That post seems to be missing.
DougHolland 166 points 3 years ago

Everywhere I go I'm usually the oldest person in the room, and I've been hearing that line since long before I'd ever heard of Donald Trump.

Always, the left has to support whatever bland middle-of-the-road candidate the Democrats put forward, candidates who seem idea-free and utterly without passion, because the Republicans have a terrifying candidate. Gotta take boring over terrifying.

And Bernie's right. I ain't arguing.

Sure is a bucket of swill we're always forced to drink from, though.

path: 0 2903045, hotness: undefined, score: 166, children: 19
sab 49 points 3 years ago

I guess the important thing is that one should do other things in addition to voting for the bland somewhat shitty candidate that's at least better than the other guy.

Unionising and getting involved on the local level are two good starting points. Encouraging others to unionise and to get involved locally is also good.

Oh, and reading up on alternative election systems and teaching people about it would be good, but maybe too ambitious. Who wants to listen to anyone ramble on about ranked choice or whatever.

path: 0 2903045 2905186, hotness: undefined, score: 49, children: 3
Rbon 16 points 3 years ago

This is the correct answer that so few of us realize. We as a people are able to do more than one thing at once. Yes, we should still vote for the lesser of 2 evils, AND we should also make progress to improve the system itself.

path: 0 2903045 2905186 2908245, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
sik0fewl 9 points 3 years ago

I think yours are better points, but also: voting in the primaries. I'm sure Bernie would support a more progressive candidate as well!

path: 0 2903045 2905186 2911420, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Nihilore 2 points 3 years ago

Just show them the CGP Grey videos, they’d short and entertaining way to introduce people to alternative voting systems

path: 0 2903045 2905186 2951876, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Nonameuser678 13 points 3 years ago

Y'all really need to reform your voting system. We have a preferential system over here in Australia. It's not perfect but it feels like our democracy is a lot more robust and diverse because of it.

path: 0 2903045 2911768, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 6
Enkrod 7 points 3 years ago

When you have two parties in power that would both lose from a more representative system, how do you go about getting better representation?

path: 0 2903045 2911768 2919788, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
Jaysyn 7 points 3 years ago

The Democrats passed RCV in Maine. The #fascist #GOP banned it in Florida.

These two things are not the same.

path: 0 2903045 2911768 2919788 2922022, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Enkrod 2 points 3 years ago

Oh I absolutely agree, one party wants a capitalist dystopia while the other pushes for a genocidal fascist hellscape with an out of control climate and the return of Jim Crow or worse.

Democrats are by far the better alternative, but can the Democratic National Convention be trusted to implement a voting system that would see them face competition from the left? Don't rely on them, people need to push it hard in addition to voting.

path: 0 2903045 2911768 2919788 2922022 2954523, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Marketsupreme 7 points 3 years ago

Man wouldn't that be great. Half the country wants ranked choice voting but the ones in power don't actually represent us they represent who is paying them.

path: 0 2903045 2911768 2912763, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
scroll_responsibly 3 points 3 years ago

the ones in power

If the “ones in power” represent those who are paying them… maybe the ones in power are the ones doing the paying?

path: 0 2903045 2911768 2912763 2920072, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Marketsupreme 3 points 3 years ago

That is exactly correct.

path: 0 2903045 2911768 2912763 2920072 2921728, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
SkyezOpen 12 points 3 years ago

This is why I, at the time, was sort of happy that trump won. I hoped that dems losing what they thought was a sure win to an assclown like trump would make them shape up and put forward some actual candidates that the people could truly get behind. Instead they doubled down with milquetoast shitlibs. We're never going to get out of this rut of voting for the lesser evil without ranked choice voting.

path: 0 2903045 2906507, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
abraxas 14 points 3 years ago

I know this is the wrong server to say it, but there were some things I liked about Hillary. I am still convinced that her gender played far more of a role in people's hatred of her than they will ever be able to accept.

Yes, she's still a neo-liberal, but she's further left than most of the Democrats, and we consistently see that the supermajority of non-Republican voters are simply not as progressive as most of us are. Hillary had a well-conceived labor plan and respected unions. She liked the idea of single-payer, if not enough to spend too much political capital on it. She was left of Obama and of Biden, if still to the right of her "progressive" so-called roots.

Here's my non-opinionated counterpoint. Trump bested Hillary on Labor when his plan was "kick out immigrants and deregulate coal so you get your dangerous job back", and she had a 100 page labor plan that involved things like subsidized retraining of coal workers. The Democrats have learned that you will not win Labor by favoring them. A bad lesson.

path: 0 2903045 2906507 2909015, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
VolatileExhaustPipe 2 points 3 years ago

and respected unions.

X: [Doubt]

path: 0 2903045 2906507 2909015 2928050, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
btaf45 8 points 3 years ago

You don't understand how politics works if you thought that Convicted Sex Offender Treason Trump winning in 2016 would result in anything other than Biden winning the nomination in 2020. The first thing literally guaranteed the 2nd thing.

path: 0 2903045 2906507 2908154, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

Then be your own Goldie Wilson. Run yourself. Enough of my neighbors have told me that I should run, that I am even though I don't believe I am qualified.

I'm running for city council, but if I win in 2026, the fascist that currently holds the chair, and constantly complains about it, won't be attempting to actively harm the community the way they currently are.

Also if I win, and continue winning the 2 terms of city council, 2 terms of mayor, then I'm done, because I'll be 60 at that point and served 16 years in government. At most they could get another term or two out of me as a state level senator or representative. I'm not sticking around past my 60s. Got too much to do.

path: 0 2903045 2957545, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
asteriskeverything 1 point 3 years ago

Just to clarify that this is something that happened often for primaries? That's new to me, even the primaries for 2020 election it didn't seem to have that outright pressure and just politicians and people in public eye endorsing one or the other.

The talk of even if you don't like then vote for them cuz other is worse I only heard really leading up to presidential election.

For what it is worth though I do not watch the news or talking heads and never have, I always prefer reading articles, so maybe I'm just out of the loop on that part of our culture.

path: 0 2903045 2905602, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
feminalpanda 1 point 3 years ago

I think a big part is that progress is slow, I want it faster but as the old generation dies off we will get further left politicians but also right so hopefully with internet and general empathy we can overcome conservatives.

path: 0 2903045 5007497, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
burntbutterbiscuits -1 points 3 years ago

I’ve stopped voting for the worst of two evils. I leave it blank.

path: 0 2903045 5580315, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Veraxus 110 points 3 years ago

Yes, Bernie, we know. We will because we have no other choice. Because of how absolutely broken and corrupt our entire political system is, we can vote for a ideologically repugnant lame-duck conservative or a literal fascist.

No matter how much we hate Biden and the DNC's corrupt, self-serving conservatism, we still have two brain cells to rub together and do, in fact, understand that "both sides" are most definitely NOT the same.

path: 0 2904325, hotness: undefined, score: 110, children: 16
HobbitFoot 38 points 3 years ago

Yeah, both sides aren't the same. How do you deal with the 20% of the country that want a fascist government and the 30% who are ok with it as long as it keeps taxes low and punish the "right people"?

I'm just venting in my reply to your comment; this isn't a criticism of what you said.

path: 0 2904325 2904740, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 7
themeatbridge 10 points 3 years ago

How do you deal with them? With patience and honesty. You talk politics, make it OK to discuss things without demonizing people who disagree with you. If it's impolite to discuss politics, then only the impolite will share their political opinions. And you know who benefits? The fascist. They want the opposition silenced by propriety. They want the extremes to be the loudest voices, because it paints the picture that both sides are unreasonable.

Don't avoid the subject. Dive headfirst into it, and be prepared to resist the urge to roll your eyes or get emotional. Be calm, be rational, and be direct. Conservativism is a fungus that grows in the darkness. In the conservative mind, they are the heroes, and everyone else is evil. You won't win that debate with logic. You have to use the gray rock method, and prove to them that you both disagree with them, and you are not their enemy.

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
abraxas 18 points 3 years ago

Unfortunately, there's a reason cult deprogrammers are heavily trained. If you're not an expert, the above behavior can have the opposite effect, helping reiterate to them that their crazy positions are actually reasonable and acceptable. The worst thing you can do to a cult member is acknowledge their beliefs respectfully. The second worst thing you can do is insult them. See the problem?

You have to use the gray rock method, and prove to them that you both disagree with them, and you are not their enemy.

This is the problem. When someone holds a belief that is not ok, telling them that is "ok" doesn't work. You'll be "one of the good ones", but it'll end there.

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596 2908932, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 1
themeatbridge 6 points 3 years ago

I didn't say that you should tell them it's OK. You can tell someone their ideas are outrageous without getting emotional or argumentative.

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596 2908932 2920533, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
SkyeStarfall 7 points 3 years ago

I've tried basically everything under the sun with ly parents and family. Including variations of this.

It doesn't work.

If someone is as set in their ways and conspiracies and worldview. There's no getting them out if it, if they don't already want to. They just come up with whatever counterargument or idea that makes sense to them or supports them. Real or imagined. Facts and reality literally don't matter.

About the only thing left I'm gonna end up trying to do is to effectively give them a form of ideological shock, which may end up just shattering their worldview. Not exactly intentional, mind you, but just by living my own life. Maybe having their child be something they're supposed to hate will shake up their foundational beliefs enough to question things.

..or it may not. Probably the more likely answer.

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596 2912960, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
themeatbridge 5 points 3 years ago

Yes, and I'm very sorry you're dealing with that. You're right, you're not going to fix a conservative mind. The strategies I mentioned are recommended to protect and preserve your own mental health, not to fix theirs. Set boundaries, identify gaslighting, disengage emotionally from their outbursts, and protect your self esteem from their whims. It might help them recognize their issues and improve their relationship with you, but there are no guarantees.

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596 2912960 2920429, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
HobbitFoot 4 points 3 years ago

The only decent tactic I found is to focus on having the government being the arbitor of who is a good person.

You also have to argue against the programming that relying on any unearned government assistance is bad. So, the best way to respond is asking if there should be a qualification that anyone working shouldn't get the same benefits of someone who is broke.

It isn't perfect, though. There is also a lot of tribalism.

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596 2905917, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Agent_of_Kayos 3 points 3 years ago

This is the same reason I talk about how much I am paid with my coworkers

Sure it makes sense that someone here longer than me will get more, but of two people are hired at the same time and one is making $3,000 more (My own experience) then it's bs

path: 0 2904325 2904740 2905596 2926937, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
variaatio 6 points 3 years ago

However recognise also.... nothing is solved by voting biden in instead of Trump. Since the issue isn't Trump the person, but the wider politican movement. There will be next trump after this trump and next trump after that trump. Names change, the situation doesn't.

It's just kicking the can down the road for another 4 years. Nothing more, nothing less. US voters and system really need to do some hard long term thinking and planning to come up with a plan to actually solve the issue. Instead of keeping kicking the can down the road for 4 years at a time. Since again (as with Trump in 2016) the can doesn't get kicked along for yeat another 4 years. Instead when USA goes to kick the can, it is actually this time a glass bottled molotov, that bursts in flames upon being tried to be kicked yeat again.

path: 0 2904325 2943209, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Wooki -2 points 3 years ago

You throw corrupt around like it has meaning when it’s nothing more than compromise. It’s compromise in order for the party to get into power, not corruption… conflating the two is ignorant to the fact DNC wouldn’t not get into power ever without it.

