I’m tired of ‘free’ apps that are just trying to bully me into paying

a year ago by Sahwa to c/android

I keep seeing free apps getting worse to push users to paid plans, all while still advertising themselves as free to use.
ook 84 points a year ago
path: 0 20527638, hotness: undefined, score: 84, children: 5
snooggums 21 points a year ago

A 'free' app the trys to shove either a sub or purchase is the same annoyance.

path: 0 20527638 20528061, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 0
atomicbocks 13 points a year ago

To a certain extent I get it though. It’s one of the fundamental failings of the App Store. In the olden days you paid for a piece of software and whatever was on the disc is what you got. When next year’s version came out you had to go to the store and pay for that one too or call the number on the shareware screen. When the App Store came out all of a sudden Apple and their customers expected devs to keep supporting apps on newer platforms with changing APIs. You can’t develop with no income, so developers turned to subscriptions and similar.

There needs to be a better way but Apple makes money off the way it works now.

path: 0 20527638 20531928, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 2
Black616Angel 6 points a year ago

Also most people do not want to pay for an app. They simply don't.

They either don't mind the ads or just buy a subscription, but don't even think about spending like 1€ once to never be bothered.

path: 0 20527638 20531928 20532061, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
foggenbooty 5 points a year ago

I don't know why the micro subscription model hasn't become a thing. I get that even if you do basically no new features on an app it still needs to be updated from time to time as Android changes. So why not have apps be a buck or two a year?

It seems they're either free, or a $8+ a month. All the fitness apps are insanely priced considering they have very little development and all the data within is crowdsourced. Plus I guarantee they're selling your health info.

I would have no issue at all subscribing to dozens of apps if they were super cheap. You get a lot of people chipping in $2 and that adds up quick. I'm guessing the reason they don't is transaction fees and app store cuts.

path: 0 20527638 20531928 20536179, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
quick_snail -2 points a year ago

Every single thing is not subscription today

path: 0 20527638 20543101, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
Zephorah 70 points a year ago

Paying once is fine. Subs are not to be tolerated.

path: 0 20527988, hotness: undefined, score: 70, children: 14
morrowind 27 points a year ago

Subs are fine for services. I personally also think they provide a better incentive structure. But they're often abused

path: 0 20527988 20529798, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 1
Lfrith 4 points a year ago
path: 0 20527988 20529798 20535801, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
artyom 17 points a year ago

I think the ideal model is something like 1-time purchase w/ 12 months of updates.

Software does often require ongoing maintenance. So after 12 months, no more updates, and it works as long as it continues to work, without any new features or patches. Updates are an optional fee for like 10-20% of purchase price.

path: 0 20527988 20529439, hotness: undefined, score: 17, children: 7
loutr 12 points a year ago

Yeah, you can't expect devs to actively work on an app indefinitely just because you gave them a few bucks that one time. It makes no sense financially if the app isn't exceptionally successful.

path: 0 20527988 20529439 20529716, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 4
Yaky 14 points a year ago

IIRC app stores downrank apps that are not regularly updated too, hence the vague "bug-fixes and improvements" updates in many apps. But seriously, how much could a developer update in a calculator, habit/medicine tracker, sky map, or any other app that is a complete feature?

path: 0 20527988 20529439 20529716 20530958, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 3
Blisterexe 6 points a year ago

It could be updated to follow the newest design guidelines^tm^

path: 0 20527988 20529439 20529716 20530958 20532549, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 1
loutr 3 points a year ago

Even if the app is relatively simple and feature-complete, you need to go back to it at least once a year to make sure it complies with the latest guidelines/restrictions, replace deprecated APIs, and check dependencies for security issues.

Simple enough for a calculator, but if the app needs to do stuff in the background, communicate with web services, play multimedia content, or use the camera, it can become very time consuming.

It may make sense on Macs where users accept making a $10 or $20 one-time payment, but very few mobile users accept paying for apps at all, let alone $5 or $10. In that case, you need a lot of buyers or you'll end up maintaining it out of pocket.

path: 0 20527988 20529439 20529716 20530958 20542873, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Lfrith 7 points a year ago
path: 0 20527988 20529439 20535680, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
artyom 3 points a year ago

Yes!

path: 0 20527988 20529439 20535680 20535738, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
GenderNeutralBro 9 points a year ago

I blame Apple for setting the standard of $1-$3 for an app with lifetime updates. And also for making it so old apps stop working on newer OSes after just a few years. The business model was broken from the start. It was great at first but the bubble burst in record time.

