Woman called a child the N word, then she claimed to be the victim. So far she raised over $150,000
a year ago by return2ozma to c/politics
Not a white nationalist, but reading that makes me wish they were at risk of extinction as they cry about it.
the world will be better without racists.
Their idea of "white genocide" is white people consensually having children with non white people.
So, I'm doing my part for white genocide and proud of it.
IE, normal normal population dynamics.
You know that inbreeding. It is under constant assault.
Indeed.
It's funny how these things work, where I live nationalists are rather intelligent people, that kind is just thugs. And something about "white race" being said seriously I've only heard from people, eh, limited in their worldview and thinking it's absolutely normal. Older teachers, for example. Or my idiot dad, but at the same time anything right-related in my interests he would perceive as signs of scary-scary fascism, I don't think one can see that combination often.
They think "white genocide" is when a white person consensually has a child with a non white person. So they want to remove all non white people and create a white Ethnostate to "preserve the white race".
Nazis. Just Nazis.
A self-respecting person would return that money. But I doubt she is.
She's one of them hence why she's even on that site.
Mangione is a hero, this woman is not.
From the site:
I called the kid out for what he was.
She's one of them.
Ah. OK, stopping defending her.
I noticed recently that new bigot accounts on reddit have been using 22 where 88 once stood.
I like how he signed it off with the [Fourteen Words] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourteen_Words)
Link to source?
Incoming Trump cabinet appointment
I'm low on cash, can I call you a slur for my go fund me?
Honky devils
The video does not include her saying it to the kid directly, but to the man (presumably father) confronting her, multiple times. Then she admits that yeah she did call the child the n-word because "he acts like one".
She proudly and defiantly doubled and tripled down on it while being openly filmed. All she had to do was move on and nobody would have been the wiser. In a normal world, this would be a clear case of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes".
I truly hope the (presumably) dad also has some fundraising going on.
Not being protective of telling children anything such, but I have used ethnic slurs in the past, especially when answering other insults. And when you were being unjustly attacked, then slipped and said something bad, and then are being attacked for that too as if that justified the beginning, then it's a natural reaction to double down on the unfortunate words too.
So, eh, depends on the situation. I think I have right to answer people attacking me and putting me into a fight-or-flight situation with any words, they'll still be in the wrong. But if this is not what happened, then using someone's race as an argument worthy of repetition should be punished.
I don't understand what the goal behind making this comment could have been. You start off admitting to using ethnic slurs with an almost "whoopsy daisie" tone. The comment you replied to told you the situation but you still add a hypothetical situation about when you think it would be reasonable to use them. And the appeal to "natural reaction" to defend something that should'nt have happened in the first place. "When people question why I shot a guy, my natural reaction is to shoot them too" doesn't excuse why you did the thing that got you questioned. There is no situation where you are on the right side when using a slur.
They have a simplistic tit-for-tat moral code and ignore the relative degree of contempt telegraphed by different ethnic slurs. Trouble seems to find this sort of person wherever they are. They will not accept your advice. Best to move on.
They have a simplistic tit-for-tat moral code
The alternatives are limited to "my group is always right" and "I pick one aspect and ignore all others, and the one aspect is always arbitrarily chosen, and when the comparison kinda equals, the result is arbitrarily chosen". If you have any to add, you are welcome.
And the word "simplistic" is usually used by people unable to defend their position with actual points. It's kinda useless otherwise.
and ignore the relative degree of contempt telegraphed by different ethnic slurs.
Since it is not given here what the particular slur would be compared against for any "relative degree", your comment clearly presents you as someone who
tends to not be very bright
, and the advice I won't accept wasn't answering my comment. I said that a continuation of an argument doesn't say much about the beginning.
Ethnic slurs are a subset of insults here. Not much different from addressing someone's body features, impairments, life story specifics.
There is no situation where you are on the right side when using a slur.
Of course there is, every time it's a minor part of the event. Like 3000 is greater than 2001, despite 1 being greater than 0. Seems simple enough.
