More than one-third of millennials believe they won’t get a dime of Social Security when they retire, so they’re taking matters into their own hands
3 years ago by RealWarrenBuffett to c/world
Of all generational cohorts, older millennials are most likely to generate enough income to retire comfortably, according to the latest Vanguard Retirement Readiness report.
Specifically, millennials aged 37-41 have the greatest chance of landing a comfortable retirement.
A lot of things are much better. It is easy to focus on the negative without realizing how bad the past really was, or for that matter how hard things were for those in the past. sure some things are worse today - work on fixing them - bit overall things are still very good.
Women's rights have been walked back, causing child rape victims to struggle to find abortions, to say nothing of women being forced to carry fetuses who will die upon birth. Trans rights are being shit on, to the point that gender affirming care is being denied to people even where it's legal. Taxes for the wealthy are too low. The middle class is rare to be in. Health insurance is insanely expensive and it's difficult to see a doctor even when you have it- emergency rooms will leave you waiting for 6 hours or more. We simultaneously have too many people, and too few children with a looming crisis of too many elderly. We have microplastics in the air, oceans, food, fetuses, everywhere. Housing is largely unaffordable across the globe. Homelessness is out of control. Massive, destructive wildfires are the new norm. Heatwaves are killing people. Migrants are clamouring to find new countries to live in (which will get worse due to climate change) causing all kinds of social frictions. The youth are anxious, depressed, and suicidal.
But please, tell me how things are good for people over all?
If I were to go back in time the the 80s, 70, 60, etc. They would have a similar list of problems that seem insurmountable, but we keep going on and things have gotten better over time.
In 1990, 1.9 billion people lived in extreme poverty, representing 36% of the world’s population. By 2019, this number had fallen to 9.2% — about 703 million people.
https://www.worldvision.org/...
Over the past generation, extreme poverty declined hugely, and there are more than a billion fewer people living below the International Poverty Line of $2.15 per day today than in 1990. On average, the number declined by 47 million every year, or 130,000 people each day.n
https://ourworldindata.org/poverty
Women's access to education has improved significantly in many parts of the world. According to the National Intelligence Council’s Strategic Futures Group, there have been decades of improvements in women’s formal education
Women's financial liberation has improved in the United States. Women now have access to credit cards in their own name and can get bank loans without a male co-signer
The ACA has improved healthcare in various ways, including providing health insurance coverage to 20 million more Americans, protecting people with preexisting conditions from discrimination, and expanding Medicaid
https://www.americanprogress.org/...
For every step back that we hyper focus on, there are two step forwards that we don't even think about. All our problems have solutions, just don't give into negative thoughts.
They would have a similar list of problems that seem insurmountable
I'd love to hear how climate change 'seems' insurmountable. We aren't even stopping ourselves making it worse, let alone actively looking to work towards fixing it.
I'm always skeptical of poverty statistics because I believe the metric to meet poverty is wrong. For instance the bureau of statistics puts the poverty line at just under 15k annually. Please tell me how a person making 20k a year affords housing, food, and other basic necessities without government assistance.
We have 4k porn. That is pretty much it.
Here's a list of bad things
Yeah but they're not AS BAD as they used to be
No they aren't. Stop shilling. Any response that isn't "student loan debt has been taken away, all housing prices are at the level of the early 1980s, the ceo-to-worker compensation level is the same as 1953, we have Medicaid for all, and the government is out of debt" will be discarded.
Like what specifically? Are you factoring in what things might look like in the coming decades? Or what things already look like for a majority of Americans?
I don’t care if I can get a 4k tv for $300 if I have no emergency fund, no retirement savings and can’t cope with a medical emergency (even with insurance).
Savings is about sacrifice for today. I personally know some who are making half a million/year who are living paycheck to paycheck, while I know others making poverty income who have growing savings. It is much easier to have a "nice" life when you have more income, but living below your means is a choice that everyone could make.
somehow you have access to post your reply. Give up your internet and that would free up some money. I have no idea what else you do in life, but I'm sure there is a lot more.
I know I gave up avocado toast and am now a homeowner.
