YouTube is reportedly slowing down videos for Firefox users

3 years ago by L4sBot to c/technology

YouTube is reportedly slowing down videos for Firefox users::Users are reporting that YouTube has begun adding a five second delay when loading a video on non-Chrome browsers like Firefox. Read on!

Thann 163 points 3 years ago

That's an antitrust lawsuit waiting to happen

path: 0 5456431, hotness: undefined, score: 163, children: 2
blindbunny 48 points 3 years ago

Time to break Google up so they can buy all the companies the government forced them to sale!

path: 0 5456431 5457066, hotness: undefined, score: 48, children: 0
misk 12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5456431 5458283, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
AngryJadeRabbit 88 points 3 years ago

Here’s a reason why net neutrality laws are good

path: 0 5458173, hotness: undefined, score: 88, children: 19
SnotFlickerman 37 points 3 years ago

Seriously, someone needs to report this to the FCC since they just re-adopted Net Neutrality.

path: 0 5458173 5458230, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 0
LeroyJenkins 25 points 3 years ago

not defending the behavior, but is this even an example of net neutrality? it's not like ISPs are putting a slow lane for specific browsers in this case. it seems more like a shitty dark pattern type thing (which should have consumer protections as well)

path: 0 5458173 5460851, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 17
SnotFlickerman 14 points 3 years ago

It could still be argued as net neutrality, because the browser with the largest market share is slowing down bits on their way to a different browser when it comes to their video service.

It also should be viewed negatively through an anti-competitive/monopolization lens.

If the internet is truly and open platform where no bits are treated differently on the path to the user based on their content, then this is inherently antithetical to that. Slowing down bits because you don't like whats in them or where they are going is fundamentally breaking Net Neutrality rules. The interruption of bits on their path is what makes it a Net Neutrality issue.

path: 0 5458173 5460851 5461617, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 16
LeroyJenkins 9 points 3 years ago

correct me if I'm wrong but I thought net neutrality by definition was the ISPs doing these shenanigans. at least that's what I gathered when the whole topic was blowing up with that guy with the face we all up voted on Reddit so he'd show up on Google Images under "punchable faces" or something.

I agree this is an anti-competitive tactic. that's what I was referring to as it being a shitty dark pattern thing - to lure people into using their tools.

path: 0 5458173 5460851 5461617 5461969, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 14
SnotFlickerman 8 points 3 years ago

It's about prioritization of data, which can be through ISPs, but in this case, it's Google choosing to prioritize or deprioritize data.

I understand, yes, that's its generally aimed at ISPs, but this is an example of a non-ISP using data-shaping to impact use of their service.

path: 0 5458173 5460851 5461617 5461969 5462095, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 13
Cethin 7 points 3 years ago

Anti-trust laws should handle it. Google is using their market power to push users from their competition to their product. It's pretty basic anti-competition behavior that is covered by classic consumer protection laws. I don't think there's any reason why net-neutrality would be needed or apply in this case.

We still need net-neutrality, just not for this reason.

path: 0 5458173 5460851 5461617 5466804, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
stormesp 63 points 3 years ago

fun fact, i had been noticing this for over a week or two already, today, after the first posts about this were gaining traction it stopped. They are probably trying to erase their tracks and make it seem like something that only happened to a few people for an unrelated reason.

path: 0 5456989, hotness: undefined, score: 63, children: 5
andrew_bidlaw 25 points 3 years ago

Or they do A\B testing and you fell from your initial group. Due to the nature of this lag, it's hard to confirm without internal leaks or investigation. At least, it got reported.

path: 0 5456989 5457891, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
set_secret 12 points 3 years ago

I also noticed it. Put it down to my sometimes flakey wifi. But this makes more sense. What a bunch of babies.

path: 0 5456989 5458947, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
Sheeple 2 points 3 years ago

So that's why YouTube seemed to act weird. I thought my wi-fi was dying

path: 0 5456989 5458947 5464872, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
criticalthreshold 3 points 3 years ago

Wow yeah. The delays have stopped on my end as well today.

path: 0 5456989 5459707, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
kusivittula 2 points 3 years ago

i felt like this has been a thing since like 10 years ago. with 100 mbps connection yt would always struggle to buffer in ff

path: 0 5456989 5459241, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
jordanlund 48 points 3 years ago

If YouTube really wanted to piss people off, all they would have to do is play the audio out of sync with the video. ;) I know, I know, "don't give them ideas!"

path: 0 5456417, hotness: undefined, score: 48, children: 1
Rocketpoweredgorilla 15 points 3 years ago

Oh I'm sure with the lugnuts running the place they've thought of that already and have it on the backburner. They just haven't figured out a way to pin it on a "glitch" yet.

