I recently rewatched the original and had forgotten just how well they portray her evil. Even as an adult I was actively repulsed the same way I would be if I met her in real life. Classic Disney definitely had some incredible villain writing.
I recently rewatched the original and had forgotten just how well they portray her evil. Even as an adult I was actively repulsed the same way I would be if I met her in real life. Classic Disney definitely had some incredible villain writing.
The cartoon or the live action
Glenn Close played it flawlessly.
Glenn Close is flawless and Horace and Jasper are played by the Weasley father and Dr. House. Names escape me today
I haven't seen the movie since I was a kid, but I did rewatch clips of it and she does genuinely come off as an extremely unpleasant person.
You might even say that she's somewhat cruel.
Yep and they do that by making it not even believably the same character.
I think the real cruella would be too proud to make a sobstory about how much of a victim she is. She's the kind of narc who would brag and totally own how awful she is because in her mind, she's not doing anything bad and she's the best and coolest person ever.
In the original animated version, sure. Because that version had good writing, especially for villains.
Most well written villains are unapologetic and just naturally evil. They know they're evil and they don't care. For some reason, most movies nowadays (particularly Disney) now insist on their villains having some tragic backstory and thinking they're good
They explore an alternate story. Sometimes they do that and explore fun scenarios like "what if Cruella DeVil was a somewhat decent person" or "what if all the heroes lived together and operated a magical ghetto and also brought their enemies back from the dead specifically so they could force them to live in squalor in the ghetto forever". Fun little alternate stories.
The Descendants series. The setting is basically as I described, except of course that the ghetto is heavily romanticized and the squalor mostly amounts to people having a vaguely punk aesthetic (as opposed to the preppy good guy kingdom). They're Disney movies for kids, after all, but they do acknowledge that their own setting is fucked up.
The premise of the story is that someone realizes that the villains had kids in there and that punishing the kids for their parents' misdeeds might possibly be kind of cruel so a few of them are selected to attend school in the good guy kingdom as an experiment. This results in a lot of choreographed song and dance routines, a romance plot, and some semi-self aware criticism of the "villains get punished harshly, heroes live happily ever after" trope.
The first one was pretty decent, the sequels were okay even if they effectively sidelined three of the four protagonists. They also made an animated series, which was a complete dumpster fire.
Cruella was excellent, in my opinion of course ๐
Yeah and it's pretty good I thought. Shits on the old story but I care not.
Gotta make content for new fascist taking over America. Everybody else will be in the famous American prison system in a short while, no need to make content for them.
The movie itself is excellent. However there is one horrible almost meme like scene where dalmatians run into a fancy party and kill Cruella's mother. If you ignore that scene, it's a great movie.
It might actually be a good thing that they made the dalmatians seem very mean/vicious.
The original movies were so popular that it actually caused a big problem for the breed. Many people got dalmatians without doing their research first. They're a very active breed, and require lots of exercise. Without proper exercise and socialization, they can become quite the trouble makers and this kind of gave them a bad reputation...
Not really "more so" just "more likely to become" as the minimum requirements are higher and thus easier to fail to meet.
I wouldn't call her entrepreneurially minded. She fully intended just to make a single coat and keep it herself. If she were intending on making it a business, she should have been setting up a Dalmatian farm with the 101 puppies and then mass produce the coats. Inbreeding health defects don't matter all that much when you're just gonna be skinning any puppies born within weeks.
Ah, a player of Dwarf Fortress.
Or Rimworld
Gotta genocide anybody who opposes... That's real entrepreneurship.
Just 100 Dalmatians for her
The comic may be a joke, but I feel like this is an issue in diversity.
Take an author who has three characters. They want better representation, so one white character becomes black.
But, it turns out that character gives a third-act betrayal. Now itโs playing up the theme that black people are deceptive and untrustworthy.
Or, they try making the second character a woman. In a key conflict, that character pulls a very stupid move that lets the bad guys get away and results in an exciting chase scene. Now it evokes the idea that women are stupid and ill-suited to detective/enforcement work.
I really want a world where we can safely set up characters for moments of failure, evil, etc, without large crowds either feeling offended, feigning offense, or worse, taking it as validation of their bigotry.
when hasnt there been a relevant xkcd ๐
I don't get why it's always assumed that a particular character is intended to represent an entire gender or race.
One of the ones I remember the most is in the original COD4: Modern Warfare. A blog highlighted so savagely the fact that your squad is sent down to rescue a female chopper pilot who's been downed and wounded. Then, a nuke goes off, killing everyone, suggesting they could have gotten out of the blast radius if they didn't save her - meaning a woman in distress was the death of the whole squad. The blog lambasted Infinity Ward for giving such a horrible treatment to the game's only major female character.
Of course, that's a relatively disingenuous interpretation. That same mission has you rescuing whole squads of pinned soldiers moments before (all men). The chopper pilot gets her great moments of heroism in the process. And it's very likely the writers intended for the squad to be killed by a nuke no matter what happens.
And there have probably been COD games out there with NO notable women in them. So somehow, the move to include one in this particular game struck them as worse than if they'd done nothing at all.
That's crazy. She was a woman combat helicopter pilot? That sounds pretty bad-ass to me. I don't see how that's "horrible treatment".
COD is disgusting imperial propaganda. Absolutely zero surprise that it's also misogynist.
Sounds more like the player that wrote the article is a misogynist, not the game.
If you're saving dudes and the last rescue is a woman and you use that as a sign of misogyny, that says more about the speaker than the game.
I think his point was that it WASN'T misogynist. The character is a combat helicopter pilot. That means she's intelligent, highly trained and skilled and of course brave. Those are bad things?