Trying to understand your point here. Because I have access to an internet-connected device means that’s the reason me and others like me aren’t saving enough?
Or maybe you meant if I have this device and I’m able to save then things aren’t as bad as they seem?
Internet access is as basic a utility as electricity and water these days. It is nigh impossible to function in society without access to the internet and pretending otherwise is just oblivious to the point of petulance.
I'm so sick of this complacency with the idea of paying into social security your whole life to fund the boomer retirees just to have it taken from us as one final fuck you. The vocalized consensus among everyone needs to be its not getting taken from us, if anything it will be fixed and made more robust and any politician that acts to remove it from us will have their heads removed from their bodies.
Absolutely. I get the doom, but there's no way I'm just rolling over on SS, ever.
All it takes is one far right politician to take all that social security money for tax breaks for the rich, write a massive IOU, create rules regarding how far it has to be funded, and then declare social security bankruptcy. It's what is happening to the USPS.
Please refer to the final part of my statement
Boomers believe social security would be gone by the time they retire. It's been a common conspiracy thing for decades.
Basically republicans who are “we need to lower taxes and also steal the rest of the social security fund and give it to people who are already wealthy”
It’s an unfunded mandate. It can’t if the fund has no money. Touch nothing and the program runs out of money to pay the drawing population. Basic math.
Something as to shift or it will in fact not be able to pay out for all members drawing in it given enough time.
The program runs at reduced payouts if it's not "fully funded". That's how the law is written and isn't controversial, just not really talked about in these kinds of doomer articles.
Vanguard assesses retirement readiness assuming your post-employment income should match around 68% of your annual salary.
Millennials in the 70th percentile of earners are the only demographic on track to come anywhere close to that coveted ratio. Early millennials are expected to hit 66% of their annual salary at retirement, while Gen X lags at 53% and late baby boomers at 51%.
Yay, wealthier Millennials? Way to grind that 401K
That was my take away. If you earn a lot of money you can fund a good retirement.
The only other real argument I found was that millennials in general may be better off because they entered the workplace when these retirement plans activate automatically whereas boomers and gen x had to actively sign up for them.
Your retirement plan activated automatically?
You can be an employee at places still? /j
Ive still never had that, Im over 30 and the only retirement account I have I made myself outside of work.
My employers 401k plan was automatic. Let it sit for 3 years and came on hard times around 2021. I actually lost ~15% of the money I put in. Cashed it out, opted out of automatic contributions and haven't looked back. I don't need some investment firm to lose my money for me, I'm already good at that on my own lol
Please revisit. That’s usually a bad idea. Yes, aggressive investments can lose money in short terms like one year or less - actually there was a long term piece of advice to not invest in stocks any money you need for the next five years. However prudent investments, like an SP500 index fund , have always increased in value in like ten year periods, and over some similar period have always beaten inflation
There’s a lot to learn about investments, but
401k’s can be VERY useful to most of us over the long term, so you should reconsider whether it’s good for your situation too
You sold when it was 15% down? And outside of retirement?
For the love of god, don’t touch your retirement savings. Consider reading this series:
You don't trust the pieces of shit my taxdollars bailed out in 2009? Why don't you trust those peices of fucking shit?
Actually it's required if you're over the age of 30. Below that age, you can delay it. Once you hit 50, the percentage input increases significantly. I work as a state employee so it's different than in private sector.
I think that even corporations are just enrolling people though too.
It has always been that way. More millennials than any previous generation are able to fund a good retirement is a large take away.
Many still are not funding a [good] retirement, but overall Millennials are better than their predecessors.
Pay my student loans. Yes you personally
Weird to determine retirement spending based on annual income instead of annual spending. Like, if someone is only spending 40% of their income now, why would they assume they are going to increase their spending by 65% when they retire? Or otoh, if someone is spending 95-110% of their income now and that's mostly housing and food, why would they only need 68% when they retire (especially if they're accumulating debt)? I'm sure its mostly a result of that data being a lot easier to get and may be using assumptions about how many years someone is working and assumed savings rate required to get that amount of money (heuristics like if you have a constant inflation-adjusted income and save 30%, it takes about 30 years to save enough to retire)?
