Sinclair Will Not Air ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ Upon ABC Return Tuesday

a year ago by Skavau to c/television

The broadcaster, which has demanded an apology and Turning Point USA donation from the late-night host, will replace the time slot with local news programming
DrWorm 208 points a year ago

This is extremely dangerous to our democracy

path: 0 19543451, hotness: undefined, score: 208, children: 14
Adverse_Reaction 85 points a year ago path: 0 19543451 19543850, hotness: undefined, score: 85, children: 0
PhilipTheBucket 38 points a year ago

Honestly, people in the "TV watching" demographic starting to become aware of what's happening, even the name "Sinclair" and how they are different from "TV" in a general sense, might be a little un-dangerous for our democracy.

This is one of the nice things about Trump running this whole thing, is that it'll all be done in a really stupid fashion and the people who are loyal to him in cringe inducing North Korea fashion aren't going to get renumerated in any way for their loyalty.

path: 0 19543451 19544129, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 5
HalfSalesman 7 points a year ago

There is no upside to Trump's victory.

I think you underestimate how fucking stupid those people are. I think they'll stay unaware.

Even if they do clue in though, kind of too little too late.

path: 0 19543451 19544129 19553008, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
primrosepathspeedrun 5 points a year ago

Also, third Reich as farce is way more fun to watch. I bet the death camps are gonna be hilariously stupid. I'll be sure to paint some fun commentary on the walls with my blood.

path: 0 19543451 19544129 19547354, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
PhilipTheBucket 3 points a year ago

Would you rather third Reich done by people who halfway know what they're doing? I will take blessings where they are available.

(Not that that makes it safe, people thought the early Nazis were hilarious idiots too. Hitler never got up before noon, Himmler was like the only guy in Germany who wasn't a veteran at that point in history, Goebbels was stumping around on his club foot talking about racial and genetic purity, and so on. As has been discussed, one of their early openly fascist moves was getting rid of a bunch of the hilariously accurate comedy that was constantly being aimed at them by the comedians of the day. They were just kind of weirdo dingbats until they weren't.)

path: 0 19543451 19544129 19547354 19552353, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
primrosepathspeedrun 3 points a year ago

I think if they halfway knew anything thry wouldn't be nazis.

path: 0 19543451 19544129 19547354 19552353 19552488, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
kent_eh 1 point a year ago

This is one of the nice things about Trump running this whole thing, is that it'll all be done in a really stupid fashion

Nice might not be the word I would have chosen, but I agree that it could be a whole lot worse if Trump and company were appointing competent people to do their bidding.

path: 0 19543451 19544129 19556556, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
pelespirit 32 points a year ago

Streisand the shit out of Jimmy's youtube channel.

path: 0 19543451 19543619, hotness: undefined, score: 32, children: 0
YoiksAndAway 28 points a year ago

Well, Sinclair sucks, but affiliates aren't obligated to show what the network airs. In fact, since Reagan got rid of the fairness doctrine, they could go full right-wing, nut-job propaganda 24-7. It sucks, especially since a few right wing douchebags control much of American media (looking at you, Murdoch), but it's nothing new.

path: 0 19543451 19543757, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 3
wolframhydroxide 14 points a year ago path: 0 19543451 19543757 19544171, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
grue 3 points a year ago

Why are you writing hypothetically about what this article is reporting Sinclair actually doing? Do you not realize that Sinclair is one of the "right-wing douchebags control[ling] much of American media" of which you speak?

path: 0 19543451 19543757 19555766, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
YoiksAndAway 1 point a year ago

Sure they are. I'm not being hypothetical, I'm just pointing out that there was never anything stopping them from doing exactly what they're doing except maybe the Fairness Doctrine, and that was revoked forty years ago. It isn't so much a death blow to democracy as it is business as usual.

path: 0 19543451 19543757 19555766 19556136, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Zorque 16 points a year ago

It's been dangerous to our democracy.

path: 0 19543451 19545187, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
ech 14 points a year ago path: 0 19543451 19545187 19546136, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
No_Ones_Slick_Like_Gaston 125 points a year ago

As someone commented on another thread, see who is sponsoring their weather segment and call them to say you're boycotting their products until they pull out of Sinclair. Fuck them.

path: 0 19543516, hotness: undefined, score: 125, children: 5
takeda 70 points a year ago

This. Targeting their revenue is the only thing they will pay attention to.

path: 0 19543516 19543910, hotness: undefined, score: 70, children: 2
acosmichippo 13 points a year ago

I'm not even sure they care about revenue. Clearly propaganda is just as much of a priority for them, maybe even more.

path: 0 19543516 19543910 19545395, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
primrosepathspeedrun 8 points a year ago

If you see their products in stores, steal or sabotage them.

Make stores reluctant to carry their shit. Make this hurt long term.

path: 0 19543516 19543910 19547372, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
BedSharkPal 6 points a year ago

I wish there was some sort of movement where consumers who give a shit about democracy could band together and boycott various companies. So when a company pulls some shit like this there's an immediate effect on their bottom line and they can be held to account.

