eat the rich

3 years ago by ThunderChunk to c/memes

It's a meme

outer_spec 43 points 3 years ago

That’s it? That’s the meme? That’s just a piece of toast with the words “The workers should seize the means of production” written on in it.

path: 0 4866903, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 19
Rambi 6 points 3 years ago

That's not toast? It's bread.

path: 0 4866903 4893587, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 17
helpImTrappedOnline 2 points 3 years ago

That's undercooked toast

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4944562, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Rambi 1 point 3 years ago

I feel very sure that there's no way it's any kind of toast. I will never concede this argument

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4944562 4948055, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
helpImTrappedOnline 3 points 3 years ago

Raw toast?

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4944562 4948055 4955068, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Kusimulkku 2 points 3 years ago

What sort of bread is it?

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4906717, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 12
Schnabeltierpoet 2 points 3 years ago

"Wheat" I assume

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4906717 4911691, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 7
Kusimulkku 2 points 3 years ago

What sort of wheat bread?

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4906717 4911691 4911785, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 6
marito 1 point 3 years ago

Sliced.

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4906717 4911679, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
Kusimulkku 1 point 3 years ago

What sort of sliced bread?

path: 0 4866903 4893587 4906717 4911679 4911794, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Kusimulkku 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4866903 4893587 4906716, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
EmpathicVagrant 2 points 3 years ago

There’s a meme of a frog puppet drinking tea, and a meme of a pootoo, and a meme of some beans. It can be literally anything.

path: 0 4866903 4895903, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
moosetwin 29 points 3 years ago

yeah you call it a meme and put it on the meme community but I don't see a meme here

path: 0 4867237, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 3
SamXavia 1 point 3 years ago

Seems to be to serious for this community.

path: 0 4867237 4867650, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
unnecessarygoat 1 point 3 years ago

i think the meme is the lazily edited stock photo

path: 0 4867237 4868863, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Gabu -2 points 3 years ago

Nor will the rich be able to see anything after we bring out the guillotines

path: 0 4867237 4872010, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
blunderworld 16 points 3 years ago

How exactly? Other than excessive bloodshed, which - other than edgelord tankies - most people would neither want, nor have the stomach to pursue.

path: 0 4862109, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 23
Someonelol 22 points 3 years ago

Take the route California is taking and educate the kids about worker's rights. Teach them it's not okay to be exploited at the work place and encourage them to tell their parents about it. Civics classes should also be taught to learn how the government works and what people's rights are under the Constitution. Encourage people to unionize now that they know how the system works.

Once the basics have been taught, elect people who care about government reform for social policies by paying for them with higher corporate and personal wealth taxes. Reform the tax system the wealthy have been using to hide their money. All their money is tied up in stocks and they're living off of multimillion dollar loans? Fuck them, tax a big percentage of the loan. All these things can be done to indirectly seize the fruits of their production at least.

path: 0 4862109 4865060, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
ByteJunk 10 points 3 years ago

General strike (like the writers guild, except everyone) until the distribution of (a part of the) dividends to the workers is enshrined into law.

Sounds pretty doable to me.

path: 0 4862109 4865840, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
PunnyName 10 points 3 years ago

Start by talking about your wages. Most people won't even do that, for fear of reprisals. Even though it's protected federally.

Casually bringing up support for unions, and those on strike.

This is base level, and in many places, will take a long time to see movement.

path: 0 4862109 4864361, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
oo1 8 points 3 years ago

i'd do some intellectual property reform.
some banking reform - more local / peer group/long term lending requirements, less fickle international finance. (and less fucking mortgage bubbles!)
some small business support / starter initiatives - link that in with how banks work.

i'd consider lobbying for some government sposored work to generate open source plans and enable production processes for useful tools - Okay that isn't going to happen , , ,

but it's not all or nothing, but you can do things to help some more workers control and access more of their tooling even if its not outright ownership of the end to end production process.

(By the way i'm basically arguing for a more "free" market in the ecnomic sense (easy access for a large number of small scale producers). . . which is exactly not what large-scale capitalists want.
They want a market "free" from any thing that might regulate their attempts to secure economic power and their abiity to use it to generate supernormal prices/profits.)

Progress doesnt happen in 4-5 year political cycles thats a hard one to improve without an electorate capable (any maybe secure enough) to thing about the longer term. Odd that it was extreme econmic and political uncertainty that brought out the likes of FDR and other post-war that people were most willing to think long term when it came to their governemnts - I guess it brought out all sorts of "crazies".

The big one in terms of bloodshed is land reform - and it has been done in a few places - sort of post-colonial type situations - but granted it does ususally have blooodshed. It's a personal judgment what degree is "excessive bloodshed".

path: 0 4862109 4866000, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
spookedbyroaches -2 points 3 years ago

What does bank reform mean? Banks already give loans to small bussinesses.

You can start a company that does what you want them to do. You can create all the innovative processes you want and open source them in the existing system.

path: 0 4862109 4866000 4887377, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
LavaPlanet 4 points 3 years ago

The women of Iceland went on strike in 1975, they stopped doing literally everything, walked out of the home, left the kids, to demonstrate how much the system would crumble without them, how important they are to everything being able to function, and ask for equal pay. They flipped everything overnight.

