Restrictions on Donald Trump's Facebook and Instagram lifted

2 years ago by girlfreddy to c/news

Meta lifts final restrictions and says US voters should be able to hear from presidential nominees.

Meta has lifted the final restrictions on Donald Trump’s Facebook and Instagram accounts in the run up to US presidential elections in November.

The ex-US president and convicted felon’s accounts were suspended in 2021 after he praised supporters who stormed the US Capitol on 6 January.

Trump’s accounts, which combined have over 60 million followers, were re-instated in 2023 but subject to additional monitoring, which has now been removed, the social media giant said in a blog post.

Meta said it had a responsibility to allow political expression and that Americans should be able to hear from presidential nominees on an equal basis.

tigeruppercut 138 points 2 years ago

Meta said it had a responsibility to allow political expression and that Americans should be able to hear from presidential nominees on an equal basis.

Meta said fascists should have their voices heard. Zuck's a coward, what a fucking surprise.

path: 0 11152203, hotness: undefined, score: 138, children: 4
mecfs 49 points 2 years ago

Trump recently threatened multiple times to jail zuck. I wouldn’t be suprised if that had an impact on this decision.

path: 0 11152203 11152747, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 3
DessertStorms 34 points 2 years ago

Zuck’s a coward, what a fucking surprise.

E: though tbf it wouldn't surprise me one bit if he's letting trump back on the platform because he wouldn't mind him winning. After all, trump is good for billionaires, there's no question about that..

path: 0 11152203 11152747 11152963, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 1
BossDj 11 points 2 years ago

And if he loses, ban him again for saying something malicious and appear to be doing diligence

path: 0 11152203 11152747 11152963 11154684, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
nondescripthandle 18 points 2 years ago

Terrorism works I guess.

path: 0 11152203 11152747 11154317, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
FartsWithAnAccent 71 points 2 years ago

Meta is cancer that has metastasized

path: 0 11152569, hotness: undefined, score: 71, children: 1
pyre 19 points 2 years ago

so that's what meta is short for

path: 0 11152569 11154201, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
jprice 48 points 2 years ago

I hope they know they should hide Mark Zuckerberg’s grave, because that thing is going to be so vandalized when he goes. Ill be the first to take a huge messy shit on it.

path: 0 11154404, hotness: undefined, score: 48, children: 7
MeatStiq 18 points 2 years ago

You're assuming this country won't be blown up before that time. I doubt any of us poors will live to see the day these assholes die. I've always wanted to watch trump have an aneurysm while at his Hitler esk rallies. Sadly that probably won't happen.

path: 0 11154404 11155228, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 1
LustyArgonianMana 4 points 2 years ago

We won't see it, but at least we will die with other people. They're going out just like those billionaires on the Titanic sub - alone in a hostile environment, scared, banking stupidly on their own hubris instead of science.

path: 0 11154404 11155228 11156137, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
LustyArgonianMana 15 points 2 years ago

The worst of our generation. Like the single worst person from Millennials by a long shot.

path: 0 11154404 11156118, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
kittyjynx 8 points 2 years ago

Hey, it is rude to shit in a urinal!

path: 0 11154404 11156178, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
AngryCommieKender 7 points 2 years ago

Thermite. Ensure that his body gets destroyed

path: 0 11154404 11154601, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
FlyingSquid 6 points 2 years ago

Don’t deny future generations an opportunity. Mummify him and stick the mummy in a pillory.

path: 0 11154404 11154601 11155163, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
SpaceNoodle 4 points 2 years ago

Seal the neck with fire

path: 0 11154404 11154601 11154968, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
FlyingSquid 35 points 2 years ago

That makes sense. It's hard to foment an insurrection or race massacre when most of your loyal soldiers don't use Truth Social.

path: 0 11152174, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 1
TachyonTele 10 points 2 years ago

Also, it doesn't make sense to give him tons of money ands then restrict him on your website at the same time too.

path: 0 11152174 11153181, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
2484345508 33 points 2 years ago
path: 0 11152147, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 0
cxg 28 points 2 years ago

A few days after trump threated to arrest zuck after the election? What a surprise

path: 0 11153810, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 0
Socsa 23 points 2 years ago

I'm sure this time he will respect the rules.

path: 0 11156895, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
solsangraal 20 points 2 years ago
path: 0 11152581, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 5
jlh 5 points 2 years ago

there are still undecided voters and/or unmotivated voters.