70th percentile is only ~$120K/year. A lot more than I make, but not exactly what I'd be using "wealthier" to describe, even if just as a comparative. Even at like 90th percentile (~220K/year) would still just be in the "well off" category in my mind.
I suggested an alternative semi-standardized metric that still wouldn't describe everyone perfectly, but I suspect would do a better job than the one used. I don't think its weird to use one. I think the one chosen is weird, even if I acknowledged one of the reasons why they probably used it (easy of data). Current spending would still be a terrible estimate for the FIRE-types who work in HCOL places and move to LCOL places for retirement, but I think it would much better account for ordinary 25th percentile income households who live paycheck to paycheck. But I doubt Vanguard really cares if their metrics are useful for poorer people who live paycheck to paycheck since its obvious they're not going to have enough anyways and not exactly their target demographic.
You're getting at my favorite article of all time, The Shockingly Simple Math of Early Retirement. Say what you will about Mr. Money Mustache or even early retirement in general, but this article really is the absolute simplest and best way to think about retirement savings. It's why I often feel poor or pressed for money but never worry about retirement, because I max it all and pay myself first, and I know as long as my percentage is high I'm on track.
Plus even before I could max my 401k and Roth (and we recently had a kiddo so had to stop Roth for a bit) or get a high savings rate, I put in way more than was comfortable because the power of compounding is worth rice and beans and not going out drinking for a bit. Now that I'm middle aged my nest egg is huge, and we've been slowly able to lifestyle inflate. But I am soooo glad my younger self saved like crazy. Time flies by, and money compounds before you know it.
People tend to spend what they earn. I have to be careful not to spend more than my paycheck every month. I know people who make less than half what I do who still do okay in life - they don't have as nice a house or as many toys, but they have food on the table and a warm roof. I know from experience that I could cut how much I spend every month by a lot - I just don't want to cut those extras from my life.
Many people are working long hours now saving for retirement when they plan to travel, and thus they think their spending will be more in the future. I know some who did that for years, and got cancer and died before their planned retirement age. I know others who have been traveling the world carefree for a couple decades after retiring.
They should be investing in a Roth account instead of standard 401k if possible. Unless you're sure that income taxes will be lower when you need to take out that money. Roth investing pays the tax up front, and the rest is yours to keep even after it appreciates in value over time.
Maybe if you assume healthcare stays as-is, you may be able to use roths to keep your taxable-income low enough to stay under the magic number required to get the deductible/max year out of pocket savings and the potentially ~$4000s of dollars a year savings in health care costs.
Numbers:
Hypothetical case: need 30K/year after taxes if getting the MYOP savings or 34K/year after taxes if not and assuming you put in all your money now and wait 30 years to retire using 5% average returns. Assume 4% WR and 27K is the threshold for extra savings. All numbers adjusted for inflation.
t401k:
Need ~213k now -> 921k in 30 years (which would be ~850k after taxes on the gains)
r401k:
Need 193k now if marginal tax rate is 10%, 197k if marginal tax rate is 12% -> 750k (no taxes paid on the gains)
Mixed (you only need to 3k/year from roth to bring taxable income down to threshold):
169K into t401k + 19-20k into r401k (10 and 12% marginal tax rates) = 189k now.
Another easy case is when the current marginal tax is 0%. If you are putting money into retirement accounts when your income is under the standard deduction, then definitely Roth. Traditional literally does nothing in that case.
Of course this is a bit of a contrived example and it assumes you have the same 10-12% marginal tax rate on either side. I think most people who have the extra income to for it to be worth the time to consider the difference probably make enough now to be in higher brackets, but probably will retire with significantly lower spending than their current income. If taxes across brackets increase in the future, otoh, then paying them now would be beneficial and may give some peace of mind about that risk.
There's so many unknowns that I think its a bit oversimplistic to assume one is simply better than the other.
Nope I don't have any examples. You should invest as you see fit, after doing your own research into the options.
