When/how do you think capitalism will be defeated?

3 years ago by return2ozma to c/asklemmy

Boozilla 42 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326165, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 15
lvxferre 6 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326165 6326832, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 3
JimmyMcGill 2 points 3 years ago

Care to explain why?

path: 0 6326165 6326832 6328574, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
lvxferre 4 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326165 6326832 6328574 6330304, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
JimmyMcGill 3 points 3 years ago

Yea I wasn’t doubting you, I just wanted for your to add some small explanation/context as to what these texts had

path: 0 6326165 6326832 6328574 6330304 6330936, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
TheGalacticVoid 1 point 3 years ago

I have reservations about unions. While it does give employees bargaining power, it sometimes does it to a fault. We see this with police unions in the US as it stops bad apples from getting proper punishment, and as a result, they get slaps on the wrist. I imagine that it would be equally as hard to fire somebody in other industries like medicine unless there's a 3rd party (like an arbitrator or court) enforcing these decisions.

Also, without any legislation in the US, I'd argue that unions will stay incredibly difficult to form, and even if they do, it doesn't necessarily mean that they can negotiate with companies fairly. Companies out there (I believe Dish is an example) have spent 10 years stalling negotiations with unions, and it's all practically legal.

path: 0 6326165 6352358, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
return2ozma -2 points 3 years ago path: 0 6326165 6326518, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
SCB -7 points 3 years ago

My hope would be that we can transition peacefully to a hybrid model with the rising power of unions, gradual emergence of worker cooperatives, and increased demand for socialized health care and affordable housing.

None of this has anything to do with capitalism tho.

Like, capitalism can and should be the economic engine driving these positive outcomes.

path: 0 6326165 6327186, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 8
pl_woah 4 points 3 years ago

The current strategy of venture capital is not success, but sabotage

It's not good enough for you to be doing well, you have to strangle the competition and introduce yourself as an unremovable bottleneck

For example, becoming the intermediary between concerts and concert goers. The fees charged and the trouble caused is worse than if they hadn't been there.

Amazon makes examples out of any business that dare challenge it's dead zone around it.

VC money is meant to crush the competition and lock in the consumer to charge rent.

Why would they ever want worker control, or unions?

Why would the private healthcare industry ever stop lobbying against socialized healthcare? Why would a capitalist success ever lead to the political change necessary for it when the doctrine of capitalism is privatization

Why would any commercial real estate firm allow affordable housing to exist when they can scalp it on investment properties and leave them empty? Why build affordable housing when the margins are small?

Capitalism isn't a savior, it's just locally optimal to the people with capital.

path: 0 6326165 6327186 6331180, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
SCB -2 points 3 years ago

VC money is meant to crush the competition and lock in the consumer to charge rent.

This is not anything close to correct lol. VCs specifically do not invest in mature companies or they aren't VCs.

Why would any commercial real estate firm allow affordable housing to exist when they can scalp it on investment properties and leave them empty? Why build affordable housing when the margins are small?

All housing built helps other housing come affordable because it increases supply. You are correct that there is little purpose intentionally building less valuable housing

path: 0 6326165 6327186 6331180 6345772, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
JimmyMcGill 2 points 3 years ago

I mean not really? Because currently capitalism as an economic engine is actively preventing these outcomes. And basically by design. How do you explain that?

path: 0 6326165 6327186 6328587, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
xigoi 0 points 3 years ago

A lot of capitalist countries have free healthcare. So how is capitalism preventing that?

path: 0 6326165 6327186 6328587 6330865, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
JimmyMcGill 1 point 3 years ago

Because in those countries it was regulated enough?

The question you need to answer is why countries like the US don’t and if you disagree that capitalism didn’t have anything to do with it

path: 0 6326165 6327186 6328587 6330865 6330930, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
SCB -1 points 3 years ago

How do you explain that?

it isn't true, so I don't

path: 0 6326165 6327186 6328587 6345773, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
jordanlund 28 points 3 years ago

"Defeated" implies being stopped by an external force, I don't see that happening.

