Tim Cook and Sundar Pichai are cowards - X’s deepfake porn feature clearly violates app store guidelines. Why won’t Apple and Google pull it?

5 months ago by Sahwa to c/technology

Once you’ve traded your principles for proximity to power, do you even run your own company?
sigh 174 points 5 months ago

this is actually a pretty wild headline to appear on the verge frontpage

good on them

path: 0 21469796, hotness: undefined, score: 174, children: 9
W3dd1e 71 points 5 months ago

I see a lot of people hate The Verge and I don’t understand why. Is it perfect? No. But, I think they have a pretty solid ethics policy and they call out bullshit.

I like 404 better but Verge is by no means bad.

Maybe there was an issue with them that I don’t know about? Idk!

path: 0 21469796 21469900, hotness: undefined, score: 71, children: 8
missphant 28 points 5 months ago

An eon ago they made a PC building guide that was riddled with mistakes and had to pull it down again and I think that's still where most of that comes from.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471279, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 3
edgemaster72 17 points 5 months ago

IIRC the initial response to extremely valid criticism of the video was also terrible, and they threw the video host under the bus for a rushed video that should've never been produced under the circumstances it was (granted he was part of the terrible response to criticism)

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471279 21471840, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
W3dd1e 11 points 5 months ago

Yeah. I just looked it up. That video was dumb and bad. Shouldn’t have made it up, but the article is still on their site. They did issue a retraction and update the story to correct the inaccuracies.

I don’t know if it warrants the Lemmy hate but I also know that Lemmy hates anything corporate so it is what it is. I’ll still read The Verge as long as they follow their own ethics policy.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471279 21471563, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
JayGray91 5 points 5 months ago

It goes earlier than that debacle for me but I honestly do not remember anymore.

If they've turned a new leaf then hey good for them.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471279 21472829, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
cerebralhawks 9 points 5 months ago

Paywalls mostly (speaking for myself).

That and, back in the day, they trashed Samsung for making big phones, then praised Apple for making objectively less functional ones (no stylus, no Note like features). We started calling them iVerge back then, for favoritism to Apple. Even as an Apple guy, I found it annoying.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471638, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
frongt 2 points 5 months ago

Google "verge pc build". They ran a video of a guy, completely unqualified, building a "$2000 PC", and doing almost everything wrong. And then the guy called people racists for dunking on him. There's layers to the story. The Verge has been a joke of tech reporting for years.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471199, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
W3dd1e 9 points 5 months ago

Found it. Yeah that video was bad.

To their credit, they did issue a retraction and repost the story with correct steps.

The copyright strikes were definitely a dumb way to handle it.

Idk if true or not but in an Arstechnica story, The Verge’s editor in chief apparently asked the Vox lawyers to rescind the copyright strikes.

I don’t mean to sound like I’m defending them. The video should never have made it up in the first place, but people make mistakes. If you own it and apologize, I’ll give you a second chance.

I don’t always agree with their take on a topic, but for the most part I have found them to be factual.

I do also agree with many Ed Zitron takes about them tho. They could be doing a better job on AI, but over the last few weeks I’ve seen an improvement there.

TLDR: that PC build from 8 years ago was dumb and extra embarrassing, they should feel bad for it, but I still think some if the hate they get is unjustified.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471199 21471528, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
boonhet 1 point 5 months ago

And "completely unqualified" in this case means a motivated 12 year old with an Internet connection would do significantly better.

path: 0 21469796 21469900 21471199 21490065, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
db2 98 points 5 months ago

Money and mutually assured destruction (blackmail-able info).

path: 0 21467782, hotness: undefined, score: 98, children: 8
nondescripthandle 62 points 5 months ago

Not just blackmail, if either had the balls to ban twitter I don't imagine the large orange fascist would keep his mouth shut and not retaliate. So it's also extortion!

path: 0 21467782 21468097, hotness: undefined, score: 62, children: 7
Lost_My_Mind 8 points 5 months ago

I thought him and musk had a falling out?

path: 0 21467782 21468097 21468236, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 6
Blue_Morpho 33 points 5 months ago

It was performative after Musk's sieg heil crashed Tesla sales.

path: 0 21467782 21468097 21468236 21468964, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 0
nondescripthandle 19 points 5 months ago

