Google is Killing uBlock Origin in Chrome

11 days ago by SleepyPie to c/privacy

The conflict of interest couldn't be more obvious
grandel 87 points 11 days ago

Sucks for Google Chrome users

path: 0 24210240, hotness: undefined, score: 87, children: 9
akilou 39 points 11 days ago

The number of people I see just drowning in ads is ridiculous. They're not using uBlock anyway. I don't know how they put up with it.

path: 0 24210240 24213902, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 5
grandel 31 points 11 days ago

They are brainwashed! I asked my wife if she wants me to remove the ads on her laptop. She refused. She wants to see them.

I genuinely can not comprehend it.

path: 0 24210240 24213902 24216988, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 3
magnue 10 points 11 days ago

Some people just don't like to tinker. They just accept the situation and live with it. For them the tinkering is a bigger headache than the ads.

path: 0 24210240 24213902 24216988 24217523, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
bigchungus 8 points 11 days ago

The "tinkering" in question: clicking ~10 buttons from the home screen.

path: 0 24210240 24213902 24216988 24217523 24218446, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
TrippingBalls 3 points 11 days ago

Those are the same people who are using YouTube and or paying for YouTube premium... Who are the same people using windows

path: 0 24210240 24213902 24221071, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
voxel 18 points 11 days ago

Some people can't tell the difference between a search engine and a browser. Some people don't know how to install software, and use whatever they got. Some people don't know better.

Them losing access to a tool like uBlock Origin, with the only alternatives being weaker options, is harmful.

I know of people experiencing blockage because they use uBOL, uBO was more effective at bypassing those blocks I assume.

path: 0 24210240 24214015, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 2
grandel 10 points 11 days ago

Very good point but I'd argue that if you know what a browser extension is and how to install it, you also know the difference between a browser and a search engine.

path: 0 24210240 24214015 24217008, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
voxel 7 points 11 days ago

Not everyone installs browser extensions themselves; many have them installed by relatives or friends.

path: 0 24210240 24214015 24217008 24220279, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
BrilliantBadger 56 points 11 days ago

Librewolf my faithful friend always

path: 0 24211474, hotness: undefined, score: 56, children: 0
lonksawakening 28 points 11 days ago

Still surprised there are so many people using Chrome.

They're this generations grannies who were stubborn about using Internet Explorer.

path: 0 24221074, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 6
encelado748 6 points 10 days ago

There are only chrome, Firefox and safari. All other browsers are derivative of the one above. Chrome is objectively the best from the technical prospective: better support for web technologies, more stable, and better performance. This is not the same as IE that was actually a bad browser.

You either choose a derivative of chrome with better interface and privacy default (vivaldi?), a derivative of Firefox if you care about open web (librewolf?) or a derivative of safari if you have macOS (orion?). But it is still one of those 3, and if google kill manifest v2 then manifest v2 is killed for all derivatives.

path: 0 24221074 24230418, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 5
WhyJiffie 4 points 10 days ago

better support for nonstandard web technologies

fixed that for you

more stable

what?

and better performance

yes it is a known fact that google sites including youtube are engineered to be slower on firefox.

path: 0 24221074 24230418 24234561, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
encelado748 3 points 10 days ago

fixed that for you

CSS scroll drive animation (standard), Cross document view transitions (standard), CSS corner shape, Multicol Level 2 (standard), some of the Filesystem Access API, WebGPU on linux, PWA manifest install (standard), took 3 years to ship documentPictureInPicture.

Facts are facts. Web standard are implemented first in chromium, then in firefox after years.

what?

Chromium based browser have strict multiprocess isolation. This is not true for firefox. If a tab crashes chrome it does not crash the entire browser. This is only partially true for firefox

yes it is a known fact that google sites including youtube are engineered to be slower on firefox.

Yes, and if you check browser performance on a neutral benchmark like speedometer 3.1 chrome is still faster. Also this is a fact.

Chromium is an objectively slightly better browser on paper than Firefox. Firefox is a much better browser for your privacy, for open source development and the health of the web in general.

path: 0 24221074 24230418 24234561 24235393, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
WhyJiffie 3 points 9 days ago

CSS scroll drive animation (standard), Cross document view transitions (standard), CSS corner shape, Multicol Level 2 (standard), some of the Filesystem Access API, WebGPU on linux, PWA manifest install (standard), took 3 years to ship documentPictureInPicture.

half of these are animations. are you choosing your browser by what cool animations it supports?

certain things are better unimplemented. like webusb and complete filesystem access, because they are too dangerous features to give to random websites by a single click. if a website wants to access arbitrary parts of my filesystem they should develop a downloadable app for that.

webgpu and pwa support are indeed happening slowly. Unfortunately firefox does not have as much funds as our favorite advertising supergiant does, and they are just the same plagued by a CEO who can't ever be fulfilled with enough of a paycheck. you will not fix that by switching to chrome.

document picture in picture kind of sounds WTF, like the other feature allowing arbitrary HTML to he rendered onto a canvas. I feel it more with the latter, but sometimes I just feel google is intentionally making the web a standard too heavy to have competitors.