Welcome to the democratic process.

path: 0 2904325 2943786, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Psythik -8 points 3 years ago

Yeah try telling that to Hexbear and see how well that goes for you lol

path: 0 2904325 2908313, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 5
Millie -7 points 3 years ago

Good thing hexchan's take is totally irrelevant!

path: 0 2904325 2908313 2909841, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 4
VolatileExhaustPipe 4 points 3 years ago

You really seem to hold a grudge. Is it a grudge aimed at the right persons and is it a grudge to hold at all?

path: 0 2904325 2908313 2909841 2928291, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Psythik 1 point 3 years ago

If you spent 5 minutes on Hexbear you'd understand.

path: 0 2904325 2908313 2909841 2928291 2942049, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Psythik 1 point 3 years ago

Good point lol

path: 0 2904325 2908313 2909841 2942032, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Jaysyn 87 points 3 years ago

Done and done, Bernie.

West to accuse him of only backing Biden because he is “fearful of the neo-fascism of Trump.

That quote shows how frankly, stupid, Cornel West is. Game theory & math show that it is impossible for a 3rd party run to succeed with US style FPtP voting in place. Get rid of that & then we can talk, but not to you, shit for brains.

path: 0 2901838, hotness: undefined, score: 87, children: 29
Sharpiemarker 42 points 3 years ago

Yep Bernie is right, 100%.

path: 0 2901838 2902331, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 4
btaf45 24 points 3 years ago

Yep Bernie is right, 100%.

He always had been. I've never known him to be wrong.

path: 0 2901838 2902331 2902639, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 3
Sharpiemarker -8 points 3 years ago

Except that one time he ran against the Democrat and got a wannabe dictator elected President. Aside from that.

path: 0 2901838 2902331 2902639 2909322, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 2
Ensign_Crab 6 points 3 years ago

Clinton earned her loss.

path: 0 2901838 2902331 2902639 2909322 2917258, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
Touching_Grass 28 points 3 years ago path: 0 2901838 2902524, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
Zagorath 11 points 3 years ago

Damn, fake London actually did something good? I'm sure it's not the first time that's happened, but it is the first time I've heard of that happening, as a non-Canadian.

But I believe that's not the first, and won't be the last, time Ontario has regressively overruled the democratic will for genuinely beneficial change.

path: 0 2901838 2902524 2904219, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
TokenBoomer 5 points 3 years ago

Does this inform your opinion?

path: 0 2901838 2902073, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 10
Kalkaline 4 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2901838 2902073 2902623, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 9
norbert 5 points 3 years ago path: 0 2901838 2902073 2902623 2904238, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
TokenBoomer 4 points 3 years ago

Here’s another link that’s not paywalled.

path: 0 2901838 2902073 2902623 2906567, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Sean 1 point 3 years ago

@Kalkaline @TokenBoomer I didn't subscribe either, but the single-party state and city of New York isn't welcoming to small democracy. The article is from December 2020,and prior to the unreasonable ballot access reforms that culled the candidates for governor from a handful in 2018 to only the duopoply in 2022, a first time in generations for a state that has fusion ballot for over a century going from one of the most reliable minor party accessible states to that of the least accessible.

path: 0 2901838 2902073 2902623 2902983, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
fragmentcity -5 points 3 years ago

Don't put this on people posting links.

Use a browser extension if it's personally important to you, or just paste the link in yourself. Archive sites go offline; they shouldn't be primary link sources.

path: 0 2901838 2902073 2902623 2904226, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 5
Zorque 9 points 3 years ago

It's personally important to the person sharing it. The reason they're not subscribing is because it isn't personally important.

If you want to share information, you need to take the responsibility of making sure it's readable. You can't just throw shit at the wall and expect everyone else to interpret it correctly. That's a recipe for misunderstanding and divisiveness.

path: 0 2901838 2902073 2902623 2904226 2906139, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
nalyd 5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2901838 2902555, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Sorchist 3 points 3 years ago

I mean, if Trump won and abolished all elections and declared himself dictator for life, then West's chances of being elected president as a third party candidate wouldn't actually change one way or the other.

So maybe being a feckless third party candidate in an authoritarian neofascist dictatorship isn't really that different from being a feckless third party candidate in a constitutional democracy.

path: 0 2901838 2902469, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Zaktor 3 points 3 years ago

Or just like, compete in a Democratic primary like Bernie did. Maybe don't shoot for president on your literal first attempt, but you can if you really want to. Bernie was way more successful in promoting his message running in those Democratic primaries than any of the random Greens have ever been.

path: 0 2901838 2905745, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
variaatio 2 points 3 years ago

a 3rd party run to succeed with US style FPtP voting in place

However as 2016 showed it is also impossible for the FPTP lesser of two evils routine to keep kicking the can down the road forever, you eventually will land on the "bandit" sector on trying to yet again run the Russian roulette of "surely the fear of the greater evil will again make the lesser evil win".

Since lesser of two evils too long leads to apathy. People won't be rebelling by voting for Trump, by voting for even Cornel West, they won't be even really rebelling at all. Instead they will be so disillusioned by decades of lesser of two evil, they will instead sign up for extra shift of work or decide to sleep in bed to rest for a day instead of going voting.

The great enemy of Democrats is not Trump, it is sleeping peoples party and you don't win against sleeping peoples party with negative campaigning and fear mongering. It will just make them sleep more. Only thing to make them awake is positive campaigning. Likeable, popular, enthusiasm generating candidates and platforms. The message of "no we can make a change" instead of "please help us keep the status guo alive for 4 more years by kicking the can down the road by preventing greater evil for these four years."

path: 0 2901838 2943362, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
VolatileExhaustPipe 0 points 3 years ago

Who do you think is smarter, a leading intellectual, harvard professor and still relevant figure or a kbin poster?

While I don't prescribe that smarts matter perspective does and my perspective is that it seems you are missing something. Do you think a person critically looking at our system and having spoken with very learned people for decades knows more than you or maybe talks on a different framework? I sure hope you do reflect on that again.

path: 0 2901838 2928742, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Yostme -2 points 3 years ago

Have you considered that Cornell West supporters don't want Biden either? Maybe in their eyes the only choices are to vote for West or to not vote at all.

path: 0 2901838 2902584, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 5
protist 6 points 3 years ago

Cornell West supporters

I've never met one. Have you?

path: 0 2901838 2902584 2902682, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 4
cabron_offsets 0 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2901838 2902584 2902682 2904398, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Yostme -5 points 3 years ago

You should probably leave the house more often then.

path: 0 2901838 2902584 2902682 2905483, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 2
protist 7 points 3 years ago

I leave my house every day and probably interact with 30 or more people, also every day

People talk politics all the time, never once have I heard anyone mention Cornell West

path: 0 2901838 2902584 2902682 2905483 2905484, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
MoonRaven 76 points 3 years ago

This is why the 2 party system is fucking bad. In the Netherlands we have a wide range of parties we can vote for, no need for strategic votes like this.

path: 0 2909393, hotness: undefined, score: 76, children: 13
ezterry 28 points 3 years ago

It's a symptom of the winner takes all election system.. Its most stable with one or two major parties. The hope for more parties is one reason some of us push for instant runoff elections, but it "confuses" people so its not had the traction I'd like.

path: 0 2909393 2912019, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 6
Tak -1 points 3 years ago

The US can't support more than two parties with how the elections are run. Instead the primaries have to filter down the varied candidates into compromises

path: 0 2909393 2912019 2917456, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
Pipoca 2 points 3 years ago

Britain uses the same system and has some successful third parties like the Scottish National Party.

Regional third parties tend to dramatically outperform national ones. Because FPTP does best with 2 candidate elections, but those 2 candidates don't have to be in the same party across every district.

For presidential elections - yeah. You run a third party candidate like Nader, you get Bush. You run Perot, you get Clinton.

path: 0 2909393 2912019 2917456 2952878, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
commie 1 point 3 years ago

You run a third party candidate like Nader, you get Bush.

no. gore won florida, but the supreme court coronated bush. anyway, more democrats voted for bush than voted for nader.

You run Perot, you get Clinton.

oof. https://en.wikipedia.org/...

two in a fuckin row, dude. maybe you shouldn't talk about something you don't know.

path: 0 2909393 2912019 2917456 2952878 2966378, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Tak 1 point 3 years ago

How is it the same system?

path: 0 2909393 2912019 2917456 2952878 2957510, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
SkyeStarfall 20 points 3 years ago

It seriously gives some really bad incentives.

Yes, voting for Biden is better... But it also very much allows the Democrats to abuse the situation and put whoever they want on there. Because the alternative will always be worse. And so you're destined to always having an acceptable president, but never a great one that people really want.

We have a parliament here and, yeah, it's so much better in basically every way. I can actually vote for what I want and not have to worry that it's not strategic. Because I'm the end it will just empower the party and thus give them more negotiating power.

path: 0 2909393 2912750, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
Aceticon 9 points 3 years ago

The Netherlands has proportional vote, that's why.

With electoral circles instead of PV, mathematically the two largest parties get way more representatives than the percentage of the public votes they get, and the bigger the electoral circles and fewer the representatives the worse it gets.

(Further, voters own behaviour changes to one of "useful vote" rather than "choosing those who better represents them", plus tribalism becomes way more extreme when there is only a black & white choice - so lots of votes are driven by team loyalty - all of which makes it even worse)

(Also smaller parties dissapear, both because they can't secure funding and because their members lose hope of ever making a difference. The closest you get to "small parties" in the US are independents, running for a very specific electoral circle only and whose voice is a drop in the ocean in a place like the US Congress)

The US has single representative very large electoral circles for Congress and double representative State-sized electoral circles for the Senate, so their system is rigged to pretty much the max it can and the result is a power duopoly.

I lived in The Netherlands and now I live in a country where the system is somewhat less so (smaller electoral circles, multiple representatives per circle) and even here you see the two largest parties getting and extra 10-20% each representatives in parliament compared to the popular vote (the governing party has 56% of parliamentary seats on 42% of votes cast) whilst the smaller parties have half as many representatives as their popular vote (in other words, every vote for a smaller party counts less than half as much as a vote for a large party, which is hardly democratic).

Most so-called "democratic" nations have this kind of rigged system, but places like the US and Britain take it to the extreme, so it's unsurprising that when the economic supercycle is at the point where the many start hurting, in the absence of true choice you get instead the internal takeover of the rightmost of the party dupoly by the Trumps and Boris Johnsons of this world offering an ultra-nationalist far-right populist mix of othering, scapegoating and simple "solutions".

(Funilly enough if you compare The Netherlands with Britain, whilst even now the far-right is stuck at maybe 20% in the former, in the latter it took over the Tory Party from the inside - which is far easier than convince half the population to vote for them - and hence has been in power for almost a decade with an absolute majority).

path: 0 2909393 2925828, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
fushuan 5 points 3 years ago

We also have more than 2 parties in Spain, however the way votes are counted it's better to vote for the big parties than the local ones. Literally, voting your local party and them supporting the big "left" party will amount less seats than just voting the big party. Usually people vote locally but since we have the looming danger of the extreme right party, people have been focusing on the big left, just to ensure that we don't get Vox.

