The tax system is so complicated, most people can’t handle navigating it on their own. Most people have jobs where taxes are automatically removed from pay checks and sent to both state and federal tax agencies. However, that amount is just an estimate and once a year (or quarter) you need to file paperwork to confirm whether you over or underpaid and then you either get a rebate (without interest), or you’ll need to send in a payment to make up the difference. That paperwork has been lobbied to remain as complicated as possible so that companies like Intuit can provide services that tax payers find useful and continue to pay for. This is more complicated for business owners, both big and small.
TankovayaDiviziya 38 points a year ago
Well, in my opinion this will be a good platform for American progressives to run on: make taxes less complicated by getting rid of middle men.
Mog_fanatic 43 points a year ago
This will absolutely 10000% never happen as long as lobbying exists in my opinion.
TronBronson 9 points a year ago
There is nothing wrong with lobbying…. There are lobbies for woman’s rights, black rights, all sorts of good causes have lobbies.
The politicians just bend over for corporate lobbies. Very important distinction. I think what would fit your argument better is will never happen as long as citizens United exists.
merc 19 points a year ago
No. You can file your taxes for free. And, if you ever pay to file your taxes, you're not paying the government, you're paying for tax preparation software or for a tax professional to do your taxes for you.
But! Even if your tax situation is very simple, filing your taxes on your own is difficult. In Europe, the government sends you a form with what they think you owe based on all the information they have on you. If you agree with the calculation, you just send the form back and either pay or receive a refund.
In the US your employer gives you some sheets of paper with some values on it. Your bank gives you some different forms. And so-on. When it's tax time, you gather up all that paper, hope you have it all, try to remember what forms you need and if you have them, and then painstakingly try to copy the right values from the W-2, 1099-INT, and so on into the right boxes on form 1040, 1040 Schedule 1, 1040 Schedule 2, 1040 Schedule H, 1095-A, and so on. Then, you try to do the calculations where it says to multiply the value from 1040 row 43 by the correct value in table A9. A9 has different values depending on how many dependants you have, and if you're filing jointly or alone.
Basically, it's doable on your own, especially if you have a fairly standard / simple tax situation. But, it's easy to make a mistake along the way. If you ever need an explanation about what you're supposed to do, that information exists, but it's in accountanteze, and it often refers to about 5 other IRS publications that just complicate things further. And, when you're dealing with thousands of dollars, a mistake could be really costly. So, most people buy a copy of TurboTax every year for $30, which somehow turns into $60 by the time you're actually ready to file because the $30 version only covers people in situation X, and since you have Y you need to upgrade.
TurboTax then takes $1 out of the $60 you paid them, and goes to Washington with that to lobby politicians to keep the tax code complicated so that people need to buy a new TurboTax every year. (Oh yeah, and things change just enough that every year you need to buy the latest software to file your taxes.)
DakRalter 1 point a year ago
Here in the UK I have never had to file taxes. It's all done as PAYE. Whatever software your employer uses will work out how much you owe via your tax code each pay packet and it's auto deducted. It's only self employed people (maybe other types of earner, I wouldn't know, I'm just a waged employee) who have to submit their tax forms. It's weird other countries aren't doing it this way.
tja 2 points a year ago
In Europe, the government sends you a form with what they think you owe based on all the information they have on you. If you agree with the calculation, you just send the form back and either pay or receive a refund.
That's not true everywhere in Europe
scathliath 16 points a year ago
I mean, yes, because if they catch you evading taxes then they get a free slave for the term of your incarceration. To them it's a win-win.
WolfmanEightySix 6 points a year ago
Imagine having to pay to give the government money. I had to open this to confirm what I was reading.
Imgonnatrythis 6 points a year ago
No they just want us to do our part by both paying taxes to the government and paying corporations that pay the government. All makes sense in a tidy corporofascisit system.
pablodaniel 6 points a year ago
Real talk: why do we have to 'file taxes' at all in 2025?
Don't we have computers that should be automating taxes?
eugenevdebs 7 points a year ago
Because companies lobby Congress to prohibit major IRS restructuring and spending. If the IRS had auto filing and a bigger budget, it would make more money than ever before.
