Florida venue cancels Marjorie Taylor Greene event after learning of its Jan. 6 focus
3 years ago by Rapidcreek to c/politics
The candidate “writes” the book and makes it available for sale. But not even their fans buy it.
The US has a shockingly high rate of functional illiteracy, and I'm going to guess that her supporters are disproportionately affected by this. Which is to say that they probably couldn't read her book if they wanted to.
Not sure what you wrote, but somehow it feels offensive? Can you read your comment to me and let me know if it said something that would offend me?
I for realsies work in education in Texas. We're truly trying our best, but the challenges we're up against are so pointless and only do harm.
Long boring Anecdote time!
Every homeschooling family I know are super republican and are "religious".
Every single child of said families have less than a 6th grade reading level.
One family that got too extreme for my parents to continue being friends with them decided that their daughters book learning was done in fourth grade. After that it was basically home economics without any of the important Financials (because the man handles that, silly, women aren't smart enough!), just basically training a maid to cook and clean and also find a husband. Only a few of her NINE BROTHERS could read the books I was assigned in 5th grade. None of them could read my personal books, as I had a college reading level by 3rd grade, but I'm a super nerd so....
Well sure enough all the boys of that family grew up to be pieces of shit from the interactions I've had with them over the years, and the daughter hasn't been seen in nearly a decade. Ran away the moment she legally could, and I hope she's living her best life away from controlling religious freaks.
My in-laws are "homeschooling" their own children, which amounts to letting them do whatever they want Tuesday and Thursday, and sending them to the church van every m/w/f to be taught by Sunday school teachers. Who of course only talk about creationism. and none of the "graduates" have even heard of Charles Darwin. And also believe humans and T-Rex walked around with each other. Whose fossils were also put in the ground as a test...
Just to pre-empt people putting down homeschooling entirely, my daughter is in online school, which is a form of homeschooling (I still have to be there to help her with schoolwork) and my wife, myself and my daughter are all atheists.
My daughter is in online school because she's an unusual kid with anxiety issues who dares to do things like wear spiked collars, so was at the very bottom of the social pecking order in middle school, meaning that even the bullied kids bullied her. One morning last year, she broke down and said she couldn't handle it anymore. She was already having thoughts of self-harm we knew about and were trying to fix with therapy and medication. The school was doing absolutely nothing to help her. The only private schools here are religious and fuck that.
So there's a state-sponsored free online school option. It's done via Pearson, and they're a horrible company, but it's what we've had to resort to for my daughter's basic mental health. I'm just glad we have the option to do this for her and I'm glad other kids like her have that option. I was pretty severely bullied in middle school too. I had zero friends in my school in seventh grade. The only friends I had went to other schools. I wish I could have done online school in 1989.
We've found a homeschool social group for teens at the public library that meets once a week and a lot of the kids are just weird kids like her. Some of the parents might be crazy religious types, but no one comes off that way.
Like so many things, the good/great reasons for homeschooling have been twisted and perverted by the Christian right (and, in some cases, misguided parents) so that often the optics are for the worst outcomes. If we had it to do over again (20/20 hindsight) we probably would have had a better outcome homeschooling our daughter. We just didn’t see out recognize the shortcomings until it was too late.
Glad you’re able to take an approach to help your daughter’s mental health. Middle school and high school are such difficult times for so many people and its effects can last a lifetime.
I don't know if it's still there, but years ago I heard an NPR story about a bookstore in D.C. which existed solely to sell books back to the PACs. The only books available in the store were written by politicians.
GOP is Grand Ole Party. It's the Republican party's second name.
PAC is political action committee. It's an organization that is not legally the candidate or their election slush fund to elect a person or people. Basically it's a way to spend money on a political thing that ignores all campaign finance rules.
Both terms are incredibly common in America. TV and radio will use both without offering an explanation.
