That post seems to be missing.
gomp 95 points 3 years ago

Death warrant? Maybe, but I expect companies (maybe not the EU, but - let's be frank - probably the EU too) to go back into X as soon as they feel they are done cashing in this virtue signaling.

There were plenty of reasons to leave twitter before this idiotic tweet from Musk (reasons due to twitter's action as a company, and not just Musk's drunken posts) and they were all happily tweeting and advertising.

Is this drop that breaks the camel's back? Maybe, but I wouldn't be holding my breath.

path: 0 5404024, hotness: undefined, score: 95, children: 5
SloganLessons 32 points 3 years ago

My chips are also on them coming back, but at the same time it feels like Musk wants to make Twitter's business harder than it needs to be.

This reaction doesn't come from the last tweet itself, instead it comes from him not stopping with hot takes and not showing any signs of slowing down.

If he keeps going, I could see companies just accepting "it is what it is" and coming back, but at the same time it also feels like he's one tweet away from going too far for most companies. And it's not like Twitter is a strong social media anyway, they are not even in the top 10 social medias in terms of active users count: https://www.statista.com/...

Maybe these companies may also decide that dealing with Twitter is more trouble than it's worth. But we'll see

path: 0 5404024 5404665, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 3
logi 6 points 3 years ago

Well, that was certainly decisive.

path: 0 5404024 5404665 5405158, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
SuckMyWang 3 points 3 years ago

I don’t think x’s value is from the number of users. It’s the type of powerful people on it and the headline style format the multiplies it’s impact across the information space. It still sucks though

path: 0 5404024 5404665 5420150, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
SloganLessons 3 points 3 years ago

right, but what matters to most ad publishers is the number of eyeballs that are converted into buying customers

path: 0 5404024 5404665 5420150 5427633, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
generalpotato 5 points 3 years ago

X is a shit company that doesn’t need to exist anymore but I’m equally tired of companies virtue signaling behind causes. Like, fuck off, I don’t need you to tell me that you’re “invested” in “human rights” or “causes” when you treat your workers like shit and fail to provide your retail workers a minimum wage for example.

X and these other companies virtue signaling behind causes for profit/marketing goodwill can all go to hell.

path: 0 5404024 5412028, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
trash80 48 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5404133, hotness: undefined, score: 48, children: 2
SnotFlickerman 10 points 3 years ago

It would be amazing if there were any sort of consequences for this clown, or any other rich clown, honestly.

I think part of the reason bad behavior has been so normalized among the general populace is because they're seeing such bad behavior from "the elites" that they "look up to" so they think that since those "rich, successful men" act like that without consequence, it must mean that behavior is okay.

path: 0 5404133 5405758, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
trash80 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 5404133 5405758 5407073, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
FewerWheels 43 points 3 years ago

So the radical free speech guy is going to sue someone for what they said? Sounds spot on for Musk.

path: 0 5407947, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 1
duncesplayed 4 points 3 years ago

Wait, I don't see that in the article. Who's he suing now?

path: 0 5407947 5416945, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
uriel238 39 points 3 years ago

How cheap does X have to get before it can be bought by a non-profit, turned into a co-op and renamed twitter?

path: 0 5412743, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 3
quicken 21 points 3 years ago

It's no longer a public company. So it can be bought when Musk chooses to sell. Or if he defaults on his loan then it may go to banks but they really don't want it and have already written off their loan to him.

path: 0 5412743 5424065, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 1
intrepid 27 points 3 years ago

Why exactly do normal people with small defaults have 'collection agents' sent after them, while billion dollar defaults are written off? Isn't that supposed to be the other way around?

path: 0 5412743 5424065 5424839, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
schnurrito 16 points 3 years ago

and then federate with Mastodon?

path: 0 5412743 5415690, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
FrigidAphelion 38 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5404458, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 4
HeartyBeast 13 points 3 years ago

Inertia. In the UK, for example, every local government council, the NHS, central government, charities etc use user Twitter//X as a free channel for announcements and publicity. Quite often they manage it though things like Hootsuite that lets the, plan and manage and cross-post to Facebook etc.

Deciding to quit that is quite a major step - especially when there isn't really a clear single alternative that has similar reach and userbase.

path: 0 5404458 5406341, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
qupada 7 points 3 years ago

Except that they've ruined that too. You now need an account to view anything, so the reach of announcements is greatly diminished.