The IRS could go after and audit rich people while the common person just gets a check in the mall from their returns. Maybe even no check, as the returns are only from miscalculations by the federal system, which is due to a bad system in place.
We need a federal tax system in the US. No one likes paying taxes but we do. The IRS is the center of that for the Feds. And the Republicans gut it because it's easy to say "I'll lower your taxes" but not solve where the money comes from.
jj4211 3 points a year ago
returns are only from miscalculations by the federal system,
Well, not really. More like incomplete calculations, erring on the side of overpayment because people are generally extra upset if they have to pay in at the end of the year, even if they technically made more money as a result. People are used to and kind of ignore the tax portion of the paycheck they never get, but they feel the taxation of actually making an active payment. So people get happy about the zero interest loan they give to the government because in the moment it feels like "free money"
My employer has to do withholding without knowledge of other potential household income, credits, or deductions, though that last is pretty much given for everyone given how high the standard deduction is now.
LeninOnAPrayer 5 points a year ago
Pay to file and get charged if we don't pay the amount that the IRS knows that we owe.
They literally know how much we owe but make us pay a private company to calculate that number and then charge us if that private company didn't help us get the right number.
So the private company offers more "protection" and "tax experts" they charge us more for and make their "calculator" a little less helpful every year so you feel like you need the "tax expert" AI chat to help you avoid a charge.
Capitalism is the most efficient system. CAPITALISM IS THE MOST EFFICIENT SYSTEM.
It's technically free to file federal and the tax prep companies must offer this by law. But there are tons of loopholes to this to the point that many people pay to file even when they don't have to.
State taxes are always charged if they need to be filed. It's free in some states but not a lot and there is no requirement on most states for how much the tax prep software charges for that.
Alexstarfire 3 points a year ago
No, and no. It is typically more convenient to pay to file taxes though. These companies hand hold you through the process and often have some protection for you if you get audited.
That said, this still means the government needs to make things easier for everyone. You shouldn't feel like you need help to just file a standard tax return if all you do is have a regular job, no investments, and no deductions. Which is something like half of the US.
AngryCommieKender 26 points a year ago
Home of the slave.
toy_boat_toy_boat 18 points a year ago
for some perspective:
canada's federal tax website lists all of the free services that you can utilize, and they even include NetFile so you don't have to upload or submit any of your docuements.
i hear we're looking for new provinces..
CalipherJones 7 points a year ago
I'd vote to join a Canadian union if it ever shows up on my state's ballot. It never will but I would. The South is a disgusting backwater of "divine" hatred.
toy_boat_toy_boat 1 point a year ago
i don't want to sound like an old fuddy, but you sound just like some of your great-great-granparents :P
CalipherJones 2 points a year ago
My great great grandparents didn't live in America. There's also the difference that I'd want to leave to escape a culture of greed, fascism and hatred while the Southern states wanted to secede to continue owning other human beings as livestock.
TheThrillOfTime 59 points a year ago
A million dollars is all it takes to buy whatever laws you want? That's a really good deal for Intuit.
LemmyFeed 28 points a year ago
Remember all those (exactly) 1 million dollar "donations" all those CEOs were giving to Trump's inaugural campaign? Those weren't donations, they were bribes and kissing of the ring. Pledge loyalty (and pay a small fee) and the government will work for you.
CalipherJones 1 point a year ago
There are a huge swath of self-serving, inwardly thinking, assholes that see themselves in Trump. That's why they love him. With him leading they can be unabashedly racist and sexist... in other words they get to be themselves.
But_my_mom_says_im_cool 20 points a year ago
Politicians are cheap, I remember once seeing a list of how much a lobbyist buys support from politicians for and the list was like $5k $2k $3k $6k. It’s ridiculous
surewhynotlem 8 points a year ago
That's affordable. Maybe I'll buy one
DontRedditMyLemmy 6 points a year ago
Now you need to save it for your tax filing fees
merc 5 points a year ago
It's much more complicated than that though. The lobbying firms hire people who are former politicians or former senior staffers who have all kinds of contacts all over Washington. Getting those guys on the payroll is extremely expensive.