Still having more than 2 parties promotes discussion and makes it really difficult for a party to go rogue.

path: 0 2909393 2913066, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Lols 1 point 3 years ago

in theory, in practice strategic votes still matter for the actual government because parties can just decide not to work with someone and the biggest party gets first picks for the coalition

meaning that in practice, having the biggest party still matters massively, and in a mostly right wing country, the right gets to vote for who best represents them, while the left still has to vote strategically if they want to take actual administrative positions

path: 0 2909393 2955229, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
tryptaminev 1 point 3 years ago

I'd like to disagree. strategic voting means you shift your vote to what you suppose to be more majority carrying, which usually tends to go for centrists with quite some neoliberal positions. And they usually manage to put through the same shit as the right on economic issues, or implementing authoritarian attacks on civil rights, like mass surveilance.

It is the same thing in the US. There is the far right extremist republicans and the right wing democrats (by european standards) because they try to cover the supposed center, and everyone left of that still votes for them. So in the end they still get no health care, no social security, lots of warmongering, bad schools and institutionalized racism...

In Germany we get the same bs with people voting social democrats "strategically", that end up pushing for neoliberal economic policies and authoritarian social policies.

path: 0 2909393 2955229 2959331, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Lols 1 point 3 years ago

im not sure what youre disagreeing with

path: 0 2909393 2955229 2959331 2961170, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
TeenieBopper 59 points 3 years ago

Look. Am I going to vote for whoever the democratic nominee is? Yeah.

Am I going to be saying the democratic party is generally also racist, transobobic, capitalist, and don't really give a shit about you? Also yes.

The republican party being more racist, transobobic, and capitalist doesn't mean the democratic party isn't. And I'm sick of people pretending otherwise.

path: 0 2922445, hotness: undefined, score: 59, children: 14
Aceticon 18 points 3 years ago

The system is rigged, hence the only choice is between evils.

No wonder american politicians are constantly harping about how the US is such a "Great Democracy" - it's to compensate just how much the mathematically rigged for political duopoly american system fails to represent the will of the average citizen, unlike an actual Democracy.

path: 0 2922445 2925259, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 3
JustZ 13 points 3 years ago

Nah, we almost had Bernie. We had FDR. We will prevail again.

path: 0 2922445 2925259 2934457, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
norbert 4 points 3 years ago

This right here folks, goddamned right. Organize, talk to your friends, and go vote every single election, participate. Get involved, canvas for local people you like, run for something; you'd be surprised how many city council seats or streets commissioner slots are completely vacant. The deck is stacked against us, the Republican party has been cultivating their bigoted base for 70 years and it's moved the entire country significantly right. We need to begin doing the same thing now if we want to win against the strain of Christo-fascism/Corporatocracy growing here in the U.S. There are only three boxes: soap, ballot, and bullet. We obviously all love using our soapbox, I'd recommend trying the ballot as well. The other box likely ends badly for a lot of people and should be avoided while the other two are still options. If we organize and vote we can absolutely drag the country back to left.

Did you guys hear about that black guy that became mayor of the racist little town simply by filling out the paperwork? We need more of that energy.

path: 0 2922445 2925259 2934457 2939356, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
AngryCommieKender 2 points 3 years ago

Was there ever a resolution to that? Seriously the FBI should have been arresting the assholes that were preventing the Mayor from doing his job.

path: 0 2922445 2925259 2934457 2939356 2957144, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

Then run. I am. Not because I wanted to, it wasn't my idea. My neighbors keep telling me that I should. If I can take the seat away from the fascist that currently holds it, in the 2026 election, I'll consider that the only real win I need.

path: 0 2922445 2956925, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
traches -1 points 3 years ago

…. You watch republicans force kids to detransition and say “yeah but the dems are just as bad”?

Like I get that they’re not perfect but holy fuck shit jesus are the republicans a bunch of ghouls. Not a single candidate even acknowledged that climate change is happening at their debate; I got kids who will have to grow up in this world dude.

Both sides my ass, only one is trying to make gilead a reality and just because the other doesn’t pass leftist purity testing doesn’t put them on the same level as actual fascists.

path: 0 2922445 2952199, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 7
Lols 6 points 3 years ago

you missed the word 'more'

its right here in this sentence (ill make it bold for you):

The republican party being more racist, transobobic, and capitalist doesn’t mean the democratic party isn’t.

the word 'more' in that sentence means they're in fact not saying dems are just as bad, or on the same level as actual fascists, theyre explicitly and literally saying democrats are not as bad

easy mistake to make, hope this helps

path: 0 2922445 2952199 2954601, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 6
traches 0 points 3 years ago

Kinda doing some heavy lifting don’t you think? One side is banning books written by minorities and replacing them with pragerU propaganda, the other is…. not doing that? And you’re painting them with the same brush?

path: 0 2922445 2952199 2954601 2955417, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 5
Lols 2 points 3 years ago

And you’re painting them with the same brush?

you missed the word ‘more’

its right here in this sentence (ill make it bold and italicised for you, and put arrows around it):

The republican party being -> more <- racist, transobobic, and capitalist doesn’t mean the democratic party isn’t.

the word ‘more’ in that sentence means they’re in fact not painting democrats and republicans with the same brush, theyre explicitly, literally and unambiguously saying democrats are not as bad

'democrats are not as bad as republicans' is not painting them with the same brush

likewise, ignoring racism and transphobia or demanding others do so because its your team doing it is not protecting minorities, its actually just accepting racism and transphobia as the price of doing business, which is horrible

easy mistake to make, hope this helps

path: 0 2922445 2952199 2954601 2955417 2960820, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
commie -6 points 3 years ago

i prefer just not to vote for racist, transobobic, and capitalist parties and their candidates.

path: 0 2922445 2929009, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 0
StarServal 53 points 3 years ago

I had this whole long post typed up but decided it all boiled down to this:

Fuck you. Give us better candidates. Populism is winning because you keep giving us disgusting ultimatums. Do better.

path: 0 2934319, hotness: undefined, score: 53, children: 27
AngryCommieKender 4 points 3 years ago

Agreed, but with one caveat. You are the better candidate. Stop waiting for someone else to take the job, they all have imposter syndrome too, so fucking go for it and keep the fascists out at the local levels, not just the federal.

I am putting my money where my mouth is and self funding my campaign for city council in 2026.

path: 0 2934319 2956567, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
StarServal 9 points 3 years ago

I am absolutely not the better candidate. I’m not leadership material at all, and I’m probably as bad as Trump at receiving criticism. The difference is that I recognize my flaws.

path: 0 2934319 2956567 2956805, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
the_post_of_tom_joad 7 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2934319 2956567 2956805 2958217, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
VolatileExhaustPipe 1 point 3 years ago

Who is your power base, who is your voting base and who does the organizing and networking for you?

path: 0 2934319 2956567 2965206, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

In my case it's my neighbors. They're the ones that thought I should run in the first place, and I already know more than half the district.

path: 0 2934319 2956567 2965206 2969648, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
VolatileExhaustPipe 1 point 3 years ago

Definitely a start, but - depending on how many votes you need - politically a bit blurry. Wish you luck.

Do you know Jineology or Bookchin?

path: 0 2934319 2956567 2965206 2969648 2990980, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
MoistMogwai 1 point 3 years ago

Not to mention, thanks to the electoral college there are only 5 to 8 states that actually get to decide who is President. My current State has voted for a Republican every year since 1964. I would have had to have been born in 1943 to have a fraction of my vote count nationally. I still vote, but I live in a State where I might as well write in someone I believe in for President. If Biden wins, that's better than Trump, but it's still so bad. As my body is breaking down at a job that doesn't pay for a house I can't afford, asking us to wait 4 years for someone better is insulting.

path: 0 2934319 2955728, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
gowan 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2934319 2968611, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
nte -3 points 3 years ago

Why don't you do better, democracy is not "them up there", it needs everyone. You are as responsible as any one else. You know better, why aren't you in the ballot?

path: 0 2934319 2958399, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
Bernie_Sandals -13 points 3 years ago

You know the Democratic Party isn't a monolith right? It's voters decide mostly who is in charge. If people want a candidate other than Biden they can vote for them in the primary.

Since no viable candidates have shown up, Biden is the best option for now

path: 0 2934319 2934360, hotness: undefined, score: -13, children: 16
bonus_crab 31 points 3 years ago

it is a monolith though. Courts ruled after 2016 that the DNC can't defraud voters or candidates because they aren't required to have a fair primary. Their lawyers argued in court that they should be allowed to select a winner undemocratically, and won.

link

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2938406, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 3
Natanael 3 points 3 years ago

That's because the party isn't a government institution, and candidates can run as independent (which does lower their chances, but the law don't care about that part)

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2938406 2951077, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
prole 3 points 3 years ago

Not sure why this comment is downvoted, you're not wrong. It might not be ideal, but it's the truth

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2938406 2951077 2954954, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
StarServal 10 points 3 years ago

If they need to threaten voters with ultimatums, then they’re not doing good enough.

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2934447, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 8
agamemnonymous 6 points 3 years ago

Cool, but we have FPTP elections, so the choice will always be the lesser evil of the two front runners. Of course a real alternative would be preferable, but until we have a fundamentally different voting paradigm, ultimatums are a mathematical certainty.

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2934447 2934609, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 7
Wogi 9 points 3 years ago

They know that. They plan for it. They don't want any actual liberals to run so the game is rigged against them from the start

Fuck them. They have absolutely no incentive to pass meaningful change and so the country will continue to swing further and further to the right, as bit by bit the conservatives sweep more of the government under their control.

The Democrats are contributing to the problem.

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2934447 2934609 2934732, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 6
AngryCommieKender 6 points 3 years ago

Then show up. You'd be better than what we've got. Lord knows that since 4 of my neighbors told me independently of each other that I should run for city council, I'm looking into running for city council, and I would be the first to tell you that I am not qualified, which seems to be exactly why they think I am qualified.

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2956683, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
Bernie_Sandals 2 points 3 years ago

Already volunteering in local county politics to push my little slice of the democrats to be more radical, about a third of them already support Bernie in the rural south so I'd like to think it's going well.

Will most likely run soonish but that's a tall task down here.

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2956683 3034289, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
AngryCommieKender 2 points 3 years ago

Good luck!

path: 0 2934319 2934360 2956683 3034289 3052681, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
notannpc 52 points 3 years ago

It would be cool if we had another candidate that didn’t suck instead of relying, once again, on voting for anyone but Trump.

Because I don’t think most people are voting FOR Biden, as much as they are voting AGAINST Trump.

path: 0 2906149, hotness: undefined, score: 52, children: 17
Poggervania 33 points 3 years ago

It was the same in the 2016 Elections too. Most left-leaning people I talked to did not want Hillary in office, but they wanted Trump not in office more than Hillary - so a vote for Hillary it was.

