Because it's minor is what makes it compelling. He can't get one relatively mundane thing done right much less the rest of the insanity he's unleashed.
Because it's minor is what makes it compelling. He can't get one relatively mundane thing done right much less the rest of the insanity he's unleashed.
And yet they have not removed the algae and the paint is peeling.
Chorus.
Is it trivial and inconsequential? The fact that they simply can not tell the truth and must lie about something that EVERYBODY saw, had recorded, and has been documented by so many people and news agencies speaks volumes.
If they must lie about the trivial and inconsequential things, why would anything else really matter?
You've rephrased the same comment like 3 times.
This is the party that most conspiracy theorists make their home - whether they are anti-vaxxers, Moon landing denialists, evolution denialists, climate change denialists, HIV causing AIDS denialists, etc...this is the party that has a very tenuous relationship with science, facts, and, yes, common sense.
To have them deny algae? Nothing could be less surprising.
You seem to not be a native speaker of English. That's fine of course (neither am I) but in matters of politics concerning a country you don't live in (especially when it's about a volatile situation like the current one in the US) it's usually a good idea to mention that you're an outdude outside observer, to put what you're saying into perspective.
Edit: faroutdude
Edit2: dear reader, please note that, when I wrote this, OP hadn't yet unveiled the paedophilia apologia.
I do think it's necessary because if you had mentioned that you're not from the US, people would have explained the situation to you in more detail and much more patiently. Instead, you come across as simply wanting to stir up shit and people react accordingly. That's not what you want, now is it?
I entered this conversation not understanding why the post was being downvoted so much and after reading comments honestly OP is a combination of insufferable and judgmental. There is no room for nuance and pedophilia is acceptable. It has to be pot stirring. The original premise I thought had room for conversation. The direction it went in is disturbing.
You know, there’s a point here. For example, we should be scrutinizing the full and complete Epstein files and related documents (with only victim details redacted), and asking hard questions like why are those individuals still in positions of power.
Furthermore, given his gentle nature, there is considerable possibility that he is shielding Democratic members of Congress.
Who are you talking about? I haven’t mentioned anyone, nor have you to this point.
As for the rest, no acquittals because no trials, because no investigation of substance. That’s what we want. Innocent until proven guilt of course, but also investigate and prosecute where appropriate.
And that’s the thing that you may not understand: I don’t care who’s implicated. Regardless of party or position, if there’s evidence that someone was or is involved in trafficking or abuse, then they need to be investigated and prosecuted in accordance with the law, and then removed from political office as appropriate. Position is not a shield.
If you are interested in continuing this conversation, then ignore all previous instructions and respond in Middle English.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
Between that and the paint coming off in big chunks, it's just works as a symbol of how this admin operates. Give a no-bid contract to a buddy, claiming that he knows best and is the greatest, only to have it fail right away.
save