CEO who drew ire for posting photo of ‘Lake America’ sweatshirts ‘no longer an employee’

20 days ago by imvii to c/LeopardsAteMyFace

A Michigan CEO who drew backlash last week for posting an AI photo of her and her family in sweatshirts that read “Lake America” is no longer employed by her credit union.
aramis87 58 points 20 days ago

I like how they acknowledge that the CEO is an employee, and not the infallible, unfireable dirty they like to think they are.

path: 0 26014271, hotness: undefined, score: 58, children: 0
danc4498 47 points 20 days ago

We can just… fire… CEOs?

path: 0 26014174, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 4
ramble81 33 points 20 days ago

Yup. If you have a Board of Directors, the CEO reports to them. And usually on a BoD you can remove other members via a majority vote. Technically, no one is safe.

Now where they can get away with it is if it’s a private company and they’re the owner. In that case, the buck stops with them.

path: 0 26014174 26014380, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 1
halcyoncmdr 14 points 20 days ago

It's also why public companies like Tesla will stack the Board with friends, family, and sycophants.

Not likely to go against the CEO even when it's obvious they should be removed.

path: 0 26014174 26014380 26019556, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
Zwiebel 16 points 20 days ago

CEO is just the top manager, not necesarily the owner of the company.

path: 0 26014174 26014763, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
TacoButtPlug 8 points 20 days ago

They kill them in China for doing dumb shit with the public's money.

path: 0 26014174 26018739, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
panda_abyss 25 points 20 days ago

Good.

I can’t imagine having someone with so little moral or practical foresight being my CEO.

Utterly pathetic.

path: 0 26013832, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 1
crank0271 39 points 20 days ago

someone with so little moral or practical foresight

Um... how many CEOs have you met? It's practically the job description.

path: 0 26013832 26014061, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 0
Bubbaonthebeach 11 points 20 days ago

Unlike an employee she probably got a reasonable buy out.

path: 0 26016989, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
gravitas_deficiency 11 points 20 days ago

Lmaooo this is incredible

path: 0 26015080, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Washedupcynic -18 points 20 days ago
path: 0 26013893, hotness: undefined, score: -18, children: 9
fonix232 32 points 20 days ago

I'm sorry but nowhere in the free speech rights does it say that your employee has to abide by it. It's a right that protects speech from the government, not from your employer or from anyone else.

In fact, pretty much EVERY single company's employment contracts will include a vague "you can't bring bad press to the company" clause, which covers social media posts etc.

If the company disagrees with your politics, then yes, they can fire you for it.

path: 0 26013893 26014334, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 1
hraegsvelmir 2 points 20 days ago

If the company disagrees with your politics

To an extent, yeah. If you're on Facebook or LinkedIn and posting holocaust denial or arguing that desegregation was a mistake, even if they are your sincerely held beliefs, a company would probably be safe firing you for bringing the company into disrepute with your posts. Unless it's something universally reviled or calls to violence, just posting "I voted for Candidate and you should too" would likely be considered an unjust termination if it just came down to your boss being a hardcore supporter of your preferred candidate's opponent. YMMV with this in the future, though. Of course, if your boss is not a total idiot, they could currently just fire you for your political views and dress it up with any reason, or even not give any cause at all, and most states would be fine with it since they have at will employment laws.

path: 0 26013893 26014334 26018202, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
grue 22 points 20 days ago

First of all, let's not pretend being pro-fascist is equivalent to being anti-fascist because it really fucking isn't.

Second, the CEO is the public face of the company in a way that a rank-and-file employee is not. It is entirely appropriate for a CEO to get the boot for behavior that damages public perception of the entire brand.

path: 0 26013893 26015770, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
bizarroland 8 points 20 days ago

Exactly. If you say something that I find politically distasteful, I'm not going to associate you with the company that you work for.

I'm going to think you are an asshole.

If a CEO says something, they are getting paid stupid money, absolutely gobsmackingly stupid money, to be the face of the company. Many CEOs make in a year what I would consider to be "retirement for the rest of my good life" money.

I'm going to associate anything they do with the company that they represent.

path: 0 26013893 26015770 26017760, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
workerONE 9 points 20 days ago

It's not like they were on vacation at Lake Ontario and just bought sweatshirts at the shop and took a photo. They were in Canada, 800 miles from the lake. They were wearing them as an F.U to Canada and to get some laughs about Trump's trolling.

Edit: they were still in the US and used AI for the shirts

path: 0 26013893 26014342, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 3
imvii 10 points 20 days ago

The shirts aren't even real. The picture was taken in the US airport, the CEO passed off to AI with a prompt of something like "put these 4 people in Lake America shirts" and posted results to her facebook. They weren't even brave enough to buy and wear real shirts, but they fronted to social media they were.

path: 0 26013893 26014342 26016344, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
daychilde 3 points 20 days ago

They were wearing them

Guess you didn't read the article.

path: 0 26013893 26014342 26016308, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
workerONE 1 point 20 days ago

Skimmed through it, looked up their location relative to Lake Ontario. Missed some details, like that it was AI and they weren't in Halifax yet. Still, my point was that it's not an innocent photo.

path: 0 26013893 26014342 26016308 26017035, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
PunnyName 8 points 20 days ago

Yeah, no, this ain't remotely the same. Getting fired* from your job isn't like getting arrested and charged.

path: 0 26013893 26015510, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
login for more options
947
135
775

'I never thought leopards would eat MY face,' sobs woman who voted for the Leopards Eating People's Faces Party.

go to feed...