It's a gamble basically but I'm gambling that taxes will be higher than the little bit more I might make on gains from the extra pre-tax money.
That will depend on your total savings and such. If you start a 401k at 25 and contribute the max until you retire at 72: you will have a lot of money and it is likely the Roth is better just because because you have so much more taxes to pay. OTOH, if you wait until 45 to start savings and never contribute the max, when you retire at 62 you will do okay (most of your income is from SS - better hope it is still there!) but your total income will be small and so you end up in a lower tax bracket. Odds are you will be somewhere between those two extremes.
Roth and regular investment accounts often have the same annual contribution limits, but the Roth has effectively more growth just because you don't pay taxes: 100,000 in a regular account is worth $70,000 after taxes (exact number depends on your state and tax bracket - it might be $80,000 it might be $50,000), while in the Roth it is $100,000.
There is also the gamble. Nobody knows what tax rates and deductions will be in the future. If things stay the same I can tell you what will happen, but I consider the odds of that zero - but the odds that things are close to today I think are good enough - but I have no way of know. They might make a withdrawals from a Roth taxable (this would go to court, but who knows how the court will look in 30 years). They might change the tax brackets - either up or down. They might make regular retirement withdrawals non-taxable (or taxed at a different rate). They might confiscate all retirement funds in some revolution. Or you might die before you retire. Again I think the safe bet is tax rules will be somewhat close to todays rules, and you will live to the statistical average lifespan plus a couple years - but I do not know.
Traditional IRAs and Roth 401ks are also things.
“Taking matters into their own hands,” as in “considering options for suicide.”
Reference to Logan's Run. Life ends at a certain age so resources are never over consumed.
Capricorn15. Today is LastDay. It is time to renew at Carousel.
Edit: Sauce https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M2vx_RCwSs
From the movie Logan's Run. It's set in the post-Apocalyptic Future and was a way to control the Population. A crystal implanted in your hand would start blinking when you become 30. You then enter the Carousel and try to win your "Renewal", an extension on your life. If you tried to run away you become a "Runner" and they have a special force track you down and kill you. It's a good book and movie.
Thanks. It's been a quarter century since I've seen the movie so I guess I forgot the carousel reference.
I think I'll read the book if I go back to it. I'm looking for a book right now. Maybe I'll just read Logan's run. Thanks!
Here is an alternative Piped link(s):
Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.
I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.
"Be strong, and you will be renewed."
And all the fish, plankton, sea greens and protein from the sea that we can eat!
Yup. Those retirment seminars are a laugh. Just save more. Dude, my family needs to have a roof over their head and eat.
Wait, Millennials think they will get to retire? How cute.
Ya, I don't think so. As a 37 yo millennial, my retirement plan is to sell my parents house, live as long and comfortabley as I can off that, then eat a bullet. Actual retirement is not something I expect to be capable of.
Mine is to sell my home and move to Mexico once my children are out of school, work remotely for a US company, then retire at like 55.
Multiplying my retirement savings (and home equity) by 20 just by moving will go a long way.
That was my plan. Are... are we not doing rhat anymore?
I have my fork, knife, and bib. Where are we meeting up?
Not having children is my retirement. I will probably work till I'm old and gray so I just tuck what I can away, buy things that hold value, and live my life.
The opposite. On the off chance I retire I plan to parasite off my kids until they put me in a home.
Muhaha
It's fine. Perfect end to the perfect life.
I don't have kids but my ex wife and I were really bad with money so if ever I had a chance to retire I squandered it.
Hoping I have something to leave my nephew so he has a leg up when he crawls out of the bunker after the climate wars.
Surely more than one third of millennials are outside the USA and don't have access to it's social security.
And if it's USA only, why is this posted in world news?
Because America is the world
America! Fuck yeah! /s
I regret to inform you, I have never seen JJBA.
7+ billion people disagree
Poe’s Law strikes again!
Vanguard says they can thank the retirement industry for that.
lol
The real headline here is that 2/3 of millennials think they're getting Social Security, or that retirement is going to be an option for them. It's optimistic, but not realistic.
Gen X here and an older one at that.
