'Zero chance' U.S. attacks Canada, Alaska governor tells conference

17 days ago by Sunshine (she/her) to c/canada

pedz 54 points 17 days ago

Without invading, the US is alreafy attacking Canada's sovereignty. And we can't believe anything a Unitedstater politician says anyway.

The governors and politicians always say the US won't do such and such, only for their orange turd in charge to do it anyway.

This is just air. Those words are meaningless.

path: 0 26018293, hotness: undefined, score: 54, children: 0
CapuccinoCoretto 42 points 17 days ago

It was zero chance when we didn't have to consider these risks. Now its more than zero. How high? No one knows, but it sure as hell aint zero.

path: 0 26018075, hotness: undefined, score: 42, children: 21
BurgerBaron 10 points 16 days ago

Only need to say two words as a counter to this article really.

Crimea

Alberta

Now, why is that? Rhetorical.

path: 0 26018075 26021283, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
FiniteBanjo 4 points 17 days ago

For Sure.

0% < Chance of US Invasion of Canada < Chinese/Russian Invasion of Canada

One thing you can be sure of is that if the USA did invade Canada that a lot of US Citizens and possibly some states will be enlisting to fight with the Canadians.

path: 0 26018075 26018122, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 17
CapuccinoCoretto 21 points 17 days ago

Respectfully disagree. US is higher than russia or china invading.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26018297, hotness: undefined, score: 21, children: 1
adespoton 2 points 17 days ago

At this precise moment in time? Probably. Over the next 50 years? US invasion is less likely.

But as the world warms, all countries will be looking at the land closest to the poles.

Eventually there’s going to be a major war over Antarctica, but probably not in my lifetime.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26018297 26018460, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
wampus 14 points 17 days ago

I think you're giving Americans too much credit to think they'd fight alongside the Canadians.

I mean, didn't the UN just release a report to do with that Iranian school children bombing, saying basically "Palantir told the military to press red button. Military pressed red button. Hundreds of schoolkids died". Americans don't give a shit. They're actively, openly committing war crimes and crimes against humanity, and laughing about it. When you see their military/government trying to pretend like it's a 0% chance/unthinkable, or refusing to answer if they'd invade because it's "so preposterous a thought!", it's pageantry.

You don't need to look much further than how ICE has been allowed to generally continue on with their agenda in US cities, to know that the 'resistance' to this sort of event would be practically non-existent, and ineffective. Or you can look at all the Americans online saying shit like "Well, I didn't vote for him (so MY conscience is clear and I don't have to do anything more!)". They'd MAYBE log in to facebook and send thoughts and prayers. The democrats would write an angry letter. That's it.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 14
dermanus 10 points 17 days ago

The factor you're missing is that in Canada we can take the fight to them in a way no other country can.

You're right that they don't care about violence elsewhere. They will care when the bridge outside their town gets blown up. Their willingness to endure pain is next to zero.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527 26019651, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 7
scrodumb 7 points 17 days ago

Bridge outside their town?

If US invades us I'm bringing the fight a lot fucking closer to home than a bridge.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527 26019651 26019980, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
wampus -4 points 17 days ago

At best, Canada would be able to do guerrilla type cell warfare. But Canada itself would be fucked.

Think about the recent announcement to do with building a "Sovereign Canadian Internet". That move highlights, quite explicitly, how we effectively don't have data cables running east west across Canada, nor do we have significant Canadian data pipelines to other nations -- we use the American backbone. So even our basic communications east / west across the country, for coordinating actions, would be obliterated in like the first hour of a serious conflict. Land lines are practically archaic at this stage, and every Canadian government institution is reliant on Microsoft, and US services/backbones. In the first hour, that's all toast. Almost all of our banks and financial institutions, and their regulators, are reliant on US service providers to function -- our ATMs run on fucking windows -- so all that goes poof.

Yes, a small cell with a modest drone setup and a chicken coup in the woods could develop bio weapons and spray it all over American cities, or do something like cow-ebola and spray their mega farms to fuckup their beef supply. We could inflict pain, yes, but we'd lose the overall conflict very quickly in terms of our institutions and country being reduced to shit.

Even more, Id also argue that Canadians wouldn't generally fight back. It's not like regular Canadians own a shitload of guns, like in the states. Even more, a huge number of Canadians identify more with their country of origin, than with Canada -- Trudeau even bragged about how Canada was the first "post national" country with no fuckin identity/cohesion, as though it was a good thing. Our population has been dependent on immigration for growth since like 2000, with a huge percentage of our younger people not really giving a fuck about "Canada" as a country. How much resistance do you think something like the millions of newly immigrated Indians between the ages of 18-30 are going to step up and fight America? Hell, many of them wanted to use Canada as a stepping stone to get American visas/citizenship anyhow, so an invasion speeds up their plans / helps them. There's no reason to think that people without a history in Canada would fight to protect it en masse.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527 26019651 26019981, hotness: undefined, score: -4, children: 5
FiniteBanjo 7 points 17 days ago

People have been chasing ICE out of neighborhoods, banning them from city properties in LA and NYC, building rap sheets to try them once the admin leaves office in Colorado, etc, but fundamentally they're a political problem that can't be solved with violence (without creating much much more violence and harm in the process).

