US strikes $1.2bn deal to pay German firm to halt offshore wind projects

13 days ago by CAVOK to c/europe

The RWE payout is the latest in a string of deals cancelling wind energy projects, a power source long derided by Trump.
jenesaisquoi 118 points 13 days ago

This is so incredibly stupid

path: 0 25172220, hotness: undefined, score: 118, children: 15
SeeMarkFly 35 points 13 days ago

America has become a torture chamber for smart people. Ooh the pain!

path: 0 25172220 25172834, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 2
jenesaisquoi 6 points 13 days ago

I think it's just the USA, the other 29 countries in America aren't that bad

path: 0 25172220 25172834 25175044, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Jhex 6 points 13 days ago

Good thing there are so few of those left there

path: 0 25172220 25172834 25173115, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
stopdropandprole 25 points 13 days ago

just so people are aware, this is FIFTH TIME the administration has done this: Source

If this sounds at all familiar, it's not your imagination. In March, the Republican administration announced that it had agreed to pay a foreign company almost $1 billion in American taxpayer money to abandon two wind farm projects that would have produced enough electricity to power more than 1.3 million homes and businesses [...]

At the administration's insistence, the company will instead proceed with different energy projects that will cost more and pollute more. [thanks to] President Donald Trump, many American consumers will pay for the privilege of paying more to turn on the lights, all while polluting our own air.

Then in April, it happened again, when the Republican administration announced plans to pay energy companies almost $900 million to abandon plans for two offshore wind farms. Two months later, Team Trump spent $765 million to buy back another group of offshore wind leases.

In late June, a fourth example emerged, when the administration announced plans to pay Duke Energy $129 million to abandon an offshore wind project off the coast of North Carolina.

With a fifth instance this week, the combined price tag for the developments is approaching $4 billion.

path: 0 25172220 25179342, hotness: undefined, score: 25, children: 0
CosmoNova 4 points 13 days ago

Both countries have governments run by very stupid, selfish manbabies and their cronies.

path: 0 25172220 25176457, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 6
Rothe -1 points 12 days ago

Which "both countries"? This is about the US.

path: 0 25172220 25176457 25187699, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
instantnudel 9 points 12 days ago

Hope that helps

path: 0 25172220 25176457 25187699 25187839, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 4
Natanael 2 points 12 days ago

They're paying the company to break the contract, not the country

path: 0 25172220 25176457 25187699 25187839 25192161, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
weps 1 point 12 days ago

what kind of county is a firm?

path: 0 25172220 25176457 25187699 25187839 25189024, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
mecen 1 point 12 days ago

I wonder if that company earned more from being banned from making wind turbines or would be from selling electricity

path: 0 25172220 25190369, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
buddascrayon 2 points 11 days ago

"After careful consideration, it was determined there is no path forward to permit these projects in the US for the foreseeable future," the company said in a statement.

From the article it looks like this wasn't just a carrot being dangled but also a stick being threatened. My guess is that they foresaw the path to completion would be too fraught under the United States government as it is and they don't see any point in fighting an unwinnable war when they can just get paid anyhow.

The long and short of it is that Germany and Europe as well as the rest of the world at this point sees no point in investing in America's future because we have none.

path: 0 25172220 25190369 25195236, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
ragas 1 point 12 days ago

That company will just build elsewhere instead.

path: 0 25172220 25190369 25193379, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
mecen 1 point 9 days ago

Well yes but they earned money from anti windmill administration and I wondered how long would this farm would need to work to earn it back

path: 0 25172220 25190369 25193379 25232995, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
brave_lemmywinks 80 points 13 days ago

Levels of dumb never thought possible.

path: 0 25172381, hotness: undefined, score: 80, children: 7
plyth 17 points 13 days ago

The US could switch off their nuclear powerplants to accelerate the transition to hydrocarbons.

path: 0 25172381 25172450, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 5
EnsignWashout 18 points 13 days ago

Let's not give the idiots more ideas. haha.

path: 0 25172381 25172450 25172533, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 3
plyth 3 points 13 days ago

