Mississippi's age assurance law puts decentralized social networks to the test

10 months ago by Nemeski to c/fediverse

Bluesky says it would block access to its service in the state of Mississippi, rather than comply with the new age verification law.
Skavau 53 points 10 months ago

Have any of Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, Discord implemented age-checks in Mississippi then?

If not, why is Bluesky the only one going dark there?

path: 0 19091602, hotness: undefined, score: 53, children: 13
joyjoy 29 points 10 months ago

Because Bluesky isn't a real decentralized platform

path: 0 19091602 19092288, hotness: undefined, score: 29, children: 5
Skavau 15 points 10 months ago

Yeah but why aren't the other sites implementing checks?

path: 0 19091602 19092288 19092473, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 2
thejoker954 15 points 10 months ago

Money.

path: 0 19091602 19092288 19092473 19092497, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
Auth 2 points 10 months ago

They will

path: 0 19091602 19092288 19092473 19093970, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AntiBullyRanger 3 points 10 months ago

πŸ€πŸ™‚β€β†•οΈ

Decentralized

BitchSky

嘘!

path: 0 19091602 19092288 19096505, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Sl00k 1 point 10 months ago

There are other Appviews on the atProto that have chosen not to implement checks that have full access to Bluesky posting/data.

path: 0 19091602 19092288 19097118, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
stabby_cicada 23 points 10 months ago

Bluesky is a small indie company. It can't afford to fight the law or implement the extensive age verification the law requires. So it chose to pull the plug and leave.

FB, X, etc, have a lot more resources to implement the extensive, invasive age verification Mississippi requires and keep fighting it in court until the decision upholding it is final.

path: 0 19091602 19092565, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 6
birdwing 9 points 10 months ago

I'm of the opinion that even if it is final, at some points laws are so ridiculous they must cease to be effective for all.

path: 0 19091602 19092565 19092633, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
ininewcrow 9 points 10 months ago

Lol .... US law is becoming less and less relevant or meaningful as time goes on

path: 0 19091602 19092565 19092633 19092832, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 0
fruitycoder 2 points 9 months ago

Tbh my first thought was "ehh people can just vpn around it then" which is basically just saying its easily circumventable and i know no instance of legal issues for those that do.

Still a net negative for that state though and the more laws and circumvemtion becomes more common the more people are thrown into the precarius class (see immigrants in the US now).

path: 0 19091602 19092565 19092633 19679978, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
lambalicious 5 points 10 months ago

and keep fighting it in court

> implying those neofash sites would fight against orders to tHiNk Of thE cHiLdReN

path: 0 19091602 19092565 19093306, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
Vittelius 1 point 10 months ago

They will if tHiNkInG oF the ChiLdReN threatens to meaningfully affect their bottom line

path: 0 19091602 19092565 19093306 19098351, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
lambalicious 3 points 10 months ago

Why would it affect their bottom line other than positively? Corporations love fascism because it can make it mandatory for people to buy from them, among other things.

path: 0 19091602 19092565 19093306 19098351 19104089, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
HubertManne 47 points 10 months ago

This is bullshit. It should be on mississippi to block the sites or require local isps to block them. The providers are on the internet and not going out to be in mississippi. Places should wall themselves off if they can't handle the internet.

path: 0 19092625, hotness: undefined, score: 47, children: 11
Prox 44 points 10 months ago

Or - hear me out here - it shouldn't be on anybody to do anything because the law itself is garbage and should not exist.

path: 0 19092625 19093333, hotness: undefined, score: 44, children: 8
IllNess 11 points 10 months ago

It should fall on the parents and ISPs should have an opt in option to block adult websites.

But we all know this is more about control and data harvesting than anything else.

path: 0 19092625 19093333 19093820, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
HubertManne 4 points 10 months ago

yup but at least then they would be leading the charge for people to leave their state.

path: 0 19092625 19093333 19093391, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
chicken 4 points 10 months ago

But the question is, what would be a reasonable legal principle for preventing such laws generally? Mississippi is going to pass bullshit laws, but it shouldn't be possible for the jurisdiction of any state to be anything on the entire internet.

path: 0 19092625 19093333 19096262, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 4
bigfondue 3 points 10 months ago
path: 0 19092625 19093333 19096262 19098400, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
chicken 1 point 10 months ago

In those cases it seems like the law does prevent state level regulation of those things, because the state is only allowed to regulate commerce happening within its borders, not what its residents do elsewhere (although they can still also regulate the use of fireworks and airguns, but enforcement is more difficult, for instance where I am they sometimes send out notices in the mail warning that it's against the law for individuals to be setting off fireworks but there's always a massive decentralized fireworks show every 4th of July anyway).

