ChatGPT told me that their hallucinations are worth it, and outweighs their negligible environmental impact. I'm not smart enough to do the maths, but it sounds like no worries, boss!
DarrinBrunner 22 points 7 months ago
If it needs to be fresh water, then they need to pay in full to build a desal plant for ocean water, and a solar farm to power it, to be owned and operated by the state. And, that plant needs to send half it's water to the local municipal water system at no cost.
Because fuck em.
9bananas 1 point 7 months ago
having not looked into it at all: it probably doesn't "need" to be fresh water, but it'll probably be rivers anyways.
i assume it works similarly to other large scale cooling operations: you have a closed loop for the heat exchangers and the cooling towers are fed by a local source of flowing water.
doesn't need to be all that clean, or fresh water, but since rivers are pretty much the only source of moving water in most places, there's not really many other options. (for the cooling towers, not AI datacanters...they could just NOT build them, if they weren't fuckwits)
same as nuclear power plants, or any other industrial application that needs a lot of cooling!
mech 3 points 7 months ago
I sure hope their devs can find something the AI is actually useful for, soon.
draco_aeneus 4 points 7 months ago
It doesn't need to be potable, but since it's using evaporative cooling, it does need to be somewhat clean. You don't want to leave gunk all over your cooling equipment.
draco_aeneus 1 point 7 months ago
Disclaimer: I have no knowledge of how these systems work. I'm basically just guessing
If the water is overly basic or acidic, and you concentrate it via evaporation, then you can damage the equipment at an accelerated pace. But even then, it's indeed a matter of money.
mrgoosmoos 8 points 7 months ago
that costs more money
SoupBrick -3 points 7 months ago
path: 0 21837624, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 3
Edit: I guess the first link I put had some shitty info/estimates, my bad. Swapped it for a wiki article.
mrgoosmoos 3 points 7 months ago
those numbers are inflated to fuck, or else the people studied for it are just wasteful as fuck
I take long showers often multiple times a day, wash a lot of stuff by hand, do a lot of garden watering, fill a kiddie pool when it's hot, and wash my hands very often. I still only reach a max of 60 gallons a day on average in the summer. typically half that in the winter. and I wfh so all my shitting is done at home, too.
who the fuck is flushing 15 gallons a day just by themself? and who the fuck is doing multiple loads of laundry every single day?
the incredibly low quality of that blog post pisses me off. garbage like that makes the world a worse place, and whoever published that should be ashamed of their work
SoupBrick 1 point 7 months ago
path: 0 21837624 21844335 21844922, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
fuck_ai
@lemmy.world
7994
4597
8702
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
go to feed...
fuck_ai
@lemmy.world
7994
4597
8702
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
AI, in this case, refers to LLMs, GPT technology, and anything listed as "AI" meant to increase market valuations.
go to feed...
Oh that's funny. I've been repeatedly told that AI is in fact negligible it comes to water usage.
Is it possible we were lied to, again? đ¤Ł
save