It will collapse under it's own weight in less than a century.

path: 0 6326595, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
Maeve 2 points 3 years ago

Let’s hope it’s the next too big to fail/stock market crash.

path: 0 6326595 6326766, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
cheese_greater 23 points 3 years ago

It seems as if capitalism sows the seeds of its own destruction. Not saying I know a better way per se but its in there all the same

Edit: to put it in Pokémon perspective: capitalism is Ghost type and its super-effective against Ghost type

path: 0 6326073, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 22
wantd2B1ofthestrokes 4 points 3 years ago

What are some examples of capitalism destroying itself?

path: 0 6326073 6326164, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 15
sin_free_for_00_days 12 points 3 years ago

Capitalism, minus a strong guiding hand as described by Adam Smith, invariably leads to monopolies, or near enough. When that happens, either through a single strong monopoly or a small group of companies, the market doesn't work and price gouging rises. You don't have to look further back than the past couple years at inflation. Every study I have seen blames inflation almost completely on price gouging and market failing to work for consumers. Think record prices (and corresponding record profits) of companies across the board. If you want specific examples, check out the long history of Walmart and the negative effects its stores have on local competition and local earnings. Or the profit taking of gas companies. Or super market chains. Or....

People who love Capitalism always seem to have missed high school history/econ and have this ignorant belief that laissez-faire is the best. Even though proven to be shitty. This belief in trickle down bullshit has resulted in 50 trillion dollars going from the bottom 90% to the top 1%. If that's not capitalism destroying itself, I'm not sure what else to say.

Or as Leonard Cohen sang so succinctly,"The poor stay poor, the rich get rich / that's how it goes / everybody knows."

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326368, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 6
JimmyMcGill 1 point 3 years ago

Is that capitalism destroying itself tho? I mean in a purist way, what you describe is capitalism changing so it does do something but what it ends up in is called late stage capitalism so did it really destroy itself or merely “evolved”? Yes in that stage it is worse for 99.99% of people compared to before but maybe that’s somewhat intended? And most importantly is that stage (more) stable or not.

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326368 6328602, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
Untitled4774 2 points 3 years ago

The vacuum can only suck up crumbs for so long until it runs out of crumbs.

In other words, the greedy aren’t letting capitalism be the cycle system it needs to be, it’s a funnel.

Either the crumbs will run out and the system will collapse, or people won’t take kindly to giving up their final crumbs and overpower the vacuum.

Any one sane person is only a few missed meals away from acting insane. Any sane society is only a few missed meals from falling apart.

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326368 6328602 6330555, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
wantd2B1ofthestrokes 1 point 3 years ago

I mostly agree with this. But I can imagine saying basically any system minus x core feature will go to shit.

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326368 6326387, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
surewhynotlem 4 points 3 years ago

Regulation is not a core feature of capitalism. It's just a really good idea

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326368 6326387 6328404, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
PeepinGoodArgs 5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326276, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 7
PlzGivHugs 2 points 3 years ago

Is there actually any record of this destroying the capitalist system though? To my knowledge, every time this happens, its just replaced with more extreme and violent capitalism.

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326276 6326749, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
PeepinGoodArgs -1 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326276 6326749 6326841, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
lvxferre 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326276 6326317, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
PeepinGoodArgs 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326276 6326317 6326848, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
wantd2B1ofthestrokes 2 points 3 years ago

I think you can say that’s immoral. I’m not sure you can say it will destroy the whole system or that this is an inevitability of any capitalist system.

path: 0 6326073 6326164 6326276 6326334, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
shinigamiookamiryuu 2 points 3 years ago

I thought that was how Dragon Type worked.

path: 0 6326073 6352123, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
cheese_greater 2 points 3 years ago

Can't it be true for both? 😁

path: 0 6326073 6352123 6352243, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
shinigamiookamiryuu 2 points 3 years ago

I could've sworn there was only one type this worked for.

path: 0 6326073 6352123 6352243 6359089, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
cheese_greater 2 points 3 years ago

Surprise!

path: 0 6326073 6352123 6352243 6359089 6359562, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Jackthelad 16 points 3 years ago

Why would you want it defeated?