Musk still donates to them I assume it's not that bad as much as Musk just needed to be told not do that thing where everyone hates him so close to Trump

path: 0 21467782 21468097 21468236 21468457, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 0
BarneyPiccolo 10 points 5 months ago

Musk has already said that he intends to go all in to get Republicans elected in 2028. He and Trump's heads may be too big to fit in the same room, but he knows which side his bread is buttered on.

path: 0 21467782 21468097 21468236 21469533, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
Tollana1234567 4 points 5 months ago

MUSK, ellisons, THIEL, probably the sackler family, and the couple that is giving him 600mil plus, and of course murdoch and PUTIN.

path: 0 21467782 21468097 21468236 21469533 21471982, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Tollana1234567 1 point 5 months ago

they staged the falling out, they are much intertwined with each other, besides epstein file implicates them both so musk has incentive to keep trump form turning against him.

path: 0 21467782 21468097 21468236 21471971, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
HotsauceHurricane 78 points 5 months ago path: 0 21470747, hotness: undefined, score: 78, children: 5
FarraigePlaisteach 19 points 5 months ago

Thanks, this is very helpful!

It’s only allowing me report apps I’ve installed so I’m wondering if I should very briefly install the app to allow that. I’m generally cautions of allowing dodgy apps on my devices.

path: 0 21470747 21471080, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 4
HotsauceHurricane 12 points 5 months ago

You don't have to open it. Therefore not being able to grant it permissions to access info.

*I mean that theoretically but it's worth a shot.we can also review bomb it on the App Store.

path: 0 21470747 21471080 21471506, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
FarraigePlaisteach 4 points 5 months ago

Perfect. Done. Thank you very much. I really appreciate it.

path: 0 21470747 21471080 21471506 21474921, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Jessica 1 point 5 months ago

I wouldn't even download apps you don't feel comfortable with because the permissions they are granted are agreed-upon at the time of download and you are also boosting the download and usage metrics simply by installing it and opening it once.

It's also extremely unlikely that an application such as X could ever be reported enough to have anything happen. I'm sure it's on a manually approved list

path: 0 21470747 21471080 21481321, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
FarraigePlaisteach 1 point 5 months ago

Yes, I feel the same way you do. I really don't want to add to the download metrics. I'm making an exception this time. Some good journalists, for example Richard Chambers (Ireland), have downloaded it to test and debunk claims made by Musk about safeguards. I think their contribution was a net positive. So there are cases where it's worth doing.

I did not need to open the app once. Just downloading it allowed me to complain to apple using the link above. I feel when it comes to a CSAM factory such as this (possibly even trained on CSAM material), and with EU headquarters in my country (Ireland), I have to report it so Apple cannot claim ignorance. Who knows, maybe a whistleblower will someday tell us how many reports there were. Unfortunately our leaders are not leading on this issue, so the social contract is broken and we should all (IMO) do much more than posting on social media. My personal discomfort is less important.

path: 0 21470747 21471080 21481321 21486995, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
pleaseletmein 72 points 5 months ago

They pulled Tumblr over cartoon porn, but using AI to sexually abuse actual women and children is all good, apparently.

path: 0 21472571, hotness: undefined, score: 72, children: 1
abbiistabbii 22 points 5 months ago

It's because they fear what Musk might do.

Twitter should be banned for making CSAM.

path: 0 21472571 21475048, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
xenomor 56 points 5 months ago

Because billionaires like these two, and the corporations that they run, believe they’re largely not accountable to the law nor cultural pressure. They exist in a cloud of privilege that never holds them to account for truth, justice nor anyone’s wellbeing as long as the investors get paid. They are sociopaths.

path: 0 21468307, hotness: undefined, score: 56, children: 1
Triumph 11 points 5 months ago

believe they're largely are

path: 0 21468307 21469254, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
BanMe 52 points 5 months ago

I've been an Apple user since the 80s, I used to be penpals with their CFO Ellen Hancock. Would get care packages from their PR team full of promo items. Exchanged emails with Wozniak and Jobs. I was deeply obsessed.

Obviously things have drifted away from the core "underdog" vibe that Apple exemplified for so long, as their popularity and device adoption surged, they've been less of the Apple I knew.