Honestly, both parties fucking suck, and it sucks even more that our options are literally “right-leaning centrists” and “fascism”.

path: 0 2906149 2906787, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 5
doctordevice 18 points 3 years ago

Neoliberals need to get this through their head: a sizeable minority of us do not like the Democratic Party and don't believe we are represented by them, regardless of whatever empty rhetoric they spew. Sizeable enough that you can lose elections without us. We are not a long-term reliable voting bloc and you need to learn tactics other than bullying and fear-mongering to get your way.

To abuse a metaphor, Hillary Clinton and her primary shenanigans were the straw that broke my back. Donald Trump and what he represented was bad enough that I managed to muster enough energy to vote for Hillary in 2016 and Biden in 2020. But I'm tired, and if I'm able to muster the energy for 2024 it'll be the last time. I'm done voting for people that I do not want to be my president. It doesn't have to be a progressive, but give me someone I can stomach or you can leave me out of your election math.

And the tired refrain of "Biden is the most progressive president ever" isn't a consolation prize, it's salt in the wound.

path: 0 2906149 2906787 2908423, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 3
Uranium3006 8 points 3 years ago

once the republican party dies, the democratic party is in big trouble for exactly this reason.

path: 0 2906149 2906787 2908423 2908629, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
burntbutterbiscuits 1 point 3 years ago

He isn’t though. By a long shot. Biden is right of center

path: 0 2906149 2906787 2908423 5580385, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
doctordevice 2 points 3 years ago

I agree, that's why that phrase is salt in the wound. It's said by neoliberals who themselves are right of center but don't realize it. They seem to think it's supposed to make progressives feel better.

path: 0 2906149 2906787 2908423 5580385 5589436, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
affiliate 7 points 3 years ago

it’s interesting to think about the damage trump has done to the progressive movement simply by “commandeering” 3 election cycles in that way. because the consequences of him winning are so catastrophic, we’ll end up with 12 years of presidents that were either trump or centrists hailed as the best way to beat him. just to clarify, i’m not trying to downplay the damage he’s done in other ways, nor how terrible it would be if he were elected

i wonder how much easier it would have been to elect a progressive if the past 3 republican nominees had been evil in a more mild and traditional way.

path: 0 2906149 2906787 2912100, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
MisterFrog 5 points 3 years ago

There's a lot of things to march on the street for, but too be honest as an outsider, national voting reform to bring in a truly democratic system (not first past the post...) needs to be at the top of the list.

So many things broken in your political system flows from it.

path: 0 2906149 2913690, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
VolatileExhaustPipe 2 points 3 years ago

You know I've been here the whole time, you could leverage the same critique in 1998 and yet wouldn't have gotten a proper voting reform. The point is for that you need a lot of power and that power you don't get currently.

Your idea is: Lets create the system so that we get more power, to do that we need enough power to change the system. You see how that is a reverse order?

If that isn't the way forward as strategic goal (since it was tried for decades and there was no success in changing it), what specific goals can you personally do to create power? Power that can benefit your community and possibly the world (just so that no nationalistic takes are posed as solutions).

path: 0 2906149 2913690 2928395, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
abraxas 4 points 3 years ago

You say that, but Biden dominated the Primary in 2020. I wanted Warren. I'd have been ok with Bernie. But I have to admit, Biden just had so many more votes.

The US is filled with conservatives. Most Democratic voters are simply sane conservatives. Biden is their idea of a good candidate. An economic neoliberal that believes in modest safety nets and personal freedom when not at the expense of others. More importantly, he believes in compromise (something Democrats need because their constituents are not single-issue voters, and often have different opinions on the issues)

It would be cool if more people were more progressive in the US. But the media doesn't really want to make that possible.

path: 0 2906149 2908868, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
VolatileExhaustPipe 1 point 3 years ago

Even if you take the parliamentarian, electoralist position about the primary in 2020 then you have to look at the structures and power bases before you can (potentially rightful) stretch the result to opinions.

Party internal politics mean that there will often be votes being cast strategically influenced by functionaries, mandated people and the old guard.

path: 0 2906149 2908868 2928529, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
SpaceCowboy 1 point 3 years ago

That's all democracy ever is. A check to keep the worst people from being in power. Non-democracies don't have this, you have to use violence to remove bad people from power. And most likely die trying to do it.

They really should tech in schools how voting really works. Figure out who the worst one is, and vote for the one that is most likely to beat the worst one. You never get everything you want in one election cycle, you have to keep on voting again and again and over a few decades you get some progress. It sucks but it's better than the alternatives.

That's why voting is a duty, it sucks, but you have to do it.

path: 0 2906149 2909112, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
emergencyfood 13 points 3 years ago

Are you confusing democracy with first-past-the-post voting? Democracy is rule by, or at least for, the people. First-past-the-post is a very old, simple and rather primitive way of choosing representatives that, as you said, is just a 'check to keep the worst people from being in power'. Newer, more representative systems such as proportional representation and approval voting are better at choosing actually good parties / candidates.

path: 0 2906149 2909112 2909443, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Zagorath 9 points 3 years ago

Are you aware that voting systems other than First Past the Post exist?

path: 0 2906149 2909112 2909221, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Ensign_Crab 2 points 3 years ago

That’s all democracy ever is. A check to keep the worst people from being in power.

I think ours might be broken.

path: 0 2906149 2909112 2917171, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
grayman 0 points 3 years ago

They should run Obama. Not that one. The other one. But Hillary would probably have her murdered.

path: 0 2906149 2909257, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
norbert 1 point 3 years ago

At least she'd lose a few voters by doing it, not like some other clowns eh?

path: 0 2906149 2909257 2938531, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
grayman 1 point 3 years ago

The whole thing is a circus. All clowns.

path: 0 2906149 2909257 2938531 2964523, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Blackmist 46 points 3 years ago

If your whole selling point is "Yeah, things are still gonna be shit for you, but at least we're not Nazis!" then at some point you're going to lose again.

Yeah, life is going to be no better under the Republicans either, but some people's lives will be significantly worse, and for some voters, that's enough.

"He's not hurting the people he needs to be hurting." That's an actual quote from an actual Trump voter. That's what you're dealing with. For some, happiness is a zero sum game. They'll quite happily suck down a spoonful of warm shit if some other sucker has to suck down two.

path: 0 2917474, hotness: undefined, score: 46, children: 17
cabron_offsets 12 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2917474 2920322, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 6
Noughmad 17 points 3 years ago

Most people are rational actors

Have you met any people?

path: 0 2917474 2920322 2930974, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
sentient_loom 10 points 3 years ago

The real problem is that they're all traitorous filth. Trump is objectively worse, but he also doesn't hide it, and that appeals to people.

Sanders was the only legit alternative in literally decades but now he has to be subservient to Biden.

There is no solution on the horizon. I agree that people should vote Biden... but in truth Biden should be replaced with an actual leader. That won't happen. And while the Democrats remain almost as evil as the Republicans it's gonna be a hard sell.

path: 0 2917474 2920322 2922128, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
Sean -1 points 3 years ago

@sentient_loom @cabron_offsets Sanders has been put into a trance of feeling "heard" by Biden while being neutered in any chance of delivering real material benefit to the people. His career as being a truth-speaker from outside the elite, he's shot his shot to do some real good and will probably retire next year.

path: 0 2917474 2920322 2922128 2922483, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
killa44 1 point 3 years ago

I mean, he is old af too.

path: 0 2917474 2920322 2922128 2922483 2928833, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Blackmist 7 points 3 years ago

That may be so, but isn't the result always a little bit closer to 50/50 than most of us are comfortable with?

The fate of the most powerful country on Earth hangs on the whims of a tiny percentage of voters in swing states. If you live somewhere like Houston your vote does not matter. That state is going red and always will. It's batshit insane that a state can be 48/52 and that just counts exactly as if it was 0/100.

path: 0 2917474 2920322 2922066, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Syrc 11 points 3 years ago

If your whole selling point is “Yeah, things are still gonna be shit for you, but at least we’re not Nazis!” then at some point you’re going to lose again.

Exactly what happened in Italy. Why is the left all over the world unable to present an actually competent and charismatic candidate?

path: 0 2917474 2920779, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 7
fadingembers 16 points 3 years ago

Because the capitalist class still controls them, curtailing any candidates that would be a threat to their power.

path: 0 2917474 2920779 2921968, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 5
t_jpeg 16 points 3 years ago

Literally. When the capitalist class are the ones funding the majority if political parties in your country, you are left with either voting for a really right wing candidate or a slightly less right wing candidate.

path: 0 2917474 2920779 2921968 2922158, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 4
Blackmist 19 points 3 years ago

“It comes from a very ancient democracy, you see..."

"You mean, it comes from a world of lizards?"

"No," said Ford, who by this time was a little more rational and coherent than he had been, having finally had the coffee forced down him, "nothing so simple. Nothing anything like so straightforward. On its world, the people are people. The leaders are lizards. The people hate the lizards and the lizards rule the people."

"Odd," said Arthur, "I thought you said it was a democracy."

"I did," said Ford. "It is."

"So," said Arthur, hoping he wasn't sounding ridiculously obtuse, "why don't people get rid of the lizards?"

"It honestly doesn't occur to them," said Ford. "They've all got the vote, so they all pretty much assume that the government they've voted in more or less approximates to the government they want."

"You mean they actually vote for the lizards?"

"Oh yes," said Ford with a shrug, "of course."

"But," said Arthur, going for the big one again, "why?"

"Because if they didn't vote for a lizard," said Ford, "the wrong lizard might get in."

path: 0 2917474 2920779 2921968 2922158 2925066, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 3
the_post_of_tom_joad 0 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2917474 2920779 2959484, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
AssholeDestroyer 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2917474 2959815, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

Then run yourself. Be your own Goldie Wilson. I am, though that is because my neighbors keep telling me to run for city council. The only difference between me and the old fucks that are currently holding the seat is just 40 years of age, and I'm over 40.

path: 0 2917474 2957182, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Kirb00 45 points 3 years ago

The DNC wouldn't be in this mess if they didn't play the women card in 2016 while screwing Bernie over. Now we're stuck with two old men who's out of touch with the younger generation of Americans.

path: 0 2925269, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 0
qwertyWarlord 45 points 3 years ago

The problem is I don't want Biden, I don't like him but I have to vote for him because the alternative is worse

path: 0 2929662, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 12
caveman8000 43 points 3 years ago

America needs ranked voting so we can get out of this two party loser cycle

path: 0 2929662 2930415, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 3
floofloof 7 points 3 years ago

And that's exactly why the USA will never get ranked choice voting.

path: 0 2929662 2930415 2939316, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
ReadFanon 3 points 3 years ago

Does ranked voting in other countries undermine their two-party system though?

path: 0 2929662 2930415 2951320, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
hglman 4 points 3 years ago

It does not, the only countries with meaningful 3rd parties are those with proportional electorial systems.

path: 0 2929662 2930415 2951320 2953993, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
SlikPikker 17 points 3 years ago

No-one wants Biden but the electoral math makes it the better choice than Trump or implicit Trump (not voting).