path: 0 11152581 11153871, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
solsangraal 6 points 2 years ago
path: 0 11152581 11153871 11154028, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
jlh 2 points 2 years ago

Ok, but that's my point. The more campaigning those people hear from Trump, the more likely that they feel that they're right and they should go out for Trump. Also, I think there are people who are undecided nonetheless.

path: 0 11152581 11153871 11154028 11157966, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ThinkBeforeYouPost 5 points 2 years ago

Which allows him to mobilize and weaponize their idiocy. ¡No bueno muchachos!

path: 0 11152581 11153480, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ralphio 3 points 2 years ago

Yep his poll numbers went up after he was originally banned. Could be a coincidence, but it does make sense.

path: 0 11152581 11156064, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Emerald 18 points 2 years ago

Oh wow what terrible timing

path: 0 11161302, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
Neato 15 points 2 years ago

Gotta let a traitor be traitorous because the country might decide we want to overthrow the country again...

path: 0 11152300, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
Atelopus-zeteki 8 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure 'the country' decided against overthrowing 'the country'. The Minority Against Governing in America was largely rebuffed. Though I'm deeply concerned that they have not stopped planning their insurrection, and will try again.

"3 years later, Jan. 6 by the numbers: More than 1,200 charged, more than 460 imprisoned for role in Capitol attack" https://abcnews.go.com/...

path: 0 11152300 11152965, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
EldritchFeminity 3 points 2 years ago

It took the Nazis two tries as well.

path: 0 11152300 11152965 11156916, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
p5yk0t1km1r4ge 7 points 2 years ago

And this is why I'm glad I quit using this shit website three years ago.

path: 0 11155140, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
fox2263 6 points 2 years ago

Why now? Idiots.

path: 0 11154758, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
mhague 6 points 2 years ago

“All I can say is that if I’m elected President, we will pursue Election Fraudsters at levels never seen before, and they will be sent to prison for long periods of time,” Trump wrote. “We already know who you are. DON’T DO IT! ZUCKERBUCKS, be careful!”

At the very least, even if Zuck isn't the best example, it's worth considering that the further conservatives descend into fascism, the more we'll see people take the easier option of not resisting.

path: 0 11154758 11156305, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
fox2263 2 points 2 years ago

The amount of projection is incredible.

path: 0 11154758 11156305 11156873, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
mhague 0 points 2 years ago
path: 0 11154758 11156305 11156873 11539306, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
otp 6 points 2 years ago

$$$

path: 0 11154758 11154844, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
xc2215x 4 points 2 years ago

Not the best decision.

path: 0 11153163, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
pivot_root 3 points 2 years ago

Sure it is--for profits. If Trump gets reelected, all those pesky government regulations about the environment and securities will be thrown out window.

path: 0 11153163 11156881, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
cygnus -41 points 2 years ago

Meta said it had a responsibility to allow political expression and that Americans should be able to hear from presidential nominees on an equal basis.

I hate to say it, but they're right. They can't silence one of the two candidates for the presidency.

path: 0 11152166, hotness: undefined, score: -41, children: 22
Neato 55 points 2 years ago

Yes they can. They are a private corporate and can do whatever they want as long as it doesn't target a protected class, and it doesn't.

And in particular, they didn't silence him because of politics, but because he was conspiring with insurrectionists. Active treason. Stochastic terrorism.

path: 0 11152166 11152343, hotness: undefined, score: 55, children: 16
cygnus -20 points 2 years ago

And in particular, they didn’t silence him because of politics, but because he was conspiring with insurrectionists. Active treason. Stochastic terrorism.

Has he been convicted of that? We can all wring our hands as much as we want, and god knows I'm not a Trump supporter, but Facebook are not going to embroil themselves into a legal battle over this.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11153108, hotness: undefined, score: -20, children: 11
catloaf 17 points 2 years ago

Facebook does not have nearly as high a burden of proof as a court of law.