Ethnic slurs are different because of their historical (and still contemporary) usage in dehumanizing and oppressing groups of people. And, again, why are you listing other ways to insult people, as if they are fine when they're not?
Life is a rarely a zero-sum exchange, and quite often both sides aren't perfect people. Just because someone slapped you after you called them a slur doesn't mean you're now in the right because they escalated to physical violence.
Like I fundamentally am having trouble relating to you on this. I can't tell if your mental is that fucked, if you are terrible at explaining something I'm missing, or if you're trying to troll. I've come across differences in opinions, based on severity and direction. It feels like we're not using the same system.
If you call someone a racial slur, you're attacking an entire race of people, not an individual. Why then would you be surprised that a ton of people get angry at you instead of just the individual you had an issue with? This is some kindergarten-level social competency my dude.
Everyone fucks up, but when you do, you're supposed to apologize. If you're so emotionally stunted that you can only "double down", then you're just digging your own grave. Society doesn't need to accommodate immaturity/anger management issues like that, but it definitely should shun racism.
Do better.
This is some kindergarten-level social competency my dude.
I don't think "social competency" is a good person's attribute and under pressure people err.
Everyone fucks up, but when you do, you’re supposed to apologize.
That's weighted by the situation. If in the rest of it you were right and you are apologizing, you might cause harm.
That's in abstract, not in this particular case.
Society doesn’t need to accommodate immaturity/anger management issues like that, but it definitely should shun racism.
This seems dangerously close to considering what crowd thinks to be right. I prefer a machine gun or at least to run away.
Anyway I'm not talking to society, it can go fuck itself.
Do better.
Just did.
If there is valuable "social competency", it's in saying "no" despite any pressure and in holding your ground on your principles. Unless those principles dictate otherwise and exactly till that moment.
So maybe I can teach you.
She continued her victimhood, “I have two small children who do not deserve this. We have been threatened to the extreme by people online. Anything will help! We cannot, and will not live in fear!”
Fucking asshole.
100% true, her children do not deserve to deal with her shit.
Her children do not deserve it.
OTOH, she's actively raising them into full-blown racists.
Yet again, she might not succeed.
To bad it's just threats. :(
To give you some hope, I use gesture navigation on my android and to go back I swipe from the right. Problem is, that's also the gesture for downvoting in the Voyager app. There's been multiple times that I've been done reading comments and want to go back to my feed, so I swipe to got back and accidentally downvote at the same time. Normally I go back into the thread and undo my downvote but I'd bet that I've missed it before. It's subtle when it happens and it happens often enough that it's probably once or twice a scrolling session.
You don't even have to ask in what racist shithole country that happened.
Who tf is funding her? Get their names and publicly shame them now. This is NOT ok.
Musk types
So Nazis
Well,.specifically rich nazis
Wouldn't be surprised if this was taxpayer funded
And she's raising the cash on a supposedly "christian" go fund me-type site. Apparently "do unto others..." is not a thing with maga christians
There's no such thing as a good Christian. They're all just hate-filled assholes itching to go back to lynching.
What an ignorant thing to say. I don’t agree with their position on the supernatural, but my generalization ends at their truth claims.
There are many good Christians, good Muslims, good pagans, good satanists, etc. And many bad among them too. Because good and evil is a different axis than theism and atheism. Nice though it would be if everything were so neatly orthogonal.
Pretty hateful thing to say lol
Prove them wrong. Most who loudly proclaim themselves christians, if not all, are more comfortable claiming "Jesus is King" rather than living as He wants them to. They point their fingers at others, spout hatred, and kill in the name of their Lord, rather than help solve poverty, healing the sick, and breaking bread with their neighbours. The billionaire "christians" even try all they can to impose their rigid worldview upon the world, and are (or are indistinguishable from) fascists. The mere existence of them is an affront to the teachings of Jesus Christ; He would throw them out of their temple in disgust. Prove them wrong by ousting these people as the false prophets they are rather than let your children fall to their toxic masculinity, discrimination, and classism.
