Trump tells 10-year-old rescued by teen lifeguard: ‘I don’t know if I’d do it’
2 days ago by lemmygarden to c/news
Also couldn't. To state the glaringly obvious I guess hahaha.
Sure, bit even in his prime, as a fit and able young man, Trump would not have lifted a finger to assist someone else in need.
Perhaps you have forgotten about his debilitating case of bone spurs.
But, should the kid have died, he would take the time to generate about ten images of him saving the kid, while saying the died because of Biden/Democrats/whatever is on his dark, decrepit mind.
Yes, but the president was kind enough to invite this young man over to the white house to tell him to his face, in front of his father.
To give some modicum of credit: I think this was his attempt at talking the lifeguard up. Like: "Wow, you're such a hero!"
But the problem is that the exclamation (regardless of truth) is supposed to be like: "Wow, I don't know if I would've been brave enough to do that! You're a real hero." Not that you just "might not have" as though saving a human life would be too inconvenient.
Then the 16-year-old kid gets to feel really brave because even the president thinks they are. (Also doesn't help that this current POTUS is an abject, selfish coward.)
I agree. This is how he meant it and how anyone who likes him takes it. It makes him likeable to those people. It's so childish to pretend it isn't.
These types of "news" articles I think are actually quite dangerous. It shifts the battleground into weaker territory. If you're a prosecutor trying to prove a guy needs a life sentence, and you have thirty testimonies of him beating puppies with hammers, why would you pull up to court saying shit like "your honor, the defendant's cologne is too sharp and clearly in poor taste"? Meanwhile everyone who justifiably hates the puppy-flattener is excited to jump on ANY bandwagon to hate the guy, no matter how flimsy it is. Next thing you know the court is all talking about his cologne. Then the defendant comes in with some actually good explanation for that like "they didn't have my regular cologne in prison" and now it looks like maybe the prosecution was wrong about him. The flimsy bandwagon falls apart.
I've said it before on here:
We MUST resist the urge to criticize bad people for weak reasons when they already provide us with stronger arguments against themselves.
This isn't news
It was tagged as US news in the guardian. It's certainly not an op-ed.
It's called a community
Yeah, Trump would be too busy raping the 16 year old life guard, so the 10 year old kid would drown.
He does legitimately seem to prefer little girls, but he still wouldn't have even bothered if he had every opportunity to come out safely and looking like a hero.
In his fucked up logic I have a sense of now but will never understand he'd be weakened by that display of heroism.
His parents fucked him up but good.
He already showed us this once in 2020. He had the world's softest ball thrown at him to spike his image, and he still fumbled it because his own personal belief system wouldn't let him just tell people "look, stay at home, work from home, wear masks in public until we figure this shit out" without a profit motive SOMEWHERE.
"I don't know if I'd do it"
Because the 16 year old is too old for him
It was a 16 year old who saved a 10 year old if I read correctly. And Trump was telling the 10 year old he "probably wouldn't" save him.
“Hold him down. We’ll tell them Biden did it.”
I hope I can do something heroic one day, so I can be invited to the White House, and I can hold a press conference to tell the entire world: "'Fuck NO! I'm not interested in letting that corrupt, treasonous, pedophile, rapist loser bask in the glow of my glory. I don't want to be anywhere near him, where I have to breathe his stench."
“I don’t know if I would have done it. Unless nobody was around, then I’d give you a yacht ride to my friends island.”
Of course he wouldn't. It'd involve him giving a shit about someone other than himself, for a start. Then he'd have to shift his ponderous arse out of his own way to actually get off it and move.
Trump doesn't know if it would, but everyone else does.
You expect him to do something altruistic for someone else? I mean, come on, what would be in it for him?
And raise the sea level by a few meters.
Also, rethorically perfectly fine. His language does tend to follow common phrases but only is tangentially similar anyway.
Could have said something along the lines: don't know if I could have done it. Probably couldn't. Probably wouldn't. I don't know.
His inner monologue is spoken out loud and his social filter barely exists. This isn't news.
He can make anything sound respect less, that being said.
Logical. But remember, Trump believes he's the best at anything and everything.
"I know all about xyz. Nobody knows more about xyz than me".
In his mind, he could do it if there was something in it for him, but he wouldn't, because there isn't.
Quite possibly, this is one of the only times in his life he's actually told the truth about anything.
Are you by any chance German, or Dutch, or Danish, or a few others I'm sure? I'm Dutch and we would also literally translate it to respectless (respectloos in Dutch, just like tactless = tactloos), but in English you'd say "disrespectful." ;)
Oh, I see. Had no idea. TIL. :)
Unfortunately he's too fat to sink.
Captain Bonespurs rides again!
to be perfectly honest i have some doubts on the matter too
Must have been an ugly kid, cause Trump for sure does kids.
I thought fat does swim?
It floats!
But not necessarily upright for breathing.
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.
Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.
7. No duplicate posts.
If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.
All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
go to feed...
We all know that he wouldn't.
save