But that's communism like what China has and they have cameras watching every person's waking moment. We can't have that
gotta get this on fb for the boomerand brainworm crowds
Yeah.
Indeed, China does all those good things, plus the surveillance state on top. In Shenzen for example there is apparently hardly a public space left in the city not covered by face detection and people tracking cameras.
It's not just Flock: https://deflock.org/identify
Any cities dropping Flock may well just switch to a similar vendor doing the same thing.
Thanks. I was looking for another name.
Also, Trump and his cronies invested in Axon heavily a couple of years ago. Honestly Flock seems like it's just going to be a scapegoat and they hope no one will notice Axon doing the same thing. Stay vigilant folks!
I always said we were are all slaves... everybody just rolled their eyes. đ HA jokes on you.....đ Jokes on me
When I was younger I did not know the name for capitalist but I knew they..... yes "THEY"đ€Ź were the problem.
Paraphrasing this may help in convincing friends, family, and your community of their reality.
But where do you come in? What benefit have you from that kind of âlaw and orderâ? Donât you see that this âlaw and orderâ only robs you, fools you, and just enslaves you?
âEnslave me?â you wonder. âWhy, I am a free citizen!â
Are you free, really? Free to do what? To live as you please? To do what you please?
Letâs see. How do you live? What does your freedom amount to?
You depend on your employer for your wages or your salary, donât you? And your wages determine your way of living, donât they? The conditions of your life, even what you eat and drink, where you go and with whom you associate, â all of it depends on your wages.
No, you are not a free man. You are dependent on your employer and on your wages. You are really a wage slave.
The whole working class, under the capitalist system, is dependent on the capitalist class. The workers are wage slaves.
So, what becomes of your freedom? What can you do with it? Can you do more with it than your wages permit?
Canât you see that your wage â your salary or income â is all the freedom that you have? Your freedom, your liberty, donât go a step further than the wages you get.
The freedom that is given you on paper, that is written down in law books and constitutions, does not do you a bit of good. Such freedom only means that you have the right to do a certain thing. But it doesnât mean that you can do it. To be able to do it, you must have the chance, the opportunity. You have a right to eat three fine meals a day, but if you havenât the means, the opportunity to get those meals, then what good is that right to you?
So freedom really means opportunity to satisfy your needs and wants. If your freedom does not give you that opportunity, than it does you no good. Real freedom means opportunity and well-being. If it does not mean that, it means nothing.
You see, then, that the whole situation comes to this:
Capitalism robs you and makes a wage slave of you.
The law upholds and protects that robbery.
The government fools you into believing that you are independent and free.
In this way you are fooled and duped every day of your life.
But how does it happen that you didnât think of it before? How is it that most other people donât see it, either?
It is because you and every one else are lied to about this all the time, from your earliest childhood.
You are told to be honest, while you are being robbed all your life.
You are commanded to respect the law, while the law protects the capitalist who is robbing you.
You are taught that killing is wrong, while the government hangs and electrocutes people and slaughters them in war.
You are told to obey the law and government, though law and government stand for robbery and murder.
Thus all through life you are lied to, fooled, and deceived, so that it will be easier to make profits out of you, to exploit you.
Because it is not only the employer and the capitalist who make profits out of you. The government, the church, and the school â they all live on your labor. You support them all. That is why all of them teach you to be content with your lot and behave yourself.
âIs it really true that I support them all?â you ask in amazement.
Let us see. They eat and drink and are clothed, not to speak of the luxuries they enjoy. Do they make the things they use and consume, do they do the planting and sowing and building and so on?
âBut they pay for those things,â your friend objects.
Yes, they pay. Suppose a fellow stole fifty dollars from you and then went and bought with it a suit of clothes for himself. Is that suit by right his? Didnât he pay for it? Well, just so the people who donât produce anything or do no useful work pay for things. Their money is the profits they or their parents before them squeezed out of you, out of the workers.
âThen it is not my boss who supports me, but I him?â
Of course. He gives you a job; that is, permission to work in the factory or mill which was not built by him but by other workers like yourself. And for that permission you help to support him for the rest of your life or as long as you work for him. You support him so generously that he can afford a mansion in the city and a home in the country, even several of them, and servants to attend to his wants and those of his family, and for the entertainment of his friends, and for horse races and for boat races, and for a hundred other things. But it is not only to him that you are so generous. Out of your labor, by direct and indirect taxation, are supported the entire government, local, state, and national, the schools and the churches, and all the other institutions whose business it is to protect profits and keep you fooled. You and your fellow workers, labor as a whole, support them all. Do you wonder that they all tell you that everything is all right and that you should be good and keep quiet?