The most successful and happiest countries in the world are the Nordic countries, which are capitalist economies.

path: 0 6326483, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 11
themurphy 30 points 3 years ago

I think it's because people see capitalism as one thing, while in reality they are implemented very differently.

The nordics are not successful only on their capitalism. It's because it is regulated, and because the money is distributed more fair than in other countries.

path: 0 6326483 6326736, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 0
theluddite 18 points 3 years ago

The Nordic countries are also on Earth, which we are destroying. Some of their wealth comes directly from that destruction. Norway is the 5th and 3rd largest oil and natural gas exporter, respectively, making their happiness the result of good social policy that makes up for capitalist inequality which is directly funded by destroying the Earth and fueling capitalism elsewhere.

Even setting the climate aside (a ridiculous thing to do, really), the Nordic model isn't possible to sustainably replicate elsewhere on Earth on capitalism's own term, because we can't make every country a net exporter of the most desired commodities for obvious reasons, or the beneficiary of complex historical circumstances, like neutrality during ww2 (Sweden), or a long-time colonial power (Denmark).

Put another way, there is no Nordic model available for Bangladesh, whose workers work six days a week in factories to make the cheap clothing that happy Norwegians wear. Norways needs Bangladeshes to keep their standard of living.

In a previous job, I spent a good amount of time in a Bangladeshi garment factory. That specific factory in which I worked had been on strike a few years prior, requesting a raise to dozens of dollars per month. That's not a typo -- per month!. The police fired into their picket line, killing and wounding hundreds. This fall, Bangladeshi garment workers went on strike again, demanding a tripling of the minimum wage from its current ~75USD per month.

The urban poverty that makes my life possible, so far away, out of sight and out of mind, is an absolute fucking disgrace. We should talk about it daily. When they go on strike, as those garment workers are now, every single westerner ought to strike in solidarity, even if motivated by nothing but shame. Instead, we don't even know that it's happening, at least in the anglosphere.

I've since become convinced that there''s only one path to a just and verdant world -- international solidarity. Communists and anarchists have filled libraries with ideas for what that might look like. I've read some tiny sliver of that corpus. If you actually want to know why some of us want capitalism defeated (beyond the anecdote that I just relayed), or if you're curious how much better some of us think the world could be, I'd be happy to point you towards books that spoke to me.

path: 0 6326483 6327406, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 7
ultra 4 points 3 years ago

What books spoke to you?

path: 0 6326483 6327406 6327657, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 5
theluddite 4 points 3 years ago

Going to give a wide range of answers based on topic, so you can pick up what interests you. Happy to give more if none of these appeal to you.

If you work in tech, Stafford Beer's Designing Freedom. It's very short, accessible, and full of so many big ideas about what computers are for that it exposes the tech industry's absolute fucking poverty of vision.

If you're interested in deep dives on more technical topics, David Graeber's Debt. It's a fucking tome, but it's also amazing. So much of what we take for granted in our world is completely arbitrary and made up, but no less powerful, and there's nothing quite as arbitrary and powerful as the concept of debt.

If reading a cinder block based on an internet stranger's recommendation is too much for you, maybe try Graeber's Fragments of an Anarchist Anthropology, or his The Utopia of Rules instead, depending on which topic interests you more. Graeber is a great place to start because he's accessible but also his mind isn't limited by the confines of capitalist realism in a very special way. He was truly one of our best.

If you want something that's extremely light and fiction, I recommend William Morris's News from Nowhere. It's extremely cringe in a way that only 100-year-old socialist utopian fiction could be. It's excessively sincere, even naive, in a way that rings hollow to our cynical modern selves, but it's such a short read, and it's so adorable. I like the way that he challenges the concept of work. I think that the modern left should revive that line of criticism. I also enjoyed that you can see early versions of things that we associate with more modern movements in his utopian vision, especially degrowth and reforestation/environmentalism, not just for "the environment," but with nature as a part of and inseparable from the human experience.