Then, those lobbyists generally don't just go off and bribe someone. They build and strengthen relationships. They know all the pain points that the politicians have, and they just make things easier. If a politician's staffer is having trouble finding a good place to live in DC, the lobbyist knows a guy who knows a guy who can get them a great apartment.
Eventually, the lobbyist isn't this guy who tries to get the politician to change some laws. He's basically part of the team. So, when new legislation comes up, the whole team works on it together, including the lobbyist.
The end result is that the $5k or whatever is only the direct contribution to the politician's re-election campaign or something. Most of the spending is hiring the lobbyist and paying all his/her various expenses that make them indispensable for the politician, so that they can step in at the right time.
technocrit 4 points a year ago
They're cheap because they fully believe in ideologies that screw everybody else. They're not doing it for the cash but for their god.
technocrit 3 points a year ago
Politicians get their jobs through an eagerness to bootlick capital.
pablodaniel 1 point a year ago
If only voters were smart enough to vote for better people.
CalipherJones 1 point a year ago
That's the number we get to see.
CalipherJones 18 points a year ago
This is from 1889. Literally nothing has changed. Go back 1000 years and it's the same fucking shit. Even 3000 years ago in Egypt. It's always rich vs everybody else just in different outfits.
Bloomcole 5 points a year ago
Karl Marx
The Civil War in France
Written: July 1870 - May 1871
Nowhere do “politicians” form a more separate, powerful section of the nation than in North America. There, each of the two great parties which alternately succeed each other in power is itself in turn controlled by people who make a business of politics, who speculate on seats in the legislative assemblies of the Union as well as of the separate states, or who make a living by carrying on agitation for their party and on its victory are rewarded with positions.
Here we find here two great gangs of political speculators, who alternately take possession of the state power and exploit it by the most corrupt means and for the most corrupt ends – and the nation is powerless against these two great cartels of politicians, who are ostensibly its servants, but in reality exploit and plunder it.
LePoisson 4 points a year ago
I want another Teddy Roosevelt in office.
Fuck man even after trust busting, those companies were then and still are stupid big and powerful and maddeningly enriching to the 1%
At least we have shiny toys now built on the backs of global labor exploitation. That's cool.
pablodaniel 2 points a year ago
We really should be moving to direct voting.
Representative democracies are tool of the ruling class to subvert control from the working class.
The fact <0.00001% of the people you come across mention direct voting in a democracy should be an indicator at how successful the ruling class has been at controlling the narrative.
pablodaniel 3 points a year ago
I've realized why this is the case.
Nations are modern-day fiefdoms. If you're not a member of the ruling class, then you're not supposed to have any say in how a nation is run. Modern politics is a song and dance around serving the ruling class as much as possible while convincing workers it's in their best interests.
Class traitors need to be ostracized more often.
eugenevdebs 4 points a year ago
Legalized bribery is only bad when the other team is in office. When your team is bribed, it's handy so they can run again in 4 years. Just don't ask them to do any campaign promises that go against their donors.
ohulancutash 1 point a year ago
It was founded on lies and lobbying. Remember “taxation without representation”? Americans were on a 90% tax discount compared to the British. America was founded off the back of the particularly idiotic, greedy and gullible, and they’ve continued on that path to present. And some fool gave them weapons.
JackbyDev 48 points a year ago
It's a little late now, but don't forget that FreeTaxUSA is free for federal and cheap for state. Also much less annoying to use than Intuit TurboTax. They don't do those fake loading animations like "checking the best deal!" As if a computer can't do like a billion of those a second.
pablodaniel 4 points a year ago
Usually it's to fool people into thinking something is happening when nothing is happening.
It's also to make them think that something is more complicated than it actually is.
pablodaniel 3 points a year ago
They don’t do those fake loading animations like “checking the best deal!”
This shit should be fucking illegal, especially with something like tax filing software.
mechoman444 46 points a year ago
Turbo tax made 1.6 BILLION in income. And that's not enough. They need to lobby and change the landscape of the countries tax system to generate even more profit on top of the profit they already made.