But Cook's behavior this year has me realizing I've bought my last Apple device. Bring on Linux in every form.

I know I don't matter at all, but it would have taken epic amounts of bullshit to make me sour on them, and here we are.

path: 0 21482168, hotness: undefined, score: 52, children: 13
Mr_Dr_Oink 20 points 5 months ago

Your individual change is a drop in the ocean but everyone making that change is a tidal wave. I have very recently moved to linux after almost 30 years using windows. It is an incredible set of OSs with brilliant support from a fantastic community and it keeps getting better.

We need to make the change and encourage others too.

path: 0 21482168 21482468, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 2
bdama 9 points 5 months ago

You're not alone. Used to be the biggest Apple fan, worked there for nearly ten years until 2023.

Last year I made the cut, the new PC I bought was custom built and is running Linux. My MacBook Air is running Asahi Fedora Remix primarily and the iPhone was sold on. Disconnecting from iCloud was a pain, getting pictures off of their system took me three months but it was worth it. Self hosting my stuff now and 2026 is the year to switch my family and friends over as well.

path: 0 21482168 21482468 21483669, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
AnUnusualRelic 3 points 5 months ago

I used Apple with an Apple 2, then once bought an Apple laptop just before they switched to intel cpus as an experiment. For reference I had already been running Linux for years at the time, so that was a test. It lasted three or four months before I ran back to Kde, couldn't stand how rigid, awkward and closed the interface was. As an aside, it was pretty much impossible to extract my data from their "photos" app. They renamed everything and dumed it in a maze of illegible directories.
That was my last contact with Apple.

Even Microsoft felt more user friendly to me.

path: 0 21482168 21482468 21483669 21494293, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Soup 7 points 5 months ago

I recently saw a video about what changed and it’s very clear that it is almost entirely Tim Cook’s fault. He’s a rotten snake who no one ever seemed to really like and who was constantly wrong about nearly everything and yet was left in charge and, with zero surprise whatsoever, immediately and consistently fucked it all up.

He was handed a roadmap to making money without sacrificing quality or much integrity(corporations seem hell-bent on making sure they always suck a little bit at the very least) and he threw it away to be a little bitch instead.

path: 0 21482168 21486694, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 7
QuandaleDingle 4 points 5 months ago

Yep, sounds like Tim Apple. XD Could you send a link to the video? Sounds interesting.

path: 0 21482168 21486694 21494123, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
Soup 3 points 5 months ago

I’ve completely lost the video, sorry.

It talked about how he has always been far more obssessed with shareholder value than quality and affordability for the customer.

Apple used to make products that got cheaper over time but under Cook they’ve been sky-rocketing in price.

It also talked about how he was so concerned with pennies that he sought to put a stranglehold on the design team, the people who came up with the entire aesthetic that is Apple a huge reason why they’ve sold so well.

I’ve no clue why he was chosen to lead the company because he’s just a massive idiot who was handed an easy win, hell he was handed something that had already won and has done so much to break what he was given.

path: 0 21482168 21486694 21494123 21501483, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 5
QuandaleDingle 2 points 5 months ago

Ah, that's alright. There's definitely been a ton of videos covering this massive blunder at this point.

path: 0 21482168 21486694 21494123 21501483 21502928, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
NotSafeForWorld 1 point 5 months ago

I think I found it: Here

path: 0 21482168 21486694 21494123 21501483 21539395, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
NotSafeForWorld 1 point 5 months ago path: 0 21482168 21486694 21494123 21501483 21503397, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Sturgist 5 points 5 months ago

Just finishing off setting up ElementaryOS on my wife's early 2015 MacBook Air. It's based on Ubuntu LTS, but with a custom theme to make it macOS-esque. Seems pretty good so far, but time will tell if she enjoys using it.