I wouldn't caucus for him, but if I was a US citizen I'd hold my nose and vote.

path: 0 2929662 2932066, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
Viking_Hippie 5 points 3 years ago

By far the lesser evil but the lesser evil is still evil. Would be swell if there was a non-evil option just this once!

path: 0 2929662 2935074, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Toastypickle 3 points 3 years ago

As south park so eloquently put it, you're either voting for a giant douche or a turd sandwich.

path: 0 2929662 2952290, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
dangblingus 4 points 3 years ago

Ehh South Park is aggressively centrist. They "both sides" their arguments constantly and provide zero alternative progressive solutions. It's become satire for satire's sake.

path: 0 2929662 2952290 2955781, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
AngryCommieKender 4 points 3 years ago

It was always satire for satire's sake. South Park never tried to present solutions, they just excell at pointing out the absurdity of current events.

path: 0 2929662 2952290 2955781 2956771, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
davi 0 points 3 years ago

I don’t like him but I have to vote for him because the alternative is worse

as you will be doing for the rest of your life; never voting for the candidates you like and you'll never be given the chance because of democrats. meanwhile your political opposites will perpetually be getting the candidates that they do like and a plethora of choices.

path: 0 2929662 2931396, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
agamemnonymous 7 points 3 years ago

How many moderate Republicans begrudgingly voted Trump in 2016?

path: 0 2929662 2931396 2934654, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
Viking_Hippie 5 points 3 years ago

moderate Republicans

There's no such thing anymore. Moderate conservatives are Democrats like Biden and the GOP is a literal fascist party now.

path: 0 2929662 2931396 2934654 2935157, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
iByteABit 42 points 3 years ago

It's sad for Bernie and other leftist parties that they can mathematically never get into power, but this is the smartest thing he can do given the system. Use his publicity to promote the closest party to his own so that the fascists don't get into power.

path: 0 2914000, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 5
Dagwood222 16 points 3 years ago

This is what the extreme Right did. The Moral Majority would show up at every local GOP meeting. If the local club usually had twenty people at the meeting, the MMs would show up with fifty. Picking the candidate for dog catcher or justice of the peace? The MM were there and they made sure they got their candidate in.

Nixon did something similar. After he failed to win the Senate seat he hit the road and campaigned hard for every GOP he could find. By 1968 he had dozens of delegates to the national convention in his pocket.

path: 0 2914000 2918998, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 4
Aceticon 2 points 3 years ago

The system was rigged from the get-go by the slave-owner landowners who designed it along the lines of the Ancient Greek system were only the men of the owner class got to choose how the nation was managed.

Of course benificiaries of it will, whenever the can, take advantage of the systems characteristics to extend how much they get out of it: when "greed is good", politicians are hardly likely to sideline personal upside maximization for the greater good.

path: 0 2914000 2918998 2925545, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

The part you are referencing came from the Greek system. They actually stole a good percentage of both the constitution, and the bill o rights from the Five Nations native nation. Their constitution had created a "communist democracy" that lasted for 15,000 years at least, and there's some evidence that their claim of 25,000 years may be correct.

Edit: please note that I'm using the terms communism and democracy very loosely here. They were a democracy, but very much unlike the Greek version, and dissimilar to the US version. They were also communist, just not Marxist or any of those thinkers.

path: 0 2914000 2918998 2925545 2957330, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Aceticon 1 point 3 years ago

Like in the Ancient Greek system slaves and women did not have the vote.

path: 0 2914000 2918998 2925545 2957330 2957877, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
iByteABit 2 points 3 years ago

A faulty system is bound to be worked around and taken advantage of by everyone that is able to. The US is very far from a democracy because of it, and it won't change because the most powerful people will do anything to keep it in place.

path: 0 2914000 2918998 2919656, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Grant_M 35 points 3 years ago

Bernie has it right again.

path: 0 2911984, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 7
clutchmatic -3 points 3 years ago

I like Bernie but he should retire and coach the next generation of Dem leaders

path: 0 2911984 2912935, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 6
meyotch 29 points 3 years ago

He has been mentoring for years. He is a better mentor while still in office where he can work side by side with freshpersons.

path: 0 2911984 2912935 2918797, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 0
Grant_M 16 points 3 years ago

He's coaching now.

path: 0 2911984 2912935 2922145, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
dQw4w9WgXcQ 2 points 3 years ago

Both Bernie and Biden seem like great people, but I'd much rather see them consulting a younger generation than having either of them at the top.

path: 0 2911984 2912935 2913723, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Omniraptor 14 points 3 years ago

Being called a "great person" imo should take a history of fighting for equality and dignity for everyone, and for most of his long career Biden has been doing the opposite of that.

path: 0 2911984 2912935 2913723 2921146, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
davi 3 points 3 years ago

Both Bernie and Biden seem like great people

a 30 second google search and the plentiful articles and videos it'll show you of biden being racist, homophobic and classicist during his entire career and defending those racist, homophobic and classicist decisions during his campaign in 2020 proves that you're either patsy or a shill.

path: 0 2911984 2912935 2913723 2931596, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
dQw4w9WgXcQ 1 point 3 years ago

Sure, I haven't done my research, and the politics of the last few years is basically all I've got to go by. And that's mainly through Norwegian media, which maybe doesn't dive too deep into the history of the people.

With that said... Chill dude.

path: 0 2911984 2912935 2913723 2931596 2935407, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Tronn4 34 points 3 years ago

Why or how the F is trump still even a candidate

path: 0 2932573, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 17
Snipe_AT 7 points 3 years ago

There's no way he makes it as the actual candidate.

I'm a republican and I can say that I and plenty of others like me will be voting blue if that absolute disgrace becomes the primary candidate.

path: 0 2932573 2945813, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 16
prole 3 points 3 years ago

Are you a billionaire tycoon? Just curious...

I'm having trouble coming up with any other reason why a person would voluntarily describe themselves as "republican" in 2023.

It's not just Trump. The Republican party is rotten to the core. Maybe it's time to reevaluate things.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 9
SamboT 3 points 3 years ago

What a way to start a conversation. Try imagining the person on the other end of the computer and try again.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121 2957096, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
prole 1 point 3 years ago

I don't follow...? I was just asking a question. Legitimately curious.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121 2957096 2957196, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
imPastaSyndrome 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121 2957096 2963669, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Dashi 1 point 3 years ago

I say this as a Democrat that used to be a republican. You think our side is all sunshine and rainbows? Neither side is perfect it really is the option of the least bad candidate and that is the issue. The two party system is a failure but it's what we have.

Yes in my opinion the democrats are better than the Republicans but that doesn't mean they are without fault. Everyone has an agenda and can make mistakes we are human after all.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121 2957198, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
prole 2 points 3 years ago

I didn't really say anything about the Democratic party in my comment. Not sure why you brought them up. No whataboutism needed here.

Conservatives are continually voting against their interests when they vote R. Period. End statement.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121 2957198 2957258, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
Snipe_AT 1 point 3 years ago

I have thought about your comment for a little bit and would like to respond candidly.

I am just a regular person who has a differing belief about what constitutes a well-functioning government. There are possibly more views that we agree upon than disagree.

At this exact moment,(because everyone's beliefs are constantly changing with new ideas and information), the views I expect we differ on are: capitalism has been more socially beneficial than destructive, we should have a smaller more efficient government, and we should prevent erosion of the constitutional right to bear firearms.

The views I expect that we agree on are: capitalism has not been properly regulated with regards to the environment (global warming was certainly caused by us), the ability to have an abortion should be codified in law, we should prevent the erosion of constitutional rights like free speech, privacy, and the ability to freely travel, while socialized healthcare will be very expensive and increase everyone's tax burden, it will also be well worth the cost.

I am a republican because I believe that my political viewpoints align with those of republicans. But I am not blind to the charlatans that have disgraced not only the republican party but also the broader American institution. I take comfort in the fact that I did not vote for Trump in either instance, choosing instead to vote for Biden when that time came.

As for why I voluntarily "describe" myself as a republican because I genuinely believe that people discussing opposing views contributes to incrementally uncovering truth (which is often in the middle) and also serves to stave off the seemingly natural pull of humans to develop tribalism described by the phrase 'us vs them.'

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955121 2975586, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Hadriscus 2 points 3 years ago

Cut the middleman, just vote CPUSA already

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955264, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 4
AngryCommieKender 1 point 3 years ago

While I tend to agree with your sentiment, I would really prefer people followed Washington's advice. No parties. He believed that partisan politics would be the downfall of the US, and given the last 239 years of evidence, I would have to agree.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955264 2956832, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
Hadriscus 1 point 3 years ago

I didn't know that. What would the US political landscape look like without parties ?

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955264 2956832 2961281, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
dangblingus 2 points 3 years ago

Despite the fact that it's a statistical likelihood that voting R is voting against your class, T is still far and away the most popular pick for R leadership.

path: 0 2932573 2945813 2955733, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
rynzcycle 29 points 3 years ago

I was always going to vote for Biden, or at least against Trump, but I have to say between the NLRB CEMEX decision and finding out that the train workers did get some paid time off with the Biden admins help, I'm more enthusiastic than I was 6 months ago.

Ultimately, despite constant obstructionism they (Biden admin) are making more progress than they get credit for.

path: 0 2902711, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 1
snooggums 6 points 3 years ago

Republicans lie about the things they do and get attention for it because of how they get the message out.

Democrats need to do a better job of promoting the things they do accomplish. Don't need to lie, just do a better job of getting the press to write stories about the positive things they do. They need to call Republicans who have racist policies racist instead of dancing around it. A few are doing it, but are ignored because they aren't party leadership.

Biden needs to call Trump a racist and a fascist on national TV. Get the public motivated! Taking the higher ground doesn't get people motivated, it just means more of the status quo.

path: 0 2902711 2904731, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
seiryth 27 points 3 years ago

Could the democrats put someone under the age of 60 in place?

Trump is fucking awful. Republicans in general are awful and will set back that country another 20 years.

But Jesus, is an 80+ old guy the best the democrats have? He's qualified, intelligent and experienced. But he's also in an age bracket that's easy to hang shit on, which is exactly what the Republicans need.

path: 0 2950749, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 15
prole 17 points 3 years ago

Could the democrats put someone under the age of 60 in place?

Can you wait 4 years while we narrowly avoid literal fascism? Jesus fucking Christ... We have the incumbent advantage, it would be foolish to give that up considering the clear and present danger that the alternative presents.

Biden wins a second term, and the Dems will have 4 years to choose a younger candidate to run next time.That is when we need to fight to make sure we don't end up with another 80 year old, or with someone like Kamala Harris as our next choice.

path: 0 2950749 2954916, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 9
the_post_of_tom_joad 8 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2950749 2954916 2958157, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
rez_doggie 5 points 3 years ago

Acab yeah that means harris

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2958157 2959804, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
SnowBunting 5 points 3 years ago

Agreed 💯

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2955422, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ZeroEcks 2 points 3 years ago

Didn't they just wait 4 years already? How many times do they have to wait 4 years?

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2964247, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
prole 1 point 3 years ago

Yeah we had 4 years to come up with a better candidate, and we didn't.

