawk 8 points a year ago

Kid Rock the next James T Kirk? Now named Charlie Kirk?

path: 0 20327325 20330625, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
harmbugler 5 points a year ago

Charlie “Redshirt” Kirk

path: 0 20327325 20330625 20337227, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Tollana1234567 1 point a year ago

or CHRIS PRATT who wanted to be a lead, lol. he was salty he wasnt in lead in many other established franchised, nah nobody wants a right wing nutty. people like pratt and sinese seems to have a fetish for authorative lead roles(its always military, copaganda types)

path: 0 20327325 20330625 20342773, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Tollana1234567 3 points a year ago

i wouldnt be surprise if they shoe-horn gal gadot at some point, miss shilling for israel/idf.

path: 0 20327325 20342776, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Zorque 3 points a year ago

So why did they scrap the Chris Pine movie franchise, then?

path: 0 20327325 20330118, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
IWW4 38 points a year ago

Ahh man. I love the castings. Lens Flares aside I do love the aesthetics.

Shame the stories were always meh to terrible.

But whatever there will always be more Star Trek.

path: 0 20326677, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 1
blave 34 points a year ago

RIP Anton Yelchin

Edit: for the most part, I agree. The roles were very well cast. But it was just the writing and the direction that I really didn’t care for.

path: 0 20326677 20327148, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 0
Vanth 22 points a year ago

Multiple ideas and filmmakers have been considered, including [...] an R-rated Star Trek movie from Pulp Fiction director Quentin Tarantino.

Ew. Keep that weirdo foot fetishist far away from all the wholesome alien characters. Talk about wrong vibes.

path: 0 20326644, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 13
blave 28 points a year ago

I would actually be very interested in seeing a Quentin Tarantino Star Trek film… But not as an official Star Trek film. Just as, sort of, an experiment.

path: 0 20326644 20327139, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 2
boeman 5 points a year ago

Galaxy Quest 2 or Orville the movie?

path: 0 20326644 20327139 20338765, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Tollana1234567 3 points a year ago

orville is controlled by mcfarlane, and hes been having problems with which network will fund the next season, plus many actors dint like how it was so far in between season, it became too unaffordable to live near the orville set.(Pallacki in rosenbaums interview)

path: 0 20326644 20327139 20338765 20342749, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ramble81 17 points a year ago

You know Kirk would have been down for some green alien foot play.

path: 0 20326644 20327290, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
bassomitron 13 points a year ago

Hey now, I enjoy many of Tarantino's movies. But I wholeheartedly agree that he'd be an awful pick to write and/or direct a Star Trek movie.

path: 0 20326644 20327123, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 7
Vanth 7 points a year ago

I will 100% admit to bias against anything Tarantino because of his defending Polanski's statutory rape and contributing to Weinstein not being held accountable for assaulting Uma Thurman and Mira Sorvina, Tarantino's own girlfriend at the time, and others. It would also not shock me in the least if sexual or physical assault allegations come out about him directly, there are already verbal assault accusations. Anyone who says a 13-year old "wanted it" when they're raped by their boss is a half step away from doing similar themselves.

"Judge the art, not the artist" type arguments fall apart for me when the artist is still alive and profiting off their awfulness.

path: 0 20326644 20327123 20329314, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
bassomitron 2 points a year ago

I wasn't aware of all that. That's really shitty and gross of him to defend Polinski and Weinstein. How tf was he not canceled during the "woke" cancel wave of the mid-2010s?

path: 0 20326644 20327123 20329314 20336149, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Vanth 3 points a year ago

Because he wasn't accused of doing things himself. And if I recall the verbal assault was against people of any gender, not just women.

You'd be shocked and disgusted at the number of famous actors and directors who stood up for Polinski back in the day. Not even that far back in the day; he's received several lifetime achievement awards since running away from the charges, and film awards as recently as 2019.

path: 0 20326644 20327123 20329314 20336149 20336328, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
SaveTheTuaHawk 2 points a year ago

he’d be an awful pick to write and/or direct a Star Trek movie.

