The Billionaires have spent a fortune making sure you hate Socialism.

13 days ago by sanitation to c/workreform

HumanOnEarth 56 points 13 days ago

Grow your own food. Share what you can't use.

Connect with your neighbours. Offer to help with anything you're good at. Share tools with them.

Hyper individualism is capitalism's best friend. You can't borrow a chainsaw from someone you don't know. You have to buy zucchini from the store because you don't know anyone with a garden. You have to pay a plumber for a simple leak instead of someone you know being able to help. And so on.

The powers that be will shit themselves if we all start cooperating instead of fighting. Why do you think they stoke the anti-trans flames so hard? Why make up that they're eating the dogs and eating the cats?

They don't want us getting along. That's bad for business. You can do your part to fuck them up simply by remembering how to be a real human. Not a consumer.

path: 0 26084159, hotness: undefined, score: 56, children: 7
Rocketpoweredgorilla 18 points 12 days ago

Grow your own food. Share what you can't use

I started a jalapeño pepper plant two years ago that's been popping out peppers like crazy. I hate peppers, so I give them to anyone who wants them around town.

I do not share tools though, they never seem to come back. If you need a tool or something I have, as long as you don't mind a furry foul mouthed Canadian I'll gladly come help though and bring them along.

path: 0 26084159 26085012, hotness: undefined, score: 18, children: 0
Tja -8 points 12 days ago

You heard it here first kids, plumbers exist because of capitalism.

path: 0 26084159 26088648, hotness: undefined, score: -8, children: 3
prole 6 points 12 days ago

For-profit plumbing businesses, yeah.

I know you're trying to be snarky or whatever.

path: 0 26084159 26088648 26091601, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
HumanOnEarth 3 points 12 days ago

That's an embarrassingly stupid thing to say.

path: 0 26084159 26088648 26094336, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 1
Tja -3 points 11 days ago

I know!

path: 0 26084159 26088648 26094336 26104973, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 0
jimmy90 -10 points 12 days ago

most of all - ignore the last 100 years of socialist history detailing what a useless, inhumane disaster it's always been

path: 0 26084159 26089038, hotness: undefined, score: -10, children: 1
HumanOnEarth 3 points 12 days ago

Who is talking about socialism? Are you OK?

path: 0 26084159 26089038 26094358, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
Semi_Hemi_Demigod 16 points 12 days ago

I don’t hate socialism. I hate socializing.

path: 0 26084613, hotness: undefined, score: 16, children: 1
Tja 8 points 12 days ago

Same. Let me pay taxes and enjoy quality public services, but don't make me talk to the neighbors.

path: 0 26084613 26088669, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 0
QueenHawlSera 15 points 12 days ago

We need more Luigis

path: 0 26084878, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 1
aizakku 4 points 12 days ago

** Luigi intensifies **

path: 0 26084878 26090390, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
aizakku 14 points 13 days ago

The Epstein class must held to account for the rat fuckery they’re doing

path: 0 26083836, hotness: undefined, score: 14, children: 1
madmantis24 5 points 12 days ago

If only they stuck with rats

path: 0 26083836 26091494, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
melsaskca 13 points 12 days ago

Amongst each other, the billionaires are the biggest socialists of all. They are simply greedy and do not want to share their ill-gotten gains. "C'mon poors! Fight each other for my pleasure and profit!".

path: 0 26090706, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
TrackenDaKracken 10 points 13 days ago

In my case, they wasted their money.

But, yeah, too many people have been duped.

path: 0 26083566, hotness: undefined, score: 10, children: 0
Snapz 8 points 12 days ago

And remember that they got rid of your third spaces so you couldn't discuss any of it (and made common affordable gathering options like concerts and sporting events out of reach for the same reason). Threw you into algorithms so you felt like you were only preaching to the choir or conversely that nobody held your same opinions/aspirations for something more - either way a formula for you to get exhausted and give up.

And you do feel exhausted.

path: 0 26097253, hotness: undefined, score: 8, children: 5
mirshafie 6 points 11 days ago

This really bothered me when I visited the USA (East coast). In retrospect I feel like I had the right to the highway, as long as I was driving. But no town square with a bench where I could just sit, no park where I could lean against a tree, no parcel of nature where I could just go for a walk. Cafés and restaurants were expensive and uncomfortable, clearly designed to push you out once the nominal transaction was complete. No wonder people eat in their car, alone.