At this point leaving shouldn't really be too difficult, since a large portion of your audience already has; because they've been shut out, or have quit voluntarily.

path: 0 5404458 5406341 5411101, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
brothershamus 2 points 3 years ago

And now we're living in the "that was a bad idea" world.

path: 0 5404458 5406341 5407548, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Carnelian 5 points 3 years ago

Many who remain actively want to spread hate

path: 0 5404458 5405157, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
TootSweet 35 points 3 years ago

Two-panel meme image of a guy saying in the first panel "oh no" and in the second "anyway."

path: 0 5406476, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 0
KingThrillgore 31 points 3 years ago

I've heard this said for months now

path: 0 5425069, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 1
linearchaos 3 points 3 years ago

Yeah, it's only a death warrant for conventionally run companies. He can run it into the ground as deep as his pockets will let him. And according to Forbes that's still relatively deep, deeper than they should be anyway.

I kind of suspect he's up to something. Maybe he's grooming it for a political ad platform. Although it's equally possible he just loves watching everybody flip the hell out, One hell of an expensive hobby if so.

path: 0 5425069 5445723, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
carl_dungeon 29 points 3 years ago

We can only hope

path: 0 5413822, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 0
sour 23 points 3 years ago

did people stop deadnaming twitter

path: 0 5411656, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 1
JGrffn 17 points 3 years ago

Right? Twitter hasn't stopped dead naming Twitter, for fuck's sake

path: 0 5411656 5418675, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
NutWrench 16 points 3 years ago

Musk only buys things that he thinks will keep his name in the news, and he's always looking for that next bong-hit of attention.

Nobody likes him. Nobody cares about him. And he makes it so obvious WHY with his racist, apartheid bullsh*t.

path: 0 5404460, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
Therealgoodjanet 15 points 3 years ago

Good. I hope it goes under.

path: 0 5404371, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
NoiseColor 2 points 3 years ago

How would that happen?

path: 0 5404371 5407393, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
FlexibleToast 6 points 3 years ago

It can't afford its debt. It's almost guaranteed to happen.

path: 0 5404371 5407393 5407853, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
NoiseColor 2 points 3 years ago

I read about where the money came from and I'm not saying I really understand it, but it seems solid enough for it to never fail unless musk wants it to fail.

Which is, like,..if somebody wants to destroy twitter as fast as possible, but make it look like it's not intentional, what would they do differently than what is happening right now? :) Jk, musk is just an incompetent bag of shit.

path: 0 5404371 5407393 5407853 5411174, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
FlexibleToast 1 point 3 years ago

It was always going to fail. At that point, Twitter as a company only recently started actually making a profit. What Musk did is called a leveraged buy-out where someone takes out a loan to buy a company. The company that is bought out is then responsible for paying that loan. Remember when I said they just barely had started making money? Well, now they have so much debt that they not only have to make enough money to cover their previous expenses, but also cover the payments for this new loan, and the new loan has interest that creates additional debt of $1 billion a year. How is a company that struggles to make money suddenly going to come up with an extra $1 billion a year? Charging for checkmarks? There aren't enough users... That's why he is so desperate. He knows that by making that joke offer, he royally screwed himself when Twitter called his bluff and forced him to buy. I think he just wanted an excuse to sell some Tesla stock that he knew was overvalued but had said he wouldn't sell.

path: 0 5404371 5407393 5407853 5411174 5453158, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
520 1 point 3 years ago

The money used to come from advertisers. Elon has been trying to move it to a subscription model, but few people want to subscribe to a place only right wingers want to be.

