Gladly I will, I should delete this post...
Gladly I will, I should delete this post...
No, I'm not.
Oh ogey...
However, you spout hateful, phobic, misogynistic, ableist rhetoric since the 2016 campaign?
2016? Motherfucker has been spouting hate as far back as we are willing to judge people for spouting hate.
Fine, I guess the chicken came to roost π
No, this is Patrick.
Lol oh honey
Yes, but unironically
Genuinely, if Trump is a genuine risk to democracy and risks increasing support to Israel, why must he be defeated in a vote? Like, if he becomes Hitler 2 and erases democracy and ups the genocide, is that okay with you because he won the vote?
No. We may all be Americans, but MAGA is an alt-right hateful term, and I will never align myself with that.
We can align as Americans and condemn violence, but that means condemning all violence.
/ seriously Well, have ye heard of the term "chickens coming home to roost"? I think that's what Trump had coming for him, I guess...
Yes the right response...
Wdym... civility demands this, so?
π πππππππππππππππππππ
That's something....
Why condemn it? Violence is an unfortunate tool, but a tool nontheless, and abandoning it when oppressors use it without care just means you aren't taking things seriously. Hitler should have been assassinated.
By weighing all violence as immoral you are not ruling it out completely. You make it a last-resort, where you avoid one great injustice with a lesser injustice - a lesser injustice which you still face consequences for.
The alternative is morally sanctifying some murders, which leads to 'morally justified' murders being done by all political sides (since they each view themselves as 'the moral ones'), and which eventually gets twisted into the party in power murdering their opponents with impunity because it's 'morally justified'.
Moralism itself is just a tool to justify the status quo. Nothing is inherently good by maintaining "civility," especially if violence is the status quo.
Shooting Nazis is good. Shooting Gazans is bad. Violence is a tool, but not always the correct one, nor is it never correct.
I think that is a misreading of why moral codes come into being, and I am not trying to preach moralism.
Moral codes are not universal truths, but instead rules of engagement for maintaining order within a system, and they exist within every social scope, though their level of detail tends to decay as the scope becomes more interpersonal. They're not really a tool of the state, but instead just a human tool. The state just codifies its own and disseminates it into the social collectives it rules.
My statement above is a moral observation about political morality within the US, and which I view is generally a useful rule within any democratic political system (I am referring to systems which have a structure and voting system associated with democratic processes, not necessarily ideal or actual democracies).
I am also not saying that this moral code is necessarily good for us or the system itself at any given moment, but stating why this moral code exists in the first place, and why anyone who is apart of our system and wants that system to survive (whether that be for avoiding personal turmoil or political ideology) will continue to condemn assassination attempts from any side.
You don't have to be a MAGA worshiper to be a decent human being that doesn't want someone to be killed by a random person, because of their beliefs or talking points. That being said... I want to hear that Trump died in a federal prison of natural causes.
Amen...
So you think Hitler didn't deserve to die? That all the Nazi officers america brought here and gave government positions were deserving.
Godwin
Godwin thinks Trump Hitler comparisons are totally fair because Trump is a fascist looking to install a fascist regime in America. It's a good read.
That's cool, thank you for sending that!
Regardless of what causes it or where he happens to be when it happens, I'm looking forward to his funeral.
Nah, violence is a tool, and if someone poses a genuine threat to democracy and can up the genocide, it's understandable that people would try to stop them. If they get democratically elected and then commit a bunch of genocide, them getting popped is a consequence.
Iβve seen the author on political shows in the UK. Sheβs the worst kind of right wing hack and her opinions are worthless.
Oh you've noticed, nice!
I will treat this with all the solemnity that Trump would if it was one of his political opponents
Indeed...
Gross. Absolutely gross.
NGL, don't disagree

Lmao, indeed!
I'm not MAGA, but anyone that supports assasination as a tool of politics is a traitor to the constitution and a terrorist against the people and should be dealt with accordingly
It wouldn't have mattered if you kill Hitler. Someone else would have risen up and taken power, eventually kicking off WW2. The conditions in early 1930s Germany were too ripe not to have a demagogue take total power there. If you wanted to prevent those events from happening, you prevent the great depression, not kill some leader of a nation
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
I would like to put it on the record that I'm 100% not MAGA. Not today. Not ever. Also, go fuck yourself.
save