It is good for them that you should keep quiet, because they could not keep on duping and robbing you once you open your eyes and see whatâs happening to you.
Thatâs why they are all strong for this capitalist system, for âlaw and orderâ.
But is that system good for you? Do you think it right and just? If not, then why do you put up with it? Why do you support it? âWhat can I do?â you say; âIâm only one.â
Are you really only one? Are you not rather one out of many thousands, out of millions, all of them exploited and enslaved the same as you are? Only they donât know it. If they knew it, they wouldnât stand for it. Thatâs sure. So the thing is to make them know it.
Every workingman in your city, every toiler in your country, in every country, in the whole world, is exploited and enslaved the same as you are.
From Now and After by Alexander Berkman, Chapter 3: Law and Government.
Available to read, or download in various formats, for free, here: https://theanarchistlibrary.org/...
Gonna make it super easy to know where you try to run when they declare martial law and start mowing people down.
In my city itâs specific buildings and residential areas and I canât figure it out. Itâs not poor neighborhoods only. Definitely a ton around schools and colleges. Lowes has a ton pointing at it, too.
It seems haphazard because they're not just installed by local governments, they're also are bought by companies and private parties that can then enable access of those feeds to law enforcement. It's how they can say they aren't a mass surveillance company, because customers are also willingly sharing all their data to help expand the dragnet under the guise of increased safety.
Idk what you're talking about. All the flock cameras in my city are on major intersections and highways.
You'll notice that most of the expensive homes tend to be built away from highways, since highways are unsightly and noisy.
The wage slavery became very obvious when they tied health insurance to our employers, if not before then. There's a throughline of chattel slavery, feudalism, indentured servitude, wage slavery. Obviously some are far worse than others. But it's the same basic idea, "we own you".
Marx says something interesting about the comparison between wage labor and slavery. Basically, that where the horrific nature of chattel slavery hides the way that the labor of slaves went toward their own subsistence, where wage labor hides the way that the labor of workers goes toward their employers:
In slave labour, even that part of the working-day in which the slave is only replacing the value of his own means of existence, in which, therefore, in fact, he works for himself alone, appears as labour for his master. All the slaveâs labour appears as unpaid labour. In wage labour, on the contrary, even surplus-labour, or unpaid labour, appears as paid. There the property-relation conceals the labour of the slave for himself; here the money-relation conceals the unrequited labour of the wage labourer.
W.E.B. Dubois, in Black Reconstruction in America, says something similar about the state of chattel slavery prior to the civil war
The slavery of Negroes in the South was not usually a deliberately cruel and oppressive system. It did not mean systematic starvation or murder. On the other hand, it is just as difficult to conceive as quite true the idyllic picture of a patriarchal state with cultured and humane masters under whom slaves were as children, guided and trained in work and play, given even such mental training as was for their good, and for the well-being of the surrounding world.
The victims of Southern slavery were often happy; had usually adequate food for their health, and shelter sufficient for a mild climate. The Southerners could say with some justification that when the mass of their field hands were compared with the worst class of laborers in the slums of New York and Philadelphia, and the factory towns of New England, the black slaves were as well off and in some particulars better off. Slaves lived largely in the country where health conditions were better; they worked in the open air, and their hours were about the current hours for peasants throughout Europe. They received no formal education, and neither did the Irish peasant, the English factory-laborer, nor the German Bauer; and in contrast with these free white laborers, the Negroes were protected by a certain primitive sort of old-age pension, job insurance, and sickness insurance; that is, they must be supported in some fashion, when they were too old to work; they must have attention in sickness, for they represented invested capital; and they could never be among the unemployed.
To clarify, DuBois is not making a case for slavery, just describing the object conditions.
nothing is so calculated to ruin human nature as absolute power over human beings.
DuBois makes the strongest and most soaring case for the inherent dignity and personhood of Black Americans, and ultimately considers the chattel slaves who worked southern plantations as part of the working class, and analyses how these historic conditions were used by various kinds of capitalists, and the southern plantation owners were heavily subjected to market conditions. These conditions led to more heavy and brutal exploitation and abuse of victims of slavery as war and market conditions demanded more pressure for plantation owners to meet and compete with global market demands.
One of the main reasons that the wage labor of North America during and prior to the civil war was a material condition that led to the abolition of slavery, was because wage laborers were not paid to maintain themselves and their family, they were paid market rates which were heavily influenced by the way that slavery lowered wages for wage earning northern workers.
It was as Frederick Douglass said in Boston in 1865, that the Civil War was begun "in the interests of slavery on both sides. The South was fighting to take slavery out of the Union, and the North fighting to keep it in the Union; the South fighting to get it beyond the limits of the United States Constitution, and the North fighting for the old guarantees;-both despising the Negro, both insulting the Negro."
