What Radicalized You?

2 years ago by alphanerd4 to c/usauthoritarianism

WhereGrapesMayRule 134 points 2 years ago

Republicans masturbate to the idea of elderly people being denied the basic necessities in life because they were unable to earn enough for a retirement due to the uncontrollable greed of the ultra wealthy.

path: 0 10240642, hotness: undefined, score: 134, children: 4
WhatAmLemmy 39 points 2 years ago

Republicans Conservatives masturbate to the idea of elderly people others being denied the basic necessities in life because they were unable to earn enough for a retirement due to the uncontrollable greed of the ultra wealthy Conservatives.

The ultra wealthy wouldn't make enough money from this to give a shit. This type of petty, ideological driven cruelty is a hallmark of conservatism (see school lunch cuts). Keep in mind, most Democrats trend to the right of center (aka "conservative") compared to the rest of the developed world.

path: 0 10240642 10243567, hotness: undefined, score: 39, children: 2
frezik 7 points 2 years ago

If it were true that Democrats are conservative, and conservatives want to deny people basic necessities, then we would expect Democrats to not support things like government healthcare, public transportation, or SNAP (food) benefits.

Except they do by overwhelming majority.

path: 0 10240642 10243567 10246146, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
rambling_lunatic 8 points 2 years ago

In Europe, even most members of the far right support public healthcare and transportation.

path: 0 10240642 10243567 10246146 10251232, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
RememberTheApollo_ 2 points 2 years ago

They want them begging at the church and kissing ass for largesse.

path: 0 10240642 10259748, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AIhasUse 104 points 2 years ago

In which country is it illegal to let your neighbor use your water?

path: 0 10241391, hotness: undefined, score: 104, children: 37
Speculater 78 points 2 years ago path: 0 10241391 10241815, hotness: undefined, score: 78, children: 8
TexasDrunk 43 points 2 years ago path: 0 10241391 10241815 10243774, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 2
techt 34 points 2 years ago

“Although the water provided to the third party is still being paid for, the water previously provided to the third party for which that third party had not paid remains unpaid and the incentive to pay that debt is reduced,” Court of Appeals Judge John Melanson wrote for a unanimous court. “This threatens the city’s ability to provide low-cost water services.”

"We depend on fining disadvantaged people for revenue and you will not threaten that."

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10243774 10245478, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 1
afraid_of_zombies 13 points 2 years ago

Same "logic" is used to stop people from filling up parking meters for other cars.

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10243774 10245478 10250452, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
CosmicTurtle0 18 points 2 years ago

participate in the giving of any money or gifts, including, but not limited to, food and drink, to an elector

Sounds like I can set up a food truck and "sell" water with the whole "pay what you can" model

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10242021, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 1
Infynis 10 points 2 years ago

IIRC some people have been doing basically this

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10242021 10242226, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
AIhasUse 8 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that has to do with not allowing people to try to sway votes as people are going to vote, I think. I can't find anywhere that even claims anyone in a US state is not allowed to give their neighbor water.

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10241907, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
grue 50 points 2 years ago

No it doesn't. It has to do with Republicans wanting people standing in line for hours to vote to get thirsty, give up, and leave without voting. This is because (a) Democratic-leaning areas tend to have longer lines for "reasons," and (b) lower turnout favors Republicans.

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10241907 10242534, hotness: undefined, score: 50, children: 1
EldritchFeminity 12 points 2 years ago

I believe this was also passed after they unexpectedly closed a bunch of polling places in predominantly Democrat voting areas just days before the Presidential election, which led to lines several blocks long of people standing out in the sun with no shade or access to water or bathrooms.

path: 0 10241391 10241815 10241907 10242534 10245370, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 0
TheUncannyObserver 38 points 2 years ago

You have to realize, the United States has many laws in most jurisdictions that criminalize poverty, and politicians on both sides of the aisle are quickly moving to pass more. It is not a good country to live in. People here get arrested for giving food to the homeless.

path: 0 10241391 10246871, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 0
Zess 34 points 2 years ago

It's probably considered stealing like if you were to use a cable splitter to take your neighbor's Internet. Except that's bullshit for a metered water connection so fuck whoever made that law or regulation.

path: 0 10241391 10243374, hotness: undefined, score: 34, children: 2
AeroLemming 7 points 2 years ago
path: 0 10241391 10243374 10260067, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
AIhasUse 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah, I suspect there is more to the store than the tweet is saying.

path: 0 10241391 10243374 10245393, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
wildcardology 10 points 2 years ago

It's also illegal to give water to people in line to vote. it's also illegal to have a water break for workers working outside in the heat.

path: 0 10241391 10252167, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 3
Bytemeister 8 points 2 years ago

It’s also illegal to have a water break for workers working outside in the heat.