The current system is all the workers do all the work, and the profits from that work go almost entirely to some douvhe who won birth lotto. The system is already rigged. Unrigging the system would look like walking off the job, but globally. It's going to happen. Society is squeezed too tightly, there's going to be havoc.

path: 0 4862109 4892463, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
AllonzeeLV 2 points 3 years ago

Agreed, lets just keep doing whatever the capitalists demand until their insatiable greed destroys them and us.

https://www.vice.com/...

It's not like it's gonna take that long. And if not climate change, the AI they don't fully understand but are trying to monetize. And if not AI, CRISPR derived vectors they don't fully understand but are trying to monetize, etc.

Lets just stay the course. It will all work out in the end, at least for the planet, and that's ultimately what matters.

path: 0 4862109 4862666, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 7
TheBeege 13 points 3 years ago

I understand the bitterness, but whoever said the commenter wanted to do what capitalists demand? They just wanted to avoid bloodshed.

There are always options like general strikes, massive voting movements, etc. It's just a matter of figuring out what will work and how to do it.

If you're arguing that capitalists will respond with violence, that's fair, but then the blame is on them, not the workers

path: 0 4862109 4862666 4863230, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
Socsa 0 points 3 years ago

These people don't actually care about statecraft or political science. It's all about fan service for them.

path: 0 4862109 4862666 4863230 4867376, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
AllonzeeLV 1 point 3 years ago

The severe, civilization scale consequences of the damage we have done, are presently doing, and will continue to do for private profit to our only habitat we all depemd on for survival from one moment to the next also doesn't care about statecraft or political science attempts to minimize/ignore/discredit it through self-serving rhetoric of those in political power attempting to maintain that power.

Sorry. No bullshitting our way out of this one like it's just another human on human genocide we can rebrand and massage the messaging of. The physics are determinate, and no amount our patented human extracted snake oil will change that.

Try to spin the greed vice, failing, and personality deficit as a positive like "rational self-interest" all day. Humanity sanctioning and even encouraging that darkest of impulses did this.

path: 0 4862109 4862666 4863230 4867376 4868020, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
blunderworld 4 points 3 years ago

That isn't what I said and I think you know it. Next time just say you don't know the answer either and save yourself the effort.

path: 0 4862109 4862666 4864046, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
AllonzeeLV -1 points 3 years ago

I know what humans are going to do by our track record. Kick the can until there is a physical obstruction preventing it.

We will talk the biggest of games claiming otherwise the whole time, though. Surely rhetoric will save the day this time!

path: 0 4862109 4862666 4864046 4864463, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
blunderworld 4 points 3 years ago

You seem to know a lot for a guy who hasn't been able to suggest any kind of realistic solution.

path: 0 4862109 4862666 4864046 4864463 4865539, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
masquenox -1 points 3 years ago

other than edgelord tankies

Maybe you shouldn't use terms if you don't understand them, liberal.

path: 0 4862109 4871603, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
IntrepidIceIgloo 0 points 3 years ago

Anyone who uses liberal as an insult is incredibly cringe in my book.

path: 0 4862109 4871603 4886699, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 4
masquenox 1 point 3 years ago

There's nothing cringier than right-wingers who pretend they aren't right-wingers... ie, liberals. For people who can be called leftist with a straight face, "liberal" is quite the insult.

Wanna see what MLK had to say about liberals?

path: 0 4862109 4871603 4886699 4890209, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
IntrepidIceIgloo 1 point 3 years ago

You lump us with fascists. "Scratch a liberal a fascist bleeds" has to be one of the most ridiculous things ever said. We're not your enemies! Democratic socialists are in the Democrat party in America. Social Liberals and Social Democrats have much more in common than Social Liberals and Conservatives. In Europe Liberals and moderate socialists form parliamentary coalitions

path: 0 4862109 4871603 4886699 4890209 4891073, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
OurToothbrush -2 points 3 years ago

THERE were two “Reigns of Terror,” if we would but remember it and consider it; the one wrought murder in hot passion, the other in heartless cold blood; the one lasted mere months, the other had lasted a thousand years; the one inflicted death upon ten thousand persons, the other upon a hundred millions; but our shudders are all for the “horrors” of the minor Terror, the momentary Terror, so to speak; whereas, what is the horror of swift death by the axe, compared with lifelong death from hunger, cold, insult, cruelty, and heart-break? What is swift death by lightning compared with death by slow fire at the stake? A city cemetery could contain the coffins filled by that brief Terror which we have all been so diligently taught to shiver at and mourn over; but all France could hardly contain the coffins filled by that older and real Terror—that unspeakably bitter and awful Terror which none of us has been taught to see in its vastness or pity as it deserves.

path: 0 4862109 4891704, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Socsa -3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4862109 4867300, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 1
lolcatnip 6 points 3 years ago

So they didn't eat the rich.

path: 0 4862109 4867300 4874480, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Daft_ish 11 points 3 years ago

This seems political

path: 0 4871170, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 2
Devouring 8 points 3 years ago

You're allowed to post political memes as long as the mods agree with your view.

path: 0 4871170 4880281, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Glytch 4 points 3 years ago

Seems economic to me.

path: 0 4871170 4880066, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
NakariLexfortaine 10 points 3 years ago

Look there, Zach, a message on the toast!