Somehow with the internet, the location of the server isn't the thing that matters, it's whose computer is accessing it and where that person and computer is located, and the liability is on the server not the user. IMO it should not work that way, because then every state with regressive politics has a stranglehold on the whole internet.

path: 0 19092625 19093333 19096262 19098400 19107125, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Lost_My_Mind 1 point 10 months ago

Psssshhhh!!!!! Get outta here with that solid logic, and critical thinking! We don't use reasoning in this country! We just cry and scream until everybody ELSE caves to the demands!

path: 0 19092625 19093333 19096069, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
crank0271 14 points 10 months ago

You're right. Imagine having to put more resources into Mississippi than Mississippi puts into anything.

How would other countries have responded if instead of building The Great Firewall, China had demanded each international company not allow Chinese citizens within China to access certain parts of their websites?

path: 0 19092625 19093709, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
HubertManne 10 points 10 months ago

Yeah what you have at the end is sorta my thought line. You want to go all censorship at least get off your ass and do it yourself.

path: 0 19092625 19093709 19094291, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
klu9 31 points 10 months ago

Malicious compliance:

  • "Are you too old to have flown on the Lolita Express with Epstein and Trump?"
  • "Are you young enough to be employed as a 'towel girl' at the Mar a Lago massage parlour?"
path: 0 19093150, hotness: undefined, score: 31, children: 1
daniskarma 7 points 10 months ago

Has Mississippi lower the age restriction to 14 years old?

path: 0 19093150 19096275, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
melroy 18 points 10 months ago

Just go away with age verification. You are breaking the internet with this non sense. Eg. Providing passports will only cause exploits and leaks, with all its consequences.

If you want to protect your children, then maybe the parents should protect them.

path: 0 19099880, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 6
jjjalljs 12 points 10 months ago

You are breaking the internet with this non sense.

I think that's their goal. Conservative types benefit when people have limited access to information

path: 0 19099880 19100121, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
melroy 4 points 10 months ago

It's all about power indeed.

path: 0 19099880 19100121 19100222, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Joker 5 points 10 months ago

The internet has been broken for at least a couple decades. The Fediverse is about the closest thing to the old internet.

path: 0 19099880 19100284, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
melroy 1 point 10 months ago

Agreed!

path: 0 19099880 19100284 19100581, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
DieserTypMatthias 3 points 10 months ago

And good luck resetting your ID.

path: 0 19099880 19104926, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
melroy 1 point 10 months ago

I want to respawn on planet earth again from scratch.

path: 0 19099880 19104926 19106339, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Flax_vert 12 points 10 months ago

Just have age verification on an ISP-level at this point.

That's a little bit of a joke. But think about it. Kids don't just find Tiktok hidden among the grass. Their parents give them a phone, give them a computer, a data plan and a wifi password without any parental controls. Then they blame Tiktok when their child commits suicide (possibly had nothing to do with tiktok).

I think maybe have ISPs become the accountable ones. Have them automatically enable parental controls, or emit a second network for kids, and add a waiver to the settings when you go to disable parental controls absolving them of any accountability and placing it on the parents.

path: 0 19100525, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 1
billbasher 3 points 10 months ago

I really don’t want ISPs policing internet traffic more than they already do. I think you’re right though. Router level second network filtering that blocks VPNs. Block the kids MAC addresses from the primary. This needs to be on parents.

That same kid could go to a nudy video store and steal something. They could get into all sorts of 18+ physical stuff.

path: 0 19100525 19102947, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
theacharnian 6 points 10 months ago

I don't understand. Does an instance hosted anywhere outside of this US backwater state have anything to fear from this? Why is Eugen being contacted all the way in Germany?

path: 0 19094284, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
rimu 5 points 10 months ago

They're primarily in Germany but there is some US presence too. From the join Mastodon site:

Mastodon, Inc. (EIN 92-3333630) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit entity in the United States that supports the growth and operational capabilities of Mastodon, including being able to receive tax-deductible U.S. donations and in-kind support.

Oops

path: 0 19094284 19094582, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
ademir 1 point 10 months ago path: 0 19111088, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
fediverse
fediverse

@lemmy.world

login for more options
42580
3239
2129

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

  • Posts must be on topic.
  • Be respectful of others.
  • Cite the sources used for graphs and other statistics.
  • Follow the general Lemmy.world rules.

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

go to feed...