It's simultaneously more and less evil than that. The ruling was that the state cannot compell employers to provide water breaks for employees working in the heat. So those people who can't take a water break while working 13 hrs a day in direct sun are forced to do so by their employers greed, and not because of some legal obligation.

path: 0 10241391 10252167 10252369, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 2
wildcardology 3 points 2 years ago

It's less evil because the government didn't force the companies to give water breaks?

path: 0 10241391 10252167 10252369 10253687, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Bytemeister 3 points 2 years ago

The ruling is less evil because it didn't block companies from providing water breaks.

path: 0 10241391 10252167 10252369 10253687 10258391, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
dev_null 8 points 2 years ago

At least where I live, you get billed separately for the incoming water and drainage. So if I'm not paying the utility, and get water to my property from my neighbor, then I'm not paying for the drainage I'm using when I flush that water down my drain.

Of course the situation is ridiculous, but this is how I'd imagine this being illegal, you are "stealing" the drainage service.

path: 0 10241391 10246693, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 13
Socsa 5 points 2 years ago

The drainage costs are just tied to consumption so it would still be double if you are using double the water

path: 0 10241391 10246693 10248165, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
chonglibloodsport 5 points 2 years ago

So your house has a sewage meter that measures the amount of sewage you produce?

path: 0 10241391 10246693 10248791, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 10
CascadianGiraffe 6 points 2 years ago

No, sewage use is measured by water use.

path: 0 10241391 10246693 10248791 10249005, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 8
chonglibloodsport 4 points 2 years ago

The person I replied to said they’re billed separately!

path: 0 10241391 10246693 10248791 10249005 10249174, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 7
afraid_of_zombies 0 points 2 years ago

If you live a housing development the place as a whole might be.

path: 0 10241391 10246693 10248791 10250434, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
Blue_Morpho 2 points 2 years ago

It's a separate line item but it isn't metered so it doesn't matter. Because the person paying for your water is also paying for your flushing.

path: 0 10241391 10246693 10259225, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
snooggums 4 points 2 years ago

I could see a utility company or township having some local rule written as something like 'running a hose between houses' being prohibited without any condition of intent to make it easier enforce when people are stealing water, and then using it against someone sharing on purpose because vague rules/laws tend to be twisted to punish people in a way far different than the intent.

Or it could be intentional in the same way as anti-homeless laws where people are just being punished for helping out the poor.

path: 0 10241391 10242592, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 1
ironhydroxide 8 points 2 years ago

It's likely a utility law, that states any connection for drinking or food use must be potable. And a hose doesn't qualify.

Yes it's technically about safety. But in that instance it's used to punish the poor.

path: 0 10241391 10242592 10244066, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
quindraco 4 points 2 years ago

Since OP used American terminology, probably they're claiming America, which would mean you need to ask which state, as water bills and such are a state law thing.

So far as I know there is no state with a law like this, but odds are very good OP never learned the nuances of the situation and something else illegal was going on, like delinquency or fraud on the water bill, or if they were in drought conditions and going over their ration due to supplying a bonus household.

In fact, my first guess is fraud, if this "hose" was connected before the meter, meaning the family was drawing more water than they were paying for.

path: 0 10241391 10243011, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Blue_Morpho 2 points 2 years ago

Nowhere.

The water company will do this intentionally when they have water mains to repair. When the street my mother in law lived on had a water main repaired, the water company hooked a hose from her neighbor's house to supply her water. Later they came and hooked her water to the next house down as they worked there way down the street.

But I could still see police doing it because they don't know the law.

path: 0 10241391 10259190, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
bluemellophone -3 points 2 years ago

As a few have guessed, it could be related to how the sewer usage is accounted for, but that’s unlikely since they are neighboring addresses. It could also be due to local water restrictions but they likely wouldn’t have cut off the water due to a relatively light civil penalty. What few have guessed, it is almost surely a public health restriction to prevent cross contamination and backflow between two serviced addresses.

