A New Study Shows that Tall Vehicle Hoods Have Caused Hundreds of Additional Deaths Each Year

15 hours ago by _haha_oh_wow_ to c/fuckcars

New research by the Times shows that thousands of fatal crashes involving pedestrians could have been avoided with lower hood heights and improved visibility.
shininghero 27 points 14 hours ago

Tall hoods, poor intersection designs inhibiting sidewalk visibility, and idiots assuming "right on red" means they can blast through the turn without needing to check.

path: 0 24399689, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 1
AbsolutelyClawless 4 points 10 hours ago

That's so bizarre to me. Even on green you sometimes have to stop if the pedestrians have green too. And right on red still confuses me. Why not have a dedicated green arrow light?

path: 0 24399689 24404380, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
savvie 23 points 14 hours ago

drivers in vehicles with absurdly high hoods have killed hundreds of pedestrians

path: 0 24400069, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 1
impairedimperator 9 points 12 hours ago

The tool does affect the result, though. It's like stories of mass violence across the world: here in the US, you see a headline like "mass shooting, 10 dead 1 wounded". In places like China, you see headlines like "mass stabbing, 1 dead 10 wounded".

Shitty drivers will always exist, but a shitty driver in a reasonable car is gonna be a lot less effective at manslaughter.

path: 0 24400069 24402179, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
snooggums 23 points 13 hours ago

Can't have flip up lights becaus of pedestrians but moving walls of death are fine!

path: 0 24400483, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 3
ITGuyLevi 4 points 13 hours ago

Did something happen to flip up headlights? I still see them all over the place.

path: 0 24400483 24400675, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Gerblat 6 points 12 hours ago

As far as I know they haven’t been allowed on new cars for a long time, but if you have an older car that has them it’s still legal to drive

path: 0 24400483 24400675 24401282, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
snooggums 6 points 12 hours ago

In the 90s there were some regulation changes about how headlights worked like requiring them to be open if the mechanism failed and pedestrian safety that made them difficult for car designers to implement so they faded out of style.

path: 0 24400483 24400675 24401462, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
AngryCommieKender 16 points 10 hours ago

Just gonna leave this here.

path: 0 24403698, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
jtrek 8 points 13 hours ago

Just make it illegal to have unsafe vehicles. Do a buyback for the existing ones.

Billions for war but anything actually useful is too expensive. This is the bad place.

path: 0 24400861, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 3
_haha_oh_wow_ 2 points 11 hours ago

I'll take "Things That Will Never Happen" for $1000!

path: 0 24400861 24403238, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
LodeMike 2 points 13 hours ago

Define "unsafe vehicle"

path: 0 24400861 24400921, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
jtrek 5 points 13 hours ago

I'd defer to someone with more expertise, but I'd guess a lot of SUVs and trucks are going to be disqualified.

While I'm waving this low grade magic wand, maybe require a special license for SUVs or something.

path: 0 24400861 24400921 24401016, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
shrek_is_love 7 points 14 hours ago path: 0 24399650, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
turtlesareneat 5 points 12 hours ago

It's weird to me that rear view cameras have become so important and mandated (for good reason) while the front end is becoming more and more dangerous - I don't want to throw technology at every problem but front bumper cams would probably do a lot as well, especially at low speeds, it could activate and take over the instrument panel when it detects anything solid in range. Be better than nothing - they're not going to ban SUVs in this country anytime soon, I'm afraid.

path: 0 24401890, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
the_wizard_of_0Z 1 point 21 minutes ago

yup... baby crusherz for men who act like boyz ..... I wich upon a star for a ford ranger from back in the day

FORD RANGERRRRRR

I know this truck, I ain't no stranger, I know that truck that's a ford fuckin' Ranger!

path: 0 24410745, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
PlasmaTrout 1 point 13 hours ago

Wonder how many of these were "squatted" trucks?

path: 0 24400396, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
cubism_pitta 3 points 12 hours ago

Squatted trucks are likely a rounding error in the data. Especially when the stock hood height of many modern trucks is so tall.

I ride past an F250, Cybertruck, or Escalade on my bicycle and my head is just barely over the hood

I AM 5'11!!!!!!

path: 0 24400396 24401944, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
_cnt0 1 point 11 hours ago

Was anything wrong with the previous 100 studies, that it needed this one?

path: 0 24403250, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
_haha_oh_wow_ 3 points 11 hours ago

More data points = more good?

path: 0 24403250 24403265, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Ooops 1 point 10 hours ago

As long as they don't get the result you want you do more studies, so you can pretend it's still actively studied and the results aren't clear yet.

path: 0 24403250 24404431, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Hupf 1 point 8 hours ago

Vehicles don't kill people. Guns kill people.

Oh wait wrong community.

path: 0 24405503, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Fedizen 1 point 9 minutes ago

Its called a 23rd term Ford Abortion

path: 0 24410857, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Eternal192 0 points 8 hours ago

"tall vehicle hoods are at fault" no hon it's idiots buying and driving large vehicles that's the problem, they aren't qualified to drive a go cart let alone something with a "large hood" and i fucking hate that fucking excuse, whoever did that study and published it in a serious tone is an idiot.

path: 0 24405794, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
fuckcars
fuckcars

@lemmy.world

login for more options
16007
2958
4860

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be Civil

You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speech

Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass people

Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topic

This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No reposts

Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

  • [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
  • [article] for news articles
  • [blog] for any blog-style content
  • [video] for video resources
  • [academic] for academic studies and sources
  • [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
  • [meme] for memes
  • [image] for any non-meme images
  • [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories

Recommended communities:

go to feed...