That franchise is so stale this would have been a great experiment.

path: 0 20326644 20327123 20330617, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
bassomitron 2 points a year ago

I don't disagree, but I struggle to see Tarantino doing high sci-fi like that very well. He's a master at creating engrossing, gripping dialogue scenes. But what do I know, maybe he'd have done a great job in the end 🤷‍♂️

path: 0 20326644 20327123 20330617 20336103, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Tollana1234567 1 point a year ago

abrams and kurtzman ruined the franchise. almost every trek has followed abrams style since.

path: 0 20326644 20327123 20330617 20342736, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
SaveTheTuaHawk 2 points a year ago

R-rated Star Trek movie

I like me some hot white on green action....

path: 0 20326644 20330640, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
scrubbles 14 points a year ago

I liked them, but it's just been too long since Beyond to justify the cast. Everyone will look a decade older, the crews are gone, everyone has moved on. And with a new Chekov (and most of the cast saying they'd feel bad doing it without him) it just would be a completely different movie anyway. Better to do something different.

path: 0 20331349, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
pimento64 13 points a year ago

We learned from the interminable TNG movies that Star Trek is not suitable for being made into action movies, and they're fortunate if they're just bad Trek or bad action since they're usually bad at being both. Then again, I'm one of the few who perceives the objective fact that Star Trek: The Motion Picture is the best Trek movie, so maybe my opinion has the high and lonely destiny of rejected truth.

path: 0 20327161, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
blave 10 points a year ago

Good riddance. Those films were terrible.

path: 0 20326660, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
protist 17 points a year ago

Keep JJ Abrams out of Star Trek

path: 0 20326660 20326901, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 2
snooggums 16 points a year ago

...and Star Wars, and pretty much anything really.

path: 0 20326660 20326901 20327193, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
Tollana1234567 0 points a year ago

and KURTZMAN out of the series making. did not learn from STD, trying to escape the problems of each season, then made picard and snw.

path: 0 20326660 20326901 20342752, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
tacosanonymous 10 points a year ago

Didn’t know that was even discussed. Thought it was three and done.

I was only in it for Karl Urban as Bones.

path: 0 20327245, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
orbituary 9 points a year ago

I liked Simon Pegg as Scotty.

path: 0 20327245 20328205, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
the_crotch 2 points a year ago

The whole cast did a great job (except sulu, he was kind of meh). The cast wasn't the problem the director was.

path: 0 20327245 20328205 20337139, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Spacehooks 1 point a year ago

Dude nailed it

path: 0 20327245 20343014, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
circuitfarmer 8 points a year ago
path: 0 20330682, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
hoppolito 4 points a year ago

I don’t mean this in a combative way (haven’t even seen much of Star Trek!) but I’m really interested in what you mean by this line:

the scripts were mostly OK too -- at least this was true of 2009.

It stuck out to me because I can’t quite grasp if you mean films in general were of lower quality in 2009, scripts were less advanced or dense, or if it is a specific reference to how Star Trek scripts were more acceptable since?

Again, not meant in an argumentative way necessarily (although perhaps a little if it’s the second assumption, as I would probably disagree 🙂) - rather I am confused by seeing it expressed like this.

path: 0 20330682 20341893, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
circuitfarmer 2 points a year ago
path: 0 20330682 20341893 20345819, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
hoppolito 2 points a year ago

Gotcha, that makes sense!

path: 0 20330682 20341893 20345819 20351331, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ivanafterall 2 points a year ago

Daniel Day Lewis/Paul Thomas Anderson is my pick. Star Trek about to get some heft to it.

path: 0 20327434, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
skribe 1 point a year ago

It's time to melt The Shat and have him as an annoying holo-creature on the Sulu and Chekhov adventures.

path: 0 20327695, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Tollana1234567 0 points a year ago

post-jja abrams trek, and kurtzman style trek has never been good, besides the animated series.

path: 0 20342722, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
movies
movies

@piefed.social

login for more options
4008
3372
3033

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

go to feed...