I'm sure I missed a lot of good places during my visit, but I felt like the pattern was very quite obvious. Highway, Walmart, highway, Walmart, highway, Walmart. The forests aren't wild parts of nature, they're closed-off as-yet undeveloped land, awaiting their appointment with the axe. The town centers now have fewer options to linger than a classic mall. The suburbs are endless rows of freestanding houses, with no padding - no library, no shop, no playground, no outdoor gym, no football field. Maybe some pro-social resident set up a box for exchanging books between neighbors. That's it.

Not saying the rest of the world is perfect by any means. But in Sweden where I live, I feel like the I'm seeing positive changes over time, with new third spaces being added every year. In my town the city center is now car-free during summer time to make space for outdoor furniture, and the nearby cafés and bars thrive. They're adding grills for cooking to parks, making nature trails more accessible, and peppering the place with playgrounds and outdoor gyms. There's a long way to go to perfect but at least it's moving in the right direction.

path: 0 26097253 26105433, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 0
5wim 1 point 12 days ago

Absolutely. But also remember that the concept of Third Places coined by Oldenburg focused on the wrong thing. A lot of the examples of "welcoming and leveling" places were actually pretty deeply exlusionary, which makes a lot of the Third Place rhetoric a white, male, heteronormative fantasy.

And importantly, it's starting from a contradictory place to build a theory of pure civic community around spaces that rely on capital. A business's primary goal is profit. The moment a patron stops spending money or takes up a table for too long, the illusion of "neutral civic ground" dissolves. By focusing on establishments (where the primary activity is conversation and consumer lingering), his theory ignores the Commons, the true public infrastructure like plazas, parks, and sidewalks. The argument can be made that instead of trying to revive Oldenburg's nostalgic storefronts, society should focus on the "right to the city" in the shared public ownership of physical space where citizens don't need a consumer identity to exist.

path: 0 26097253 26098623, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
Snapz 1 point 10 days ago

Very true and a welcome point of view.

I can say that practically, growing up very low income, we (small sample of course) could exist for hours, months and years in these places without spending a dollar and without being harassed - and that was with a pretty diverse group (by race, gender, neon hair color and pierced bodies/clothing), but this was in a more predominately progressive, middle class community (bordering wealthy areas) to be fair. And importantly we did always exist in the shadow of it, regardless of spend, and that has to have an effect on some.

I can say that the behavior continued in a form as an adult when I would work from a certain coffee chain using angles with their loyalty program to buy a single coffee for under $2 and work the whole day, consuming maybe $50 retail while working in a more comfortable environment than I could afford otherwise, with connectivity, air conditioning and power.

So by no means ideal, but with today's desert of connection as an alternative, I think myself and others were able to learn, connect and grow in these spaces, within very limited means, and I can pretty confidently say without suffering impacts of indoctrination or desire to rejoin these places as an adult, as a "fully productive" and participatory member of society.

So my hope would be that people still had those imperfect spaces (of course supplementing the truly free community supported options you mention) for those lessons they did offer, the community one could build and the perspective gained by close proximity to the problems within these spaces (learning what not to do, seeing that the person who carried 4 bags from different stores still didn't look happy. It didn't "fix" her)

path: 0 26097253 26098623 26128754, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
5wim 2 points 10 days ago

Thanks for taking the time to reply with your perspective, I've had a similar experience.

path: 0 26097253 26098623 26128754 26130275, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Hueristic_Autistic 1 point 11 days ago

algorithms that have devolved into echo chambers and amazon recommendations. yeah and anyone who creates is a third space is usually labelled an evil person or a conspiracy theorist and put on an FBI watch list. now they have, "an aging problem," at concerts, clubs and events because no one can afford them except for those in their late 40's early 60's, 2012 was the last affordable year for any of those things(, that's conservative it's more like 2014.) you're never preaching to the choir because there's a bunch of hive minds and if you're not adhering to them, you're the odd man out so having an opinion doesn't even fucking matter anymore.