Edit: Everything but the webcam just worked out of the box. The webcam was a motherfuck though. Took the better part of 3hrs trawling forums to find the full instructions for installing the kernel module to get it running....

path: 0 21482168 21486569, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
phx 3 points 5 months ago

And this is also why we NEED mainstream Linux mobile (phone) devices. Google is actively locking down their ecosystem. Both Apple and Google see customers as walking wallets

path: 0 21482168 21503601, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
abbiistabbii 45 points 5 months ago

I mean Grok is literally being used to make CSAM so it should not only be taken down but the law should get involved in any reasonable country.

path: 0 21475054, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 7
bearboiblake 7 points 5 months ago

how many times do we have to say it

the law is optional for corporations and the rich

the law is for oppressing the poor and justifying it

path: 0 21475054 21485351, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
QuandaleDingle 4 points 5 months ago

It's just crazy dude. Give pedos an opportunity, and they WILL take advantage of it. You could be making an image hosting app for frickin octogenarians and they'll somehow discover it and use it as their spank bank. I hate that shit.

path: 0 21475054 21494183, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Bunbury 1 point 5 months ago

The thing is though… is it actually CSM according to the law if there is no real child involved along the way? At least some countries might need a law change first before tackling this.

Edit: I checked the local law where I’m located and it’s “images or videos depicting a minor during a sexual act”. I’d argue these AI generated images aren’t of minors because they don’t exist. We probably need new laws first unless it’s provable that the images represent a specific real life minor.

path: 0 21475054 21485611, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 4
abbiistabbii 4 points 5 months ago

The thing is though… is it actually CSM according to the law if there is no real child involved along the way?

Legally, yes. The law in the UK also includes images of children that are drawn or computer generated.

path: 0 21475054 21485611 21486213, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 3
k0e3 3 points 5 months ago

I had kind of assumed this was the case in a lot of countries with one of the more prominent exception being Japan (we have a lot of fucked up manga/anime).

path: 0 21475054 21485611 21486213 21493677, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
abbiistabbii 3 points 5 months ago

Japan had legal Child Porn until disconcertingly recently.

path: 0 21475054 21485611 21486213 21493677 21494131, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Bunbury 2 points 5 months ago

Good. I also read a bit more into it and while I’m not located in the UK apparently there is a specific extension to the law that also includes drawings and “collage” type edits. It doesn’t mention AI yet but surely this should count.

RIP my search history. But I’m glad we don’t need to wait for the law to catch up (in some places). Now all we have to do is scream from the rooftops that the laws need to be applied. Or even better: sue someone.

path: 0 21475054 21485611 21486213 21486831, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
magnetosphere 41 points 5 months ago

Do you need a back brace to stand up straight, buddy? Because at this point, I am certain you haven’t got a single vertebra.

Just want to make sure this line gets the attention it deserves.

path: 0 21468684, hotness: undefined, score: 41, children: 0
kinkles 37 points 5 months ago

This was a really good article. The author is rightfully pissed off.

path: 0 21468261, hotness: undefined, score: 37, children: 5
sausager 21 points 5 months ago

path: 0 21468261 21468320, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 4
throws_lemy 45 points 5 months ago path: 0 21468261 21468320 21468485, hotness: undefined, score: 45, children: 1
Sunshine 13 points 5 months ago

Thanks little kiwi ❤️

path: 0 21468261 21468320 21468485 21468536, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
jenings 8 points 5 months ago

You can just enable ublock origin to bypass these verge popups

path: 0 21468261 21468320 21469837, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
throws_lemy 0 points 5 months ago
path: 0 21468261 21468320 21468466, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
stringere 36 points 5 months ago

Post deepfake porn of them and their wives or husbands on X.

path: 0 21480029, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 3
muusemuuse 17 points 5 months ago

That’s…actually a pretty good idea.

path: 0 21480029 21480676, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 0
Leonardo_da_Vinci 5 points 5 months ago

More views, more ads. Go ahead make them richer.

path: 0 21480029 21481385, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Spacehooks 2 points 5 months ago

Time to find out if they are into sph.

path: 0 21480029 21481385 21493565, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
xep 30 points 5 months ago

More proof that rules and guidelines only apply to those without power or privilege.

path: 0 21471735, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 0
tgcoldrockn 30 points 5 months ago

Everyone watched as Tim Apple bowed and kissed the ring. 'Coward' was already his namesake.

path: 0 21472066, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 0
brachiosaurus 29 points 5 months ago

Because they are indeed cowards.

path: 0 21475097, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 1
Signtist 5 points 5 months ago

"Coward" implies that they want to do good, but are too scared to do so. There's no reason to think that, and indeed we shouldn't. They want money and Elon makes them money; that's all there is to it. If ethics mattered to them at all, they wouldn't have been able to climb to the position of CEO of a major corporation in the first place.

path: 0 21475097 21482302, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Tamps 26 points 5 months ago

It appears to demonstrate that it's very much profit over principles and values.

path: 0 21478366, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 0
MimicJar 25 points 5 months ago

Why won't Apple and Google pull it?