There are very good reasons why we all want every exit to the public water network to be isolated, which comes with safety inspections and other requirements. As soon as your break down that model of one address serving more than one address, it makes a massive mess of maintaining and inspecting the safety of the water delivery network.

path: 0 10241391 10249826, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 1
Blue_Morpho 1 point 2 years ago

When water mains need to be repaired, the water company connects homes with hoses so they have water during repairs. My mother in law got her water from a hose connected to her neighbor for two weeks during repairs.

path: 0 10241391 10249826 10259306, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Gullible 69 points 2 years ago

This makes me so angry that I have to decompress by giving away food to the unhomed in Bullhead City Arizona.

path: 0 10244074, hotness: undefined, score: 69, children: 11
mojo_raisin 36 points 2 years ago

"Dehomed" is almost more appropriate for many without a home. Their homes were taken by resource hoarders using the tools of state.

path: 0 10244074 10245951, hotness: undefined, score: 36, children: 7
sigmaklimgrindset 15 points 2 years ago

"Dehomed" is such a better term than "homeless" or "unhoused". First term I've heard that doesn't put the blame on the person without a home.

Even "unhoused" is too neutral of a term for how people often end up without secure shelter.

path: 0 10244074 10245951 10247031, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 6
Fuzzypyro 19 points 2 years ago

Unhoused genuinely seems like a tip toe attempt to make saying homeless less ugly or like it’s a word to sidestep bs YouTube guidelines like unalive. It’s dumb. Not having a home sucks.

If I were to pick between the two then “dehomed” explains it better than “unhoused”. But “homeless” definitely defines what it feels like when it happens to you.

path: 0 10244074 10245951 10247031 10248645, hotness: undefined, score: 19, children: 3
Gullible 12 points 2 years ago

Wheel of euphemisms turn turn turn…

path: 0 10244074 10245951 10247031 10248645 10250061, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
Willy 1 point 2 years ago

a comedian I just saw suggested the term nomad/nomadic as a much cooler and accurate replacement for all those terms. I like it.

path: 0 10244074 10245951 10247031 10270321, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Buddahriffic 1 point 2 years ago

I think that one is only appropriate for those who choose to not have a fixed location home. Calling those who are just struggling to survive without a home nomads feels like it dismisses and even romanticizes their struggle.

path: 0 10244074 10245951 10247031 10270321 10278919, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
loutr 13 points 2 years ago

I'm guessing this is illegal as well? Land of the free indeed...

path: 0 10244074 10247790, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 1
Gullible 7 points 2 years ago path: 0 10244074 10247790 10250015, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
Texas_Hangover 5 points 2 years ago

Oh damn. I rode through bullhead one time. It was over 100° at midnight. Can't imagine being stuck there.

path: 0 10244074 10247287, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
FlashMobOfOne 66 points 2 years ago

My parents are 80 years old and their car died in April, so I had to loan them mine, basically permanently, because the alternative is that they have no income at all.

The country that the Democrats and Republicans have built would be a-okay with letting them starve to death.

path: 0 10247846, hotness: undefined, score: 66, children: 10
Liz 48 points 2 years ago

One third of Americans can't drive, yet the American town is built as if everyone was a sentient automobile.

path: 0 10247846 10250234, hotness: undefined, score: 48, children: 3
Moneo 21 points 2 years ago

The north america in Pixar Cars is exactly the same as ours because we've built everything for cars not people.

path: 0 10247846 10250234 10250605, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
JJROKCZ 3 points 2 years ago

Worth noting that like 25% of the population live in the 2-3 cities with acceptable public transit options. Another sizeable chunk are either too young or too old to drive, so a third being unable to drive isn’t shocking or that bad honesty

path: 0 10247846 10250234 10251396, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Liz 11 points 2 years ago

Being too young or too old to drive shouldn't exclude you from full participation in society in the ways you are otherwise able. You should be able to go grocery shopping even if your reflexes aren't up to the task of driving. You should be able to go to your baseball game without getting a ride from your parents.

path: 0 10247846 10250234 10251396 10253379, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
PoliticalAgitator 13 points 2 years ago

The world that neoliberalism has built.

path: 0 10247846 10249465, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
anonono 11 points 2 years ago

Being old in the US is hard mode. I mean old people in other countries live with and are supported by family. Imagine tossing la nona in a retirment home, mama mia.

path: 0 10247846 10250086, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 1
afraid_of_zombies 2 points 2 years ago

If I ever retire it will be abroad.

path: 0 10247846 10250086 10250392, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
beebarfbadger 4 points 2 years ago

The country that the Democrats and Republicans have built would be a-okay with letting them starve to death.