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2964247 2987468, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
PixelatedSaturn 2 points 3 years ago

Yes, but Biden, he is a liability. I don't believe any of those idiot stories about dementia or anything, but he is old. Campaigns are really demanding even for non geriatrics. If he slips too much and he will slip a lot, because that is what he was known for even in his best years, this could mean Trump. Having Trump again would be a disaster.

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2956756, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
prole 4 points 3 years ago

And what kind of optics do you think there'd be if the Democratic party pulled their incumbent candidate, and then what? Run Kamala Harris? No, not her?

So they pull both the incumbent candidate, and his (not super old) running mate? And replace them with whom?

You might not personally think that those actions are signs on weakness and/or disunity within the party, but people largely do. People have entire careers surrounding shaping those optics. This is important shit.

Maybe if there was already a young Democrat/progressive that the party and base has been coalescing around to be Biden's successor. Right now, we have nobody.

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2956756 2957473, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
PixelatedSaturn 1 point 3 years ago

The train has passed for that of course. Unless something happens to Biden in which case ... they will have to do exactly that: find someone. What are the optics that the whole party has no one else, but a really old man anyway?

Before Biden announced it would be possible to get someone else.

path: 0 2950749 2954916 2956756 2957473 2987934, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
prole 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2950749 2954916 2956756 2957473 2958268, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Totuustorvi 5 points 3 years ago

Can someone put into words why it seems impossible to find/nominate a proper (democrat) candidate out of the whole USA population?

Ever since Obama and maybe even before, it has been so difficult. What stops the good people from advancing.

path: 0 2950749 2956891, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 3
hydrospanner 5 points 3 years ago

What stops the good people from advancing.

Democracy is, at its core, a popularity contest.

It's a lot easier and more effective to be popular with deception and favors than by responsibility and moral fiber.

Therefore the only politicians who are able to succeed to the point that they get to the national level are those who have learned how the game works and play it with a combination of deceit and favors.

I'm not saying democracy is bad...in fact, of the various systems it competes with, it's one of the best...but that doesn't mean it's flawless, and this is one of its many flaws.

path: 0 2950749 2956891 2960437, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
VolatileExhaustPipe 1 point 3 years ago

Why are democratic countries that aren't the USA manage to generate a wide set of qualified candidates which aren't close to death (both Trump, Biden, Clinton, Sanders, Reagan, Bush)?

path: 0 2950749 2956891 2960437 2965088, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
hydrospanner 1 point 3 years ago

First, my comment made no mention of age, only compromised morals.

To answer your question, though, I feel it's a combination of population size, demographics, scale of representation, and the nature of the way the respective systems have evolved (both naturally and intentionally)

  • Population: The US has lots and lots of people spread out over a wide area. Lots of people mean that there's lots of qualified people, and it follows that the older you get, the more time you've spent in this arena, therefore the more experience and connections you have.

  • Demographics: Simply put, Baby Boomers. There's more of them than there are of anyone else, and they tend to elect their own.

  • Scale of Representation: US elected officials at the national level represent a huge number of constituents. This means that getting elected is more about appealing to a broad spectrum of voters, to the point that it's often more about just being objectionable to the fewest voters. This is Joe Biden's greatest strength: nobody really really likes the guy, but he's someone that (among his base) not too many people actually dislike, or at least not enough to withhold their vote. It's boring but effective within the situation, like trap hockey. Representation of such a wide and diverse group of people means that politicians won't champion any agenda that might put off voters. A vote is a vote regardless of whether it's lukewarm or zealous, and a thousand "meh" votes are drastically more valuable than a hundred fanatical votes.

  • The Nature of the Beast: like it or not, America has a two party, first past the post, winner take all system. This means that the game is very closed-ended, full of binary/Boolean strategy: A or B, vote or don't vote, win the state completely or don't win it at all. This ties in with the previous point and makes a campaign and election even more about being as inoffensive as possible.

So for a winner take all, nationwide race like president, the way the Xs and Os work out is that your party's best odds come with someone who's got lots of connections, is widely recognized, and whom the fewest people in your base will dislike enough to not vote for them. In the vast majority of cases, that means an old candidate who's had decades of experience and network building, who has no controversial positions, odd personality quirks, etc., and who is just a hair more likeable to moderates than whomever the other party puts out there.

The only time in recent history this hasn't been the case was 2016, in which Trump pulled more votes out of his base and the far right than anyone gave him credit for...and maybe 2000, although a decent argument could be made there that Clinton's stigma hobbled Gore's campaign just enough. With SCOTUS help.

Thus, you get usually old (experienced, well known), usually male, usually white, usually straight, usually at least vaguely religious, usually rather boring candidates.

path: 0 2950749 2956891 2960437 2965088 2970536, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
sentient_loom 4 points 3 years ago

At least under 70

path: 0 2950749 2952048, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Dubious_Fart 26 points 3 years ago

I'm really sick of thhe fact that avoiding Americas descent into full blown 4th Reich fascism is dependent on idiots in the voting booth.

path: 0 2910995, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 0
Ertebolle 24 points 3 years ago

Yep. It sucks that this is the choice we have to make, but it is, at least until we figure out a way to fix our voting system.

path: 0 2902187, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 13
chaogomu 5 points 3 years ago

STAR voting would fix everything. This website goes into more detail.

The simplified science of it all says that if a voting method forces you to choose between candidates or rank them in a fixed order, then that very ranking will, over time, promote two dominant parties. (Arrow's Theorem)

A cardinal voting system, such as STAR, is immune to Arrow's Theorem. STAR was designed to be the absolute best voting system possible. It's easy to use, easy to count, and gives better results than any other system.

path: 0 2902187 2902913, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 12
Ertebolle 8 points 3 years ago

I'm a fan of MMP voting (used in Germany, New Zealand, and the Scottish/Welsh parliaments in the UK), where you vote for a district representative and a party and the parties get extra seats to ensure that the proportions balance out. It's easy for voters to understand - no ranking or rating or whatever - and it simultaneously lets you support third parties (because they'll get some seats even if they don't have a majority in any district), lets you vote for the best candidate in your particular district without regard to their party (if you like your local Republican but you hate national Republicans you can simultaneously vote for your guy + for him to be in the minority), eliminates gerrymandering (since party representation comes from a percentage of the overall vote), and makes every vote count (since even in a deep red district your blue vote still contributes to the national total for your party and therefore its share of legislative seats).

If that proves successful then we can explore other systems for national/presidential votes, but you're never going to get a serious third-party movement in the US if you insist on starting with the White House - reforms to support third-party presidential candidates are the sort of thing you do after you've got 40 or 50 minor party representatives in Congress.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2903727, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
chaogomu 3 points 3 years ago

The problem with multi-member districts (which are required for proportional voting) is the fact that to get rid of an incumbent, you need a vast majority to actively vote against them. For example, in a 5 member district, you need over 80% of the vote against one bad incumbent to get rid of them.

Proportional voting also explicitly makes political parties part of government. The goal is to not do that.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2903727 2906396, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Ertebolle 1 point 3 years ago

MMP doesn't require multi-member districts; the extra seats are not tied to a particular district, they draw from a list of names submitted by each party.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2903727 2906396 2920374, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Zagorath 3 points 3 years ago

Except for the fact that any cardinal system other that Approval is absolutely trivial to game, automatically devolving into Approval.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2904386, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 8
chaogomu 3 points 3 years ago

STAR gets around that by adding the runoff step.

Also, Approval gives better results than any Ordinal system, because Approval is also immune to Arrow's Theorem.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2904386 2906339, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 7
Zagorath 5 points 3 years ago

Every voting system has pros and cons. It's impossible to create a perfect voting system because there are multiple mutually-exclusive criteria by which a system can be measured.

So it's important in such discussions to be forthright about which criteria you consider more or less important than others.

In order to avoid the spoiler effect and to discourage trivial tactical voting. To these ends, criteria like the Later-No-Harm criterion and Favourite Betrayal are important, but one need also look at the ways in which systems that fail them do so.

Approval Voting fails LNH trivially. In a genuine three-candidate race (i.e., one where prior to the election, you know all three have a genuine chance of winning) where your honest vote is to approve of Left and Centre and to disapprove of Right, but where you more strongly approve of Left, you are disincentivised from voting honestly because that will hurt the chances of Left winning. Unfortunately in so doing you also increase the chances of Right winning, compared to if you voted honestly. Basically, you're forced to make a decision between your honest vote which increases the chances of a mediocre result, and a dishonest vote which increases the chances of either a very good or very bad result. It's LNH because you're incentivised to not vote for Centre even though you honestly would have.

In IRV you get a similar outcome in theory, but what we've seen in practice is that it doesn't actually play out. The difference comes down to how preferences are distributed and who gets eliminated. If Centre ends up coming last on first preferences, that's where Favourite Betrayal comes in. In your honest vote, Centre's preferences distribution is entirely up to those who voted Centre, which could be a mix of Left and Right, which risks Right winning. If you had voted dishonestly and put Centre ahead of Left, you're increasing the chance that Centre isn't eliminated first, and instead Left is, with Left votes going to Centre—a better outcome than Right winning.

But the thing is, in practice this doesn't tend to be the case. I live in a seat where this happened in our election last year, and it turns out that people who vote for one candidate overwhelmingly tend to second preference the same candidate (at least once smaller non-viable candidates are ignored). The Australian Greens (Left) and the Australian Labor Party (Centre) actually preference each other at the same rate. And so it came down to the fact that Labor was eliminated first (after non-viable candidates) by a very narrow margin, giving almost all their next preferences to the Greens, resulting in a Greens win. Not voting strategically, in the real world, actually pays off under IRV. Under Approval, because the ability to actually express your nuanced preference doesn't exist, tactical voting is more strongly encouraged. In summary, while LNH and Favourite Betrayal are, in a sense, "equally bad", the former is more of a problem when looking at the real-world preferences of voters, and a system which fails the latter should be preferred over one that fails the former.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2904386 2906339 2908835, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 5
Zagorath 3 points 3 years ago

I think one other important detail though. While IRV is my preferred single-winner system, I fundamentally think that single-winner systems are flawed. Elections should avoid them as much as possible, in favour of proportional multi-winner systems.

path: 0 2902187 2902913 2904386 2906339 2909271, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
giantofthenorth 18 points 3 years ago

Damn. Maybe he should run again so we can at least get a good old man in office

path: 0 2909617, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 4
IDontHavePantsOn 19 points 3 years ago

The DNC would never allow it. They have actively worked against him twice and at least once they took bribes. Ahem. Sorry. Contingency based donations.

Him telling anyone to back Biden shows they have a political gun to his back, but God do we need him in office. Too bad the rich are for some reason opposed to taxing the the rich 🤷

path: 0 2909617 2911683, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
Grant_M 9 points 3 years ago

Bernie is telling everyone Joe Biden is a good guy and his friend.

path: 0 2909617 2911992, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
DragonTypeWyvern 0 points 3 years ago

Bernie should tell his good friend to conditionally veto KOSA because he got played like some kind of sucker that doesn't read the bills he supports.

path: 0 2909617 2911992 2925534, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
cabron_offsets -5 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2909617 2920345, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
AllonzeeLV 16 points 3 years ago

I'll vote for Biden, just like the people on the Titanic turned on the water pumps. It might buy slightly more time. Maybe.