Finally, if you like philosophy, and you want in depth analyses of capitalism, and don't mind something that's maybe less accessible, I recommend Adorno and Horkheimer's essay The Culture Industry. It was written in the 1940s, and it reads prescient today. They saw the rise of capitalist mass media as more than just a threat to independent thought, but a pacifying, homogenizing, almost all-consuming force. If you want something longer than The Culture Industry, and probably slightly less accessible, I recommend their Frankfurt School colleague Herbert Marcuse's One Dimensional Man. He basically argues that capitalism, and more specifically what he calls "technical rationality," has conquered our culture and our very ability to reason, at scales big and small.

path: 0 6326483 6327406 6327657 6332185, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
ultra 2 points 3 years ago

Do you own theluddite.org?

path: 0 6326483 6327406 6327657 6332185 6332204, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
aldalire 2 points 3 years ago

This answer right here chief 👆

path: 0 6326483 6327406 6333440, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
moon 1 point 3 years ago

Cuz rich gets richer and they steal my wages. Fuck em.

path: 0 6326483 6348914, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ultranaut 1 point 3 years ago

It's probably not sustainable for one.

path: 0 6326483 6326834, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
OpenPassageways 10 points 3 years ago

Gens Y, X, Z, and soon A are being taught by conservatives that capitalism can't be reformed, and therefore are digging capitalism's grave with their own hands.

You want reasonable restrictions on firearms? Conservatives say that can't be done because of the 2nd amendment. They're basically teaching gens Z and A that the 2nd amendment needs to be eliminated and those generations might actually have the numbers to do it eventually.

It will be the same with capitalism. You want reasonable regulations and taxation to reign in the abuses of the rich and corporations? Conservatives say you can't do that because the free market must be supreme.

Conservatives will dig the grave of capitalism by continuing to fight against any reforms that would make capitalism more livable for future generations.

path: 0 6336022, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Witchfire 8 points 3 years ago

Climate change or nuclear war wiping out humanity

path: 0 6326493, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
nintendiator 8 points 3 years ago

There's currently no external forces that can defeat capitalism.

We have to do it on our own. Eat the rich. Guillotine the techno-feudal lords. Confiscate and coöperativize their infrastructure resources.

path: 0 6331787, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
rab 7 points 3 years ago

After mother nature kills every last human being.

path: 0 6332216, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
NeoNachtwaechter 6 points 3 years ago

Capitalism is still preached in Usa, like socialism is preached in North Korea.

But capitalism is dead and gone.

Today we have neo-feudalism, or some call it techno-feudalism.

path: 0 6330816, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
SheerDumbLuck 6 points 3 years ago

When we start talking to each other again without paid influence.

The troubles facing us all, middle class and below, are the same troubles. We need to practice working together locally to build something bigger before major movements are likely to work out. How do we rebuild community nonprofit hubs?

path: 0 6326366, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
HelixDab2 6 points 3 years ago

It's unlikely to happen without some kind of apocalyptic event. Communist societies works very, very well on a small scale; you can have communes with maybe as many as a few hundred people, because everyone is connected to everyone else. That all falls apart when you start talking about anything bigger. Capitalist societies don't seem to need that direct relationship in order to function.

I think that the best we can hope for is some kind of reform that blends parts of capitalism with socialism, and sharply constrains that rights of the capitalist class.

I don't think that we'll even get that though; I think we'll get Cyberpunk 2077.

path: 0 6358310, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
some_guy 6 points 3 years ago

Destruction of Earth.

path: 0 6337534, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
LillyPip 6 points 3 years ago

I think society will collapse first, likely due to mass displacement and migration due to climate disasters which will make more people willing to accept fascism.

path: 0 6328171, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Pumafred9 3 points 3 years ago

With thunderous applause.

path: 0 6327119, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
TheGiantKorean 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6327653, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
qooqie 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6326108, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
sin_free_for_00_days 2 points 3 years ago

The huge difference now is these disgustingly rich fuckheads don't live in any type of proximity to their workers anymore.