If the USA starts a war with Canada many Americans will see joining Canada as a means of improving their own situation: Canada would likely offer citizenship to enlistees.

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527 26019610, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 4
wampus 3 points 17 days ago

Dream on.

Americans would react similarly to how the general citizen of Russia has acted during the Ukraine conflict. So long as their regular lives aren't disrupted by the conflict, the vast majority would shrug and not give a shit. Or, they'd do exactly as you just noted, and say "This is a political problem that can't be solved with violence (without creating much much more violence and harm in the process)".

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527 26019610 26019671, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 3
Witchfire 2 points 17 days ago

A significant portion of the US is rightfully pissed, but oppressed by the fascist and fascist enabling majority. However, I do feel like war with Canada would be seen as enough excuse to get spicier

path: 0 26018075 26018122 26019527 26020069, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
jownz 0 points 16 days ago

Most Americans can't even count to zero.

path: 0 26018075 26022292, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 1
EdgeTriggered 1 point 16 days ago

Zero is indeed an advanced mathematical concept :)

path: 0 26018075 26022292 26028280, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
scrodumb 27 points 17 days ago

When an American says something just assume the complete opposite is the truth.

Trash people, the lot of em.

path: 0 26019989, hotness: undefined, score: 27, children: 1
cecilkorik 8 points 16 days ago

Yeah sounds like something that somebody who was planning to invade would say.

“Russia is not going to attack anyone,” Dmitry Peskov, a spokesman for Russian President Vladimir Putin, told reporters Tuesday morning, according to a translation of his remarks. “It’s not like that.”

path: 0 26019989 26025460, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
damnthefilibuster 24 points 17 days ago

He would know because Alaska is traditionally the center of political and strategic decisions in the US, right? Right??

path: 0 26019172, hotness: undefined, score: 24, children: 0
switcheroo 23 points 17 days ago

Zero chance? We have a fucking MORON as our president and the pedo has fired most of the military that won't follow illegal orders. Crimes against humanity mean nothing to him, and the shitheads that should be stopping him just shrug.

Fucker is going to attack cuba next! Guess since Iran isn't making him look good, he's got to find another distraction. All of this because he is a child rapist.

path: 0 26019738, hotness: undefined, score: 23, children: 0
i_stole_ur_taco 15 points 17 days ago

The Alaska governor should know, because I have it on good authority that they have a ton of foreign policy credentials because they can SEE Russia from Alaska.

(That’s an old reference to Sarah Palin’s hilariously stupid and failed attempt to run for Vice President years ago)

path: 0 26018194, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
rozodru 15 points 16 days ago

MAGA Gov. says 'Zero chance' soooooo a bit more than zero then.

Try it. lets see how far you get up here.

path: 0 26024284, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
DeadEndLink 14 points 17 days ago

Who tf would believe a MAGA governor after what they've done to their own people?

Ohhh interview in Banff Alberta....got it...

path: 0 26018693, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 0
wirebeads 9 points 16 days ago

I’m 51 and prepared to fight for my country and safe my family from a repressive regime.

I’m not in the army, and I may not last long, but freedom is a hill I’ll fight for and die on.

path: 0 26034198, hotness: undefined, score: 9, children: 1
ILikeBoobies 4 points 15 days ago

Still wish we did it when I was younger.

path: 0 26034198 26036334, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
eestileib 8 points 17 days ago

Bull, shit.

path: 0 26018432, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
DeathsEmbrace 8 points 17 days ago

If they attacked Canada they would lose immediately.

path: 0 26018352, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 13
BlameThePeacock 2 points 17 days ago

They wouldn't lose immediately, they would have lost before they even attacked. Their own military personnel would likely refuse orders, sabotage the mission, desert, or surrender immediately. I'm sure there would be a few people willing to follow orders, but you can't run an invasion when 1/3rd of your own soldiers are actively attempting to prevent you succeeding.

path: 0 26018352 26019591, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 12
karlhungus 10 points 17 days ago

This is far too positive an outlook.

I bet way more people would follow orders.

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26019870, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 8
BlameThePeacock 1 point 17 days ago

I don't think you realize how many US military personnel have worked directly with Canadians regularly as part of their career, especially the ones in charge of everything. We are pretty much constantly running military training exercises and joint missions at this point.

We've got a ship docked at your base in Hawaii right now. Pacific Rimguard 2026 just wrapped up in Asia with another one of our warships. There are hundreds of Canadian military personnel permanently stationed at NORAD. We spent 13 years in Afghanistan with the US.

Even if only 10% were intentionally fucking up, it would still absolutely cripple the capabilities.

Not to mention the complete lack of a useful target. What are they going to do to "capture" the country? Kidnap the prime minister? Our system doesn't actually have a problem handling that. You could hold our entire parliament hostage and you still wouldn't actually be able to get Canadians to do anything useful. What would the point be?