Web standard are implemented first in chromium, then in firefox after years.

I just addressed this in the previous sentence.

Chromium based browser have strict multiprocess isolation. This is not true for firefox. If a tab crashes chrome it does not crash the entire browser. This is only partially true for firefox

how is that only partially true on firefox? this is exactly the reason why it consumes so much memory when having lots of websites open.
I do not remember the last time firefox crashed for me. must have been many years ago.

Chromium is an objectively slightly better browser on paper than Firefox.

only if you completely ignore a bunch of aspects of it. in reality, it has a few advantages and lots of disadvantages. oh, and its also the default for billions of people who have no clue why choose one over the other.

path: 0 24221074 24230418 24234561 24235393 24250802, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
CrypticCoffee 25 points 11 days ago

Didn't they already with manifest v3?

path: 0 24210302, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 4
novafunc 24 points 11 days ago

They disabled it with flags, but manifest V2 still existed in the code and could be enabled. This is about Google now removing V2 from the code. That will make it harder for third party browsers to include V2, since they would need to patch it back in and develop new patches to keep it working.

path: 0 24210302 24210689, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 3
CrypticCoffee 5 points 10 days ago

The point was made very strongly at the time. Don't use a Google driven chrome project. You don't have that issue on Firefox or its forks.

path: 0 24210302 24210689 24228965, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
AngryRobot 6 points 10 days ago

I have NO idea why Firefox has such a low adoption rate. I've been using it ever since Netscape Navigator was outdated and ive never had issues with it. uBlock Origin on mobile, baby!

path: 0 24210302 24210689 24228965 24230009, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
tomenzgg 1 point 10 days ago

It used to freeze up a lot; and, then, you lost all tabs, if it did. That's why I'd stopped using it and switched to Chrome, back in the day.

With all the crap Google's doing, I tried Firefox out again something like 5 or 7 years ago and it's now better than what Chrome offers (for me, of course; I'd've probably still switched, anyway, just to deGoogle my life further).

I do find it starts to massively lag when I get to a certain number of tabs/windows; but Chrome doesn't seem to ever shut off my CPU fans under the same level of load so not like it gets a leg up.

path: 0 24210302 24210689 24228965 24230009 24234275, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Eternal192 15 points 11 days ago

Biggest problem is that people are stupid and can't comprehend that there are alternatives to the shit being served up.

path: 0 24211419, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
dropdrip 3 points 10 days ago

I'd argue it's the government's fault. In the computer-age government's failed to educate their populations on what and how to use computers. They instead taught their students how to use X, Y and Z software. Ignorance here is the root of the problem. A symptom of ignorance could be stupidity I suppose... but users are lazy too. Governments also failed to regulate the nascent software-industries whilst pouring billions into that market. It's too harsh to just criticize the individual.

path: 0 24211419 24230563, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
TrippingBalls 2 points 11 days ago

There's that saying... Can't fix stupid

path: 0 24211419 24221082, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TranquilTurbulence 15 points 11 days ago

oh no

path: 0 24217768, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
MonkderVierte 11 points 11 days ago

And "sideload" on Android.

path: 0 24218848, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
solrize 6 points 11 days ago

I remember the junkbuster proxy from before this stuff was done with browser extensions. Is it time for that approach to make a comeback?

path: 0 24210906, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 6
grue 29 points 11 days ago

No, it's time for people to finally get their asses in gear and fucking ditch Chromium-based browsers for Firefox-based ones.

path: 0 24210906 24211169, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 5
Eternal192 -11 points 11 days ago

Google owns Mozilla and have been slowly getting their greedy fingers in there and they have been changing it to suit their purposes.

Mozilla has been resisting, but it's only a matter of time.

path: 0 24210906 24211169 24211385, hotness: undefined, score: -11, children: 4
f1error 11 points 11 days ago

Google owns Mozilla

I'm going to need verifiable proof of this.

path: 0 24210906 24211169 24211385 24214467, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 3
LostCarcosan -2 points 11 days ago

Mozilla is funded by Google. Not sure about them owning it, but they do give Mozilla money

path: 0 24210906 24211169 24211385 24214467 24217094, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 2
DieserTypMatthias 5 points 10 days ago

Literally everything's better than Chrome.

path: 0 24234924, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
gnufuu 2 points 10 days ago

I once broke my leg and that was better than Chrome

path: 0 24234924 24235633, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Lettuceeatlettuce 5 points 10 days ago

Wait!!! You mean the multi-trillion dollar mega-corp that promised that Manifest 3 would actually make adblockers more effective, lied to us???

path: 0 24234331, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
alia 3 points 11 days ago
path: 0 24210901, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
privacy
privacy

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
49245
4905
6038

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don't promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

go to feed...