The fact that she was shot down doesn't reflect on her gender, it could happen to any pilot in that situation. It's war, it's inherently dangerous.
I really want a world where we can safely set up characters for moments of failure, evil, etc, without large crowds either feeling offended, feigning offense, or worse, taking it as validation of their bigotry.
It's a real Heads-I-Win / Tails-You-Lose game, because the White Male Anti-Hero gets the exact opposite treatment. If you make a Sopranos or a Wolf of Wall Street or a Fight Club, the very obviously corrupt and villainous lead character somehow ends up being this celebrity icon for reactionaries.
The same people complaining that John Boyega and Daisy Ridley ruined Star Wars will come out cheering for Adam Driver while claiming Imperialism is cool now.
Anything that makes a story exciting or different - the ups and downs of the story arc, characters with personal flaws or quirks, foreign settings and distinct cultures, non-English languages, non-CisHet romances - become at once implicit indictments of the out groups and charming complements toward the in-groups.
And a lot of that just boils down to the critics themselves. Far-right media amplifying its megaphone year after year, until we're deaf from their screamed opinions. There's no right answer for a film maker or story writer when the designated state-sanctioned censors and corporate flaks are all patriarchal white nationalists.
The movie Tallulah, I watched it completely hungover and one thing I noticed is that there is only 1 guy in the movie and he solves EVERYTHING by just being the only rational person. There's a lot of things happening between all the girls in the movie but there is one angle where it really looks like "girls crazy, man rational"
Tallulah
I haven't seen it but I do like Allison Janney. I'll have to check it out.
Yeah this tends to also create the problem a lot of writers fall into when having a more diverse cast where non white cis male characters come off as too perfect. They can't make mistakes, big or small, cause they're worried about the examples you gave (not saying you're implying this). I know I've heard from a lot of people on the topic of representation that they'd loveless perfect representation, but that's a hard thing to walk especially if funds aren't allocated to maybe get a consultant on the team that could help represent that group without it being stereotyped.
I really want a world where we can safely set up characters for moments of failure, evil, etc, without large crowds either feeling offended, feigning offense, or worse, taking it as validation of their bigotry.
Yes, the world would be much better without racism, sexism, etc. That's why we resist.
I don't know if resistance should be restricting creative freedom to the point where every character MUST be considered a representation of millions of people.
That's less equality and more just a new form of racially-based control.
Great movie for describing the reality of "entrepreneurship".
Also didn't Cruella employ two career criminals and literally stole the puppies and even complained that there were cops all over the place looking for her and her two stupid henchmen?
Yeah theft is illegal under capitalism.
lmao oh precious child.
Spare me your fake condescension covering your utter lack of argument.
Stealing people's property is illegal. Prove otherwise.
Capitalism is theft.
Grow the fuck up, dude.
Itโs only illegal for you because youโre not in the owner class.
No, stealing 101 puppies is not "legal" if you're rich. Fucking embarrassing.
I understand their liking of her. Ursula basically makes a living taking advantage of insecure and/or highly vulnerable people and giving them extremely disadvantageous contracts and approaching them in their most vulnerable moment.
In short, she is everything what every grifter is to a T.
THIS. Honestly.
Valid, but the focus on it, uh...I'm increasingly getting the feeling that our wonderful, lefty heaven is actually incel.
Excuse me, someone please tell me Lemmy isn't incel.
Its definitely an extension of 4chan as much as it is reddit.
Neither of those are beating the accusations though.
Villians are often queer coded, so I'm obligated to side with Cruella sorry, pongo and perditia better run
OK, so you read the person's comment and had 2 possible conclusions, 1. That they advocate murdering puppies. 2. They're making a joke about pinkwashing similar to OP, and you went with 1, because of their instance.
Am I understanding this correctly?
Yeah, here, where we treasure inclusion, freedom, and human rights, we don't really talk with those people. They are weird and obnoxious. Fortunately, it's easy to spot them. No, no, not by their skin colour, just the name of their instance. No, no, it's nothing like hating people from a certain country, silly, it's about an entire Lemmy instance, it's completely different!
It only makes sense if you attribute all things you don't like to any person you don't like.
Talking to or about people like they're cartoon villains instead of actual people isn't productive.
@lemmy.world
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
*๏ฟฝ Be Nice!
*๏ฟฝ๏ธ Community Standards
*๏ฟฝ Keep it Real
*๏ฟฝ๏ธ Credit Where Credit is Due
*๏ฟฝ Post Formatting
*๏ฟฝ Post Frequency/SPAM
*๏ฟฝโโ ๏ธ Internationalization (i18n)
Sรญ, por favor [Spanish/Espaรฑol]*๏ฟฝ Moderation
The following artists are banned from the community.
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.
*๏ฟฝ Be Nice!
*๏ฟฝ๏ธ Community Standards
*๏ฟฝ Keep it Real
*๏ฟฝ๏ธ Credit Where Credit is Due
*๏ฟฝ Post Formatting
*๏ฟฝ Post Frequency/SPAM
*๏ฟฝโโ ๏ธ Internationalization (i18n)
Sรญ, por favor [Spanish/Espaรฑol]*๏ฟฝ Moderation
The following artists are banned from the community.
It should be noted that when you make reports, it is your responsibility to provide rational reasoning why something should be removed. Saying it simply breaks community rules is not always good enough.
Note: This is not a rule, but a helpful suggestion.
When posting images, you should strive to add alt-text for screen readers to use to describe the image you're posting:
Another helpful thing to do is to provide a transcription of the text in your images, as well as brief descriptions of what's going on. (example)
go to feed...
She is one of the best movie baddies, and her name is marvellous.
save