Lets not pretend though that either of our only 2 parties, Neoliberal and Fascist, are going to improve our worsening situation.

All we're voting for is the rate of collapse. At the end of the day, the people who bribe both parties need to be checked to address that. And that's clearly not going to happen. So collapse is inevitable.

path: 0 2902946, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
asteriskeverything 4 points 3 years ago

I agree a lot except that anything is inevitable.

For example I see drastically different discussions happening on a much larger scale than ever before, with a lot of new ideas gaining more momentum and becoming a common enough public opinion.

I also have a ton of hope for gen z. They seem the generation with the most educated and socially aware youth. Once they are voting and running I'm really hopeful that's when progress will start making quicker headway. It's just survival, treading water until we get there. Maybe I'm naive, I need that hope though.

path: 0 2902946 2906561, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
SpaceCowboy 15 points 3 years ago

A lot of people have been taught to have an idealized concept about Democracy.

The reality is democracy is the worst system... except for all the others.

In an ideal world you'd be able to vote for a candidate that is a perfect match for your political positions. But we're pretty fucking far from an ideal world.

The reality of democracy is that isn't about getting exactly what you want. It really only gives you a way to remove terrible people from power. And keep terrible people from gaining power.

Yeah that sucks, but it's better than living in an authoritarian system where you have to use violence to remove terrible people from power. And likely fail and die while attempting to do so.

If Trump wins, that's what it'll be, an authoritarian system where you can't remove the terrible person from power by voting.

If Biden wins, it'll be more bullshit, but you'll be able to vote again in the next election after that.

path: 0 2908993, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 4
Comment105 4 points 3 years ago

The problem with democracy is that humans are actually stupid fucking apes and they fear math, so they simplify the math to the point of undermining the whole system.

This problem also shows up in some welfare systems with a simple rather than gradual cutoff if you start working more. Stay below 60% employment or lose all help immediately.

path: 0 2908993 2914491, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
SkyeStarfall 3 points 3 years ago

This is a bit of an odd take considering other countries already have better versions of democratic systems. Just take a page out of their books.

path: 0 2908993 2912776, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Gargantu8 1 point 3 years ago
path: 0 2908993 2910102, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
PersnickityPenguin 0 points 3 years ago

There best form of government is an enlightened despot, it so I've read. However if the wind of the king are law, then when things go bad, they really go bad. And the transition of power gets ugly.

path: 0 2908993 2910802, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
oldbaldgrumpy 13 points 3 years ago

I don't feel like Biden or Trump should be our next President.

path: 0 2960048, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
cybermass 2 points 3 years ago

I would love to see AOC run but I'm not even American so I'm just watching the dumpster fire from a distance

path: 0 2960048 2970786, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
oldbaldgrumpy -3 points 3 years ago

I can't see AOC as president. I feel like she's the face of the far left. She will probably better serve her party there.

path: 0 2960048 2970786 2984193, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
cannot 12 points 3 years ago

Rich old white man endorses rich old white man over rich old white man

path: 0 2958044, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
LongPigFlavor 11 points 3 years ago

Young voter here, I'll be "ridin with Biden".

path: 0 2951644, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
autotldr 7 points 3 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Progressive US voters must unite behind Joe Biden rather than consider any of his Democratic primary challengers because the threat of another Donald Trump presidency is too great, Bernie Sanders has said.

“We’re taking on the … former president, who, in fact, does not believe in democracy – he is an authoritarian, and a very, very dangerous person,” the senator and Vermont independent, who caucuses with Democrats, said on NBC’s Meet the Press.

Sanders’ remarks came as Trump continued grappling with more than 90 criminal charges across four separate indictments filed against him for his efforts to forcibly nullify his defeat to Biden in the 2020 presidential race, his illicit retention of classified documents, and hush-money payments to porn actor Stormy Daniels.

And though polling for now shows Biden generally is ahead of Trump, that has not stopped Robert F Kennedy Jr and Marianne Williamson from mounting long-shot Democratic primary challenges – or third-party progressive candidate Cornel West from running.

Sanders didn’t elaborate, but his remarks seemed to be an allusion to the Trump White House’s creation of the US supreme court supermajority, which last year struck down the federal abortion rights that the Roe v Wade decision had established decades earlier.

That court also struck down race-conscious admissions in higher education as well as a Colorado law that required entities to afford same-sex couples equal treatment, among other decisions lamented by progressives.


The original article contains 530 words, the summary contains 233 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

path: 0 2901284, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
Danc4498 -1 points 3 years ago

Can you tldr the tldr?

path: 0 2901284 2903159, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 1
s20 3 points 3 years ago

Jesus Wept.

Bernie say Vote Biden because Orange Man dangerous. Bernie say it to dangerous to fuck around.

That summary was shorter than essays I turned in in 5th grade. Take one minute out of your life, or just don't bother. FFS.

path: 0 2901284 2903159 2904269, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
randon31415 5 points 3 years ago

The left people want won't win the presidency until they at least win a governorship or a senate seat. The last time we had a radical departure from those that came before them in the white house (politically speaking, not skin color) we had a 4 year long Civil War backlash.

path: 0 2939686, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
AS004 3 points 3 years ago

The last time we had a radical departure from those that came before them in the white house (politically speaking, not skin color) we had a 4 year long Civil War backlash.

Are we ignoring the New Deal Dems or what, now? They were a major departure from everybody else before and Roosevelt even threatened to pack the Court when they tried to rule some of his policies unconstitutional.

path: 0 2939686 2945983, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
randon31415 1 point 3 years ago

Well, there was a war involved with that as well, but I would argue that the New Deal was a compromise moderate position to the alternative of complete communist revolt, which was starting to sweep the globe at the time.

path: 0 2939686 2945983 2964336, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Millie 5 points 3 years ago

Out here desperately hoping that the fake leftists propping up Trump are mostly Russian trolls or just a pocket of internet children. I think actual real life people on the left in the US largely get how dangerous this could be.

path: 0 2902780, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 20
bdonvr 12 points 3 years ago

fake leftists propping up Trump

Huh?

path: 0 2902780 2906862, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 9
Millie -4 points 3 years ago

I've been having a number of conversations on Hexchan recently trying to make sense of their politics. The most common instance of their hateful hypocrisy I've encountered is this constant assurance that they support trans people while immediately attacking and dog piling and trans people who point out that the situation would be much worse under Trump.

I live in Massachusetts. We are a very blue state and we're one of the best places in the world to transition. We have informed consent, legal protection of our basic rights, and mandatory insurance coverage of trans health care, which state insurance also covers. Whatever you think of the DNC, the Democrats in Massachusetts are absolutely allies of trans people who've worked to actively protect our rights.

Still, I'm well aware of the danger that federal law could potentially pose. I know there may be a time when I have to flee the country if things get bad enough, and that's a lot more likely under Trump.

But they don't actually care about my rights, happiness, or safety, or those of any other trans people. They don't care what happens to us, they just want to use us as a bludgeon to dunk on people.

The hexchanners who aren't actively Russian trolls seem to be little more than useful idiots for conservatives, minimizing the damage they do to vulnerable populations and engaging in high school level pettiness and hate.

path: 0 2902780 2906862 2907203, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 8
VolatileExhaustPipe 10 points 3 years ago

Just want to mention a couple things. I work with a group that ensures that people who are trans or gay get asylum in Germany and also get reasonable safe transit. Of course I could do more, but we even brought a trans person from the US who effectively fled what you describe to the right resources so that they could get asylum here (and also into contact with the doctors so that HRT prescriptions don't have gaps). I am involved in what is now majorly labeled queer politics since the early 90s when the FRG was a place often more restrictive than the GDR in terms of law.

I do regularly read and sometimes post on Hexbear, I read up your comments (which account for quite a bit of your posting history with this account there) and can understand some of the aspects you mention, but don't get why you conflate the personal slights against you with an assigned bad position for them. The latter includes words like "hexchan".

You do believe that there are some factions in some states of the USA in which the democratic party acts well and secures some of your rights, this is what you hope to strengthen when you defend the democratic party. Plenty users have not as much faith as you do (often people who do have quite a political history themselves, too) including a not small variety of trans users who answered you. Even some in the US and some of them disagree with your outlook. That is a difference of politics and a difference of mental models.

But they don’t actually care about my rights, happiness, or safety, or those of any other trans people.

Is disingenuous at best and more reasonable slander. I get that you want to be safe - and hexbear users want that, too, for others, for themselves and for you. However they have a wide range of life stories, users from places the US bombed are posting regularly. They were bombed under Obama too, with harsh police procedures and reduction of rights for LGTBQ folk. Some want a USA that isn't as easy at the trigger of military "intervention". Being able to experience multiple points of view is part of a global society and internationalism which is in my eyes the only way for us non cis-endo hetero people to survive long term. Shunning a community of up to 20k users cause you have political differences and slandering them is something you can do, but it will count for what liberal privileged trans users do.

path: 0 2902780 2906862 2907203 2920758, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
krolden 7 points 3 years ago

Can you please link to this hateful hypocrites I am genuinely curious.

path: 0 2902780 2906862 2907203 2909101, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 6
honeynut 3 points 3 years ago path: 0 2902780 2906862 2907203 2909101 2909553, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
Millie -6 points 3 years ago

Nope. Blocked the community and all the users who replied. Go dig around in their trashcan of an instance if you like. Or just tell them you're trans and want to make sure Trump doesn't get into office so you don't have to flee the country and watch them come out of the woodwork.

path: 0 2902780 2906862 2907203 2909101 2909395, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 1
Icalasari 6 points 3 years ago

Honestly, this whole thing feels eerily similar to the rise of Hitler - Even Trump facing legal troubles matches well enough

path: 0 2902780 2902909, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 5
sab 4 points 3 years ago

The good news is that building your personality cult around an obese man in his late 70s is not very sustainable in the long run.

path: 0 2902780 2902909 2905311, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
Zorque 3 points 3 years ago

The bad news is they have stock of backups a mile long.

path: 0 2902780 2902909 2905311 2905833, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
sab 2 points 3 years ago

For some weird reason he's not that really replaceable. Following the republican primaries now is a good indication of what the party will be after trump - they're all trying to rip a page from his book on populism, and as far as I can tell they're all failing.

path: 0 2902780 2902909 2905311 2905833 2912877, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
American_Communist22 -1 points 3 years ago

may allah push that removed down the stairs

path: 0 2902780 2902909 2905311 2933032, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
American_Communist22 -2 points 3 years ago

nah, he's the person before the rise, the one who get the dominos to fall further

but honestly, the dominos have been falling since washington

path: 0 2902780 2902909 2932879, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Zaktor 3 points 3 years ago

Seriously. There were people getting kidnapped in protests because Trump sent in the border guard to "defend" a court house. That's way beyond "the status quo protects order and property first and foremost".

path: 0 2902780 2905901, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
American_Communist22 -1 points 3 years ago

no its really not, the US has been doing this shit since inception

path: 0 2902780 2905901 2932855, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
mycorrhiza 2 points 3 years ago path: 0 2902780 2942249, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
American_Communist22 0 points 3 years ago

You ignored all the previous times we grilled you for your ignorance, get a grip, you can read.

path: 0 2902780 2932840, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
geekworking 3 points 3 years ago

Tl;dr Bernie preaches to the choir.

path: 0 2907561, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
DessertStorms 2 points 3 years ago

Sure, vote for Biden, but if all you do is rely on a vote for the other capitalist puppet you're not actually dong anything to stop fascism, or even achieve any significant change in how things are run, it's literally just a band aid on a cancer at this point, a band aid that serves to lull you in to a false sense of complacency as you enable the machine to keep chugging on:

https://www.newyorker.com/...

https://www.counterpunch.org/...

https://blacklikemao.medium.com/...

https://truthout.org/...

https://nyanarchist.wordpress.com/...

path: 0 2903087, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
s20 22 points 3 years ago

Okay, cool. Won't disagree. How does voting for someone else, or not at all, help?