That was nearly unheard of just 20 years ago.

path: 0 20527988 20529204, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 2
becausechemistry 8 points a year ago

I understand your sentiment, but a lot of that isn’t right.

Early iPhone apps were going for $10-20. So many developers being okay with just data harvesting plus so many devices out there made the $0.99 / free with ads model dominate – people got used to “free” apps from the big guys (Facebook, Google, whoever).

iOS apps are pretty resilient to OS updates. They usually only totally break when huge changes happen (dropping 32-bit support, etc) and those happen once a decade.

Tons of Windows software didn’t survive the 3.1 to 95 transition. A bunch died on 98 to XP, too. In the Apple world, a lot got left behind on the Mac when they went from PowerPC to Intel processors in 2007, or when they dropped 32-bit libraries.

path: 0 20527988 20529204 20531866, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
GenderNeutralBro 1 point a year ago

Hmm, maybe I'm thinking more iPhone 3G era than original iPhone era? I recall a time when there weren't many apps yet and you could put out anything marginally-functional for 99¢ on the app store and get some quick cash from it. I don't remember $10-20 being the norm but maybe that was before I was onboard.

I've certainly been burned by apps either breaking with iOS updates or no longer being available to download on the App Store (so you could keep using them, but only on existing devices that already had them installed).

path: 0 20527988 20529204 20531866 20546635, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
JoshuaFalken 4 points a year ago

As with anything, nuance exists. Does a monthly / annual donation to a FOSS developer count as a subscription?

I have a few things I've paid once for additional function or even banner ad removal that don't receive updates. Though at a glance I don't see anything I have installed that has a recurring cost and receives no updates.

I suppose there's a fine difference between what I consider a subscription, and supporting active development of something I use regularly, but that difference probably varies person to person.

path: 0 20527988 20529342, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
MinFapper 52 points a year ago

Honestly, these days I use fdroid as my primary app store. It's been an amazing way to cut through the junk and find great apps.

path: 0 20528482, hotness: undefined, score: 52, children: 3
leavemealone 23 points a year ago

Same but with the droidify client. FOSS is life.

path: 0 20528482 20529083, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
Lfrith 2 points a year ago
path: 0 20528482 20535658, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
pineapplelover 2 points a year ago path: 0 20528482 20535737, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Korhaka 33 points a year ago

If it isn't FOSS, it's not free.

path: 0 20540521, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 2
RickAstleyfounddead 7 points a year ago

Notesnook took down a basic Markdown feature as Premium and its foss. I felt like betrayed

path: 0 20540521 20546766, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 1
BlameTheAntifa 8 points a year ago

Did they!? I’m self-hosting the server and haven’t noticed any functionality disappear. Markdown is a local feature you can toggle in settings, not something you should need a server for.

Edit
Oh my god, they did. And ligatures, too. What a way to punch the FOSS community in the face! I think if you set up your own server and connect to it that arbitrary and coercive limitation may disappear.

Another edit
I see the code changes in 3.3.0. The “good news” is that being open source means you can reverse those aggressively anti-user anti-features if you feel up to it. Search for markdownShortcuts in the code. It seems like the gating mechanism is very simple and should be easy to flip on or off. See this https://github.com/...

path: 0 20540521 20546766 20547181, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
CosmicTurtle0 33 points a year ago

What I can't stand is when platforms don't take no for an answer.

Every fucking visit to Dropbox: "Upgrade to Standard!"

Every check out on Amazon: "Upgrade to Prime!

Every time I open Walmart: "Upgrade to Walmart+"

I fucking can't stand it.

path: 0 20531369, hotness: undefined, score: 33, children: 6
purplemonkeymad 35 points a year ago

Would you like to activate this annoying feature!

  1. Yes.
  2. Remind me later.
path: 0 20531369 20532413, hotness: undefined, score: 35, children: 4
AnarchistArtificer 15 points a year ago

A friend once said that she finds the invasiveness of this legitimately a little triggering, because it so vividly reminds her of the time she spent with an extremely abusive partner, who would similarly restrict her ability to meaningfully say no to something.