And in the coffee? Revolution.

path: 0 4860888, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
TheBeege 2 points 3 years ago

Not 100% sure why, but i love this. Thank you

path: 0 4860888 4863237, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
jack 8 points 3 years ago

What does that even mean? Give us some practical advice

path: 0 4881843, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 7
ElBarto 3 points 3 years ago

Make your own bread I guess.

path: 0 4881843 4901993, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
WhiskyTangoFoxtrot -14 points 3 years ago

It means they want to shit on anyone who suggests any mechanism for social change that might actually work instead of wanking about some glorious revolution that'll never happen. Just another way of maintaining the status quo while pretending to be a revolutionary.

path: 0 4881843 4886528, hotness: undefined, score: -14, children: 5
Crass_Spektakel -7 points 3 years ago path: 0 4881843 4886528 4887000, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 4
PipedLinkBot 1 point 3 years ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Zimbabwe

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

path: 0 4881843 4886528 4887000 4887015, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
LavaPlanet 1 point 3 years ago

Needs to be more like the women of Iceland in 1975

path: 0 4881843 4886528 4887000 4892270, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
wraithdrone 1 point 3 years ago

If at first you don't succeed, try, try, try, try, try, try, try again, and also blame everyone else that you had to kill your own people for the good of the whole....

path: 0 4881843 4886528 4887000 4906626, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Crass_Spektakel 0 points 3 years ago

Classic communist tactics, Tovarishch, and if it fails you just didn't believe hard enough...

path: 0 4881843 4886528 4887000 4906626 4906655, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Track_Shovel 6 points 3 years ago

I made a bunch of Dalle pics on this topic last night:

path: 0 4862536, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
RedditWanderer 5 points 3 years ago

If there was hope, it must lie in the proles, because only there, in those swarming disregarded masses, eighty-five percent of the population of Oceania, could the force to destroy the Party ever be generated. The Party could not be overthrown from within. Its enemies, if it had any enemies, had no way of coming together or even of identifying one another. Even if the legendary Brotherhood existed, as just possibly it might, it was inconceivable that its members could ever assemble in larger numbers than twos and threes. Rebellion meant a look in the eyes, an inflection of the voice; at the most, an occasional whispered word. But the proles, if only they could somehow become conscious of their own strength, would have no need to conspire. They need only to rise up and shake themselves like a horse shaking off flies. If they chose they could blow the Party to pieces tomorrow morning. Surely sooner or later it must occur to them to do it.

path: 0 4901624, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Seraph 2 points 3 years ago

Directly seizing I don't think would end well. I think it's one of the short comings of communism.

Encouraging employee owned companies is where it's at. But to be honest I'm not sure how you would incentivize that.

path: 0 4861775, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 8
TheBeege 5 points 3 years ago

You incentivize the same way unions are growing now. Just show people the benefits and constantly shout it from the highest mountain tops.

So bb, tell me more about those sweet, sweet employee-owned companies for other readers' benefit.

Tell me more about how employee owned companies are better at long term planning. Tell me more about how they're concerned about balancing profit for survival's sake with societal good. Tell me more about how they participate in the benefits of the free market via competition while not becoming all-consuming, profit-driven monsters. Tell me more about how they avoid stakeholder-chosen, sociopathic leadership in favor of leaders wanting the best for the company's mission and its employees. Tell me more about the coffee shop branch that was shut down by its company and reopened as an employee-owned cafe. Tell me more about AAA. Tell me sweet nothings, bb

(And yes, I'm explicitly not talking about communism because it's an emotionally charged concept, and i want to focus on things maybe people don't know so much about)

path: 0 4861775 4863376, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
jlou 2 points 3 years ago

A better case for worker cooperatives is just pointing out they satisfy the moral principle that legal and de facto responsibility should match. The workers are jointly de facto responsible for using up the inputs to produce the outputs, but in a capitalist firm, the employer holds sole legal responsibility for 100% the corresponding legal claim to the positive and negative result of the enterprise while employees receive 0%. In a worker coop, this mismatch is corrected

path: 0 4861775 4863376 4868006, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
masquenox 0 points 3 years ago

Encouraging employee owned companies is where it’s at.

What did you think "seize the means of production" meant?

But to be honest I’m not sure how you would incentivize that.

Oh, that's simple - you get rid of the police.

path: 0 4861775 4871681, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 5
jlou 2 points 3 years ago

Seize the means of production comes from a conceptually separate part of anti-capitalist critique then workers' control/workers' self-management. It is common to conflate these two strands of anti-capitalist thoughts. It is technically possible to have common ownership of the means of production without workers' self-management and workers' self-management without common ownership of the means of production. Universal worker coops only requires abolishing wage labor not private ownership

path: 0 4861775 4871681 4871827, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
masquenox 2 points 3 years ago

I don't think the person I was responding to is ready for this level of analysis, okay?

path: 0 4861775 4871681 4871827 4871944, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Seraph 2 points 3 years ago

Thanks for assuming I'm an idiot who doesn't know what I'm talking about. Pleasure to meet you too!

path: 0 4861775 4871681 4871827 4871944 4873228, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
jlou 2 points 3 years ago

Fair enough

path: 0 4861775 4871681 4871827 4871944 4871966, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Aux 2 points 3 years ago

You already have a mean of production in your hand. But the only thing you produce is stupid memes.

path: 0 4881641, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 12
interdimensionalmeme 2 points 3 years ago

Even if they did produce something, Jeff Bezos would steal it as soon as it started making a buck.

Seizing the means of production made sense when that was the leverage the owners used to strip the surplus value from you.

Today, they use gatekept platform and a captive audience with AI manipulation to insert themselves between you and the customers and strip you of your surplus value.