The trick is to just blame THEM for it. American Dream: if you can't make it, it's because you're lazy - it's the bully saying "stop hitting yourself, stop hitting yourself!".

path: 0 10247846 10265300, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
FlashMobOfOne 6 points 2 years ago

My parents, sadly, were very irresponsible with their money, but it's insane to me that we have 100+ billionaires in this country and we're just letting people die left and right whose lives can be saved.

path: 0 10247846 10265300 10265493, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
beebarfbadger 2 points 2 years ago

The money flow is a one-way street upwards and not being happy with that is blasphemy against the ruling caste.

path: 0 10247846 10265300 10265493 10266822, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
InAbsentia 43 points 2 years ago

If the service is metered and public, it shouldn't matter in my opinion. This is just municipal bullying.

path: 0 10252295, hotness: undefined, score: 43, children: 2
some_guy 17 points 2 years ago

You're missing the point. When the state catches you being a decent human being, it is incumbent upon the state to crush you like a bug. What's next? Feeding the hungry?!

path: 0 10252295 10259782, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 1
Olgratin_Magmatoe 13 points 2 years ago

What’s next? Feeding the hungry?!

No, that's already been illegal in a lot of states/cities.

What's next is shutting down shelters, ane arresting the homeless on sight and putting them in forced labor.

path: 0 10252295 10259782 10260842, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
treefrog 38 points 2 years ago
path: 0 10240639, hotness: undefined, score: 38, children: 0
Duamerthrax 28 points 2 years ago

Post 9/11 Public School. Watching people just slide right into authoritarianism felt like I was seeing them replaced with pod people.

path: 0 10260006, hotness: undefined, score: 28, children: 1
ameancow 21 points 2 years ago
path: 0 10260006 10260678, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
surewhynotlem 10 points 2 years ago

I think my answer is: having empathy and an imagination.

It really doesn't take much anymore..

path: 0 10242535, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
lugal 9 points 2 years ago

That and the realization that the ruling class doesn't have those

path: 0 10242535 10243047, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
Hugh_Jeggs 9 points 2 years ago

Yous are fucking evil

path: 0 10242910, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
beebarfbadger 8 points 2 years ago

This thread makes it sound like if you're not fully on board with a hyper-exploitative oligarchy, you're the radical one.

path: 0 10266720, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
MehBlah 8 points 2 years ago

The actions of the combined US government since my birth.

path: 0 10261652, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
Heisenburner 8 points 2 years ago

Being raised catholic and only really paying attention to the Jesus parts

path: 0 10260890, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
qyron 7 points 2 years ago

Okay, so I'm going to leave my two cents here.

I'm European, from a left leaning, liberal (in the sense we actively recognize individual rights and liberties but one individual freedom can not tramble the next), and this exact same legal disposition exists.

Allow me to share the explanation I was given.

Fresh water is not easy to manage, sanitize transport and distribute. The operation is insanely complex and expensive, with huge expenses for quality control, infrastructure and machinery.

Water is a public service here; it is a guaranteed right. You need to reach extreme lengths to have your water service shut off, like having several months of delinquent bills.

however, all of this infrastructure needs to be paid for and it is paid through a serious of added charges, some percentually calculated based off the amount of water you use, others are fixed values charged as service fees (like sanitation and garbage collection).

This implies that if all the water consumed in an entire building was being paid by a single person, the water itself would be paid, but related costs would only be charged once, meaning the portion of money collected to cover the entire maintenance of the services would be severely reduced.

By enforcing that for each home there must be a separate service, the overall cost is diluted and the value service is maintained as cheap as humanly possible and the basic services are maintained as public services, out of the reach of private sector interest.

And, please take my word for, you do not want water, sewage or garbage collection controlled by private companies.

These are sectors where there is a limit for how much expense you can cut. It requires constant investment in machinery and infrastructure to just maintain operations. Improving efficiency requires even higher investment that is only recoupable after several years, if ever.