They already know. Merkel saved their oil industry by making electricity for cars expensive.

path: 0 25172381 25172450 25172533 25172799, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Thorry 1 point 13 days ago

Yeah but what if Germany were to be hit by a 9.1 earthquake followed by a huge tsunami and have the disaster cause the need for emergency generators that were flooded by the tsunami? We can't have that risk! Shutting down all nuclear reactors was the only option.

path: 0 25172381 25172450 25172533 25172799 25177385, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Trampampoline 1 point 13 days ago

Won't make a dent either way. The entire climate situation basically depends on the death of capitalism, egotystical billionares taking fault(LMAO) and overhauling our entire way of life at this point.

path: 0 25172381 25172450 25172533 25177238, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
SabinStargem 3 points 12 days ago

Normally, I am very pro nuclear. The Trump Regime has proven itself to be utterly shit at wielding every form of power known to mankind, be it soft, wind, or kinetic. 😒

path: 0 25172381 25172450 25193112, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
SeeMarkFly 6 points 13 days ago

The day's not over yet!

path: 0 25172381 25172830, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
danc4498 77 points 13 days ago

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on "costly subsidies". 

Thank god we’re not paying costly subsidies

path: 0 25172531, hotness: undefined, score: 77, children: 12
Fermion 61 points 13 days ago

$1.2 Billion to make a project not happen sounds like a pretty costly subsidy.

path: 0 25172531 25172575, hotness: undefined, score: 61, children: 10
RamRabbit 2 points 13 days ago

They are being paid $1.2B to build gas power projects in the US. Whereas before they were being paid to build wind power in the US. They are not being paid to do nothing.

path: 0 25172531 25172575 25173027, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 9
danc4498 16 points 13 days ago

Thank god it’s not a costly subsidy though.

path: 0 25172531 25172575 25173027 25173149, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 0
Mihies 6 points 13 days ago

Are you sure? Because wording isn't clear, but pay out sounds like a .. pay out, not 'please, build something else'. 🤷

path: 0 25172531 25172575 25173027 25173812, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Jiral 4 points 13 days ago

That's not what the article says.

path: 0 25172531 25172575 25173027 25173888, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 5
RamRabbit -1 points 13 days ago

RWE said that it will now reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

path: 0 25172531 25172575 25173027 25173888 25173924, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 4
Rothe 2 points 12 days ago

No they aren't. They are investing in gas power projects, but the US government is not paying them the money to do that. The money is solely for breach of contract regarding the wind power project.

path: 0 25172531 25172575 25173027 25187720, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
thisisbutaname 4 points 13 days ago

Especially not on fossil fuels!

path: 0 25172531 25172634, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
SpaceScotsman 29 points 13 days ago

Can I get paid a billion dollars to do nothing?

path: 0 25174929, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 2
starlinguk 6 points 13 days ago

They'd already spent that billion on preparations. If they hadn't received their money back the shit would have hit the fan.

path: 0 25174929 25177546, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Sprossnix 2 points 13 days ago

Only if you reinvest the sum into conventional gas projects, including $900m (£669m) in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export terminal project in Louisiana.

path: 0 25174929 25177953, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
mereo 22 points 13 days ago

This is incredibly stupid. While China and the rest of the world are leading the charge in renewable energy, the U.S. is set to remain in the Stone Age due to pure hubris and short-term profit gains.

Paying 1.2 billion to get rid of that technology is just ideologically short-sighted. It's simply stupid.

path: 0 25172775, hotness: undefined, score: 22, children: 1
ywain 3 points 12 days ago

Exactly, European energy generation during an extreme summer has shown that renewables are the most reliable, until systems are in place for storage. The world can't rely on fossil fuels or even nuclear at the moment due to climate change.

path: 0 25172775 25179639, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
deeferg 20 points 13 days ago

Interior Secretary Doug Burgum said in a statement posted on X that Americans deserve an energy system built on common sense and not one dependent on "costly subsidies".