Yeshua the hardline Orthodox Jew from first century Galilee wouldn’t recognize the religion that sprang up only a few decades after his death, let alone what sprang up in Europe, and especially the various modern sects. He would be appalled that gentiles had created an entirely new religion out of the worship of his idol.
Ok so then Where’s the Christian’s while kilmar Garcia is getting lynched with no due process while trump edits a picture with ms13 on the knuckles?
Supporting trump and trump lies. That’s where.
Lynched? Do you even know what that means?
Garcia had been to immigration court twice already. He was self admittedly in the country illegally. He was twice found by the immigration courts to be an MS13 member. He has tattoos that are believed to stand for MS13 on his knuckles, not the clearly photoshopped for reference letters.
I hate being human.
Its over half a mil actually. Her goal is a million. The fuck people?
The prices are too high, I have not a bean!
I just watched 30mins of this guy setting up and observing ants in an ant farm. Ants are pretty baller. Wouldn't mind living in a society like functioned so cleanly and efficiently like those.
I guess her defense was that he was acting like a little n-word. Then other racists were like nodding their head saying I support this.
I'm glad to know I'm not a cunt who plays victim. I hate the n word but if I said it and got my ass kicked I wouldn't be mad because I'll know I deserved it.
I hate how these people play victim whenever they face consequences....but can't wait for Trump to give her the Medal of Honor. ( /s for the trump part)
Can you really say there is not a chance Trump would get involved somehow, get her up on stage etc. Not sure the /s is needed.
Don't link that shit. Sheesh.
What was it (and why was it upvoted)?
it was me commenting on how much more money she's getting and the link to the fundriser, not in hopes that anyone donates, but because the comments and usernames in there were way worse than I could have imagined.
sorry, was mostly in disbelief that such thing existed and the comments and the usernames were way worse than whatever the post title said.
I know what I want to say would get me permabanned on Reddit. How does that work here, I wonder?
These profligates need to be lashed to crosses and feasted on by ravens, burn their houses to the ground and salt the earth. Let their names be shouted to the sky so that all know what damned well happened, removing their name implies shame for one action and there is no shame in killing fascistic dogs.
No. The point of that is to erase everything about them, I want it remembered so that those similar to them might having a second thought onto their next action.
In the video she said the other child stole from hers so she called him the n word because "he acts like one". They want everyone to be able to "call a spade a spade" so let's apply that to them too. This bitch and everyone who's donated money to her are fascist scum and deserve to be treated accordingly.
Depends on your admin. And the admin/mod of the community you're posting on.
If the admin of the instance hosting the community you're posting to (or a mod of said community) removes your comment, it would prevent anyone seeing your comment anywhere.
If another admin removed your comment, it would do nothing for anyone except the users of that admin's instance.
Bans are similar. YOUR admin can ban you which would stop you being able to post anywhere. Other admins can ban you too, but it would only stop your comments/posts appearing to their users, and keep any comments/posts of yours on their communities from being seen by anyone outside your instance.
If for example lemmy.world banned me, a thelemmy.club user, lemmy.world users would not see any future comments from me. If I then commented on a post on !memes@lemmy.world the lemmy.world server would reject my comment and not tell any other instance of it. Users of thelemmy.club would see my comment, but nobody else. My comments/posts on non .world communities would be seen as normal by everyone but .world users.
Source: am instance admin
You're a professional victim.
Fuck off, Nazi
Works just fine. Just about everyone agreed on what to do with Nazis 80 years ago. Get off your cross.
your country
You really are just blindly swinging and missing, aren’t you
THIS is the FREEDOM Americans VOTED for! REMEMBER this Next Time you read about an Innocent Business Owner HURT by Trump's Policies! THIS is Why they Voted for him DIVISIVE LIBTARDS!
That's not enough to hire security for very long.
racist militias (the police) will protect her, not only for free, but using tax dollars,
People and employers should find out who her contributors are.
Why? The N-word in this context seems much more harmful.