I don't think I'll get SS and I will be of retirement age in the next 12 years.
My funeral will also be my retirement party.
So I'm in Canada but worked in finance for close to 20 years. I have been told outright that by the time I retire the system will be losing money (I'm 46) so we are contributing to a sunk cost. My parents are poor so they deserve the money that CPP affords them but Jesus Christ we are fucked with people living longer and it doesn't help the largest fucking generation ever was right before my jaded ass.
Thats when you stop working but aren't dead yet.
Like when I'm going from my shift at my first job to my shift at my second job?
Kind of but it takes years and your second job boss doesnt care.
I already know as a GenXer I'll get none. I'm lucky to have a pension and retirement funds.
in Australia 12% (used to be 10) of your salary is automatically invested for your retirement that you can't touch until then except in extreme circumstances (or you have a shit PM who let's anyone withdraw it during covid). even then, it will be hard to say it will be enough and you want some other side investments. if you don't own a house, like many my age, things would be grim.
and even in bad scenarios, we accept none of us will ever see a pension. currently boomers can get a rediculous amount on top of owning a large valuable house and they will screech black and blue about "entitlements" but for everyone else it's a "handout"
They lose their mind when you tell them the aged pension costs the taxpayer 5x what unemployment benefits do
Lol retire
i'm 39 and live in Germany where we're supposed to have such an amazing social security. Even I don't have hopes for retirement security. "but you can get private retirement insurance" -. well not if i'm not earning enough to put something to the side comfortably, and hey i'm in one of those "important jobs for the society" fml
Millennial here. My plan is to use my notes from the movie Nomadland and plan my life to life like that until I die on the side of the road.
cali life
“…expected cuts to Social Security benefits materialize…”
Um, how about no? What if, instead, we taxed the billionaires, or simply raid their offshore accounts, to fund the program? If corporate media didn’t removed about it on their behalf, would they even notice?
Maybe we don't put a cap on how much people put into social security each year so that it isn't impacted as much by income inequality.
It wouldn't solve the inequality, but it would reduce the impact on social security.
What if you're in your late 30's and you have ~20k in debt and barely any savings to last a month. I'm staring down a hopeless void.
File. For. Bankruptcy. Best decision you could ever make. Hell, just ask GPT how to do it. It's just paper work and then blamo, debt be-gone. Do some research , there different kinds of bankruptcy. The rich do it all the time. It's as American as President Camacho.
I've got some beans.
I actually prefer beans over steak.
Some good sashimi though? I'll take that.
Yeah? How did you do that?
Even leechyness aside, it's just winning the housing market lottery. No one can afford a house right now, and if they could, it's not appreciating like crazy anymore.
The guy got extremely lucky with timing and also somehow found enough cash for a down payment.
It's not hopeless. You're behind ideal, but you can be in a good spot by your mid 40s if you make that a goal. 30k makes you debt free and have a good emergency fund. If you haven't changed jobs in a few years, you can probably find another job with a raise that gets you 30k more in about 3 years.
If you wipe out that debt by 45 and start saving for retirement, 15k/year nets you about 500k-700k by 65. That's not retire on a beach money, but it's better than the average boomer.
Where are you getting his income figures from?
If you haven't changed jobs in a few years, you can probably find another job with a raise that gets you 30k more in about 3 years.
"Everyone works in STEM"
Does this plan require good returns on investments? Cuz 15K × 20 years doesn't equal 500 to 700k. Isn't that how a lot of boomers got financially wrecked? Putting all their money into 401Ks or housing only to have them lose a ton of value every time there's a once in a lifetime financial crisis? Hopefully this doesn't sound sarcastic, they're honest questions.
Yes it's assuming 7% which is a long term average. Boomers largely never saved for retirement, it wasn't wiped out. The stock market is resilient over time, with retirement planning it's important to not panic and pull money out, use index funds and there's very few 5 year periods where the market is actually down. When your close to retirement get more conservative, because a downturn can really hurt you when tour planning to withdraw that money. A financial planner can help, they should be able to explain their plan and fees upfront l. The plan may be a bit general until you actually sign something, but you shouldn't have to pay one for an initial meeting.