path: 0 6326108 6326375, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
FaceDeer -7 points 3 years ago

Ironically enough, Elon Musk - posterboy of "rich fuckheads" - actually does live in proximity to his workers. I read a while back that he'd sold off all his houses and lived in the same rental properties that his on-site engineers used.

path: 0 6326108 6326375 6326449, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 1
sin_free_for_00_days 6 points 3 years ago

I read that he sold his real estate and was staying in a place owned by another billionaire while looking for a place. That was a couple of years ago, I don't really follow that fuckhead.

path: 0 6326108 6326375 6326449 6326661, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
DarkGamer 2 points 3 years ago

Through abundance it will defeat itself by working too well. Approaching full automation the only way for capitalism to survive is via UBI, otherwise there will be no consumer markets. When we have enough productive capacity and sufficient UBI that everyone is wealthy without having to work, a society like the Federation from Star Trek becomes possible. When everyone has enough wealth that hoarding it becomes meaningless, we might achieve something like a communist society.

path: 0 6326515, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
MxM111 0 points 3 years ago

"Hoarding" or controlling resources will be always meaningful. There is limited amount of accessible matter, and even if all basic needs of every human is satisfied, people have inspirations to do things, including BIG things, and for that they need resources. The only way we might have something like communist society is if AI takes control, and no human is controlling anything of a value. Kind of like a "Culture" series of books by M. Banks. Or if we go completely virtual, but even then, the computation resource is of the value...

path: 0 6326515 6326639, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
CADmonkey 2 points 3 years ago

When we are filling the vent shafts for the last billionaire bunker with dirt and rocks.

path: 0 6386402, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Rhynoplaz 2 points 3 years ago

When the poor have more money than the rich and are willing to give it up.

path: 0 6326682, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
kool_newt 2 points 3 years ago
path: 0 6352601, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
moon 2 points 3 years ago

When the old people die out

path: 0 6348913, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
0x4E4F 1 point 3 years ago

When there is enough critical mass that sees that this shit ain't working... so, never most probably... or after a nuclear war or another global catastrophy. People tend to look in retrospect only when faced with huge problems.

path: 0 6326096, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
anachrohack 1 point a year ago
path: 0 18017429, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Modern_medicine_isnt 1 point 3 years ago

I think there needs to be a catalyst that can't be known in advance. Right now, too many people have too much to lose. If something changes that, then we can bring down capitalism. Something like mortality for only the top 1% "might" do it, but probably not since the people who need it are the old people, who are also to old to fight. So it needs to be something that causes the young people to have nothing to lose.

path: 0 6326338, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
FaceDeer -1 points 3 years ago

If the "1%" was to suddenly magically die, that would just mean that the 2% becomes the new 1% and carries on. I think there needs to be a more fundamental change. Something better than capitalism will need to come along, and so far it's hard to say that any of the alternatives we currently have fit the bill.

path: 0 6326338 6326436, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
shinigamiookamiryuu 1 point 3 years ago

I wouldn't say it's necessarily better, but communist idiosyncrasies seem etched in all the most capitalist societies already, and this will almost certainly grow from that.

path: 0 6352171, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ultranaut 1 point 3 years ago

One of these days they are going to finally sell us the rope. Or, I think Marx was probably right and eventually the productive capacity of capitalism will grow so extreme that something new and different emerges from it. Basically, capitalism probably doesn't work post-scarcity. As far as when, possibly never but probably sometime in the next few hundred years if we don't collapse our civilization first and get stuck Mad Maxing the wasteland.

path: 0 6326214, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
theKalash 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 6400672, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
intensely_human 0 points 3 years ago

I think capitalism will be defeated the next time we completely forget what happens every time communism defeats capitalism.

path: 0 6358289, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
tal -1 points 3 years ago

Well, there are some fairly reliable maximum bounds, I suppose:

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

There is a strong consensus among cosmologists that the shape of the universe is considered "flat" (parallel lines stay parallel) and will continue to expand forever.[2][3]

The ultimate fate of an open universe with dark energy is either universal heat death or a "Big Rip"[12][13][14][15] where the acceleration caused by dark energy eventually becomes so strong that it completely overwhelms the effects of the gravitational, electromagnetic and strong binding forces.