I actually want to vomit from how stupid as fuck that whole country is to not have done anything to these people.

path: 0 25175046, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
hendrik 17 points 13 days ago

Why not use the $1.25bn and reinvest it into a wind park in the North Sea? Feels a little backwards to give in to the bully and revert to fracking gas, and then put in another $18bn own money?!

path: 0 25172493, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 6
Jimbabwe 13 points 13 days ago

Yeah man, that’s the point. It’s backward as fuck. It’s absolutely, mind-numbingly idiotic.

path: 0 25172493 25172503, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Ooops 5 points 13 days ago

Why not use the $1.25bn and reinvest it into a wind park in the North Sea

Because the same brain rot makes the same kind of people go insane there, too, and then vote for corrupt "conservatives" that sabotage renewables for fossil fuels (read: for the juicy bribes the fossil industry pays).

Germany is just working on new legislation to prevent renewables where the grid isn't build up to handle it while also providing zero reasons for grid providers to build up the grid. Then they complete the package with no guaranteed feed-in compensation anymore.

Which obvious leads to a "sure you can build renewables, but a third party benefitting from fossil fuels has total control over your ability to sell your product"-situation were exactly noone will ever invest in renewables anymore. (PS: storage was also blocked by insane double taxation for years before a different government fixed that, and so instead the CEO of the record-holder in burying applications for connecting storage to the grid in red-tape -literal years for a process that should take a few days- was awarded with a job as Minister of Economy and Energy...)

They are doing exactly the same bullshit, they are just not as obnoxiously loud and boastful with their insanity as the orange moron is.

path: 0 25172493 25173378, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 4
weps 1 point 12 days ago

I took a boat ride between wind parks in the north sea

pretty huge

the guys you have that are stopping this suck at stopping it because the wind farm are there anyway

path: 0 25172493 25173378 25189108, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Ooops 1 point 12 days ago

the guys you have that are stopping this suck at stopping it

The advantadge of a more fragmented continent. Just because Germany's government has subscribed to the fossil fuel insanity (not surprisingly given their connections to MAGA, Heritage Foundation etc...) doesn't mean that Denmark or the Netherlands don't build some in the same coastal regions.

Enter the interconnected grid between countries and now the cheap electricity Germany doesn't want to build is sold to them at a surplus. Then they cry about their higher costs, lie that it's caused by renewables and double down on building expensive power generation instead.

See: in the end they pay money so they can pay more money for their electricity. Exactly like the morons in the US do. Conservativism is a cult that brain-washes people into voting against their own interests so the handful of people actually paying our politicians can get even richer.

path: 0 25172493 25173378 25189108 25191567, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
weps 1 point 11 days ago

Germany is 3rd in the world for wind in the sea

you're in some kind of hole

path: 0 25172493 25173378 25189108 25191567 25195885, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
hendrik 1 point 13 days ago

I mean it's not exactly the same bullshit in the extent of it.

Sad thing is: We used to be on the right track. Not nearly fast enough, but at least we were headed the right direction. As of today, my energy meter shows each sunny summer day, we have like 120% of Germany's energy demand met by renewables. We now need a bit more of it, plus storage, plus the grid to make it work during the morning, evening, night and winter. But then we got an incompetent government, politicians said we now have other things to do and becoming more right-wing is more important than continue to fix the energy situation... Also doesn't help how we now spend a lot of taxpayer money on war machinery instead of useful stuff. It's a shame.

path: 0 25172493 25173378 25173961, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
christianhawkins 15 points 12 days ago

Hey America, I am going to build an offshore wind park. Please pay me to stop.

path: 0 25184162, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
notsure 14 points 12 days ago

I want you to shoot yourself in the foot. How much?

path: 0 25182761, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 3
M0oP0o 5 points 12 days ago

Depends if I am an american or not. Hospital costs factor into this if you live in the home of the fee.