This isn't capitalism anymore this is something else entirely. It's a metal disorder. A disease.
pablodaniel 27 points a year ago
This isn’t capitalism anymore this is something else entirely.
That's the thing, it is capitalism. It's always been about those who have more exploiting those who have less.
The problem is this generation of workers has been duped into believing that corporate profits are a good thing, rather than an indication of workers getting taken advantage of.
It's all bass-ackwards by design. I stopped trying to find rhyme or reason and just settled on "most people are dumb as shit."
ShaggySnacks 18 points a year ago
Capitalism demands that line must always go up.
pablodaniel 4 points a year ago
Line goes up means businesses are taking advantage of customers.
Line goes down means customers are taking advantage of businesses.
Why are customers cheering when line goes up and angry when line goes down? Oh yeah, they're useful idiots.
technocrit 4 points a year ago
And this is just taxes. Capital also do this with our health, water, air, etc.
Doctor_Satan 41 points a year ago
Intuit has been doing this for a long time, just in case anyone was wondering why $1 million seems like a low bribe. And it goes beyond preventing you from filing your taxes for free, with one of their goals being to make it as much of a pain in the ass as possible, so you are too frustrated to do it yourself.
This if from a 2019 Pro Publica article:
But the success of TurboTax rests on a shaky foundation, one that could collapse overnight if the U.S. government did what most wealthy countries did long ago and made tax filing simple and free for most citizens.
For more than 20 years, Intuit has waged a sophisticated, sometimes covert war to prevent the government from doing just that, according to internal company and IRS documents and interviews with insiders. The company unleashed a battalion of lobbyists and hired top officials from the agency that regulates it. From the beginning, Intuit recognized that its success depended on two parallel missions: stoking innovation in Silicon Valley while stifling it in Washington. Indeed, employees ruefully joke that the company’s motto should actually be “compromise without integrity.”
Internal presentations lay out company tactics for fighting “encroachment,” Intuit’s catchall term for any government initiative to make filing taxes easier — such as creating a free government filing system or pre-filling people’s returns with payroll or other data the IRS already has. “For a decade proposals have sought to create IRS tax software or a ReturnFree Tax System; All were stopped,” reads a confidential 2007 PowerPoint presentation from an Intuit board of directors meeting. The company’s 2014-15 plan included manufacturing “3rd-party grass roots” support. “Buy ads for op-eds/editorials/stories in African American and Latino media,” one internal PowerPoint slide states.
TheEighthDoctor 40 points a year ago
Imagine paying to file taxes, lmao
rippermonty 38 points a year ago
That's called bribery in my country. It's disgusting and very prevalent here but at least we don't embellish the idea with polite terminology 😂
Dagwood222 37 points a year ago
I've said it before and I'll say it again.
Trump could have held the Saudis up for $50 billion on Inauguration Day 2016. Five minutes with the ambassador and he could have walked away with plenty of loot.
Yosemite Sam could have figured it out.
UnderpantsWeevil 33 points a year ago
Some of this is about accepting bribes. A lot more is simply ideology.
Trump's people do not believe the IRS should exist and they are trying to dismantle it. DirectFile is just low hanging fruit, intended to make people more frustrated with tax filing and more easy to radicalized in an attempt dismantle and replace with tariffs.
Like, this is a real decades long project that goes way beyond Trump. Abolishing the income tax was Goldwater's wet dream.
Dagwood222 5 points a year ago
I agree with you that the Project 2025 folks are important, but I'm talking about Trump in particular.
The shoes, the NFTs, and the crypto schemes are all about fleecing his own people.
There was a lottery where the top prize was dinner at the white House with POTUS. They ran it for months and there was never a single winner.
I think he really likes stealing from poor people. Either that or he's too chicken to go toe to toe with someone who might hit back.
merc 3 points a year ago
Add to that that Grover Norquist runs an organization called Americans for Tax Reform. GOP politicians all have to sign a pledge with them that they will never vote for a tax increase or for anything to make filing taxes easier.
Supposedly, this is because if taxes are easy to file, Americans won't hate them enough and it makes it easier for the government to raise taxes. But, it's awfully convenient that this is exactly what Intuit, H&R Block, etc. all want too.
technocrit 2 points a year ago
I don't you understand who actually controls the petrol-dollar.
