cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/53563321
The Seeed Studio XIAO ESP32-S3 Sense is for tinkerers, not super-spies.
The ‘Sophisticated’ Bug OpenAI Found in Its Conference Room Can Be Yours for $13.99
4 days ago by themachinestops to c/technology
cross-posted from: https://infosec.pub/post/53563321
The Seeed Studio XIAO ESP32-S3 Sense is for tinkerers, not super-spies.
If they are insinuating that because it's cheap it's not sophisticated think again.
You can get motion sensors based on quantum dynamics principles for just $1, they are in all phones today, and those are based on extremely sophisticated theory and production methods. But industry has managed to find ways to make them extremely cheap despite that.
So putting the sophisticated in quotes based on the low price is an oversimplification.
That said, there are probably more sophisticated miniaturized options for spying than the cheap gadget they used.
Sophisticated is commonly used as a comparison to other sinilar things. So a sophisticated computer in 1980 is different from one in 2026 because technology advanced significantly. A lot of common features on cell phones would have been called sophisticated 20 years ago, but not anymore.
In this case sophisticated is intended to mean relative to other similar devices. Since this is a commodity electronic device you can easily buy for under $13 it doesn't fit the common usage of 'sophisticated' for 2026.
Language is messy. I sometimes think of sophisticated as the opposite of simple.
It kind of is, isn't it?
Edit:
Goddam people are contrarian here.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/...
Simple is the first antonym (opposite) stated, and simplistic is number 4.
This place is a cesspool sometimes 🤡
Depends on what you mean by is.
No, it isn't.
(Source: https://www.youtube.com/...)
Ok, but you could also say a simple pc about a modern pc, that does not mean it's actually simple. It's because it is used in place of ordinary. And ordinary also doesn't mean simple in the literal sense. Even a "simple" mobile phone is in fact not simple.
No literally a common motion sensor.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_sensor
Quantum sensors have applications in a wide variety of fields including microscopy, positioning systems, communication technology, electric and magnetic field sensors.
One of these are the perfectly common motion sensor that detects if you move your phone, which is based on quantum phenomenon, like the phase shift between photons send in different directions.
I am extremely ignorant on these things. If what you say is true, it stands to reason that all the claims that "only 3 companies can produce memory chips" are most likely bullshit.
I hate the way the world is going right now.
Could have just hacked the TV like a normal pro.
Why hack it? Just buy the data from LG
Seriously how does a multibillion tech company keep a smart tv in their confrence rooms? It has to be modified and its microphones removed, or forever offline at least
China's already got control of that!
What good will onboard encryption be if the device is seized? They will just figure out how to decrypt.
I guess you’d need to set up asynchronous encrypt / decrypt keys, then move the data encrypted end to end. The target device can do the decrypting, while the bug only does encrypting.
How so?
If you ever intend to decrypt the data, don’t you need a decryption key?
I think my point stands, you’d need this device to be only capable of encryption. Otherwise, anyone with access to the device can decrypt it. So it goes without saying, you’d have to push the data to a second device which handles decryption.
You can have an encryption key that can't decrypt the data. That's what public and private keys are. The device can have a public key to encrypt the data, and then it can only be decrypted with the attacker's private key. No need to even get it out of the device, you can also perform the decryption on the same device. Just don't store the private key in there.
Hack the planet!
@lemmy.world
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
go to feed...
Actual image of OpenAI and Kash Patel's FBI meeting:
save