Facebook most likely has a far larger budget for their legal team, too. I don't think they'd be worried about a lawsuit.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11153108 11153370, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
TachyonTele 8 points 2 years ago

They've convicted a hell of a lot of other people for it so far.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11153108 11153218, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 6
cygnus -15 points 2 years ago

So Facebook is supposed to block the GOP presidential nominee because other people were charged of a crime and he was not? We'd all like that, but come on.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11153108 11153218 11153276, hotness: undefined, score: -15, children: 5
FlyingSquid 5 points 2 years ago

He’s been convicted in the court of public opinion. Facebook doesn’t need to wait for a court to bar him from their platform.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11153108 11155183, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
cygnus -4 points 2 years ago

They don't, but it's much easier for them this way. It's mind-boggling that so many in this thread want Facebook to go way out on a limb here and are shocked when the multi-billion dollar company takes the much easier, safer way out. Stop expecting tech megacorps to decide the presidential race for you, people. You may think you want that now, but it's a VERY bad precedent.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11153108 11155183 11155290, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent -26 points 2 years ago

The problem is that it fundamentally makes them a political org to choose one side over the other. There are very strong arguments that insisting on "no political discussion" is an inherently conservative stance, but by allowing one candidate to speak but the other to not they are implicitly supporting the former.

And the US Government has made it clear that they don't consider a violent insurrection to be treason. So why should facebook go to bat and make themselves an even bigger target come January?

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11152501, hotness: undefined, score: -26, children: 3
Neato 24 points 2 years ago

The problem is that it fundamentally makes them a political org to choose one side over the other.

And the US Government has made it clear that they don’t consider a violent insurrection to be treason.

No they didn't. They prosecuted a LOT of people for that.

So why should facebook go to bat and make themselves an even bigger target come January?

That's the reason. Fuck Facebook's own rules, they are trying to mitigate an attack by a fascist dictator.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11152501 11152644, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 1
NuXCOM_90Percent -6 points 2 years ago

No they didn’t. They prosecuted a LOT of people for that.

And we just had a supreme court ruling that gives the ringleader immunity for anything he will ever do because he was POTUS for four years.

Individual users? Yeah, ban them because the law applies to them. Orange shitstain? There is no legal ground for him having commit treason so it is purely a decision by the moderation staff of a company who don't want to get navy seals knocking on the door come January.

That’s the reason. Fuck Facebook’s own rules, they are trying to mitigate an attack by a fascist dictator.

Yes. I said that was the reason. Glad we are in agreement.

And considering the American People would rather bicker over whether Biden is old than "holy fuck the nazis have a publicly available plan for how they are going to destroy the country"... when The People clearly won't have your back, why fight on their behalf?

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11152501 11152644 11152788, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 0
Viking_Hippie 1 point 2 years ago

The problem is that it fundamentally makes them a political org to choose one side over the other

Yes. They have once again sided against their own rules and the law in favor of unlimited disinformation and calls for violence.

NOT because they're taking a stand against unfair censorship. The real reason is that his stochastic terrorism breeds TONS of engagement and thus advertising income and marketable data.

but by allowing one candidate to speak but the other to not they are implicitly supporting the former.

That would have been true if either both or neither had exhibited a pattern of blatant contempt for the rules of the platform. Since only one did that, it's preferential treatment to NOT kick him off permanently.

And the US Government has made it clear that they don't consider a violent insurrection to be treason

Prosecutors sacrifying full justice and accuracy in exchange for an easier path to conviction isn't the US government making anything clear.

So why should facebook go to bat and make themselves an even bigger target come January?

Because aiding and abetting a fascist uprising by voiding the rules that everyone else has to abide by isn't an admirable or even acceptable thing to do.

path: 0 11152166 11152343 11152501 11156171, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
takeda 27 points 2 years ago

I would say that staging a coup definitively breaks the TOS.

path: 0 11152166 11152207, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 0
DessertStorms 13 points 2 years ago

Imagine piping up to defend the non-existent "right" of a self declared fascist to spew his lies. 🤯

Careful not to choke on that boot...

path: 0 11152166 11153033, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
cygnus -9 points 2 years ago

The fact you think I support Trump or Facebook tells me all I need to know about the quality of the discourse in this thread. No wonder the left can't get anything done in your shithole of a country.

path: 0 11152166 11153033 11154265, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 1
pivot_root 2 points 2 years ago

Whether you like it or not, Canada is heavily dependent on said shithole of a country. You're similarly as fucked as the rest of us if Trump wins and decides to stop protecting Canada or importing their natural resources in favor of domestic production.

path: 0 11152166 11153033 11154265 11156939, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TrickDacy -1 points 2 years ago
path: 0 11152166 11154071, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
news
news

@lemmy.world

login for more options
39627
40399
9561

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.

Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.

If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.

All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

go to feed...