Now pay Bezos' 40% tax until Amazon basic is ready to outcompete out of the platform entirely. Welcome to the second page of Google !

path: 0 4881641 4892929, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
Aux 0 points 3 years ago

Lolwut? You're delusional, mate.

path: 0 4881641 4892929 4907677, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
OurToothbrush -3 points 3 years ago

I'm pretty sure phones are not all that is involved in commodity production.

path: 0 4881641 4936745, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 9
Aux 0 points 3 years ago

But they are. Because we live in a service economy and the only thing you produce are services. Phone is enough. Use it wisely.

path: 0 4881641 4936745 4939902, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 8
OurToothbrush -3 points 3 years ago

Yeah. Hold on, I'm just going to build a house, get access to fresh water, and produce food with my phone. After that I'm going to get vaccinated with my phone. And after that I'll make some clothes with my phone.

Go read the first few chapters of capital on means of production.

path: 0 4881641 4936745 4939902 4965100, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 7
Aux 0 points 3 years ago

Yeah, you can build a house with a phone. Your few chapters are a bit outdated, by about two centuries. The world has moved on.

path: 0 4881641 4936745 4939902 4965100 4992521, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 6
pewgar_seemsimandroid 1 point 3 years ago

NO they hug tree

path: 0 4966018, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TryNotBeingARetard 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 4892604, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
HowMany 1 point 3 years ago

They are bitter and stringy and taste of used currency - not at all worth eating, but for use as fertilizer.

path: 0 4911471, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Stuka -1 points 3 years ago

Time to stop blocking the people who post this stupid shit.

path: 0 4881739, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
LavaPlanet 3 points 3 years ago

Did you mean to say start?

path: 0 4881739 4892284, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Ragdoll_X -2 points 3 years ago

bread 👍

path: 0 4861650, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
AllonzeeLV -3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 4861807, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
Devouring -3 points 3 years ago

Genuinely speaking, do you really think Amazon will continue to operate if the "workers" took it over from the (evil) executives and owned all the power?

In my opinion, it'll fall apart in no time, because not a single decision will be made to progress work and to solve problems, and every problem will be a vote to people who don't understand the consequences and will prefer to serve their personal needs. Am I wrong?

path: 0 4880339, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 42
Dogyote 5 points 3 years ago

I think your worries are misplaced. I work for an employee owned cooperative with about 60 employees. I think half of the employees are also owners. There's still a CEO, chosen by the board of directors, who are elected by the employee-owners. Day to day operational decisions are made by whoever is in charge of the relevant department, just like a shareholder-owned corporation. Bigger decisions, like long term strategy or how to distribute profits among employees, are voted on by all of the employee owners instead of shareholders. It's been in business for about 20 years and makes enough money to share profits with all employees regardless of their ownership status. So essentially this business operates like any other, but the profits are shared with the employee-owners and employees instead of going to shareholders or insane CEO salaries (compressed pay structure).

path: 0 4880339 4892501, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
Devouring -4 points 3 years ago

This is exactly the problem with such discussion. We end up with anecdotes. Yeah, I gotta see that company's financial statements, their business model, and their growth, to decide whether this is a good thing. In fact, the idea that it makes "enough money" doesn't sound good good. This kind of "stability" (I'll call it) is either due to a niche field or a dying company that sooner or later will become irrelevant. It's not how the real world works.

And even with this model you proposed, someone eventually can put their foot down. Those employees can sell their shares if they want, and we're all the way back to the (evil) capitalist model you don't like.

path: 0 4880339 4892501 4892609, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 3
jlou 3 points 3 years ago

Worker coops are a good thing because unlike employer-employee-based firms they don't violate workers' inalienable rights. The justification is a principled ethical argument.

The workers' voting shares should be inalienable and attached to the functional role of working in the firm. The employer-employee contract would be abolished, so there would be no mechanism within the legal system for having a capitalist firm.

An inalienable right is one that the holder cannot give up even with consent

path: 0 4880339 4892501 4892609 4895057, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Devouring 1 point 3 years ago

Until everyone fights what "rights" are, which is kind of the problem everywhere. You have a picture of these rights, which are pink and rosy. I believe you have good intention. But you have to imagine an contentious environment where everyone will disagree with you to maximize their gain, and minimize their effort. Any system you put in place and anything you define as rights will be malleable and will be up for thousands of debates, and eventually you'll be the dictator for setting up a system that you think will work. Back to square one.

This is why I said it's opinion. I got my answer. You agree with firing people. Good enough for me for now. Others don't.

path: 0 4880339 4892501 4892609 4895057 4895232, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Dogyote 0 points 3 years ago

I really think you should stop arguing and start listening.

path: 0 4880339 4892501 4892609 4911392, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
jlou 4 points 3 years ago

It is a straw man that democracy means every problem is put to a vote. Workers can jointly decide to delegate decision-making to executives and managers. The difference in worker coops is that these executives and managers are ultimately democratically accountable to the people doing the work

path: 0 4880339 4891808, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 34
Devouring -2 points 3 years ago

So you're saying someone will want to act as an executive, but without getting the executive pay?