Google will pull it as soon as Apple does, they're a follower not a leader.

path: 0 21469878, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 2
cerebralhawks 3 points 5 months ago

Funny how it’s the other way around when it comes to hardware. Headphone jack removal and fingerprint reader, Droid did both first.

With software, copying Apple is everyone’s game. Samsung were caught red handed literally telling their designers where they could copy Apple more. They’re only just getting around to the important bits. Software updates, and synergy with a computer (which unfortunately is Windows, not Linux).

path: 0 21469878 21471599, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
MolochHorridus 7 points 5 months ago

The ”Droid” you’re talking about isn’t Google.

Conflating the company Google, Android operating system and every company that makes phones running Android is a common mistake people make.

path: 0 21469878 21471599 21474897, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
lechekaflan 23 points 5 months ago

Because money. And the laws are useless against them.

path: 0 21485582, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 1
Puddinghelmet 3 points 5 months ago

And the blackmail in daily life

path: 0 21485582 21494375, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
ipkpjersi 22 points 5 months ago

Because billionaires like to stick together because they think that they're better than all of us combined.

path: 0 21472246, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 0
DarrinBrunner 18 points 5 months ago

Because, it's NEVER been about protecting kids, or other vulnerable people. The filthy rich don't give one flying fuck about vulnerable people.

path: 0 21494722, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
SpicyTaint 17 points 5 months ago
path: 0 21469291, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 6
frongt 11 points 5 months ago

They can afford to hire the Pinkertons to find you.

path: 0 21469291 21470429, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
Bob_Robertson_IX 10 points 5 months ago

Not them.... their family members. Spouses, siblings, parents, kids. There are no rules any more.

path: 0 21469291 21470117, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
RightEdofer 6 points 5 months ago
path: 0 21469291 21471548, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
HertzDentalBar 5 points 5 months ago

In elons case he actually would love that, he's fucked

path: 0 21469291 21470878, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
0_o7 4 points 5 months ago

I don't know man, C level executives are all about the money, they would sell out their moms to make a buck.

If it doesn't hurt their position in the company, they wouldn't give a single fuck. They literally kissed the ring of a dictator, they'd dance to any tune to make the line go up.

path: 0 21469291 21472674, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Kissaki 1 point 5 months ago
path: 0 21469291 21475123, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
FrankFrankson 14 points 5 months ago

They are not cowards, they don't give a single shit about it. There isn't enough backlash to effect Google so Google doesn't care. That is how corporations deal with every subject. They don't treat child porn differently becuase it's one of the more henious offenses; it's simply another rule broken and it is delt woth the same way as anyother broken law or rule: ignore it or throw money at it and admit no wrong doing.

path: 0 21475350, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
e461h 3 points 5 months ago

It’s the opposite. They are cowards. Any move to do the right thing makes you a target for oh dear leader (who is also a pedophile). So they ignore it because it’s more profitable to avoid falling out with the administration. The only value a corporation has is greed.

path: 0 21475350 21481351, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Sunshine 14 points 5 months ago path: 0 21468528, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
melsaskca 13 points 5 months ago

Fuck Tim Apple and Sundar Google.

path: 0 21476351, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
9point6 11 points 5 months ago

All sorts of weird precedents are being set in the shameless kowtowing to the deluded traffic cone

Lawyers are going to be making any kind of weird argument based on some precedent set during this presidency for decades

path: 0 21468712, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
tigeruppercut 9 points 5 months ago

Time to spread vids of Cook and Pichai 69ing

this was as close as I could get without burning too many rainforests--maybe people with better AI skillz can get an actual image of them fucking

path: 0 21494652, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
evol 8 points 5 months ago

hopefully more leftists/progressives will wake up about how trusting these companies with "censorship" and having closed source proprietary tech/platforms so entangled in our lives is a bad thing. Most in my experience just complain about how we need to tax them without really thinking about how we can disentangle them from our lives. The past 20 years have been this weird bubble where the largest creators of capital (silicon valley) were not explicitly sided with the auth right wing. People have gotten too use to this especially with personal data and just expecting the state to save them.