Elon wanted Xitter to be a bastion of right wing speech. He just didn't think about what that would entail.

path: 0 5404371 5407393 5407853 5411174 5415222, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
mp3 14 points 3 years ago

We've yet to see any regulatory actions with real consequences, so yeah I doubt it.

path: 0 5405180, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
Goun 3 points 3 years ago

A $50 fine or something

path: 0 5405180 5445983, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Varyk 10 points 3 years ago

Knew he was good for something

path: 0 5403978, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
RobotToaster 9 points 3 years ago

Haven't people been saying that since before he even bought it?

path: 0 5404628, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
nyakojiru 6 points 3 years ago

the guy don’t give a single fuck, people don’t get that he don’t care about loosing money.

path: 0 5446935, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
MrScottyTay 4 points 3 years ago

Can we please stop posting business news here

path: 0 5412706, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
JimmyBigSausage 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5404355, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
waspentalive 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5405684, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
onlinepersona 0 points 3 years ago

No he hasn't. 200M users won't jump off because of this. If most people really cared, they'd be switching to alternatives - they don't.

path: 0 5407659, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
phx 20 points 3 years ago

Money doesn't come from the users, it comes from the advertisers. The platform is already in the hole but it's getting worse over time

path: 0 5407659 5407902, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
Albinjose7345 6 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5407659 5410449, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
kandoh 6 points 3 years ago

It shows how much more important being first is rather than being the best.

path: 0 5407659 5410449 5411869, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
jimmydoreisalefty -61 points 3 years ago

Seems like a smear of Musk for not siding with Israel and instead calling for a ceasefire or peace.

Looking at the talk Musk had with Lex Fridman.

path: 0 5404070, hotness: undefined, score: -61, children: 13
Therealgoodjanet 32 points 3 years ago

Please don’t conflate anti-semitism with Pro Palestinian voices. What he is doing is not helping anyone.

path: 0 5404070 5404431, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 2
jimmydoreisalefty -4 points 3 years ago

Anti-semitism is a real thing, but Israel-Palestine has always made it harder to understand. If it is truly anti-religious or just questioning Israel gov't and actions.

path: 0 5404070 5404431 5404580, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 1
Therealgoodjanet 12 points 3 years ago

The problem is that Zionists like to say “Israel = Jews”, raging when you say something anti-Zionist that you’re being an anti-semite. However, what Musk is doing is actually saying Jews are the problem. That’s antisemitism. That is not helping Jews nor is it helping anyone who is anti-Zionist because now people will say “see? Anti-Zionist equals anti-Semite, just look at Musk if you don’t believe me.”

path: 0 5404070 5404431 5404580 5404857, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
520 25 points 3 years ago

It's not that he sided against Israel. It's that he sided against Jews. The Israeli government and its supporters like to conflate the two a lot, but they are very different things.

So when someone writes “Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of dialectical hatred against whites that they claim to want people to stop using against them.” and Musk responds with “You have spoken the actual truth.”, that is not an anti-Israel position, that is an antisemite position, one that couldn't be made more clearer even if he posted it with a picture of Auschwitz

path: 0 5404070 5404731, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 2
Therealgoodjanet 4 points 3 years ago

Amen!

path: 0 5404070 5404731 5404786, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
deFrisselle 1 point 3 years ago

If you read the religious texts and are familiar with the oral scriptures there you go Though those views mainly only exist in communities of Orthodox Jewish sects that dedicate their lives to religious studies

path: 0 5404070 5404731 5428684, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
roguetrick 10 points 3 years ago

I'm sorry, but proclaiming that Jews are conspiratorially poisoning the world against whites is not remotely related to Israel/Palestine. It's blatant Nazi shit. Muddying the waters is also generally crypto-fascist shit, but I don't know you and I'm not going to put that label on you. Just realize that's what you're doing.

path: 0 5404070 5405177, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
otter 7 points 3 years ago

To add on to what others have already said

and instead calling for a ceasefire or peace.

He didn't do that either though? He attacked those calling for peace/ceasefire

He's attacking everyone, as if he's trying to distract people from each controversy with a different controversy

path: 0 5404070 5404892, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
demesisx 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 5404070 5404892 5416833, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
yolo 5 points 3 years ago

He wasn't really in good standing before the conflict.

path: 0 5404070 5404313, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
jimmydoreisalefty -8 points 3 years ago

True, politics makes Musk a tribalist issue.

path: 0 5404070 5404313 5404605, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 1
static 7 points 3 years ago

He wrote that the jews are responsible for the great replacement conspiracy theory, how is that not antisemitic?

path: 0 5404070 5404313 5404605 5406249, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
markr 4 points 3 years ago

He in fact demonstrated the clear distinction between being an antisemitic Nazi fuckwit and opposing Israeli military actions in Gaza.

path: 0 5404070 5408517, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...