This.
I can handle DDMMYY[YY] it reads correctly. But YYYYMMDD is numerically correct, most signifcant to least significant digitwise.
That thing only American's do, is completely non-sensical.
This.
I can handle DDMMYY[YY] it reads correctly. But YYYYMMDD is numerically correct, most signifcant to least significant digitwise.
That thing only American's do, is completely non-sensical.
For sorting or filing, I agree. I think in day to day life, though, Day and month are way more significant. So I actually prefer DDMMYYYY for that.
DDMMYYYY would be great, if it weren't for 95% of Americans that use MMDDYYYY. Is 07/02/2000 July 2nd or Feb 7th?
Thus the only solution is to write out the month or start with the year, because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM. Plus by using YYYYMMDD you get the added benefit of the dates all being sortable using dumber applications.
because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM
You are saying it like if MMDDYYYY made any sense. To someone who uses MMDDYYYY daily, they could think of YYYYMMDD as "Its like the usual but backwards" and now you have a group of people reading it as YYYYDDMM.
Makes sense, I just mostly interact with Europeans, so I don't encounter this problem a lot. I really don't have a problem with YYYYMMDD though anyway.
I still prefer yyyymmdd for day to day. If year is irrelevant just skip it. If you only use a date format you get used to it and it becomes the most efficient one due to consistency. Sidenote, in my language the default date format is actually yyyymmdd.
Dd MMM YYYY
And in a lot of countries they just say 20 May, 2024. So no ordinal numbers for the day.
Except when we don't, like 4th of July...
In a, "Alright I guess that technically works and at least can follow the logic". It's pretty damn niche, however (who is going to ask for two or more years in advanced for a date and not go, "Just text/email it"? Heck, even this is pushing it, but I can at least follow the logic)
Could be that I'm slightly fucking up definitions in my head, it was a long day yesterday
I expected to see this when I looked at the comments, and you didn't disappoint me!
That one for file sorting, the one in the pic for everything else.
Beautiful
It's the only one that makes any logical sense!
/c/iso8601 assemble !
This person sorts
YYYY-MM-DD
Hungarians feeling superior with their YYYY.MM.DD fornat.
Although that's not ideal for URLs
For history, sure, but for day to day stuff I think I can remember what year it is and don't need it right at the front lol
I use this for notes, and generally everything written; mainly for reference when looking back on old information. Today, whether I say Wednesday the 9th, or 2023-08-09, it's fairly inconsequential, but in 2-3 years if I have to reference a note, email or something else where I said today's date, I won't have to compare the date of the note to the calendar for that time period to see which 9th was on a Wednesday.
Everything you do now becomes history, so adapting to this format makes it easier when today becomes your history.
And programmers tend to go: "I don't need to comment my code, I know what it does" 😂
I comment my code, but know where I put it? At the end XD
Okay, hear me out.
With other numbers, non-date numbers, we put the numbers representing the most quantity to the left, and numbers representing the last quantity to the right, eg 1 hundred, ten and 1 would be 111, where the number representing 100 qty comes first from the left, and each position moving to the right, represents a smaller and smaller amount.
Since years are longer than months, which are longer than days, the YYYY-MM-DD format actually follows the same convention that we commonly use for all other numbering systems, big on the left, small on the right.
So why would the date be the exception?
No more comments necessary in this thread.
What about YYYY/MM/DD?
Yeah, that's the one you use for filenames. Backup images and the likes.
Now that I think of it, this may actually be a pretty nice system to store files hierarchically by date.
Nobody puts Baby in a tertiary folder!
Not if you encode it using an exponent. One Planck time unit is roughly 1.8 x 10^-43^ seconds, so with an exponent of 2^128^ (roughly 3.4 x 10^38^) you could write a second as 54510 x 2^128^ TP
Stop right there criminal scum, you are not allow to publish original copyrighted works, you are stealing from the artist's mouth by squandering his market value !
So that's why normal people screenshot.
As usual, there's an xkcd for that. Along with a more detailed explanation.
I'd have to say April 25th because it's not too hot, not too cold. All you need is a light jacket.
to make things as not confusing as possible, my rule of thumb is:
But what about why 10k, the horrors
Some men just like to watch the world burn.
@675 is the best!
Wow, TIL. Whenever I'm down on my life's accomplishments, I'll just remember that this tried to happen.
One might ponder: is it better to be forgotten or be forever remembered for attempting something silly?
To eliminate this confusion I propose the days of the month should start from 13.
yall trippin, it should be MMYYDD
https://xkcd.com/1179/
1691579826
next gen American:
In Sweden we tend to use iso, except sometimes on "Best before" dates. It's always fun trying to figure out if your food is going bad by, for instance, the 10th of August or the 8th of October...
I don't like it, but at least the numbers are ordered by specificity. MM/DD/YYYY is a big red flag.
mmm?
Covid year was about 120 months long instead of 12 so yea
Jan,Feb,Mar etc.
It's the standatized way to write the months in three letters. So Jan, Feb etc...
Going day to day, dd/mm/yyyy works, but for archival purposes and looking up stuff in the past, mm/dd/yyyy works better, imo. Like when you need to go through a physical file cabinet, or an electronic database.
Or you're the type of person who's zoned out all the time and don't even know what month it is until you look at a clock or calendar.
@lemmy.ml
go to feed...
@lemmy.ml
go to feed...
ISO 8601 or bust.
save