just like this, this doesn't matter, right now what i am typing doesn't mean jack shit but at least you can put it out there. you can put your opinion and your voice out there. I guess that matters more than anything

path: 0 26097253 26105917, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Lushed_Lungfish 7 points 12 days ago

Of course, when things start to go sideways, they are the first to scream for government assistance. The very definition of socialism.

path: 0 26091556, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
anon_8675309 7 points 12 days ago

As much as possible just stop participating in capitalism.

path: 0 26091751, hotness: undefined, score: 7, children: 0
switcheroo 5 points 12 days ago

That's why the Epstein class can also be called parasites.

path: 0 26086831, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
YragNitram1956 5 points 11 days ago

Old but still relavent.“But there’s a reason. There’s a reason. There’s a reason for this, there’s a reason education SUCKS, and it’s the same reason it will never, ever, EVER be fixed. It’s never going to get any better, don’t look for it, be happy with what you’ve got. Because the owners, the owners of this country don’t want that. I’m talking about the real owners now, the BIG owners! The Wealthy… the REAL owners! The big wealthy business interests that control things and make all the important decisions. Forget the politicians. They are irrelevant. The politicians are put there to give you the idea that you have freedom of choice. You don’t. You have no choice! You have OWNERS! They OWN YOU. They own everything. They own all the important land. They own and control the corporations. They’ve long since bought, and paid for the Senate, the Congress, the state houses, the city halls, they got the judges in their back pockets and they own all the big media companies, so they control just about all of the news and information you get to hear. They got you by the balls. They spend billions of dollars every year lobbying, lobbying, to get what they want. Well, we know what they want. They want more for themselves and less for everybody else, but I’ll tell you what they don’t want: They don’t want a population of citizens capable of critical thinking. They don’t want well informed, well educated people capable of critical thinking. They’re not interested in that. That doesn’t help them. Thats against their interests. Thats right. They don’t want people who are smart enough to sit around a kitchen table and think about how badly they’re getting fucked by a system that threw them overboard 30 fucking years ago. They don’t want that! You know what they want? They want obedient workers. Obedient workers, people who are just smart enough to run the machines and do the paperwork. And just dumb enough to passively accept all these increasingly shitty jobs with the lower pay, the longer hours, the reduced benefits, the end of overtime and vanishing pension that disappears the minute you go to collect it, and now they’re coming for your Social Security money. They want your retirement money. They want it back so they can give it to their criminal friends on Wall Street, and you know something? They’ll get it. They’ll get it all from you sooner or later cause they own this fucking place! It’s a big club, and you ain’t in it! You, and I, are not in the big club. By the way, it’s the same big club they use to beat you over the head with all day long when they tell you what to believe. All day long beating you over the head with their media telling you what to believe, what to think and what to buy. The table has tilted folks. The game is rigged and nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care! Good honest hard-working people; white collar, blue collar it doesn’t matter what color shirt you have on. Good honest hard-working people continue, these are people of modest means, continue to elect these rich cock suckers who don’t give a fuck about you….they don’t give a fuck about you… they don’t give a FUCK about you. They don’t care about you at all… at all… AT ALL. And nobody seems to notice. Nobody seems to care. That’s what the owners count on. The fact that Americans will probably remain willfully ignorant of the big red, white and blue dick that’s being jammed up their assholes everyday, because the owners of this country know the truth. It’s called the American Dream,because you have to be asleep to believe it. George Carlin

path: 0 26106775, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
Thebeardedsinglemalt 2 points 11 days ago

I got about 2 sentences into that and knew it was the honorable George Carlin.

path: 0 26106775 26109794, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
UpAndAtThem 5 points 13 days ago

Absolutely. Strong community bonds and local resilience should be a foremost corcern, and ideally come before ideology, heritage, or tradition.

