Then let me rephrase it, because I forgot it's the internet and people will try to misunderstand me.

As a member of a non-specified group X, I would hate it if people would precondemn me based on thing Y, which a part of group X does more than the average population.

I could have picked any other stereotype, I just happen to be not a woman, and of the majority ethnicity in my country. Blame my parents.

However, based on this hypothetical, yet relatable thought experiment, saying that a group does a bad thing because some people who happen to be in that group do that bad thing more often than other people is at the very least rude.

I mean, I get it's inappropriate to be like "what about men". It's pretty clear they are talking about blanket judging straight women for Perry's actions. "Not ALL straight women" - ya see?

In my experience though, they lean towards harassing gay men over queer women. 😅

frfr it's crazy, nobody said anything about men but he still had to drop in a "not all men" anyway. these fuckin' "people"

Rule of thumb, if someone critiques an identity that you are a part of and the critique doesnt apply to you then its probably not about you.

Try telling that to victims of racism, homophobia, transphobia, and other forms of bigotry. It’s not a particularly sound piece of advice.

drunk straight women love to SA queer women

That is a very general statement. I really dislike like such blanket statements. Because what is the difference between that and statements like “black people are dumb”, “Mexicans are drug dealers”, or, yes, “straight men are rapists”?

if someone critiques an identity that you are a part of and the critique doesnt apply to you then its probably not about you

If someone critiques a whole identity, they should either make sure that it applies to all or at least the overwhelming majority of that identity, or be prepared to be called a bigot and prejudiced.

To be extremely clear, because I know this is the internet, nuance is dead, and everything has to be black and white and packed for a 10s attention span:

You should critique people. You should point out toxic and hostile behaviour and oppressive social norms. You should, in my humble opinion, never fall into the trap of going from "gay people are bad" to "straight people are bad".

The opposite of a restrictive society that enforces a one-size-fits-all norm (like heterosexuality, or being of $majorityEthnicity) is not an inverse stereotype, it is a free society where people are judged on their actions, not the properties they were born with.

Rose tweets: "Purposeful poop" to "bomb a petit" to a sloppy mess of writing over the top of Funkagenda..stop trying to make 'Wit..I mean "fetch" happen."

This references Perry's mission statement to make 'purposeful pop', puns on her song 'Bon Appetit', and claims 'Swish Swish' samples dance act Funkagenda. 'Wit' is a reference to Perry's album Witness, with 'fetch', of course, being a Mean Girls reference.

Even though they translated my brain still imploded. wat.

Oh... I thought they were calling each other fashion and was so comfused!

What, what's a fascist? Is that looks fisting or something violet keeps posing about?

Why branch out when everybody else can join in?