Why not both? I just found the meme in the wild
Why not both? I just found the meme in the wild
This is usually how users that use the 'tankie' as a pejorative out themselves as anti-leftist or just plain uninformed. There's already a term for those who support that kind of fascistic rhetoric: Nazbols.
Either they don't know the term, or they do and choose not to. The former owns up quick, the latter digs in and keeps on a grudge about it.
No surprises here.
What I mean is the way tankie is used as a pejorative isn't really about defining a tangible political group so much as saddling socialists with answering for, or plain being, nazbols.

campism is bullshit
All tankies are campists, but not all campists are tankies. There is a distinction.
Intolerance as in authoritarianism is bullshit.

This is good actually, I like it when people can have full lives.
Yeah, not a tankie but the PRC and the USSR were huge in lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty and generally creating stability in parts of the world that effectively still practiced feudalism.
Doesn't make them anti-imperial or excuse their more disastrous/evil decisions either.
I suppose he also caused all of these https://en.wikipedia.org/...
And of course he personally caused flooding and storms that damaged crops, and was the only person in china who thought that the three pests were pests. Also he is of course personally responsible for the material conditions which lead to the warlords era and the revolution, people were having a great time prior and the alternative to the cultural revolution and great leap forward would of course have been a rapid and successful industrialisation of agriculture with no hiccups.
Famine in China was a reality until the revolution, yes mistakes were made. They were made by an entire government. Yes Mao had some bad ideas, but they were desperately trying to recover from a century of exploitation, war, corruption, neglect, and civil war.
All with little aid, and almost no industrial equipment.
No not really. Republic of korea looks similar, and they did come off the back of a brutual occupation. Japan is much smoother and starts higher. They lack the ludicrous increases caused by domestic policy.
Also all three of those places got huge amounts of USA money from when the usa had half the money in the world. China did not get industrialised by foreign aid, the government did it.
The usa rebuilding japan, korea, amd taiwan was largely in response to China and the USSR btw. So indirectly the revolutions helped them too lol.
Lemmy.world users love their COINTELPRO posting.
You got absolutely cooked last time you tried using anti-communist talking points to try and dunk on "tankies". You have no arguments, just bad faith trolling.
Thanks for the heads-up. Blocked 'em. š¤š¼
No democratic socialists don't beilieve in anti-imperialism so we should not work with them and "tankie" is a meanigless buzzword.
your definition of imperialism is wrong if you're simping for putin and xi and think you're anti imperialist
I don't I dislike both strongly stop accusing of things im not doing.
Heh. "Fourth". š
AOC IS THE BESTš« When you say support, like what do you even mean? What is this tankie thing....? I feel like you are a fed on the feddi or straight poppin out turds. You ain't got a pot to piss in and no levers... You in the binary, the good and the bad ignoring the hierarchy. In a world like this including the imperial core you don't rise to the top by doing what your peoples want. If it appears that you do... it is the corpos managing perception. I like tankies... I don't know what your issue is. As it stands in the USA there is no real left... You people are losing creating loser memes. Pro war liberals larping as leftist blind to the pieces on the chess board... like poodles begging for treats. Ratios and proportions my dear children... Ratios and proportions. The game changes but really nothing new under the sun. Different day same shit.
You are all getting curbed stomped.
Even just the wording reveals the idealism: "I believe in"... No one gives a fuck what you believe in. Marx never said "we must believe in these things". And this jumble of concepts contains elements that are in completely different categories. The recognition of revolutionary potential in the proletariat and the use of labor unions to express power is an empirical analysis, not a belief system. The recognition of human rights is either moral objectivism (which is a form of idealism and decidedly anti-Marxist) or it's a super structural tool and/or propaganda tool.
Leftism isn't virtue signalling.
Many leftists in position of privilege should reevaluate the discrepancy between their idealism and their lack of support for material changes to the present material reality. Sure, it is easy to be part of the global north and believe in their own "freedom" (mostly the absence of violence afflicted to their socioeconomic class), while at the same time being part of exploiting and bombing the global south.
If we are going to be idealists, ask this: How many lives are lost every day due to the free exploitation of labour? How many people starve in a world of plenty or are outright killed in conflict over ownership of resources? Opposing material change is the idealist condoning murder of the innocent proletariat due to the aesthetics of action looking bad. This is the liberal perceived moral high ground.
I believe humans need society to exist and I believe humans should continue existing and thus I believe I should work towards sustaining human society. I have come to the belief that Marxism is the best analytical toolset for proceeding through the process of cultivating that sustainable human society from where we are today.
How can class consciousness develop at all without collective beliefs being forged and tested dialectically within the material world? workers organize around demands like freedom, democracy, and labor unions using them as stepping stones to human emancipation.
Leftism isnāt virtue signalling.
So the characteristic tankie prediliction for personality cults isn't virtue signalling? TIL.
Correct. It's not a tankie predilection, it's a human predilection. It is used by humans to influence other humans throughout history in widely varying contexts.
Your comment is an example of virtue signalling in that you are signalling that you don't participate in that "bad thing" called "personality cults" because you are "a good person".
itās a human predilection.
No it isn't. The amount of people who voluntarily engage in personality cult worship is vastly outnumbered by those who do not. If it was a "human prediliction" - as you claim it to be - regime elites that rely on personality cults to maintain their power and privilege (which includes a whole bunch of ones tankies simp for) wouldn't have to spend so much treasure and energy enforcing personality cults on all and sundry, would they now?
Just because 2 + 2 equals 4 doesn't mean 4 is the answer to everything.
Your comment is an example of virtue signalling
If virtue signalling is the thing that makes me immune to personality cults I'll be sure to keep on practising it. After all... it seems to have worked so far.
So deification of leaders, divine mandates, royal ceremonies. Entire accents developed through cults of personality. Monuments that have stood for millennia were part of cults of personality. It's found in the history of every continent, of nearly all people's, stretching back millennia.
It's not only limited to the people named by Living Colour.
No, no, see, its called a different thing.
I don't understand your reply. I'm non anglophone and online translation didn't help
The image you posted indicates that "true leftists" are different from tankies because true leftists "believe in" a bunch of concepts that are socially constructed as "good things to believe in"
Yeah who cares about what you want or how you think the world works/should work. The real test is who your friends are.
Yeah totally, its just a sports team. That's why you shouldn't believe in stuff. Believing in stuff is counterrevolutionary. Wanting stuff is counterrevolutionary.
So in a Marxist world nobody has any rights.
And we wonder why people recoil from it.
There is only one world, we think anyway. In the Marxist view of the world, Rights are human-invented construct that serve a function. If the only world you want to live in is one where Rights are an objective reality that inhere to entities by some magic, I don't know what to tell you
Iād like to live in a world where I canāt be hauled away for saying āfuck Stalin.ā
On .ml? Good luck.
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
I think this flag would be more appropriate here because its used by nazbols
Edit: Looks like I might have angered some nazbols
save