Plenty of fucked up neo-Nazi compound nutters supporting her worthless ass.
I've got a plan...
Lawsuit and send all that money to the child's family. If this actually happened, it would be fucking hilarious to see the reaction from those assholes that sent her money.
Seriously?!! I would let the parents of the child beat that woman's ass. I would never call a child that name. A matter of fact, I don't ever say that word to be mean or anything at all. It's disrespect😤😤 People are really getting annoying..
You cannot be that naive. She might have reacted to a white child taking a toy, she might have called the kid a brat. But she would have never called a white kid any racial slur. This is racism plain and simple and it's disgusting to make excuses for it.
It’s infuriating, but it’s not that much money. Imagine all those people on average sent $10. 15,000 people max. Thats like, one small fucking town in America. One small, very red, white and racist town. It doesn’t represent all of the USA.
it's almost half a million by now.
they disabled the comments, but still, some usernames are sketchy at best.
every single person who donated deserves to be doxxed and hopefully lose their jobs.
and I'm being "kind" to them, because I don't want to stretch whatever moderation rules there are here.
"Nate Higgers" donated and got like 50 likes. They're white supremacist.
they aren't even hiding it, they are straight up celebrating it
Let's start here, fuck you.
Then, let's move on to this, someone can be a cunt, and you can call them a cont for being one, but if your first response is to reference their race by calling them a racial slur, then your not as angry about them being a cunt as you are about their race. And that's the problem.
I don't know what race you are, but your opinion is shit. Not "your white/black/Indian/Chinese/Mexican/etc opinion is shit", it's just you and your opinion that's shit. See how it's supposed to work?
"blacks"
The article is missing an important fact, namely that the child allegedly tried to steal from her. There is no video evidence of this (as far as I know), but it probably should have been mentioned in the article.
Not saying that's an excuse for her behavior, but it does provide some background as to why she's claiming to be a victim.
A 5 year old taking your personal belongings is cause for a learning opportunity. Anyone who would call their self a victim is just pathetic.
What would you say could have been learned from this?
Talk to the childs parent. Be polite, the more polite, the more embarrassed the parent will be. Then the child will learn a lesson from thier parent.
The guy in the video didn't seem all that interested in his son's behavior, although it's hard to tell if it was because he was more offended about the slur. I don't really see any winners here, they both acted like idiots if you ask me.
Seemed like the perfect opportunity to teach a 5 year old that stealing isn't okay without escalating the situation with the use of racial slurs.
> allegedly
> fact
Choose one.
It is a fact that she claims that the child was stealing from her.
Nothing concrete, but it’s an important detail to the story that was mentioned in the video, and the article just completely ignored that.
Oh in that case…
No, when someone robbed me and sexually assaulted my wife racial slurs are among the few insults I didn't use because that's not what my problem was with that asshole.
It matters exactly zero why she did it. I mean they could have mentioned her alleged motive it in the article but it's far from an important fact imo.
The article makes it appear as if she called the child a slur for no reason at all. Whether her excuse is valid is another question, but you can't just leave that out.
The article makes it appear as if she called the child a slur for no reason at all.
She basically did. I don't see a reason for taking her motives into account whatsoever. If she was a kindergartner you'd say something like "I don't wanna hear it! You don't call people that." and that would be the end of it.
Whatever happened to "sticks and stones may break my bones, but words can never hurt me"?
I do grow weary of "news" picking and choosing which facts to present so that they can make a story that gets more clicks.
It's all manufactured outrage if you ask me. They want you to get mad and stay mad so they can tell you who to hate and what to do about it instead of doing something productive with your life.
Without social media and the Internet, none of us would have ever heard about this incident (or others like it), unless it happened to someone we actually know, and our lives would have likely been better for it. Definitely more peaceful.
I already said I wasn’t trying to excuse her behavior. It was dumb and unnecessary, and clearly not very helpful.
Ah yes, the other N-word, the one for white people. Really showing off your moral superiority, aren’t you.
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
From one of the top donors, just insane...
save