Ever since she made this point to me, I realised that I had been thinking of online consent dialogs as being distinct from the general concept of consent that we use in other life contexts (such as sexual consent, medical consent etc.). Since then, I have started to fold the online stuff into the more general notion of consent, which adds a whole bunch of connotations that makes me feel far more icky whenever I see a dialog that doesn't let you say no.

path: 0 20531369 20532413 20536403, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
MummysLittleBloodSlut 3 points a year ago

One time a bunch of people who were important to me complained that I was violating their consent by exposing them to left wing political ideas they didn't like. It fucked me up

path: 0 20531369 20532413 20536403 20541934, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
AnarchistArtificer 2 points a year ago

Oh wow, that is pretty fucked up. That sounds similar to what I've heard described as "weaponized therapy speak" — where terms from mental health therapy creep into daily vernacular and, divorced from their original context, are misused in a way that causes harm.

The archetypical example of this might be if a person doesn't remember a past event that their partner is referencing in an argument, they may be accused of "gaslighting". It's not always an intentional misuse, but sometimes it is deliberate and maliciously used to manipulate someone. A big example of that is someone making unreasonable and controlling demands of a person, and then getting annoyed if that person doesn't comply, because they're "not respecting boundaries".

I don't know whether what you describe would count as misusing therapy speak, but I do know that I feel icky about "consent" being used in this way — in addition to being a hurtful way to put you down, this feels like it obfuscates the actual meaning of consent.

Regardless, I'm sorry that happened to you; that really sucks. It must've been hard to feel like you weren't allowed to express your beliefs — politics are pretty pervasive, so even if you're avoiding actively political discussions, political subtext can seep into regular conversations pretty easily. Having different political beliefs to you was no excuse to shut you down in such a hurtful manner. I hope you have better friends now.

path: 0 20531369 20532413 20536403 20541934 20589355, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
quick_snail 2 points a year ago

Stop shopping at Walmart and Amazon

path: 0 20531369 20543089, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
finalarbiter 30 points a year ago

Very little pisses me off like downloading a 'free' app and immediately being hit with a paywall for a subscription without so much as a free trial. Those devs can go fuck themselves. Their app is NOT free and should not be marked as such.

Alternatively, shit like what Accuweather did also pisses me off. Years ago, they had a one time payment to remove ads permanently. I paid, because I like their service and didn't mind kicking a few bucks their way to support development. A few months later, they introduced a sub model that locked many existing features behind a wall and started showing me ads again. I immediately uninstalled that shit, sent them a scathing email (which I recognize does nothing, but made me feel good), and found an alternative.

path: 0 20530380, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 0
pineapplelover 26 points a year ago

Instead of looking for "free" look for "open source"

path: 0 20535726, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 0
somerandomperson 26 points a year ago

Then use FOSS apps.
Atleast they kindly ask, NOT "BUY THE PAID VERSION OR FUCK YOU, NOTHING FOR YOU, GO TO HELL".

path: 0 20527649, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 0
possiblylinux127 26 points a year ago

https://f-droid.org/

Anyway a lot of these developers get it wrong. Don't bully people into paying with aggressive or misleading tactics as that just alienates your user base. Instead make the app so good to use that people are willing to pay for extra features. The free version should be so good that people stop and wonder how they can support the dev. Then offer a feature that is genuinely useful.

path: 0 20534850, hotness: undefined, score: 26, children: 1
Lfrith 6 points a year ago
path: 0 20534850 20535622, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Ilandar 15 points a year ago

Okay, but what is the solution? I see a lot of whining from consumers about how expensive and enshittified everything is, yet very few people seem to be willing to donate to/pay for the few alternatives that exist. They vote for the same entrenched political parties in their countries (or don't vote at all). They don't get involved in activist movements. Why are we expecting the system and/or the outcomes to magically change when all we are willing to contribute is crying on social media?

path: 0 20538865, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
SoftNoodle 13 points a year ago

I have no issue paying for an app. I have an issue with a free app wanting me to pay $5 a month to use it.

path: 0 20538865 20541802, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
MummysLittleBloodSlut 3 points a year ago

Platforms removing bot reviews? I know Google wants every app on their store to be 5 stars, but that's not good for users. We should all be giving bad apps 1 star reviews to help other users find the good ones.

path: 0 20538865 20541669, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
MedicPigBabySaver 1 point a year ago

I paid for Boost!, definitely worth it. IMO: it's the best Lemmy app.

path: 0 20538865 20543205, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
unexposedhazard 12 points a year ago

Then uuuuh stop using them?

path: 0 20532371, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 3
RabbitMix 7 points a year ago

One of the things the article is complaining about is that many apps look like they are free in the store with an optional subscription, but once you've downloaded them you find out basic features are locked behind a subscription.