PanArab 1 point a year ago
Arab governments have been paying tributes for decades and hosting US troops all in exchange for the uncertain guarantee of not being turned into another Iraq or Libya. Any more extraction and the US risks them aligning with Russia or China instead. The mobs know that they shouldn’t bankrupt those who pay them protection money.
Dagwood222 0 points a year ago
True, but $50 billion wouldn't break the bank for the Saudis. Moreover, Trump's recent actions show that he doesn't really care about anything more than 15 minutes in the future.
Dagwood222 1 point a year ago
How many private airplanes and yachts do the princes have?
They could cut down to seventeen harems each and still have enough to pay off Trump.
It wouldn't have to be a lump sum either.
Stock market manipulation or a similar scam would put the same amount in his pocket.
Someonelol 9 points a year ago
They might call it something like a convenience fee.
pablodaniel 30 points a year ago
Funniest part is how they're bribing the government with the money they took from customers. Now they can take more money from customers, which is more money for bribes.
It also means they didn't need to charge customers the prices they charged, since they have enough money to operate their business and bribe politicians.
It's like, you're paying them to work against you.
So backwards, but that's by design. Don't be a useful idiot.
pablodaniel 28 points a year ago
If you know someone who works for one of these companies, you should ostracize them.
Stop giving free passes to people making our society worse.
WarlordSdocy 15 points a year ago
I mean I feel like it depends on their role in the company. Not everyone has the luxury of choosing the work they do. I know at least a few people who work in billing for a healthcare company that don't want to do that work and understand it's bad but don't really have another choice as they couldn't get any other jobs. I'm not gonna blame someone for working at a bad company unless they're like an executive or other high up person who could take their skills to a different industry.
renzev 18 points a year ago
Anyone who advocates for ostracizing fellow workers indiscriminately is doing it in order to keep the working class bogged down in endless internal feuds instead of organizing. Solidarity is the only solution.
prole 4 points a year ago
Solidarity should also involve being united on what work is acceptable and what is not.
This doesn't seem indiscriminate to me. I think we 100% should judge people who work for evil corporations, regardless of what their position is.
Test_Tickles 3 points a year ago
Wait, so I wasn't supposed to punch that guy in the janitors uniform in the dick just because he said Intuit (turns out he was saying "into it")?
Agent641 5 points a year ago
Then they should do their job exactly as half-assedly as it's possible to do without actually being fired. Steal coffee and creamer from the kitchen. Steal toilet paper. Accidentally deleted System32 on the office computer. Open all file attachments and links in emails. Crop-dust the bosses office. Start office rumours to sow discord and erode company loyalty. Slip and fall on a stair, go on extended paid medical leave. When fired, sue for wrongful termination, crowdfund the legal fees
WarlordSdocy 2 points a year ago
That's a fair strategy if you actually can organize with other people at your work to do things like that. But it still does rely on having enough stability to get fired and not end up homeless while getting a new job or trying to sue. Crowdfunding can work if you happen to get lucky and your story gets picked up by lots of people, but it can also reach no one and leave you with nothing. So at the end of the day it's gonna come down to organizing, if only there was some kind of organized body of workers you could form to fight policies that are bad for people in general along with being bad for the workers.
Quetzalcutlass 10 points a year ago
Historically senators and representatives side with companies who've only given them thousands or tens of thousands of dollars in contributions. It's very cheap to buy a vote.
Though often there's also the understanding that a career spent supporting them will be rewarded with a cushy, high-paying lobbying job once they leave politics. Or paid speaking gigs if you're the President.
Forester 6 points a year ago
It's not incompetent to give someone a penny and have them give you back $100. That's a great investment. So I would have to say their corruption is very confident if they can give a million dollar bribe and get back a billion dollars of revenue.
MutilationWave 3 points a year ago
I think they mean the government corruption. How cheap it is to buy votes. You can buy a Supreme Court justice with an RV.
Phoenixbouncing 3 points a year ago
With the nice simulator mode so you can run the numbers and see how much you need to budget for well beforehand.