Taking our the 10 military bases we have? We wouldn't even give a shit, they don't run or do anything that we need to function as a country.

Afghanistan was a shit show, and the people were a different skin colour and spoke a different language, soldiers could at least somewhat talk themselves into keeping things "separate" mentally. However, do you think the average American soldier is going to be able to shoot people that looks like their own brother, sister, son, daughter, father, mother, etc. they left at home without immediately having a mental breakdown?

We saw this kind of shit already happen between Russia and Ukraine, where lots of Russians just decided to surrender or do their least. It doesn't work well, even with a dictatorship willing to shoot you for disobeying. If the US military tried to punish or shoot soliders en masse for refusing to invade Canada you'd have riots in every single city in the US.

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26019870 26020077, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 7
kent_eh 2 points 16 days ago

We spent 13 years in Afghanistan with the US.

Remember a few months ago when Trump publicly denied that reality?

And remember large numbers of Americans believing that lie?

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26019870 26020077 26026856, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 2
karlhungus 1 point 16 days ago

I'm Canadian.

I still think your way too positive, and using russia/Ukraine seems to me to be an argument against you (considering its still going)

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26019870 26020077 26031035, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 3
theacharnian 5 points 16 days ago

Nah, they would win the war almost immediately, there is no question. They could be in control of all our major urban centres within days.

The problem for them is not the war, i's the occupation. The occupation they would start losing almost immediately as well. But it will take them a long and painful time. Any puppet they set up will be weak and in need of American arms. They would probably employ mercenaries and ICE-type goons. But "might is right" would be their only justification and every one of those found bleeding in some back alley will be one more step down the path to them losing and pulling out. Terrorism will become our national passtime and it won't be contained north of the border, and it will almost certainly spill over to become an American blue-vs-red civil conflict. They will lose, but we will all suffer for a long time.

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26021793, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 2
BlameThePeacock 1 point 16 days ago

What does "in control" mean in this case? How do you "control" a city?

Being there with the military and not having an opposing force is one thing, they could do that. What benefit would they get out of such occupation though?

There's usually one of 2 purposes to an invasion, capture the territory and make it part of your own for financial purposes, or to kill everyone (or a large portion) to free up space for your own people to take over.

However, getting anything financial out of invading Canada is impossible realistically. They can't just come in and directly capture the tax dollars or something, none of that even exists physically at this point for a start, and any sort of force they use is just going to result in people refusing to pay taxes, the economy tanking, and them not getting anything anyways. They would have no way to enforce anything against such mass resistance.

They already get most of the resources we produce, the Oil in Alberta almost entirely flows to them for example. If they invaded they can say goodbye to that, even the US military couldn't protect that much pipeline from terrorism.

There's just no useful goal to invading Canada in the first place, so if they do it out of pure spite they're going to have to contend with their own population being absolutely livid about it. Like full riots in every US city livid. It will make the Palestine and BLM protests look like an episode of Mr. Dressup.

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26021793 26029700, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
theacharnian 1 point 16 days ago

Exactly, we're saying the same thing.

Yes they can't be opposed, but once their tanks roll into Toronto, Montreal, Ottawa, Vancouver, Calgary, etc, and once they've installed Maple MAGA collaborators as premiers and prime ministers, then what.

path: 0 26018352 26019591 26021793 26029700 26030435, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
captain_aggravated 7 points 16 days ago

Ah fuck we're attacking Canada.

path: 0 26030729, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
BarneyPiccolo 4 points 15 days ago

Nah, MAGA is focused on Cuba right now. And after that, they're going to have to kill millions of Americans, so they can stay in office past 2028, and not go to prison.

Canada is safe, for a while. Lots of other people to kill before we get to them, and we're already low on bullets.

path: 0 26040389, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
BeMoreCareful 3 points 16 days ago

He fucking hopes.

path: 0 26030048, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Sunshine 2 points 16 days ago

He’s sitting there pretty smug about getting a little bit of extra land from BC.

path: 0 26030048 26030341, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
melsaskca 2 points 13 days ago

That Alaska governor must not know exactly how insane trump is.

path: 0 26073282, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
AGM 0 points 16 days ago

I spend a good bit of time reading, listening to and engaging with DC-based policy and strategy content for professional reasons. Wars, invasions, military action, sanctions action etc all tend to be openly discussed long before anything happens. There is zero discussion of invading Canada. None. Nobody in policy or strategy among the big influences with money behind them in DC that shape US interests believes this is a US plan. They really don't think of Canada much. Even the trade war is discussed from a US perspective as just a component of the US changing their industrial policy, not as a specific effort to undermine Canada, though we feel it hardest because of the depth of our integration.

path: 0 26026453, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
canada
canada

@lemmy.ca

login for more options
12517
16119
3730

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta

🗺️ Provinces / Territories

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Baseball

Basketball

Curling

Hockey

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales

🗣️ Politics

🍁 Social / Culture

🌐 Other Relevant Communities

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Provide sources when making a claim. Do your research or google it doesn't cut it. The one making the claim is responsible for backing it.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


go to feed...