I hate when people are so incapable and dumb that, despite having a world of information at their fingertips, they would rather complain about not knowing something about us politics, in the comment section of something about us politics, than just do a 10 second Internet search.
although lemmy's /politics isn't only American politics you should be aware this sub was US politics only on The Other Place.
however, as it's not ELI5, I feel like it's reasonable to use common jargon when discussing a topic. I shouldn't need to explain what wattage is if this was discussing power stations, I shouldn't need to explain what FPS is if discussing video games.
Per search engine: PAC — Political action committee: an organization established by a corporation or other special interest to raise money from individuals for a political campaign or other political cause.
The cost to attend was $45 to $1,000 to meet Greene and "receive a signed copy of her book.”
These traitors never stop grifting, do they.
It’s it signed by her, or by the person that wrote it?
Until I see evidence to the contrary, I will assume she doesn't know how to write her name, so I will guess the latter.
They could have given her a stamp. That's what I would've done.
Zing
That's 100% on the venue. I mean let's be honest, if it's a Marjorie Taylor Greene event you should probably assume it's got some Jan 6/white supremacy focus until proven otherwise.
Florida venue seems more level headed than Florida man
This is the best summary I could come up with:
The event was set to be hosted by the Republican Party of Osceola County at the Westgate Resorts in Kissimmee.
It was originally pitched to Westgate as a small book-signing event featuring Greene, without mention of Jan. 6.
The cost to attend was $45 to $1,000 to meet Greene and "receive a signed copy of her book.”
Greene has long supported former President Donald Trump's belief that the 2020 election was stolen from him, and she has downplayed the severity of the Jan. 6 attack — which left five people dead and about 140 police officers injured.
“Just another day in Florida where the local Republican Party in Osceola County is hosting an 'anniversary' event to mark January 6th and Marjorie Taylor Green is the 'special' guest,” Democratic state Rep. Anna Eskamani posted on X.
Osceola County Republican Party Chairman Mark Cross did not reply to a request seeking comment, so it is unclear whether the event has been rescheduled.
The original article contains 383 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 58%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
How bad does she have to be if even Florida is telling her to eff off?
In other news, Florida venue is latest target of conservative terrorism.
One option for a venue left: Four Seasons Total Landscaping
Get ready for her to screech about "muh free speech reeee" 🙄
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles. Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to US politics and contain quality and original content. Social Media adjacent hosts like Substack are allowed, but ONLY if they tie back to a company/subsidiary. No personal or friend group blogs and no self-promotion. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and re-hosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing other users of being bots or paid actors.
- No memes, trolling, misinformation, or low-effort posts/comments (including reposts). If you see posts like this that anger you, do not engage. Report, block, and live a happier life than they do. Any slap-fight is subject to comment removals. Fights full of rule violations will result in temporary bans to cool off.
- No manipulating votes via bots or alt accounts; this will result in permanent bans. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in an account ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be permanently banned.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules and use critical thinking when reading, posting, and commenting. Users that repeatedly have comments or posts removed, weaponize reports, or violate the code of conduct, will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. The reason(s) behind moderator action(s) are publicly available through the Modlog.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
The book is just there as a gift within a grift.
The candidate "writes" the book and makes it available for sale. But not even their fans buy it.
The books are ordered at full price despite that by PACs to be given away at stuff like this.
This funnels money from PACs directly into the candidates pocket.
A couple years ago it was a big story, because one of them was strategically doing it thru the specific stores around NYC that were sampled for best seller list. They ended up pretty high up on the list for a couple weeks. Media even interviewed workers at the store who were really confused. Books come in on a schedule a couple skids at a time, all individually packed and not at bulk prices. And not even stay a day until picked up by another truck and shipped off again. At some stores this was more volume than every other book that went through the store normally.
They were burning money like crazy, because it was money laundering. The entire point is to move as much money around as possible.
I wouldn't be surprised if one tried some bullshit with valuating the signature tho.
Have the PAC buy them, pay the candidate to sign them, and then give them out at events like this. That could double maybe even triple the money laundering, but I don't know if they have the balls to do it.
save