Why would anyone want to do that stressful job and responsibility, instead of just being a cog in the wheel and typing on a computer or moving boxes? Who decides who does what? And what happens if the managers disagree with half the "workers/owners" when a decision has to be made that benefits a part but hurts another? Who has the authority to put their foot down for the "greater good" even though half the workers don't like their decision?

path: 0 4880339 4891808 4892040, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 33
jlou 4 points 3 years ago

The executives can be paid more. In a system where all firms are worker coops, it would be a much more compressed difference between the least paid and most paid worker in a firm than the absurd pay differences we see today.

A manger in a worker coop has the same decision-making rights as in any company. The difference is that they are democratically accountable to the workers instead of being accountable to the employer, an alien legal party. Essentially, workers hold all voting shares

path: 0 4880339 4891808 4892040 4892315, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 27
Devouring -3 points 3 years ago

You said a bunch of nice things, but you ignored the core of the problem. If workers hold all voting shares, what happens when they're split on an issue? Who can tell them to STFU for the better of the company?

Another similar question: What if there's an issue that will lead to half of them getting fired? Like, say, a technological advancement? So if work can be optimized by 200% by adding computers, but then 50% of the people are useless then. Wouldn't the workers vote to stay employed/paid instead of saving the company that can be destroyed in a competitive market where better, faster companies can emerge if this company doesn't adopt the newer tech? Who will make that decision?

path: 0 4880339 4891808 4892040 4892315 4892421, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 26
Schadrach 2 points 3 years ago

This is all stuff you hash out when you create a co-op. But normally you create a co-op, you don't convert a giant multinational into one.

path: 0 4880339 4891808 4892040 4892277, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
jlou 1 point 3 years ago

Even giant multinationals have to be eventually converted to worker coops or federations of worker coops because the workers that work in these companies are having their inalienable rights violated as well

path: 0 4880339 4891808 4892040 4892277 4892359, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Devouring -1 points 3 years ago

I'm not sure I understand... are you saying that your plans don't work on giant corporations, so maybe you shouldn't propose things like OP did?

Well, according to the post, you want to seize the means of production and eat the rich. Sounds delicious! I would love to know whether you're just a bunch of guys having wet dreams or whether there's a framework where this can really work. Tell me how you're gonna seize Amazon and keep it running like it does now.

path: 0 4880339 4891808 4892040 4892277 4892348, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
interdimensionalmeme 0 points 3 years ago

That's every bureaucracy that ever existed.

path: 0 4880339 4892946, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
OurToothbrush -2 points 3 years ago

Do you think the shareholders are active in problem solving? Workers include basically everyone but the shareholders. The tech guys, the executives, the managers.

path: 0 4880339 4891651, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
porkins -4 points 3 years ago

I’ve debated people at length on this topic and have concluded that this is a half-baked idea that is impossible to implement without destroying society in any form that has been presented to date.

path: 0 4861795, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 39
irmoz 4 points 3 years ago

You can't call an idea with 200 years of history and hundreds of books on the subject "half-baked" without explaining what about it you think is unfeasible. Either you have never actually talked to a socialist, or you've simply never listened.

So, a few questions:

  1. Why is it "half-baked"?
    • What ideas does it propose?
    • What is wrong with those ideas?
  2. How is it "impossible to implement"?
    • What methods are proposed?
    • What prevents those methods from working?
  3. What do you mean by "destroy society"?
    • What exactly do you define as society?
    • How would socialism "destroy" that?
path: 0 4861795 4863346, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 26
porkins -1 points 3 years ago

The factory has owners. It would be unfair to not compensate them for their capital investment. You are describing a situation where you disallow private enterprise, but all systems describing this type of agreement to date have resulted in terrible outcomes. It will destroy competition. I am reminded of hearing about my brother’s visit to the Soviet Union when he was younger. He went with his group to an ice cream shop and asked what flavors they have and they said vanilla. As in, this limits options and provides a shitty quality of life. It also leads to issues where people who are able to provide a high value to society are not rewarded at a higher rate than a lazy or dumb person. The incentive is gone. These are issues that no text has reconciled. Even Plato’s dreamed Utopia, he knew that such a thing only would work if you brainwashed people generationally to value the idea of communal ownership. He basically left it at the leaders not being able to own things, but having all that they need while other classes under them could still own things. In essence, his utopian society was totally unrealistic in any meaningful timeline and still formed different classes of people.

It destroys society to take away people’s possessions because we built a system where property ownership is a central component. Having possessions is such a basic human construct that your are living in a pipe dream if you feel that you can remove that. The idea that people would share with one another and not get what they are worth to society is salient in describing why socialism as a whole crumbles. You can have socialized policies, but destroying the whole economic system doesn’t work. See my reply later in this thread for examples of real incremental changes.

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 25
masquenox 3 points 3 years ago

The factory has owners.

Fuck the owners.

but all systems describing this type of agreement to date have resulted in terrible outcomes.

Prove it.

It will destroy competition.

What competition?

a high value to society are not rewarded

What value does Donald Trump bring to society?

The incentive is gone.

Prove it.

These are issues that no text has reconciled.

Prove it.

work if you brainwashed people generationally

You mean completely unlike people brainwashed into believiing "capitalism gud?"

Having possessions is such a basic human construct

Stop conflating simple possessions with private property, genius.

why socialism as a whole crumbles.

Socialism seems perfectly alive and kicking to me - despite the uncountable amounts of treasure spent violently crushing it.

See my reply later in this thread for examples of real incremental changes. no change whatsoever.

FTFY.

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4871863, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
spookedbyroaches 0 points 3 years ago

Fuck the owners.

