Trump administration tells federal employees to wear "Freedom" pins—or else
3 days ago by Sunflier to c/politics
What? No arm bands?
Oh wow, that's just perfect. Chef's kiss.
Joanna: You know what, Stan, if you want me to wear 37 pieces of flair, like your pretty boy over there, Brian, why don't you just make the minimum 37 pieces of flair?
Stan, Chotchkie's Manager: Well, I thought I remembered you saying that you wanted to express yourself.
Joanna: Yeah. You know what, yeah, I do. I do want to express myself, okay. And I don't need 37 pieces of flair to do it.
[flips off Stan]
This is where the people with conservative brain worms mutter some stupid platitude like "freedumb ain't free".
I was working for the EPA when they were transitioning from Lotus Notes to Office 365. Management required us to wear pins that said "Ask me about MyWorkplace" on the cutover day. I wore a clown suit to work that day. Workers loved it. Management was not amused. It technically met dress code, but I only made it 2 hours before I was told I had to change clothes.
I worked at a call centre where somehow neckties were mandatory (except on Friday, management was American) they stated that the formal wear would somehow percolate through the telephone (except on Fridays, but that's logical, right?)
One day it was tropically hot (not air-conditioned) I wore t shirt and just the tie around my neck, like a scarf (I had considered the Rambo approach, but deemed it too out there).
Wearing a dress shirt was not in the dress code, so I got away with it, though they changed that over time. Let's just say my tenure was not long lasting..
Of all the things that changed in corporate culture, I'm most happy for two things:
- For one, Covid killed dead the notion that being in-person for many jobs was really necessary. I work in IT, and I cannot tell you how many people fought the notion of remote work, tooth and claw. The data didn't matter, the facts didn't matter - they wanted to see you at a desk. Ideally in an "open plan" or in a cube, not in an office where you could shut the fucking door and get things done. They would tell everyone they are a "thought worker" and then set up an environment where being able to concentrate was next to impossible.
Even worse, after the Cult Of Agile (Scrum) came along, it was not only management fighting you on remote work, it was brainless drones that had adopted the Cult of Agile as meaning you must be in-person to "collaborate", even doing forced pair programming and by Gawd, you had better be in-person for the ceremonies, because that was what the Church of Scrum required. Even better was stupid performative stuff like everyone having to actually, literally, stand up at their desks, even if everyone involved could already all see each other and "the whiteboard". 🙄 So, even at a time when nearly every company had set up the capability of using VPN to remote into work, along came a process that had, among its core adherents, a dictate that explicitly prohibited being remote. Thanks, Agilistas!
- The other that has died a long slow death, and Covid probably would have killed that if it wasn't already mostly dead already - ridiculous dress codes, especially ones involving ties for men.
As much as I hate and loathe brainless adoption of processes like the Church of Scrum, I absolutely hated the idea of having to wear a suit to do something like IT. Thankfully, it was kind of withering by the time I entered the workforce, depending on the company. But the idiotic uniform of wearing at least a pair of khakis, dress shoes and a collared shirt stuck around for way too fucking long at some places.
So the manufacturer of the traitor pins and other magat trash (Ace Specialties) are bona fide nazi collaborators.
What should happen to the factories and warehouses of nazi collaborators?
Fucking firebomb the buildings collaborators and toss the collaborators buildings in prison.
The Kinder eggs with actual chocolate (Kinder Surprise) are still banned; only the Kinder Joy eggs with cream and cocoa wafers separated from the toy are allowed, which aren't nearly as interesting of an experience in my opinion.
Land of the too stupid not to inhale their food like a vacuum cleaner.
Kinder Eggs were/are banned because of food safety.
In this 2016 example a girl died from choking on a piece of a toy from a kinder egg.
I think this issue reflects an interesting difference in regulatory philosophy and how we might choose to protect freedoms vs public health, and what sorts of items are seen as "too bad to be allowed."
I would not wear any fucking thing that douchebag “mandated”. And if they reprimanded me I would sue the shit out of them. To me this is clearly a 1st amendment issue.
So much freedom.
The irony is overwhelming
Sounds to me like you don't love freedom enough... you're going straight to the gulag!
They should all turn it around and start wearing red white and blue arm bands.
Praise, worship and obey or you will be punished. Sure ... whatever ...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
@lemmy.world
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
go to feed...
save