SirMaple__ 2 points a year ago path: 0 16550829 16551214 16551296, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
merc 1 point a year ago
Unfortunately, the tool WealthSimple provides used to be called SimpleTax. It was made by a team in Vancouver and operated as donationware. You could file your taxes then choose however much you wanted to donate to them for the tool. They promised that they'd never sell your data, and never charge for the tool.
But... then they sold out to WealthSimple, who of course removed that promise to never sell your data.
RealisticDoughnut 20 points a year ago
I'll stick to FreeTaxUsa even if they charge me. Fuck Intuit.
Lumidaub 16 points a year ago
Wait sorry what? Non-USian here, bear with me.
What does "program" mean here? Why is this program necessary to file your taxes for free? Do you guys have PAY to file your taxes if you don't use/apply/qualify for that program?? Am I misunderstanding what it means to "file" taxes? It's been a while since I was this confused by a US thing.
Quetzalcutlass 28 points a year ago
US tax code is (deliberately) complicated and unlike other countries, you need to manually fill out the forms with your financial data even though the government already knows it and what you owe (minus exemptions that the vast majority of citizens won't claim). This is because there is a major industry around tax preparation, and the big names (such as Intuit) have aggressively lobbied for decades to keep the process as complicated and inconvenient as possible so that people are forced to pay them to fill out their tax forms. This lobbying has also resulted in the legally mandated free filing options being buried and hard to find, with many people not even knowing they exist.
Tax prep is a huge scam with many billions of dollars behind it. Weather providers are probably going to be next in the news, since they've been trying to kill the free government-run forecasts and force people onto their paid platforms for just as long.
MutilationWave 10 points a year ago
Free Tax USA is easy to use and free for federal, $15 for state. I used it last time. This time I filed for an extension because the IRS might be so gutted by October I won't even have to pay. And I owe a lot because I was a contractor for most of 2024.
Normally I have no problem paying taxes but this time it's different.
Lumidaub 5 points a year ago
Okay so the "paying" is for when you use third parties to "help" you file, yes? You don't pay the government for the privilege of being able to file, yes? So what does/did this Free File thing do?
Taxes aren't easy in Germany either, I'm glad I have a husband who is level-headed enough to do them for us both because I'd always have a near mental breakdown when I tried. But it's always been obvious to me where and how to file without involving anyone I'd have to pay. Fuck.
Quetzalcutlass 5 points a year ago
Personal filing is always free, the "free" in "free filing" refers to the prep part. It just means you fill out and submit your taxes yourself rather than paying a tax firm's accountants to do it for you. Calling it that makes it seem like the firms are part of the process rather than bloated parasites feeding off taxpayers. I wouldn't be surprised if the name was also a result of their influence.
Their accountants can claim exemptions and rebates buried in the tax code that laymen wouldn't know exist - ones that they lobbied for to make their services more attractive. It makes them worthwhile for some households, but only because they're solving a problem they birthed and grew in the first place.
melmi 4 points a year ago
IRS Direct File was just a free government-run alternative to the tax filing programs like TurboTax.
You can still do your taxes by hand without the help of any software for free, but they've killed the website that fills out the forms automatically and the manual process is significantly more complicated.
lapping6596 2 points a year ago
Free file is software that people use to file. As far as I'm aware, it's always been free to print out the forms and mail it all in.
chiliedogg 5 points a year ago
The existing paid weather and mapping services are not excited. Right now they just repackage days that's provided by the government for free, so while their customer base isn't as big as it would be without NOAA, NWS, and USGS data available to anyone, their expenses are super low.
They'd need 1000x at many customers to cover the expense of gathering their own data.
Instead, what they'll all end up doing is paying huge money to third party services (e.g.SpaceX), who have existing infrastructure that can be used to launch weather monitoring services and will end up being the only ones to benefit from this.
Quetzalcutlass 1 point a year ago
Their argument is that the government releasing detailed weather data for free makes it impossible for commercial offerings to compete. So it's likely they'll either lobby to force the government services to stop providing anything other than the raw data (leaving weather companies to translate it into forecasts and useful visualizations), or to privatize the NOAA weather stations and satellites so they can sell the data for profit.
pablodaniel 2 points a year ago
Why don't Americans vote for politicians who want to get rid of the "tax preparation industry?"