Fine

Prove it (terrible outcomes for socialism)

The USSR, Cuba, PRC is better but for some reason they are very authoritarian.

What competition?

Granted there are many industries that don't have good competition, but the vast majority do. Look at clothes makers, construction, pharma.

What value does Donald Trump bring to society?

He bought real estate where there was more demand than people expected, and took advantage of that. There was no apartments in the empty plot before Trump Tower, now there is and people want them.

Prove it. (innovation)

The USSR did have great amounts of innovation in the beginning, but once you get to a certain point, it just gets pretty much impossible. Look at the second person's answer.

Prove it (reconcile)

While it is dumb to say that there are no texts to reconcile these issues. It is crazy how the USSR didn't implement any solution except rewarding innovation to drive innovation. I'd say that is enough evidence to say with confidence that there are no existing solutions to the mentioned issues.

You mean completely unlike people brainwashed into believiing “capitalism gud?”

Sure there is some brainwashing in the right where they think capitalism is great in and of itself. I think that people also recognize that capitalism needs some good amount of regulation that would curb the failures there. It's not perfect as it exists now, but it sure as shit better than any socialist or communist nation.

Socialism seems perfectly alive and kicking to me - despite the uncountable amounts of treasure spent violently crushing it.

If you're gonna make enemies with the most powerful nation in the world, that usually happens. The USA saw a threat to their influence and took action.

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4871863 4888781, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
porkins 0 points 3 years ago

What if I refuse to work?

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4871863 4908263, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
irmoz 2 points 3 years ago

Let's start with your first assumption. Why must a factory have individual owners? Why not instead have it owned by the workers who are the ones actually producing?

Also, don't conflate private and personal property. If you are indeed talking about private property, it is very unlikely you have any to begin with. The vast majority of private property is owned by a few billionaires.

Lastly, people do not need money to incentivise work. Boredom, creativity and the desire to help and or contribute to society does that well enough. Given a stable level of comfort, people will seek work that matters to them.

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4864707, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 15
porkins 2 points 3 years ago

Because the workers didn’t find the money to buy a whole factory..

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4864707 4865041, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
porkins 0 points 3 years ago

I own private property and am not a billionaire, so not sure what you are on about with that statement. I got educated and have a decent living situation with a nice corporate remote job. I’ll have my student loan paid off around 40. These things were all easy to do. The people with issues do this to themselves. Sorry you are lazy and want to leach off my success.

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4864707 4870848, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 9
jlou 1 point 3 years ago

Under postcapitalism, the factory would be commonly-owned. The company that operates the factory would worker-controlled. That being said, there is nothing wrong with the holder of the building even in common ownership setup being compensated. What is unfair is to demand control rights over the firm for this capital and make the workers at the company your employees. Not everyone against capitalism is a communist. There can still be economic incentives for productive activity

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4865696, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
porkins 0 points 3 years ago

That’s kind of how a business works though. People show up at the entity that you’ve orchestrated, work via your guidelines, and get paid.

path: 0 4861795 4863346 4864035 4865696 4869196, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
masquenox 2 points 3 years ago

I’ve debated people at length on this topic

...and lost every time, it seems.

path: 0 4861795 4871724, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AllonzeeLV 1 point 3 years ago

We can have the perpetual pain of subsistence and servitude to the oligarch club until it collapses under the weight of its own manipulation and propaganda after generations of needless suffering of our children and children's children necessitating the painful work of rebuilding, or we can destroy the society built from the ground up as a capitalist exploitation trap and do the painful work of rebuilding.

This society perpetuates the misery and exploitation of the many to serve the whims and desires of the few. You act as if it's worth saving. Go to one of your local tent cities, where we throw our fellow humans, aka defective capital batteries, to die of exposure and police harassment. This system is rotten to its core and will have to be torn down and rebuilt, the only question, just with climate change, is do we let the gaping wound continue fester, hoping it will be the next generation's problem to amputate? Or do we take on the painful necessity of repairing the boomer's greed plague for the future they didnt care about at all?

I'd rather our species be destroyed than continue to commit itself further and further to greed and greed worship. I consider greed far worse than hate. At least people that kill out of hate cared about who they killed, in that they want them dead. A capitalist that poisons children's drinking water to make private shareholders a few extra dollars doesn't even care to know those children's names, they were just speedbumps to glorious profit. To me it is the darkest we can go to hurt others for profit. And our society's core value above all others is greed. That's worth saving?

path: 0 4861795 4862054, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 8
porkins 1 point 3 years ago

Your opinion is all feelings and no solutions. Morally, I can’t contend that it would be nice to help people who can’t help themselves and that we should definitely fix the human impact on the environment. I also agree that the Boomers caused a ton of shitty issues with poor policy choices stemming from greed. However, I don’t think that your solution is well thought out. It seems juvenile to simply say that the workers should assume the means of production. That in itself does not equate to a full working solution. Here’s an example of potential incremental changes that would help your cause: 1) Put term limits on all legislators. 2) Allow only one Supreme Court nomination per presidential term, adding a new judge to the pool. A retiring judge is replaced by a vote of the judiciary themselves. 3) Campaign finance reform with capped election funding. High salaries for politicians and steep penalties for kickbacks and bribery. Politicians with financial interests in a vote must recuse. 4) UBI. 5) Strict enforcement of antitrust laws. 6) Caps on higher education costs at public institutions. Federal loans only for public schools with capped interest rates. Your UBI will be tapped instead of a reliance on salary. 7) Reinstate a modernized Fairness Doctrine in order to ensure that people aren’t pigeon-holed into a narrow understanding of current affairs. 8) Create a pathways to citizenship for all with roots in the country then close the borders. Make a transparent immigration system with many more types of work visas. Strictly enforce the new policies. 9) Eliminate the electoral college in favor of direct ranked choice voting.