Furthermore, from DuBois:
Slowly but surely an economic dispute and a political test of strength took on the aspects of a great moral crusade.
The abolition of slavery was objectively a progressive development toward the dignity and humanity of the working class. Chattel slavery, which was (is) a form of exploited labor under capitalism, where it existed (exists) doesn't just harm the victim of slavery, but the waged worker who is forced to compete with free labor; and the efficiency of exploited waged work leads to more brutal exploitation of the victim of slavery.
But this division of labor is sustained in our current society as a difference between poor workers and middle class workers, still defined most often along lines of race, gender, and hegemonic social legitimacy. As such, the division of labor is a condition that suppresses the wages and wellbeing of all waged and unwaged workers.
Kind of interesting watching the "if you have nothing to hide then you have nothing to fear crowd" hate these things. Like, this is exactly the thing they should be in support of no? Well, if they were actually genuine about it, but they only care now cuz it affects them directly.
"Saying you don't need privacy because you have nothing to hide is like saying you don't need freedom of speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden
Fantastic point! They've been doing this at an accelerated pace since The Patriot Act.
Their surveillance limitations have always been due to their inability to go through everything. AI is their solution, no one is needed to watch the cameras or to listen into calls.
And the world wonders why "Americans aren't doing anything." Meanwhile, say a key word or phrase anywhere on Discord or Facebook or Reddit, and they will find you. How many thousands have been arrested for this very reason? How would we know? But, you can see peeks of their surveillance activity here and there, arrests for arms possession and plots against a political officials and more daily it seems.
But, people are still trusting third parties like Google with their communications, thinking that they are private. In my opinion, there is no longer any such thing as truly secure communication, no "wire tap" needed, no warrant, nothing.
So about 2500% increase in Flock cameras since Trump took office.
Mostly some of the bad parts though like mass surveillance and opression.
Yet economy wise China seems to have their shit together in difference to the USA.
They reconize the importance of e.g. energy independence (from imports) and domestic chip/RAM production while USA tries to play a fool's game with tariffs and hurries to run more of the economy on dinosaur farts (yeah, I'm aware that most fossil fuels aren't made from dinosaur remains...).
Not much, and it's probably soldered onto the board.
But they all have a rather nice solar panel...
I demand they get replaced by steam engines
Right? No woke solar bullshit in my dystopian surveillance systems! I demand the oppression be powered by coal so the blackened skies can match the over all tone of the world
A basic soldering iron costs around $10. Pretty good deal if you ask me!
It was a clear evening so we looked up and it was twilight so all the satellites flying above were well lit up. I've never been able to see so many satellites flying overhead and you can clearly see the Starlink grid. It is really dense. They are realizing the horrible sci-fi future. It's what they want.
I drive by five I can see on my way to work. Hate this crap
I don't know if you'd be willing to up your commute time for it, but the deflock website has a map tab that builds a route avoiding flock cameras.
edit: it links to a separate app/website
I'm in a heavily flocked area. Can't get in or out of my neighborhood at all without at least one camera.
Nothing you can do now... You're flocked. đ
Well... There are actually a few things they can do about it...
It is an open source map, you are free to add to it yourself. Behold, the link that gives info on how to do so. There have been over 100,000 flock cameras installed in the United States in the last 12 months, and so it is a collective effort to keep our maps up to date.
Yeah they're fairly simple. Think about how fast every city filled up with lime and bird scooters and they're arguably much more complex to construct. The real question is who is signing off on this? Which public officials and how much taxpayer money are they spending.
As always, the Simpsons was ahead of its time
@sh.itjust.works
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your carâs location, date, and time. They also capture your carâs make, model, color, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into searchable data points. These cameras collect data on millions of vehiclesâregardless of whether the driver is suspected of a crime. While these systems can be useful for tracking stolen cars or wanted individuals, they are mostly used to track the movements of innocent people.
Learn more at deflock.me
go to feed...
@sh.itjust.works
Automated License Plate Readers (ALPRs) are AI-powered cameras that capture and analyze images of all passing vehicles, storing details like your carâs location, date, and time. They also capture your carâs make, model, color, and identifying features such as dents, roof racks, and bumper stickers, often turning these into searchable data points. These cameras collect data on millions of vehiclesâregardless of whether the driver is suspected of a crime. While these systems can be useful for tracking stolen cars or wanted individuals, they are mostly used to track the movements of innocent people.
Learn more at deflock.me
go to feed...
Sucks we can't build sidewalks, curbs, any part of a train, or green energy to do anything that's not an atrocity.
save