I like to think this will cause open source solutions and federated ecosystems to become more popular. Maybe i'm a doomer but we will just get more tiktoks about trump is bad and "late stage capitalism". People I think just will never sacrifice convenience in life, its why authoritarianism seems to always win.

path: 0 21473297, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
hornedfiend 7 points 5 months ago

Why would respecting the guidelines upset "the right"? Are they all pedophiles?

Apple's keyboard doesn't even have the word pedophile. Kind of ironic isn't it?

path: 0 21472440, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
PierceTheBubble 5 points 5 months ago
path: 0 21485240, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
TeddE 6 points 5 months ago

No, I don't think that's what's happening here. I think people are theorizing that X is very likely to respond to pressure from Google and Apple threatening to deplatform them, and loudly complaining about them not applying their own rules equally is a great way to remind their internal lawyers to put pressure on them (insulting the CEOs is just a nice bonus).

Frankly, if the fallot here is a relaxed adult policy, that's still a win. LGBTQIA advocacy groups tend to get lumped in as 'adult', which is a problem for trans-affirming suicide prevention hotlines trying to save lives.

As for your slippery slope question, that Pandora's box is already open. Just half a year ago Mastercard and VISA put the strongarm on Valve and itch.io to let the payment processors ban any game they choose under the guise of pornography censorship. Pressuring a platform to censure an app 'for the sake of the children' just isn't the virgin ground you seem to think it is.

path: 0 21485240 21486200, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
JensSpahnpasta 5 points 5 months ago

There is another battle: There is a fight to open up app installation on phones. The EU recently forced Apple to allow other app stores on iOS and Apple is fighting this as hard as you would expect. Apple & Google are taking 30% of each sale in their stores and are making bank. One of the arguments they are pushing is "safety". Only apps on their vetted app stores are safe, every other store is unsafe and so on. If they allow a child porn app in their store, all of their arguments in this debate are invalid. And that is also an important fact for that debate.

path: 0 21485240 21485663, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
MonkderVierte 5 points 5 months ago

But Xitter disabled image gen now.

Sure, yes, with any niche app, they would've pulled it from the store and never allowed it again.

path: 0 21475141, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
LifeInMultipleChoice 5 points 5 months ago

Sadly I'm hoping they do it so Musk will poor money into allowing side loaded apps in Android and iOS permanently

path: 0 21471547, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
0_o7 5 points 5 months ago

Appeasing fascist is always, always going to make them bolder.

But apparently fighting back "is exactly what he wants" so yea, good luck with doing more of nothing "exactly what he wants" .

path: 0 21472795, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
OldGrayDog 4 points 5 months ago

If you want to get it banned, make some deepfake porn of them and their family members and watch how fast it disappears.

path: 0 21495820, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
DarkSideOfTheMoon 3 points 5 months ago

Sometimes I have the impression X is doing everything to be removed to the App Store so Musk can sue and get rid of the guidelines. And as we can see here we can do even CSAM on his social network and no one do anything, this should be a matter of law, not a private company like Google or Apple.

path: 0 21488337, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
BadlyTimedLuck 1 point 5 months ago
path: 0 21471916, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
ZestyAdmin 1 point 5 months ago

X is a propaganda tool. If they remove that then they also risk opposing the larger objectives of the USA.

path: 0 21504806, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
gustofwind -6 points 5 months ago

Right in the name

They’re guidelines

path: 0 21468229, hotness: undefined, score: -6, children: 3
TheReturnOfPEB 24 points 5 months ago

fancytalk for a double standard

path: 0 21468229 21468434, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 2
Telorand 11 points 5 months ago

Exactly. They're okay with the fascist Xitpool, but if any regular dev ever crossed those "guidelines," they'd be banned in a heartbeat.

path: 0 21468229 21468434 21468900, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
T156 4 points 5 months ago

Just take the app name, for example. From memory, single letter app names aren't typically allowed in either of those places. X got a special exemption to let them use that name.

path: 0 21468229 21468434 21468900 21471621, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
technology
technology

@lemmy.world

login for more options
85657
20004
16397

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


go to feed...