See, real changes. Not, “Let’s eat people and steal shit!”

path: 0 4861795 4862054 4863216, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7
AllonzeeLV 2 points 3 years ago

Literally everything you just proposed is beyond a pipe dream under the current rigged system. The owners bribe the Republicans and Neoliberals to dictate their preferred economic policy as they stoke social issues to keep the peasants divided. The oligarchs that bribe both major parties will never permit UBI, they spent decades systematically legalizing political bribery culminating in citizens united, they are the reason Antitrust laws on the books aren't enforced, they are the reason the fairness doctrine was abandoned for private profit, and they like us fighting over abortion, immigration, guns, etc because it stops us from uniting against them.

Also the idea that even without the oligarchs that politicians would regulate their own term limits is absurd. Why do you think they exempt their pay from government shutdowns and have lifetime universal healthcare just for themselves?

The last, last, last chance to do any of what you suggest using the constitutional tools of the system would have been to soundly and firmly reject the Reagan grift, trickle down economics, and the Jack Welch dehumanization of the economy 50 years ago. Instead they convinced their "opposition" party to take the bribes and the peasants not to engage in "unseemly" class war as they won without a fight. We've lived under class occupation ever since. This system is beyond all salvation.

Don't worry though, the half of the peasants that have been indoctrinated from childhood to believe what you believe will protect that occupation against their own interests to the bitter end, so you have nothing to fear from us tankies.

Unfortunately for you, the sycophants, and capitalists, and everyone else including me, climate change is the physical reaction to our careless actions, and is completely immune to any and all pathetic attempts to obfuscate, blackmail, bribe, assassinate, or otherwise con it into backing down, despite all the vaporware like clean coal, corn ethanol, hydrogen, and planet scale carbon filter the capitalists try to make another buck on before last call. But oowee, they're trying to bullshit their way out of it to darkly hilarious effect.

https://www.vice.com/...

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-02669-8

path: 0 4861795 4862054 4863216 4864340, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
porkins 0 points 3 years ago

You want too drastic a change. I believe a political evolution is still possible without throwing the baby out with the bath water.

path: 0 4861795 4862054 4863216 4864340 4870948, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
irmoz 1 point 3 years ago

Your opinion is all feelings and no solutions

So try actually reading the Communist Manifesto - get it from the horse's mouth, it's very short. Then, if you still feel like there isn't enough detail and that the reasoning isn't detailed enough, try Kapital. And then, how about the decades and decades of theory that came after? You can keep claiming that socialists "don't have any solutions", but please realise that this is an absurd claim when the field of socialism has so, so many detailed and comprehensive theories based on observation, experimentation and further research - scientifically so.

path: 0 4861795 4862054 4863216 4867915, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
porkins 1 point 3 years ago

I will. I make it a point to read everything that people suggest to me. I’ll likely come back here to shit on it though.

path: 0 4861795 4862054 4863216 4867915 4871001, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
jlou 1 point 3 years ago

Why have you concluded that?

path: 0 4861795 4863151, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
BleatingZombie 0 points 3 years ago

Let's eat this guy, too

path: 0 4861795 4862032, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Zoboomafoo -4 points 3 years ago

"Seize the means of production" is a communist's rallying cry because they know that they can't build anything on their own

path: 0 4865321, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 10
Maven 10 points 3 years ago

Who do you think built the means of production in the first place? I've never seen a rich guy in a suit laying down bricks all day to build a factory.

path: 0 4865321 4865574, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
Zoboomafoo -1 points 3 years ago

It was a group effort

path: 0 4865321 4865574 4866936, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
AllonzeeLV 4 points 3 years ago

Yeah, a group effort, lol

The laborers planned and built the stuff, and the owners took the profits. Good job team!

path: 0 4865321 4865574 4866936 4868231, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Maven 1 point 3 years ago

Which group?

path: 0 4865321 4865574 4866936 4867292, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Zoboomafoo 0 points 3 years ago

Capital and labor, both are intertwined and cannot exist without the other

path: 0 4865321 4865574 4866936 4867292 4872032, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
jlou 1 point 3 years ago

On the part of labor. No matter how causally efficacious capital is. It can never be de facto responsible for anything because responsibility is imputed through the tools back to the workers using them.

path: 0 4865321 4865574 4866936 4868124, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AllonzeeLV 6 points 3 years ago

The workers built the means, they just never owned them.

Let me guess, you think Steve Jobs made the iPhone because he pulled it out of his pocket on a stage and took the credit of engineers standing on the shoulders of publically funded basic research? Steve jobs couldn't engineer his way out of a wet paper bag, and that is well documented.

path: 0 4865321 4865592, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
Daft_ish 3 points 3 years ago

Remember when bill gates bought dos and used his moms connections to sell it IBM?

Remember when apple was given their entire gui by xerox?

Remember when xerox exects threw what would be the modern "PC" in the trash because they are only good at collecting money and wouldn't know revolutionary technology if their own R&D made it?

path: 0 4865321 4865592 4871322, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Zoboomafoo 1 point 3 years ago

I think Steve Jobs made the iphone by coordinating and funding a team of engineers to develop and produce the phone, then marketed it using his own name for brand recognition.

