Staggering amounts of fentanyl hit streets as the DEA watched and took no action, records show

13 hours ago by kinther to c/politics

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration allowed hundreds of thousands of fentanyl pills to hit the streets of New Mexico from 2023 to 2025, according to current and former DEA agents and records reviewed by The Associated Press.
thesohoriots 61 points 13 hours ago

They noted the drug is so dangerous it has to be handled in a specialized laboratory.

No it’s not, you fucking cowards. You can spill a vial of liquid medical-grade fentanyl on your skin and wash it off. Dumb cop shit like this is why you’re not intercepting it.

path: 0 24381565, hotness: undefined, score: 61, children: 4
CharlesDarwin 10 points 9 hours ago

I think drug-war propaganda is what really, really caused a whole generation of kids to learn to call bullshit on some tough guy with a badge trying to speaking loudly and authoritatively on almost any topic, most especially drugs.

I remember I was maybe in 5th or 6th grade when I first ran across the infamous Blue star tattoo bullshit. Supposedly handed out by cops to our school...even back then, I had my suspicions. But the usual suspects among kids and adults were buying it hook, line and sinker.

https://en.wikipedia.org/...

Later, I was at a job where someone wanted to put that up on the break room wall as some kind of PSA, but was showing it around to everyone first. I literally laughed out loud and told them this was an urban legend. This was c. 1994-1996; I told them to look it up. I was given much side-eye and treated like I "didn't care about the kids" since I was young and single.

The flyer still went up. 🤣

There is just a helluva lot of bullshit floating around and for things that many normies haven't been exposed to and don't bother to look into, what a cop says will pass as the "authoritative" answer.

TBF, I know nothing about fentanyl and have never really looked into it.

path: 0 24381565 24384697, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 2
applebusch 5 points 8 hours ago

this stuff usually comes from republicans so im going to invoke that every accusation is an admission of guilt. republicans were/are giving all kinds of hard drugs to children. damn that makes me sad because its probably connected to epstein...

path: 0 24381565 24384697 24385719, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Cethin 3 points 5 hours ago

The thing about drugs is, as far as I'm aware, the "hard drug" thing is bullshit, and it's part of the problem. We give drugs to kids all the time, in the form of caffeine. Most people have a caffeine dependance and at least casually use alcohol.

I dislike that we treat some drugs as evil, and others as part of our daily lives. The should all be handled with proper education and care. People should actually be made aware of what addiction feels like, and how to handle it. They should also be informed of what certain drugs feel like and have access to harm reduction techniques if needed.

Drugs aren't evil. They are often dangerous though. They have been a part of human culture for longer than we've been human. We should be free to use them if we choose, and this should be able to be done safely.

path: 0 24381565 24384697 24385719 24388708, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
4am 3 points 6 hours ago

They’re not intercepting it because the plan was for the defiant drug users to be poisoned and genocided so that the god fearing law abiding sees-authority-as-divine Christian nationalists would be the only ones left

path: 0 24381565 24387419, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
justOnePersistentKbinPlease 30 points 11 hours ago

And they are blaming Canada.

Where they caught the staggering amount of 1 pound. Heading into Canada.

In the same time frame they caught more than 2 tons at the Mexico / US border.

path: 0 24382705, hotness: undefined, score: 30, children: 1
pivot_root 14 points 11 hours ago

Manufactured pretext. It would not surprise me if the 51st State rhetoric comes back soon.

path: 0 24382705 24383068, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
4am 20 points 10 hours ago

Fent was the reaction to young Americans discovering that the Drug War was bullshit. We all discovered that when used responsibly, we could have weed. We could have psychedelic experiences. All the bad shit that was going to happen was happening because of bad people, and it wasn’t the drugs that changed those people.

Fent adulteration was an attack on all people who dared to oppose the law and get high. It was a genocide against defiers, in the same way that crack was used against black people.

path: 0 24383936, hotness: undefined, score: 20, children: 0
wuffah 16 points 11 hours ago

If the fentanyl is still making it into the country in “staggering” amounts, then who the hell are we killing on all those boats in the Caribbean?

path: 0 24383233, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 2
Malyca 15 points 10 hours ago

Fishermen trying to feed their families

path: 0 24383233 24383673, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
Doomsider 11 points 9 hours ago

In at least in one case it looks like it was human smuggling. Could you imagine getting blown up for trying to escape a situation you are in for no reason other than Trumplethinskin needing a distraction from his history of pimping children.

path: 0 24383233 24384914, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 0
modestmeme 10 points 12 hours ago

The “war on drugs” didn’t work and neither, apparently, does “looking the other way”…

path: 0 24381618, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 5
Diplomjodler3 15 points 12 hours ago

It works just fine. It has always been a war on poor people and minorities.

path: 0 24381618 24381763, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 3
modestmeme 0 points 12 hours ago

Which works fine ?

path: 0 24381618 24381763 24381840, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
tmyakal 9 points 12 hours ago

In as much as it's working as intended.

path: 0 24381618 24381763 24381840 24382375, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
Diplomjodler3 8 points 12 hours ago

Exactly. It was never about reducing drug use.

path: 0 24381618 24381763 24381840 24382375 24382506, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
SeductiveTortoise 1 point 6 hours ago

Okay, but have they tried giving drugs 300 billion dollars? I've heard this will win any war.

path: 0 24381618 24387908, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
CombatWombat 8 points 12 hours ago

I am cynical enough to believe that had fent caused fewer overdose deaths, the DEA would have been more enthusiastic about preventing its distribution and sale.

path: 0 24382192, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
phutatorius 4 points 12 hours ago

So, how is Trump getting a kickback for this?

path: 0 24381894, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
bhamlin 4 points 7 hours ago

They were enforcing drugs, by making sure they got to the streets.

path: 0 24386919, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
Malyca 4 points 10 hours ago

I guess they prefer to blow up fishermen

path: 0 24383662, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
daannii 3 points 4 hours ago

They need drugs on the streets so they can keep excusing their illegal kidnappings of immigrants.

path: 0 24389190, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 2
bedifferent 2 points 4 hours ago

@daannii @kinther Ya don't need anything but an authoritarian playbook and man, we're hitting it. Anyone real and imagined can be kidnapped and put in a lovely for-profit prison camp for any reason. We've been seeing what's been coming for a long time. We've getting there.

path: 0 24389190 24389348, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 1
daannii 1 point 2 hours ago

True. But they are also happy to manufacture a problem to support their actions.

path: 0 24389190 24389348 24390621, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
politics
politics

@lemmy.world

login for more options
30158
30920
9765

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

go to feed...