Why don't more politicians mention it at all?
Why has the working class been conditioned to squabble over bullshit while the ruling class robs them blind, again?
I'm starting to think consumerism breeds stupidity.
pablodaniel 1 point a year ago
Culture needs to change.
Email 7 points a year ago
Definition: A system of services, opportunities, or projects, usually designed to meet a social need.
In this case, a digital service provided directly by the IRS, hence the name "Direct File." In contrast, filing by paper is still supported. Tax preparation businesses have been actively preventing the US filing process from being simplified, naturally because that's the reason they make money.
Lumidaub 5 points a year ago
So this Direct File thing is simply for filing your taxes online? Because we have a thing like that too (doesn't every "civilised" country?). And that's what they want to abolish? US lobbyists are something else, man.
lime 10 points a year ago
every time this comes up i am flabbergasted.
this year was my most complicated tax filing yet since i was involved in a bankruptcy, switched jobs, bought a house, contracted work on the house which was eligible for tax credit, and got an inheritance within the span of a few months. it took me almost 20 minutes to do, which was basically only because the tax agency don't package their various calculators in the pre-filled form and i had to double-check the credit thing.
it drives me mental, then i hear about "tax month" and i feel it could be worse.
rickyrigatoni 3 points a year ago
I spent the entirety of apr 15th making fun of my friends for not doing their taxes in feblueberry.
SoftestSapphic 4 points a year ago
Next year we're going to be making fun of the people who paid taxes
rickyrigatoni 1 point a year ago
Pissed I didn't sign up for a W-4 this year. They're already taking my money and I'm gonna have to file just in case I get a refund. But next year I'm evading so fucking hard.
MutilationWave 1 point a year ago
This might be way too personal but did you declare bankruptcy because you were expecting the inheritance? Pretty smart. If your debt was high that's like free money. It seems this has to be the case if you filed for bankruptcy and then bought a house. Most people who don't have to file bankruptcy will never afford a house.
MutilationWave 1 point a year ago
Oh ok that makes far more sense, thanks.
Wanpieserino 8 points a year ago
Then stop accepting wealth in your country. You accumulate the capital of the whole world inside your country and then expect them to be there for any other reason than to control the policy there?
Make it make sense
prole 1 point a year ago
Unless you're wealthy enough to afford a bevy of attorneys, they will still go after you.
Shit, they'll probably start using AI to determine who the easiest targets are (spoiler: it's always the working class).
LarmyOfLone 8 points a year ago
Put every manager of TurboTax in prison as a traitor.
LarmyOfLone 6 points a year ago
I think people have to understand that we've entered a different era. The rich have gotten richer and become insanely powerful and "the game" has gone on for so long all the rules have been slightly bend to allow them to become more rich and powerful. If you continue to "be sensible" and ask if you may nibble around the edges, all you get is fascism. It's inevitable. So first you have to destroy them and their power, then you can reform the system. Reforming the system now, even if you could, won't do anything.
RymrgandsDaughter 7 points a year ago
1 million to make filing taxes annoying af, well I'm not filing anything again
Phoenicianpirate 7 points a year ago
I honest to God can't imagine how fucking cheap the price for them to make it so that people have to use their paid services... which will make them many, many times more than their bribe ever was.
It would be like if you paid me 1 dollar and I did something that would make you 200 or 300 dollars...
technocrit 5 points a year ago
Thankfully genocide joe opened up free taxes to everybody and put those leeches out of business!
\s
eugenevdebs 8 points a year ago
It is funny that it's only an issue in Lemmy that Trump is doing it. Meanwhile the IRS has been stuck doing this for decades because of corporate lobbying from Intuit.
This as much of a regression to about 2023. When America was already behind on tax filing since the 1980s compared to every other country. Even the "shithole" nations Trump hates have had better tax systems for their citizens.
Bloomcole 7 points a year ago
path: 0 16568232 16570519 16570705, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
eugenevdebs 7 points a year ago
They literally bribe to Democrats more than Republicans, fucking hilarious. Helps explain why Congress won't do anything.