Privates work for profit. These entities work to just break even, although some can be highly profitable, but profit is always destined to reinvest.

path: 0 10244669, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 22
IamtheMorgz 12 points 2 years ago

You're definitely right about the reasons why, but it's extremely frustrating to have this kind of situation when we could probably just find another way to find it and treat water like a basic human right!

path: 0 10244669 10245062, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
qyron 4 points 2 years ago

And you are right! Much needs to change.

path: 0 10244669 10245062 10245139, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
TechNerdWizard42 11 points 2 years ago

I would argue that doesn't apply. This post and whatever you call lemmy subr's is specific to the idiocy in the USA. In Europe like Canada to the best of my knowledge the public utility maintains the infrastructure up to your main. If it leaks before where you get charged, it's their problem and their pipes.

In most of the USA, their responsibility ends at your property line. Utility companies are already all privatized, electric, gas, water, and sewer. If you have an issue with a leak or distribution, they will shut you off at the property line and let you figure it out.

The added infrastructure cost for supplying water through 1 extra valve or not is paid for by the homeowner when the house was built. The labour to turn your water on and off is paid for at the time through fines and fees for disconnection and connection. There is literally no cost that they bear for your lack of water.

path: 0 10244669 10245296, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 4
archomrade 8 points 2 years ago

Not to mention the cost of maintaining a utility like that could easily be socialized. There is no reason why we need to distribute the cost of maintain a public utility to individuals when it's something everyone benefits from (and should be a basic human right, anyway)

path: 0 10244669 10245296 10247457, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
qyron -3 points 2 years ago

I would argue that doesn't apply.

And so you did.

This post and whatever you call lemmy subr's is specific to the idiocy in the USA.

I find myself divided between idiocy and a complete lack of sense of humanity. Maybe it's the sum of both.

In Europe like Canada to the best of my knowledge the public utility maintains the infrastructure up to your main.

Where do you think the funds for that come from?

If it leaks before where you get charged, it's their problem and their pipes.

Yes and no. The money expended to install, maintain and repair those systems are raised either through indirect taxation, to then be transfered via a municipal or some other publi entity budget (which is a very bad practice), or by charging complementary fees directly added to the service, which are then directly managed by a publicly held company, that manages such services and is under public scrutiny.

In most of the USA, their responsibility ends at your property line.

Here, likewise. The service providers are required to make sure whatever is to be dispensed reaches the meter.

Utility companies are already all privatized, electric, gas, water, and sewer.

I am sadly aware of that.

If you have an issue with a leak or distribution, they will shut you off at the property line and let you figure it out.

In your house? Your problem. But shutting your service with no reason? That's rich.

The added infrastructure cost for supplying water through 1 extra valve or not is paid for by the homeowner when the house was built.

You forget the cost to maintain the main lines. Whatever it is to be provided requires a way to reach the destination.

The labour to turn your water on and off is paid for at the time through fines and fees for disconnection and connection.

The labour costs are already calculates for the salaries. The extra fees and fines are extra income.

There is literally no cost that they bear for your lack of water.

The main lines need to be kept in working condition, even if unused. That costs money.

path: 0 10244669 10245296 10247410, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 2
TechNerdWizard42 5 points 2 years ago

You're missing the point that the meter is not the property line in the USA. At least I hope that's the only thing your rambling is missing. And arguing semantics about taxation on a public service is stupid. It costs more money to staff the hotline to answer calls than the cost to maintain a shutoff valve to your property because all the costs are born to the homeowner and service subscriber already.

Incase it wasn't clear, this is NOT true in almost everywhere else in the world. My properties outside the USA the utility must maintain to high standards all the way through my meter which is located on my property, but usually in my dwelling. All the subterranean pipe, the pipe through the foundation, the pressure regulator, the backflow valves, that's all owned by the city and I can't touch it. But I also don't pay for it when it breaks. And when it leaks they dig the ground up and fix. That's NOT how it works in the USA.

path: 0 10244669 10245296 10247410 10248124, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
qyron -2 points 2 years ago

Apparently, we both suffer from a lack of understanding for the others words.

As I lack the will to continue this exchange, I wish a good day.

path: 0 10244669 10245296 10247410 10248124 10248408, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Semi_Hemi_Demigod 8 points 2 years ago

And, please take my word for, you do not want water, sewage or garbage collection controlled by private companies.