Neither a universal heat death nor a Big Rip --- and we expect one of the two to occur --- seems likely to be conducive to capitalism.

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

The heat death of the universe (also known as the Big Chill or Big Freeze)[1][2] is a hypothesis on the ultimate fate of the universe, which suggests the universe will evolve to a state of no thermodynamic free energy, and will therefore be unable to sustain processes that increase entropy.

The theory suggests that from the "Big Bang" through the present day, matter and dark matter in the universe are thought to have been concentrated in stars, galaxies, and galaxy clusters, and are presumed to continue to do so well into the future. Therefore, the universe is not in thermodynamic equilibrium, and objects can do physical work.[15]:§VID The decay time for a supermassive black hole of roughly 1 galaxy mass (10¹¹ solar masses) because of Hawking radiation is in the order of 10¹⁰⁰ years,[16] so entropy can be produced until at least that time. Some large black holes in the universe are predicted to continue to grow up to perhaps 10¹⁴ M☉ during the collapse of superclusters of galaxies. Even these would evaporate over a timescale of up to 10¹⁰⁶ years.[17] After that time, the universe enters the so-called Dark Era and is expected to consist chiefly of a dilute gas of photons and leptons.[15]:§VIA With only very diffuse matter remaining, activity in the universe will have tailed off dramatically, with extremely low energy levels and extremely long timescales.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Rip

In physical cosmology, the Big Rip is a hypothetical cosmological model concerning the ultimate fate of the universe, in which the matter of the universe, from stars and galaxies to atoms and subatomic particles, and even spacetime itself, is progressively torn apart by the expansion of the universe at a certain time in the future, until distances between particles will infinitely increase.

In their paper, the authors consider a hypothetical example with w = −1.5, H0 = 70 km/s/Mpc, and Ωm = 0.3, in which case the Big Rip would happen approximately 22 billion years from the present. In this scenario, galaxies would first be separated from each other about 200 million years before the Big Rip. About 60 million years before the Big Rip, galaxies would begin to disintegrate as gravity becomes too weak to hold them together. Planetary systems like the Solar System would become gravitationally unbound about three months before the Big Rip, and planets would fly off into the rapidly expanding universe. In the last minutes, stars and planets would be torn apart, and the now-dispersed atoms would be destroyed about 10¯¹⁹ seconds before the end (the atoms will first be ionized as electrons fly off, followed by the dissociation of the atomic nuclei). At the time the Big Rip occurs, even spacetime itself would be ripped apart and the scale factor would be infinity.

path: 0 6327950, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
RememberTheApollo -2 points 3 years ago

It will not be defeated. It will simply reinvent itself. Forms of capitalism seem to be human nature.

path: 0 6327740, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
r3df0x -2 points 3 years ago

Tell American conservatives to tax Mike Bloomberg and other anti gun billionaires 70% and use the money to buy guns for poor people. America will become communist overnight.

path: 0 6327585, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
RememberTheApollo -2 points 3 years ago

It will not be defeated. It will simply reinvent itself. Forms of capitalism seem to be human nature.

path: 0 6327658, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
asklemmy
asklemmy

@lemmy.world

login for more options
41904
9896
9041

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have fun

Doxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, toxicity and dog-whistling are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'

This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spam

Please do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reason

Just remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.

It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.

Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !uspolitics@lemmy.world


7) No Hit-and-Run questions.

Please don't delete your post for no apparent reason. If you plan on deleting a question later, say so in the post, or if you feel that you have a good reason to remove it, message a mod beforehand. It's not fair to the ones who took their time to answer, and it's not in the spirit of the community.


8) No Bots.

Posts or comments from bots, LLM's, AIs, Neural Networks, Transformers, or Marvin the Paranoid Android are not welcome in AskLemmy. Real humans only please.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


go to feed...