Personally the worst trend I've started seeing is "free" apps that are great for a few days until you find out they've been silently giving you a free trial of the premium subscription and now you'll have to pay up to keep using basic features. They're hoping now that you've spent some time learning and using the app you're invested enough to start paying to keep using it. You could be getting yourself into one of these apps and not even know it til a week later, it's infuriating.

path: 0 20532371 20535722, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 2
RememberTheApollo_ 5 points a year ago

Does the store not have an “in-app fees” subtext on the app page?

path: 0 20532371 20535722 20535818, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
unexposedhazard 3 points a year ago

If an app doesnt have that flag but still uses them, you can report it.

path: 0 20532371 20535722 20535818 20540393, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
hiramfromthechi 12 points a year ago path: 0 20536209, hotness: undefined, score: 12, children: 2
AnarchistArtificer 3 points a year ago

Good blog post, thanks for sharing. I like the point about companies double dipping by trying to extract both our data and our money; I feel like I'm probably going to use that at some point when I'm on my soapbox and complaining about big tech.

path: 0 20536209 20536283, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
thethunderwolf 0 points a year ago

That blog post is AI slop, both text and image

path: 0 20536209 20547138, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
cRazi_man 11 points a year ago

Enshitification

path: 0 20527643, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
EarMaster 10 points a year ago

I would love to have an overview before I install an app what it might cost. Play store lists at least minimum and maximum in-app-purchases, but the information is not very visible and I cannot filter my results based on it. And if need to pay for a subscription on the app website it will not be reflected at all.

Developers should be forced to provide an outline what you get for free (if they decide to advertise/sell their app as free) and what the different payment/subscription tiers include.

Of all places Microsoft Windows Store does it quite well for some apps (like MS Office), but also does not enforce it for all apps.

path: 0 20530679, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 1
qupada 2 points a year ago

It also gives you no clue whether those prices are one-off purchases or monthly subscriptions, making them entirely useless.

$3.99, sounds like a dea.... per month... YOU BASTARDS.

path: 0 20530679 20532640, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
gustofwind 10 points a year ago

You can either have 0 of my money forever

Or you can have a reasonable amount of it for lifetime access, at minimum, to the version I purchased

path: 0 20528138, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
net00 8 points a year ago
path: 0 20529024, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 1
frongt 5 points a year ago

Yup. Even if you don't change anything in your app, it still requires maintenance to run on newer devices.

path: 0 20529024 20529068, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
quick_snail 6 points a year ago

Literally never experienced this. Try fdroid

path: 0 20543071, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
henfredemars 6 points a year ago

The behavior is actively endorsed by the platform.

path: 0 20528135, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
Beacon 5 points a year ago

Unpopular opinion: I'm fine with any try before you buy model as long as (1.) it's clearly stated up front before downloading and also (2.) it allows you to try enough of the app to decide if it does what you want or not

path: 0 20529765, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
not_me 4 points a year ago
path: 0 20528199, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
HugeNerd 3 points a year ago

I'm especially tired of websites dressed up to look like the official place to get (insert free program) and are SEOd to show up first and try to extract money from you.

path: 0 20535794, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
artyom 3 points a year ago

Then don't use them?

path: 0 20529405, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
commander 1 point a year ago

I've only purchased like 3 apps in like 15 years. Every now and then I donate to an open source project. I used to pay for Office, Adobe Cloud, Sony Vegas way back in the day. What happened was the free and open source became far beyond capable than my technical ability and if I needed pay software, it was for work at a company that purchased licenses themselves. It was fast forward in mobile apps. There was already 20 years of open source desktop software being adapted to mobile even if less limited it covered what I and many people would want to do with a mobile device was quickly covered.

Now it's a matter of getting people to stumble on your software first and get them to pay before they learn of any of the truly free stuff. Cloud services where storage/processing is fully off your device and way better in ways are what can't be fully replicated as a free service for people. A NAS can work out to be cheaper for storage but way less functional and more hassle for most people

path: 0 20532241, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
android
android

@lemdro.id

login for more options
22220
4380
1654

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities
Lemmy App List
Chat and More

go to feed...