Like, okay, the system's broke. But we're stuck in the broke system (for now). Is it somehow wrong to want to lessen the harm the disease does while the cure is being made? Even if that difference is marginal?

path: 0 2903087 2904033, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
karmiclychee 5 points 3 years ago

It's funny, I had to reread op's comment a couple times before I realized (I think) that they aren't making the usual argument against voting - I'm so conditioned to expect it because the usual centrist/progressive discourse is black and whited to "vote" vs "don't vote." We get it from the media, bad actors, wishy-washy liberal-liberals, and... (Sigh) leftists who don't know any better.

"Vote, and" should be the message - vote and organize, vote and run for office, whatever. To your point, we need to at least keep a thumb on the gushing artery if we plan to survive.

path: 0 2903087 2904033 2908907, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
AnonTwo 2 points 3 years ago

I took my 3rd option 7 years ago. I'm not really feeling it again until the trump and court situations are dealt with.

path: 0 2903302, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Gnubyte 1 point 3 years ago

Isn't Biden 80 years old?

This is a misplay but if you look at the numbers Kennedy is losing to Biden in polls by a large 50% margin but also I've never heard of this site so beware its credibility:

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/...

I'm not keen on Biden continuing at his age. Because you're voting for his vice president at that age.

I don't think Biden could beat Trump again. Every person who got laid off during Bidens administration will have something to say about it in the voting booth. Democrats need to push up a better candidate.

path: 0 2966901, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
sentient_loom -2 points 3 years ago

Employee publicly supports boss.

path: 0 2952038, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
OprahsedCreature -3 points 3 years ago

image

path: 0 2958799, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
Amaltheamannen -4 points 3 years ago

This will always be the choice for people on the left, at some point you have to bite the bullet and stop supporting right wingers like Biden just because Trump is worse.

path: 0 2903729, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 4
AnonTwo 5 points 3 years ago

Ok, so trump is worse. Good to see we acknowledge that.

But if we were to assume for a moment that the other choice could literally be trump in the upcoming election, then nows not the freaken time for this shit.

Nows not the time to "bite the bullet" when it's going to be the literal reason we aren't biting the bullet.

path: 0 2903729 2904827, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
rayyyy 4 points 3 years ago

At some point people on the left have to bite the bullet and run candidates from the ground up in order to get someone who has ANY chance to actually change anything. In the meantime the sane people must hold the ground against fascist authoritarians by not allowing them to get into power at all costs - this means voting for the lesser evils until someone with a chance of a snowball in hell moves into position. That is how the crazies got their man into power. Schoolboards, county officials, mayors, even dog catchers must be pushed up the ladder of power. Anything less is just blowing smoke.

path: 0 2903729 2907184, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Amaltheamannen 2 points 3 years ago

Has there been any meaningful change the past 100 years achieved through voting? Every achievement I can think of in the US was won by riots and popular movements.

path: 0 2903729 2907184 2926186, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Veraxus 0 points 3 years ago

We need to forcefully reform the US political system... doing everything in our power to bust the current party system. There should never be a scenario where one party controls anything even remotely resembling power.

The first step is national RCV on all matters. Until we can get that, there is no other peaceful path forward.

Edit: The second step is aggressive campaign finance reform. The third is limiting all representative groups to day-to-day operations only, while guaranteeing that all legislative matters anywhere in the country are vetted ONLY by a public vote.

path: 0 2903729 2904425, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
4RYAZ -5 points 3 years ago

Problem is trump would certainly be better than any other politician, but What we need is someone better than trump.

path: 0 2960469, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
tallwookie -5 points 3 years ago

Bernie is a real life caricature of "old man shaking fist at the sky"

path: 0 2922717, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
the_post_of_tom_joad -7 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2933199, hotness: undefined, score: -7, children: 2
FluffyPotato 5 points 3 years ago

The US has like the worst election system and it needs to change but that change will not happen if fascists are in power. The only option you guys have is vote for the lesser of two evils and organize and gather support while they are in power. First step would be getting ranked voting passed locally in my opinion. The alternative is just being the ideologically purest in a death camp. And besides voting is pretty easy even in the US from what I heard.

path: 0 2933199 2933974, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
the_post_of_tom_joad 3 points 3 years ago
path: 0 2933199 2933974 2938490, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
blazera -10 points 3 years ago

he's had a whole term and shown he's not planning on stopping Trump. He's still walking free after all the treason and assaults on democracy.

path: 0 2902961, hotness: undefined, score: -10, children: 19
s20 17 points 3 years ago

I mean, yeah! Trump's facing 91 felony charges at my last count, and been indicted at least 4 times, but sure. Ain't nobody doin' nothin'.

path: 0 2902961 2904093, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 11
blazera -8 points 3 years ago

None of these are actual consequences. Like i said, he is still walking free.

path: 0 2902961 2904093 2904266, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 10
Ertebolle 7 points 3 years ago

So you'd prefer it if Biden just, like, did a little fascism and sent a bunch of goons to drag Trump off to Guantanamo or wherever?

path: 0 2902961 2904093 2904266 2904546, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
blazera 0 points 3 years ago

Prosecute him sooner than the entire length of watergate to nixons resignation. God the trials dont even start until next year.

path: 0 2902961 2904093 2904266 2904546 2904929, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
s20 3 points 3 years ago

So... The current administration should, what, put a hit out on him?

path: 0 2902961 2904093 2904266 2906695, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
gamermanh 3 points 3 years ago

So should we just skip due process?

Trump's a shit and probably deserves that treatment, but that's still not what we do here

path: 0 2902961 2904093 2904266 2904877, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
blazera -4 points 3 years ago

Due process for anyone else is a hell of a lot faster. I was mad after the first month of Bidens term with no prosecution announcement. We're just now beginning the process that will continue to be long and drawn out.

path: 0 2902961 2904093 2904266 2904877 2905092, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 4
donuts 10 points 3 years ago

Maybe the last few years of Trump's fascist authoritarian rhetoric have confused you, but the President does not, and never should, prosecute crimes. Despite its obvious flaws, we have a legal system for a reason.

path: 0 2902961 2904303, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
snooggums -1 points 3 years ago

The prosecutors at the Department of Justice arr members of the Executive Branch under the President.

The President should not be unilaterally deciding who to prosecute for political reasons, but he is overseeing the prosecution of crimes as the head of the Executive Branch.

path: 0 2902961 2904303 2904551, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
blazera -3 points 3 years ago

Maybe you werent paying attention during trumps terms to know the president has control of the attorney general and department of justice. Its how trump avoided consequences for the shit with russia and extorting ukraine. The executive branch does prosecute crimes, they just dont oversee the trial. And bidens DoJ have not been prosecuting crimes.

path: 0 2902961 2904303 2904590, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 4
spaceghoti 3 points 3 years ago

No he doesn't. He's not supposed to, and that's what the careerists were trying to stop. The DOJ and Attorney General are part of the Executive cabinet but they answer to Congress, not the President. The President has his own White House counsel, the AG does not serve as his personal lawyer.

path: 0 2902961 2904303 2904590 2908615, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
blazera -1 points 3 years ago

This just is not true, the president chooses the AG and has authority to terminate them. They are part of the presidential cabinet and are legal advisors to the president. They are wholly under the executive branch.

path: 0 2902961 2904303 2904590 2908615 2921662, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 2
authed -11 points 3 years ago

I'd vote for Bernie but not Biden

path: 0 2902923, hotness: undefined, score: -11, children: 9
s20 10 points 3 years ago

Okay. As a moral standpoint, I understand that. Hell, I support it.

But from a pragmatic standpoint... what good does that do?

path: 0 2902923 2904138, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 6
ReadFanon 2 points 3 years ago

From a pragmatic point, what good does voting for Biden do?

path: 0 2902923 2904138 2951514, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 5
s20 -1 points 3 years ago

Nope. I asked first. Answer or don't, don't pull that childish shit.

path: 0 2902923 2904138 2951514 2956073, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 4
ReadFanon 1 point 3 years ago

Not voting for Biden means that Biden is one vote further away from being president.

Now it's your turn.

path: 0 2902923 2904138 2951514 2956073 2969704, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
btaf45 -6 points 3 years ago

I’d vote for Bernie but not Biden

You will do what Putin wants which is the opposite of what Bernie wants. Got it Ivan.

path: 0 2902923 2908292, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 1
authed 3 points 3 years ago

Lol... As if Putin as anything to do with it

path: 0 2902923 2908292 2948227, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
PowerCrazy -17 points 3 years ago

Don't worry, I won't be voting for Cornell West nor Biden nor Trump, and no one should. Since voting is absolutely the least someone can do, I'll be voting for a non-capitalist candidate.

path: 0 2902689, hotness: undefined, score: -17, children: 7
AnonTwo 7 points 3 years ago

You can hold your principles high above everyone else as the person you hate the most wins. Least you didn't vote for him, right?

path: 0 2902689 2903488, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
PowerCrazy -9 points 3 years ago

Agreed. Whatever racist shill the Democrats (who are supposed to be better then that) put up will hopefully not win and since voting is the literally the least one can do, there is no reason to not support a non-capitalist candidate.

path: 0 2902689 2903488 2904159, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 1
AnonTwo 9 points 3 years ago

That reply...is incredibly weird, not gonna lie.

Like it almost sounds like you're just trying to use buzzwords to make Democrats vote in a way that will help Trump get into office from inaction.

path: 0 2902689 2903488 2904159 2904322, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Icalasari 7 points 3 years ago

Sadly, First Past The Post means your vote will be wasted and essentially count as a non vote

path: 0 2902689 2902931, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 3
mrnotoriousman 9 points 3 years ago

Worse, it actively helps push things further right.

path: 0 2902689 2902931 2903785, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
ReadFanon 2 points 3 years ago

Not voting for the furthest right party is the same thing as voting for the furthest right party 🤓🤓

path: 0 2902689 2902931 2903785 2951548, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
PowerCrazy -8 points 3 years ago

Totally agree, voting is a waste, but it is the literal least one can do, so no need to support Capitalism at that level.

path: 0 2902689 2902931 2904171, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 0

thanks for using Leebra!

go to feed...