Could take it further and have some sort of central fund that would also allow compensation to people who would need to buy a more expensive alternative that people could donate to (maybe a little far fetched). People can't be tracking every day what company bends the knee.

path: 0 19543516 19544967, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
acosmichippo 10 points a year ago

problem is it's very fuzzy. there is no black and white cutoff between "boycott" and "no boycott". Every company has done something shitty at some point, so you'd need a constaantly updating sliding scale. But then how would you weigh unrelated issues like privacy, environment, antitrust, freedom of speech, etc? Every person is going to feel more strongly about one thing compared to another.

path: 0 19543516 19544967 19545444, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
PedroMaldonado 66 points a year ago

Fuck Sinclair

path: 0 19543368, hotness: undefined, score: 66, children: 0
CentauriBeau 65 points a year ago

path: 0 19544774, hotness: undefined, score: 65, children: 0
rafoix 61 points a year ago

Monopoly tactics. Time to break it up.

path: 0 19543474, hotness: undefined, score: 61, children: 5
rafoix 6 points a year ago

It is in no way the opposite of a monopoly. It is an oligopoly which seems to have a similar effect to a monopoly.

path: 0 19543474 19544540, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
ohulancutash -17 points a year ago

It’s literally the opposite of a monopoly.

path: 0 19543474 19544490, hotness: undefined, score: -17, children: 3
blitzen 5 points a year ago

This one decision not to air something isn’t the example of monopoly, but the totality of the situation does exhibit monopolistic behavior.

path: 0 19543474 19544490 19544538, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
ohulancutash -5 points a year ago

The network can’t have a monopoly because it’s reliant on affiliates. Affiliates can’t have a monopoly because of ownership limits.

path: 0 19543474 19544490 19544538 19544591, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 1
blitzen 8 points a year ago

Ownership limits, with this FCC?

path: 0 19543474 19544490 19544538 19544591 19544623, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
memfree 19 points a year ago

Wasn't this the initial 'threat' that got ABC to pull Kimmel? I thought Sinclair made this threat, then the FCC chimed in, then everyone else objected.

So now Sinclair is following through, and we'll see what the FCC does.

path: 0 19543735, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 2
Bustedknuckles 12 points a year ago

Was a different affiliate owner, "Nexstar" that wanted permission to break the ownership cap. Same deal as Sinclair, of course

path: 0 19543735 19543871, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
memfree 15 points a year ago

Well, you got me to look it up myself. I think it was both.

From CNN, Sept 17:

“Regardless of ABC’s plans for the future of the program, Sinclair intends not to return Jimmy Kimmel Live! to our air until we are confident that appropriate steps have been taken to uphold the standards expected of a national broadcast platform.”

From Deadline, Sep 17(worth a full read):

The two largest station groups, Nexstar and Sinclair, wielded their influence over ABC‘s decision to pull Jimmy Kimmel‘s show from its ABC stations.

Nexstar strongly objects to recent comments made by Mr. Kimmel concerning the killing of Charlie Kirk and will replace the show with other programming in its ABC-affiliated markets.”

Nexstar’s announcement was followed soon after by ABC’s decision to pull the show indefinitely.

Sinclair Broadcast Group, the largest of ABC’s affiliate groups, said that it also objected to Kimmel’s comments, and said that it would “not lift the suspension of ‘Jimmy Kimmel Live!’ on our stations until formal discussions are held with ABC regarding the network’s commitment to professionalism and accountability.” It also called on Kimmel to make a direct apology to the Kirk family, and for the network to make a “meaningful donation” to them and Turning Point USA.

path: 0 19543735 19543871 19544005, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
blitzen 12 points a year ago

Doesn’t this whole thing highlight how ridiculous that the FCC has purview over over-the-air broadcasts but not cable or the internet?

path: 0 19544601, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
grue 2 points a year ago

It highlights how ridiculous it is that the FCC has been regulatory-captured and is failing to do its job enforcing rules against media consolidation.

path: 0 19544601 19555842, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
edgemaster72 1 point a year ago

GOP: You're right, we should also control cable and the internet. Make America Great Firewall Again!

path: 0 19544601 19546428, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
blitzen 3 points a year ago

I’m not necessarily saying I think the FCC should have full control, I’m just saying the imbalance is notable.

path: 0 19544601 19546428 19547668, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
SlartyBartFast 10 points a year ago

Sinclair can go fuck himself!

path: 0 19552647, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Bwaz 9 points a year ago

The Sinclair ABC station KATU in PORTLAND OREGON will not be airing the Kimmel show. Clearly, just what their viewers want.

path: 0 19556625, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
itsgroundhogdayagain 6 points a year ago

My local ABC is owned by Nexstar. Sinclair owns the FOX station.

path: 0 19544947, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Bonus 5 points a year ago
path: 0 19544748, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Territorial 4 points a year ago

We've given it a lot of thought, and decided to remain evil.

path: 0 19555508, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
inclementimmigrant 4 points a year ago

And the best thing to do is to find the local people who are advertising with your local maga station and let them know that you are boycotting their stores for the foreseeable future and then never watch that local station ever again.

path: 0 19544810, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
rebelsimile 2 points a year ago

oh cool they found more weirdo retrospectives to run I guess.

path: 0 19545652, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
television
television

@piefed.social

login for more options
3339
3877
2698

Welcome to Television

This community is for discussion of anything related to television or streaming.

Other Communities

Television Communities

A community for discussion of anything related to Television via broadcast or streaming.

Rules:

  1. Be respectful and courteous to all members.
  2. Avoid offensive or discriminatory remarks.
  3. Avoid spamming or promoting unrelated products/services.
  4. Avoid personal attacks or engaging in heated arguments.
  5. Do not engage in any form of illegal activity or promote illegal content.
  6. Please mask any and all spoilers with spoiler tags.

Matrix Link

List of Best Rated TV Series as voted by the Fediverse

go to feed...