As a non american? I don't know $500K or so? I mean it would suck but not the worst thing to be paid for.

path: 0 25182761 25183154, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
Danquebec 1 point 12 days ago

That would probably leave me with a lifelong harm. My body is important. I'd only start considering it at $100 million.

path: 0 25182761 25183154 25187997, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
notsure 1 point 12 days ago

I want your optimism

path: 0 25182761 25183154 25183204, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
bad1080 13 points 13 days ago

art of the deal...

path: 0 25175528, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
angelmountain 10 points 13 days ago

This just seems so dumb and stupid on all kinds of levels. What does Trump think he's gaining from this in the end? I just don't see it.

Is he just getting paid by his friends with oil companies? Is that it?

path: 0 25178085, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
siftmama 5 points 13 days ago

Delays in becoming independent of oil at the expense of the taxpayer (not of oil companies).

path: 0 25178085 25178293, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Art____Dent 9 points 13 days ago

A Shame

path: 0 25172072, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Eddbopkins 8 points 12 days ago

1.2 billion of free money to not do work. Wow the trump administration sure knows how to waist money.

path: 0 25189314, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
DudeImMacGyver 7 points 13 days ago

What a spectacularly stupid waste of money!

path: 0 25172685, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Sgt_choke_n_stroke 7 points 12 days ago

If I was president I would order every new wind turbine be planted out side every trump golf course in the United states. 6 per golf course and tackey hotel

path: 0 25189360, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
betanumerus 6 points 12 days ago

dj is serving the oil companies, not the people

path: 0 25183151, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
roomy 4 points 13 days ago

What the heck? Why would they care if Germany is generating power?

Im THIS close to throwing my phone into an open fire

path: 0 25172882, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
RamRabbit 10 points 13 days ago

The US was paying them to build wind power projects in the US, now the US is paying them to build gas power projects in the US.

path: 0 25172882 25172901, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
roomy 3 points 13 days ago

Ohh that makes a lot more sense, i skimmed across the article

path: 0 25172882 25172901 25174403, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Ooops 4 points 13 days ago

No, they paid a German company that was building massive off-shore wind power production in the US to cancel the project and reimbursed them for voiding the lease on those off-shore areas.

Basically the US pays to keep economically viable wind power financed privately away, then pays again for the subsidies to get economically non-viable fossil fuel power generators build instead. All while screaming how they don't want to take part in that renewable scam that only works because of subsidies.

It's so stupid, you would be laughed out of the room if you brought up such an idea in serious fiction...

path: 0 25172882 25173534, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
MonkderVierte 1 point 13 days ago

If in doubt, click link, read first sentence.

path: 0 25172882 25178698, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
melsaskca 4 points 12 days ago

So it's not just the american "business" people that are corrupt, it's "business" people everywhere, throughout the land. Time to go back to hunting and gathering methinks. /s

path: 0 25188744, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
BarneyPiccolo 4 points 12 days ago

Anything to keep money out of the hands of working Americans.

path: 0 25191236, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
RamRabbit 4 points 13 days ago

They are getting paid $1.2B to build other power projects in the US. Not to simply do nothing.

path: 0 25172857, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
Rothe 2 points 12 days ago

That is a false statement. The US government paid them money for breaching the contract for the wind power project. The company is then investing some of that money in other projects in the US (which seems like a stupid decision, considering the unreliability of the country, but that is capitalism for you).

path: 0 25172857 25188179, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
altphoto 4 points 12 days ago

But they restarted this morning again since the deal didn't say when to restart lol.

path: 0 25179838, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
whyNotSquirrel 3 points 13 days ago

Wow, that surely will attract business in the US if they start paying to not do something! Art of the deal indeed.

Well I also can NOT build offshore whatever and I'll not do it for half the price!

path: 0 25172712, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Pomal 3 points 13 days ago

Remedial.

path: 0 25172379, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
87Six 2 points 13 days ago

We should post these in guess the country format

path: 0 25174488, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
botbot 2 points 13 days ago
path: 0 25178082, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
europe
europe

@feddit.org

login for more options
11836
11383
5243

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

  • on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
  • on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
  • on Hungary: Euronews

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

go to feed...