He's able to complain and be heard. They were locked away to be used and forgotten for others to profit on their misery. He has quite a way to go.
ChicoSuave 33 points 2 months ago
Gentryfried 6 points 2 months ago path: 0 25074878 25077558 25078406, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
Tweak 3 points 2 months ago
McBride said shortly after the Tates were arrested that “they’ve never done nothing wrong.
He's not lying lol
Gentryfried 3 points 2 months ago path: 0 25074878 25077558 25078406 25084898 25097409, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
UnderpantsWeevil 6 points 2 months ago
The pimps and the hookers they traffic suffer the same violence at the hands of the state.
resipsaloquitur 28 points 2 months ago
If he’s able to post on X, he’s being treated far too well.
A_norny_mousse 3 points 2 months ago
Yeah, this. Like those whiny types that got in-celled after Jan6.
I seriously don't understand why taking their phones away is not the first order of punishment (after their guilt has been proven beyond reasonable doubt of course).
Darkassassin07 56 points 2 months ago
Get significantly more reaction/likes/upvotes to your reply than their original comment did.
Greater ratio of likes vs them.
binarytobis 7 points 2 months ago
My understanding is that it’s the original comment’s retweet/reply ratio. At least it used to be.
Darkassassin07 3 points 2 months ago
Originally, yes; but language evolves.
Additionally, some people will attempt to "ratio" a tweet themselves. This entails a person showing up under a disagreeable tweet and betting that their post will receive more favorable statistics than the original post.
GrabtharsHammer 13 points 2 months ago
That's when the reply gets more updoots than the OP it replied to.
funkless_eck 4 points 2 months ago
what people haven't mentioned, I don't think, is the original intent of the phrase to "get ratio'd" was to have more people reply to your tweet than like it. As it's significantly more effort to write a reply than to hit like it usually indicated the person had said something foolish and people were rushing to correct them rather than simply like the tweet
UnderpantsWeevil 22 points 2 months ago
The deplorable treatment of prisoners is entirely independent of the soulless sexual violence of the Tate Brothers.
This is not any kind of actual social justice. It's merely a single high profile individual getting caught in the same misery machine as hundreds of thousands of other people.
Gentryfried 11 points 2 months ago path: 0 25078266, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 3
Dookieman12 4 points 2 months ago
"Hey, look! That guy pissed really far!"
LodeMike 4 points 2 months ago
Ratioing means nothing. It's so easy to do. Of fucking course accounts with large follower counts are going to have lots of inactive followers, and of course replies to that account are going to be disproportionately visible and thus get a lot of likes.
Gentryfried 2 points 2 months ago path: 0 25078266 25082365 25083619, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
finallymadeanaccount 5 points 2 months ago
Aww. Does baby have a sad tummy?
Tweak 4 points 2 months ago
Sure.
But I don't inherently believe his claim that he isn't getting clean water.
I'm much more inclined to believe that he is shitting himself though, just not for the reason he claims. "I didn't poop my pants because I'm facing the consequences of my actions, it's because I'm being abused!!!"
His conditions are far more likely to be compliant than the conditions he forced others to endure. The benefit of the doubt doesn't swing one way here, he's hung it up that way. He is a serial liar and everything he states should be questioned.
In any case, my beer betting money is on him not getting deported. If he weren't a US citizen I'm sure it would happen, but he paid for his Trump gold card, and I'm sure they need some proof it's worth it to sell more.
A_norny_mousse 1 point 2 months ago
I’m much more inclined to believe that he is shitting himself though, just not for the reason he claims. “I didn’t poop my pants because I’m facing the consequences of my actions, it’s because I’m being abused!!!”
This is likely tbh
cockmushroom 1 point 2 months ago
It's compliant to leave sandwiches in a roach infested box on the floor though
A_norny_mousse 3 points 2 months ago
We do have to account for exaggeration to the point of nonsense though. I think @tweak@feddit.uk has a point, esp. in their subsequent comment.
And while you're technically correct, this guy has been shitting on human rights for long enough to get a little mild counterbalance in return, even if it's just a product of his imagination.
Thinking of all the women (some underage) he abused, and men (some underage) he fucked up, I viscerally hate this guy and approve of any abuse that will get the whino out in him.
NigelFrobisher 1 point 2 months ago
The Tate brothers may sex traffic you, but at least they give you access to clean tap water, I guess…
murderedbywords
@feddit.uk
2586
71
1702
Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.
The following things are not grounds for murder:
- Personal appearance ("You're fat", "You're ugly")
- Posts with little-to-no context
- Posts based on a grammar/spelling error
- Dick jokes, "Yo mama", "No, you" type responses and other low effort insults
- "Your values are bad" without any logcal or factual ways of showing that they are wrong ("I believe in capitalism" - "Well, then you must be evil" or "Fuck you you ignorant asshole")
Rules:
- Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
- Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
- No bigotry of any kind.
- Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
- If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
- Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.
go to feed...
murderedbywords
@feddit.uk
2586
71
1702
Responses that completely destroy the original argument in a way that leaves little to no room for reply - a targeted, well-placed response to another person, organization, or group of people.
The following things are not grounds for murder:
- Personal appearance ("You're fat", "You're ugly")
- Posts with little-to-no context
- Posts based on a grammar/spelling error
- Dick jokes, "Yo mama", "No, you" type responses and other low effort insults
- "Your values are bad" without any logcal or factual ways of showing that they are wrong ("I believe in capitalism" - "Well, then you must be evil" or "Fuck you you ignorant asshole")
Rules:
- Be civil and remember the human. No name calling or insults. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone else.
- Discussion is encouraged but arguments are not. Don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguments sake.
- No bigotry of any kind.
- Censor the person info of anyone not in the public eye.
- If you break the rules you’ll get one warning before you’re banned.
- Enjoy the community in the light hearted way it’s intended.
go to feed...
Wow now he gets to live like the sex slaves he trafficked.
save