In fact, a new survey from Nationwide and Harris Poll found that 39% of millennials and 45% of Gen Z believe they won’t receive a dime of Social Security.
Meanwhile, 61% of millennials and 55% of Gen Z don't know what Social Security is.
I'd wager the 61%/55% includes the 39%/45%
Does it count if my retirement plan is a van? Because. It's more than likely going to be a coffin appartment or a van with ways are going and I have one of the good pensions
I have an autistic kid who's 11 and not self sufficient. My retirement plan is to work until I'm dead.
my retirement plan is [...] going to be a coffin
Is where I'm at 😂
The social security insolvency boogie man gets dragged out to scare everyone at least once a generation. It really is a persistent feature of how our nation is managed.
Remembering The Circle Jerks "Shit hits the fan" from early 1980's.
Millennial here and I have a few family members that rely on SSDI so I just like that my contributions support them. I'll figure things out myself for retirement. But an estimated 7.8 million people rely on SSDI and taking that away from them could very well be death sentences. We have to do better.
It's not exactly that I'm buying into it disappearing is a foregone conclusion - just that if something doesn't happen to proactively protect and improve the system, than yeah, it's in big trouble in the next decade. And my personal bias puts my main concern on the people who rely on it for disability insurance since they are some of the most vulnerable. Of course I want what I paid into it myself later in life, but at least I can see it helping those close to me for some consolation if it doesn't.
This sounds like the solution is to make sure their boomer parents have accidents.
40yo millennial checking in. I landed a job at the state run hospital and signed up for the pension. Before I managed that, my "retirement plan" was to be a traveler. Pick up 13 week assignments all over the country with some down time between assignments. I still have it in my back pocket just in case.
I'm daydream about doing that ALL the time, but I wouldn't even know where to start if I'm at 0 on knowing how to do that. From a 27yo millennial to a 40yo millennial, pls help. What resources did you use to plan out where you'd work and how certain you'd be of employment if you really needed it? Thank you so much if you've even read this far.
There are agencies that act as intermediary for healthcare workers to pick up travel gigs. You sign up with the agency. Hospitals/laboratories/etc who need short term staffing solutions (laughs then sobs in COVID staffing shortage) reach out to agencies saying they need a nurse/medical assistant/medical laboratory scientist and the agency sends them the resumes of all their contract workers that are available. If the facility wants you, the agency contacts you to see if you want to take it.
Housing/living expenses are covered and you make BANK compared to the permanent employees (who may resent you for it). The travel pay and contracts are slowly returning to pre COVID levels but it was ludicrous for a while there. I did try to figure out a way to take a leave of absence from my job (don't want to lose that pension) so that I could pick up a travel gig. It was that lucrative. There's always a staff shortage in healthcare somewhere in the country.
There is potential for feast and famine so people doing it as their sole income need to plan for that or be willing to work in facilities that are a dumpster fire or in places that they wouldn't relocate to for permanent work. Most contract agencies don't offer benefits so that also needs to be planned for. Travelers usually make 2-3 times more per hour than permanent staff and have a separate allowance for living expenses so getting your own health insurance won't negate your earnings.
Oh Locum Tenens, sure. That is absolutely the ideal field for that kind of lifestyle. I'm hoping there's easy access to some parks jobs for like 6 months at a time while living mobile or something.
In my country we know that for sure since so many young people are leaving the country and the rest are working minimum wages because employers are paying them on the side to avoid paying taxes. We are also not allowed to take out our pension savings, like you can in USA. So you end up working like an idiot for government to maybe pay you back money if you manage to live up to average age.
Shit's going to fall apart completely at some point, but we were thinking this 30 years ago too and its still somehow kicking along. Is it enough to bank on for retirement? Absolutely not, but that's also sadly been true for quite a while.
Not me. I’m gonna just die in a gutter somewhere.
Thanks O’Bidump W. Reagordarterxon.
@lemmy.world
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/...
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/...
go to feed...
A lot of things were supposed to be better than we thought in the beginning
save