path: 0 5456417 5456513, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
ShunkW 27 points 3 years ago

This is not Firefox specific. It's another anti ad blocker technique they're trying.

path: 0 5460536, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 3
Jolteon 14 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5460536 5461696, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 2
Cethin 9 points 3 years ago

Everyone not on chrome/chromium based browser it seems. Get everyone to switch to chrome then remove chrome's ability to block ads I assume is the plan, though I doubt anyone using Firefox isn't aware of chrome and this is likely to push them further away, not towards it.

path: 0 5460536 5461696 5466717, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
ShunkW 8 points 3 years ago

To anyone using an ad blocker it would appear. Not saying it's right, just trying to correct misinformation.

path: 0 5460536 5461696 5461754, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
rtxn 20 points 3 years ago

Time to spoof the user agent?

path: 0 5456969, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 4
krigo666 29 points 3 years ago

Nah, just be patient and wait the 5s. They are trying to create an artificial problem to try to make users switch to their garbage Chrome browser. When they see that Firefox users are smarter and don't give a shit about their stupid tactics, or even better, use different apps like FreeTube to see the videos, they will stop. Either that or destroy the platform.

I wait the 5 secs, don't bother me at all. It's not like they are an ad... :D

path: 0 5456969 5457211, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 1
LWD 14 points 3 years ago

deleted

path: 0 5456969 5457211 5458822, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
user224 10 points 3 years ago

Nah, wouldn't want to contribute to Chrome market share.

path: 0 5456969 5457558, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Zeroxxx 3 points 3 years ago

No, that just sweeps the issue under the rug.

path: 0 5456969 5460810, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
syrooks 19 points 3 years ago

Friendly reminder you can watch YouTube videos in VLC (I have not tested whether speed is affected this way)

path: 0 5461380, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 3
Shayeta 16 points 3 years ago

I'm pretty sure it takes more effort, if not also time, to copy URL into VLC every time i find a video.

path: 0 5461380 5461482, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 2
syrooks 16 points 3 years ago

It’s about the principle lol

path: 0 5461380 5461482 5461651, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
Shayeta 2 points 3 years ago

Ah, spite, one of my favourite motivators. Carry on.

path: 0 5461380 5461482 5461651 5472824, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Uniquitous 15 points 3 years ago

The article gives the game away. Just change your user agent and you're golden.

path: 0 5462962, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
lapommedeterre 14 points 3 years ago

I wouldn't put it past them, but I think it needs more evidence.

path: 0 5456975, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 2
CriticalMiss 6 points 3 years ago

Try spoofing your user agent and see if it improves.

path: 0 5456975 5457277, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
ledtasso 3 points 3 years ago

Is anyone even able to reproduce the issue? It cannot be improved if you can't reproduce it in the first place.

path: 0 5456975 5457277 5460308, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
bradbrewsbeer 8 points 3 years ago

F that

path: 0 5456669, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
3xa8yte 6 points 3 years ago

They also restrict subscriptions to one account if you buy anything on the playstore. Subscriptions which aren't restricted by their creators. Google has become a full shitshow. I'll take care to give them 0$ from now on.

path: 0 5460874, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
EmoBean 7 points 3 years ago
path: 0 5460874 5463024, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
FishFace 6 points 3 years ago

The video in the article does not clear caches before retrying and seeing a faster load. Amateur hour.

path: 0 5457917, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
FaeDrifter 3 points 3 years ago

They actually found a 5-second sleep embedded in the JavaScript, so it's not the cache.

path: 0 5457917 5460179, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
elvith 4 points 3 years ago

Depends, in the original Reddit thread, someone already pointed out that this 5s delay is to wait for some ad thing and then execute code if it doesn’t work within this timeframe. So… depending on what gets cached, blocked, loaded,… it might behave differently on a reload depending on cached data

path: 0 5457917 5460179 5460931, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
FishFace 2 points 3 years ago

They found something which waits for five seconds and then does something. At least part of the thing in question was removing some stuff from the DOM - I couldn't understand anything else from the minified JS. That is not a smoking gun.

path: 0 5457917 5460179 5461213, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
tabular 5 points 3 years ago

yt-[tab-tab] (paste)

path: 0 5457282, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Immersive_Matthew 5 points 3 years ago

Petty Alphabet…petty. Do you not have a killer AI coming? What does YouTube even matter in the face of what is coming. Do you really have competitive AI?

path: 0 5460484, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
paraphrand 4 points 3 years ago

Why does this sub allow duplicate posts?

path: 0 5457761, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Betch 2 points 3 years ago

I've noticed that when I open a video in a new tab instead of just left-clicking it. Slightly annoying but better than ads and using chrome.

path: 0 5457601, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
88783
22173
14582

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...