He could not have done it without those engineers and workers, and they would not have made the phone without Jobs.

path: 0 4865321 4865592 4892091, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Crass_Spektakel -5 points 3 years ago path: 0 4886849, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 18
PipedLinkBot 1 point 3 years ago path: 0 4886849 4886855, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
OurToothbrush 1 point 3 years ago

Literally sharing nazi propaganda from Hearst press lol

Anyway, capitalism is known for never having famines or economic crises, especially not cyclical ones

path: 0 4886849 4891607, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 16
pewgar_seemsimandroid 1 point 3 years ago

but capitalism still has issues mabye ecofashisim is the way for as minimized issues as possible?

path: 0 4886849 4891607 4892706, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
OurToothbrush -3 points 3 years ago

Oof, too real, you have to add a sarcasm tag

path: 0 4886849 4891607 4892706 4893465, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
Crass_Spektakel -3 points 3 years ago

Well, actually I am sharing "Wikipedia Propaganda" but if you want to call Wikipedia Nazi-Propaganda...

And yes, the only pro-Western nation ever falling into a serious Food-Crisis was... Haiti.

See, I know we are doing something right. I am not sure what we do right and there is enough things we don't do right but... the right things we do amazingly right. If that is because the Ghosts of Hitler are possessing us all or that we are just not a bunch of utter idiots - you call.

path: 0 4886849 4891607 4898834, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 13
OurToothbrush -4 points 3 years ago

And yes, the only pro-Western nation ever falling into a serious Food-Crisis was… Haiti.

Read Late Victorian Holocausts if you want to be less wrong.

Well, actually I am sharing “Wikipedia Propaganda” but if you want to call Wikipedia Nazi-Propaganda…

The holodomor was originally fabricated by a hearst press associate at a time when Mr Hearst and the third Reich were openly collaborating on spreading nazi propaganda in the US. The famine was bad but the myth that it was a genocide needs to die as it is literally nazi propaganda and was used as a justification for collaborating with the holocaust in Eastern Europe

This is in fact the mainstream academic position. You may look to Conquest, Davies, and Wheatcroft, who are genuinely anticommunist historians, for their analysis (they all say it wasn't a genocide)

path: 0 4886849 4891607 4898834 4901824, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 12
Crass_Spektakel 1 point 3 years ago

In what way is the Late Victorian Age "Pro-Western"? In the same way Dschengis Khan was "Pro-Western"? Besides, ONE book is quite vague for such an assumption as your claim isn't even listed in the list of great famines.

Oh, and you claim the Holodomor didn't happen? Well, let me guess, Stalin also didn't got 30 million sowiet people killed?

Tovarishch, your lies gave away whose bread you eat.

path: 0 4886849 4891607 4898834 4901824 4906641, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 11
wraithdrone -5 points 3 years ago

Cause, you know, it's always worked soo well in the past...

path: 0 4862380, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 13
ssboomman 6 points 3 years ago

What’s the other option? Continue to be fucked by a system the privatizes everything and destroys our environment? Continue to be fucked harder by the billionaire class?

path: 0 4862380 4864748, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
oo1 3 points 3 years ago

This dude must be trolling.

or maybe doesn't have a very broad experience of assets, ownership or work.

path: 0 4862380 4864748 4865166, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
wraithdrone 2 points 3 years ago

Surely you don't want to suggest that environmental protection has worked better in socialist countries?

path: 0 4862380 4864748 4879970, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
spookedbyroaches 1 point 3 years ago

So you think when the state owns the means of production things are gonna be better?

path: 0 4862380 4864748 4887157, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
ssboomman 1 point 3 years ago

Nah but When the workers do it will be.

path: 0 4862380 4864748 4887157 4905270, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
pgp 2 points 3 years ago

Which past is this that you speak of? And how is the present a better option than anything at all, really?

path: 0 4862380 4865913, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 7
spookedbyroaches 1 point 3 years ago

The Soviet Union, Cuba, Vietnam. Are these countries you want us to model ourselves after?

path: 0 4862380 4865913 4887240, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
OurToothbrush -4 points 3 years ago

Yes. All of those countries had more civil rights and longer life expectancy after the revolution

path: 0 4862380 4865913 4887240 4891955, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 2
spookedbyroaches 2 points 3 years ago

Oh yeah that makes sense. Because a revolution automatically means that your life expectancy increases. At this point, let's just have continuous revoltuions back to back. We'll live forever.

path: 0 4862380 4865913 4887240 4891955 4892113, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
wraithdrone 1 point 3 years ago

You mean apart from not getting shot if you want to leave the country or being sent to be worked to death in a prison labor camp for a dissenting opinion?

path: 0 4862380 4865913 4879996, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
pgp 1 point 3 years ago

Still don't know what you're talking about. Anyway, in capitalist free America people are shot for knocking in the neighbour's door, is that better? Lest we talk about the private jail system that demands prisoners, in order to be sustainable.

path: 0 4862380 4865913 4879996 4883542, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
wraithdrone 1 point 3 years ago

Have you never heard about the USSR, the GDR or communist China?

path: 0 4862380 4865913 4879996 4883542 4887390, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
memes
memes

@lemmy.ml

login for more options
56703
14856
4782

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

go to feed...