Realitaetsverlust 4 points a year ago
So, just so I get this right, it's no longer possible to file your taxes for free anymore?
ArchRecord 5 points a year ago path: 0 16570915 16572819, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Realitaetsverlust 2 points a year ago
Thanks for the explanation. That is kinda wild ngl.
SolidShake 4 points a year ago
is there a fact check on this? seems wild to me. wonder what the maga cult defense is on this one.
technocrit 3 points a year ago
wonder what the maga cult defense is on this one.
Here ya go: HRC drinks baby blood.
parrhesia 2 points a year ago
path: 0 16558742 16564519, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
They are in there and a few days ago Trump announced they were ending the direct file program.
sommerset 4 points a year ago
Well that is just a tip of the iceberg.
What do u think his digital currency was for?
Corpos buy currency, he sells his coin, he does whatever corpos want, done.
Corpos write off as failed investment, Trump gets paid.
All digital currencies are for some shit like this - fraud.
ImmersiveMatthew 3 points a year ago
The joke might be in there as while AI cannot do your taxes today, we are hopefully not too far off.
Kurious84 2 points a year ago
Anyone else starting to think since Trump likes Putin maybe he too would like to gather all of the nations wealth for himself and his leeches. Seems like they'll get all the money and kick backs and business and we're left with even less, causing us to work more and get less.
UncleGrandPa 2 points a year ago
In the trump Reich
Everything is for sale.
Everything
BeMoreCareful 1 point a year ago
Is he just doing all this through executive orders?
yournamehere -1 points a year ago
i see people are greedy and dumb so they vote one of two parties and pretend it is a democracy? nancy pelosi will rule longer than the elisabeth IV. i fear. did any human order airstrikes in more countries you are not at war with than obama? both parties are nationalistic and selfish like their voters. and thats why it is doomed to fail. both parties cam be seen as collapsed. republicans are taken hostage by maga and dems so crooked they should stop calling themselves democrats.
HipHoboHarold 1 point a year ago
Sure, Timmy is stabbing you repeatedly. And last time he gave it a bit of a twist. Which looked painful.
Bht remember when Great slapped you?
Yeah. Sounds like both of these people are terrible.
Now if you excuse me, its my turn to get stabbed. So excited.
21Cabbage -2 points a year ago
I've always thought the best argument against him being bribed is that the cash he's pocketing from staying at his own hotels is pretty petty as far as what the president could potentially get in the way of ill-gotten gains.
Quetzalcutlass 5 points a year ago
Trump is incredibly miserly for someone who's so terrible with money. He straight-up refuses to pay anyone he thinks won't win a lawsuit against him, stiffing dozens of contractors who worked on his real estate projects over the decades. He even ghosts the venues that host his rallies when it comes time for his campaign to repay them.
There was an experiment where checks were mailed weekly to various random wealthy people with slightly less each week to see at what point they wouldn't even bother cashing them in. Trump was one of only two people to keep cashing them even when they dropped to pennies per check.
He's also infamous for lying about his wealth. He is (or was before his presidency gave him endless opportunities to grift) a paper billionaire who in reality was so deep in debt and had such bad credit due to his constant bankruptcies that no bank in America would lend him money. That's how he got involved with Deutsch Bank, the one with shady connections to the Russian government.
He's corrupt, incompetent, and willing to do anything for money. And he has so many grifts running that even if they aren't making much individually, he's still "earning" a fortune overall.
IndustryStandard -19 points a year ago
Lobbying bad when Trump
CalipherJones 4 points a year ago
Legalized bribery has always been bad numbie.
technocrit 3 points a year ago
Don't you remember how genocide joe spent the past 4 years shutting down all these lobbyists?
\s
microblogmemes
@lemmy.world
11690
4662
10177
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
go to feed...
microblogmemes
@lemmy.world
11690
4662
10177
A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, Twitter X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.
Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.
RULES:
- Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
- Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
- You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
- Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
- Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
- Absolutely no NSFL content.
- Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
- No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.
RELATED COMMUNITIES:
go to feed...
save