I'm glad I have the freedom to choose between one private water company and one private garbage collection company, and I hope my sewer system is soon given away to a faceless multinational and not paid directly to my local government.

Because I'm an American goddammit!

path: 0 10244669 10247578, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 5
afraid_of_zombies -1 points 2 years ago

Your sewage system is already partially private. I can say this with confidence if you live anywhere on earth outside of maybe North Korea.

It's a question of how much. Like my city for example: if you had a sewage emergency at night the people who show work for a private company. All the people working, part-time, there are pretty much retired government workers. Now is this a big deal? I personally don't think so. The same company that services the night for my city has it for the neighboring ones. It just makes sense to have this be a part time job that spans a big area vs hire someone full-time to only work in one city.

Now who built your system? It was almost certainly a private company. That subcontracted it out to other private companies. Is this a big deal? Meh, it depends. I have seen incompetence in both government engineers/project managers and I have seen it in private sector as well.

Now who maintains your system? Well again it depends. Some special snowflake equipment you are going to have to call the OEM or their rep, day to day stuff the local government employees can usually handle.

I guess my point is your system is already partially private and I am not really convinced altering it more government or less government would add any additional benefit. We have a system that basically works.

path: 0 10244669 10247578 10250609, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 4
Semi_Hemi_Demigod 1 point 2 years ago

When it comes to infrastructure, I don't particularly mind the government contracting out maintenance. What I mind is the infrastructure not being owned publicly.

path: 0 10244669 10247578 10250609 10266153, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
afraid_of_zombies 1 point 2 years ago

Hmm I have not personally seen that. Can you give me an example? The only thing I can think of is privately owned septic systems but I don't think you meant that.

path: 0 10244669 10247578 10250609 10266153 10267486, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
hOrni 2 points 2 years ago

I don't get it. Part of the price for water goes to sewage removal. So if You use more water, You pay more, You can remove more sewage. If one person is paying for 2 people, the same amount will be spent, what's the problem?

path: 0 10244669 10249476, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
DessertStorms 0 points 2 years ago

That's a a lot of words to say you enjoy the taste of boot..

path: 0 10244669 10285174, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
John_McMurray -12 points 2 years ago

You're pretty brainwashed. There's nothing at all scary about privatized garbage collection.

path: 0 10244669 10247675, hotness: undefined, score: -12, children: 6
thirteene 2 points 2 years ago

I'm sure a vc would approve an ewaste app that sorts your trash and recycling for you! They just go through your trash to see what products you buy, how often you go through them and be sure to share that data with their advertising partners!

Edit:the point is they want to sell your data, not that we need someone to filter our recycling; but I feel the love.

path: 0 10244669 10247675 10247890, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Socsa 2 points 2 years ago

We have a municipal garbage service and they already use a combination of collection workers and cameras to reject recycling bins which have non recyclables. They'll leave you a note about it and everything.

path: 0 10244669 10247675 10247890 10248149, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
afraid_of_zombies 2 points 2 years ago

A universal recycling machine can be made at any time. It just costs too much energy and consumables to make it worth it.

path: 0 10244669 10247675 10247890 10250645, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
John_McMurray -5 points 2 years ago

The fuck? I literally live in a place with private collection. Its cheap and none of this is an issue.

path: 0 10244669 10247675 10247890 10248121, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 0
qyron 1 point 2 years ago

Each one speaks from their own perspective and experience.

path: 0 10244669 10247675 10248108, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
John_McMurray -4 points 2 years ago

Nah Sometimes it's just political bs.

path: 0 10244669 10247675 10248108 10248551, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 0
bouldering_barista 0 points 2 years ago

Why are we still sharing twitter screenshots on Lemmy? Can we not just ask similar questions and let people converse from there?

I was radicalized by being pulled out of my brainwashed family and realizing the "system is working exactly as intended and must be dismantled "!

path: 0 10251321, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
usauthoritarianism
usauthoritarianism

@lemmy.world

login for more options
1457
559
114

ChonkyOwlbear is an Illegitimate Usurper

There's other groups and you are welcome to add to them. USAuthoritarianism Linktree

See Also, my website. USAuthoritarianism.com be advised at time of writing it is basically just a donate link

Cool People: !thepoliceproblem@lemmy.world

go to feed...