My prof usually says "jain", which is "ja" and "nein" merged.
suuure, with this exact amount of "u"s
3 seems to be the golden rule for that kinda thing
Yeahnah
I think op is taking about a situation where a statement/question is partially true, but also partially untrue. Like "Do some things fall faster than other things because they're heavier?" The answer is "kinda but not really".
"In an atmosphere" is the proper response to that question because it isn't kinda true, it is entirely context dependent.
It's common to say it in Canada too, but it can either mean no, yes, or simply be a placeholder phrase.
It's the Schrödinger's Cat of utterances - you don't know which it is until the sentence is finished/you elucidate from the broader conversational context.
Also “No yeah”. The second one applies!
Kinda
I think a fitting substitute would be Jein/Jain, coming from combining Ja(Yes) with Nein(No). Although I feel it doesn't perfectly match the 'but' part, It feels close enough that it's the only thing I could think of.
When sticking to German I would rather suggest a slightly bored mumbeld "Jooaa..."
Jein is different.
"Let's circle back to this"
"Doch" is more like a logical "not" (¬).
Example:
Alice: "Bob, you don't like apples. Bob: "Doch" (Bob likes apples)
I've always thought of doch as an affirmative where a negative was expected.
I don't think its about the expectation of a negative, but rather it specifically disagrees with a previous negative, saying it is in fact positive. Doesn't work with disagreement in general, only when the challenged statement was negative.
That's clearer, I agree.
Ahhh yeah naww
I do think it depends heavily on inflection.
It's got to have that friendly familiar drawn out "fuuuuuuck you" that connotes "yes, you're right", "I disagree", and "fuck you" simultaneously.
maybe....just maybe.
are you gonna answer the question?
maybe.
This always means no from my experience.
perhaps
"fine...whatever."
For some reason, I'm never successful at linking to specific times in YouTube videos (yes, I tried &t=35s), but try about 35 seconds into this:
thanks for using Leebra!
go to feed...
“ostensibly”
save