The corporate fucks of the world are great at dividing us up and watching us fight each other over ideological and traditional differences, then laughing while they rob everyone blind.

path: 0 26083945, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 0
Gpennyhigh 4 points 12 days ago

Ultimately, maga’s unhealthiness is they refuse to adapt to reality, whether that’s climate science, economic data, or global best practices. Their policies actively make life worse for most Americans while enriching a tiny elite. The tragedy is that many of their own voters would benefit from the very systems they oppose, but corporate propaganda, tribalism and proudly choose to stay in dualism, keep them voting against their own interests repeatedly. Until that changes, the US will continue to lag behind nations that prioritize people over profits. Real truth sets us free!

path: 0 26098270, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Mulligrubs 1 point 11 days ago

The billionaire class aren't "MAGA" (they manipulate MAGA and Greens for that matter)

This tiny elite that makes life worst for most Americans is Democrat and Republican (and UK royal family, etc.)

Real truth does set us free! It ain't "MAGA", they're as powerless as you are; it's "EPSTEIN FILES".

path: 0 26098270 26116588, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
Tollana1234567 1 point 11 days ago

also co-opting anti-vaxxing too.

path: 0 26098270 26106117, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
RedGreenBlue 2 points 12 days ago

How much money do you need to spend to defund education and gate it behind fees?

path: 0 26084614, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
minorkeys 2 points 11 days ago

We should invest in whatever they hate the most. Obviously they don't hate hurting others or being selfish, so whatever they hate probably doesn't have those things and are safe for us.

path: 0 26117484, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Radical_Socialist_t00t 2 points 10 days ago

It worked, people are so dumb

path: 0 26119939, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Sam_Bass 1 point 11 days ago

wasted effort

path: 0 26117051, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 0
jld 0 points 11 days ago

The fight isn’t left vs right, it’s down vs up. That’s what they spent their money on, making sure we lowbies keep on fighting against each other. None of it works, except to make sure powerful people remain powerful and rich.

path: 0 26106511, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 7
Thebeardedsinglemalt 2 points 11 days ago

It never was right vs left, it never was generational. That's just what everyone has been duped into arguing over. And they love it. Because while people under 40 are bitching about all their problems being because caused by anyone over the age of 70, those ultra wealthy kid-fuckers and laughing their asses off funneling more tax dollars into their bank accounts

path: 0 26106511 26109829, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
Objection -1 points 11 days ago

Those who want to act against the rich and powerful are called, "the left."

path: 0 26106511 26116655, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 5
jld 0 points 10 days ago

How? By funneling taxes to a central authority and empowering them? Because we're not empowering society by doing that. We're actually empowering just a small group, who gets all the agency to make decisions on behalf of everybody and, most likely, on behalf of themselves mostly. An actually fair society needs to be governed in a decentralized manner. On the far left, we've got communism, and we all know how that went, and on the far right we've got fascism, and we definitely know how that went.

I maintain my original hypothesis that "the left" and "the right" are simply constructs designed to keep up fighting among ourselves, where we mostly disagree with each other in a tribalist way, as opposed to actually discussing and thinking about the problems, and trying to come up with solutions. To me, it's plain simple that we need both mindsets combined to be able to actually fight the rich and the powerful.

But that's it from me on politics this week. As a problem solver, I have less and less interest on this pointless topic.

path: 0 26106511 26116655 26126632, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 4
Objection 0 points 10 days ago

That is an anarchist position, anarchism is a strain of leftist thought.

To me, it’s plain simple that we need both mindsets combined to be able to actually fight the rich and the powerful.

We need right-wing thought to fight the rich and powerful? What part? Cutting taxes on the rich? Starting wars of aggression? Kicking down doors and rounding up immigrants?

The right is completely wrong, has no insight on anything, mostly on account of being completely anti-intellectual. All of their policies are about reinforcing existing heirarchies, strengthening the rich and weakening the poor. Opposing those policies is not "tribalism." I challenge you to name one right-wing position with any merit.

As a problem solver, I have less and less interest on this pointless topic.

Pointless topics! So you don't actually care about fighting the rich at all.

path: 0 26106511 26116655 26126632 26126826, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 3
jld 1 point 10 days ago

That is an anarchist position, anarchism is a strain of leftist thought.

Well, there's also anarcho-capitalism, or minarchism. But what's happening right here with this discussion is exactly my point. There's a senseless drive to put individuals into these tiny bubbles of left or right, and this solves nothing.

We need right-wing thought to fight the rich and powerful? What part? Cutting taxes on the rich? Starting wars of aggression? Kicking down doors and rounding up immigrants?

Nah, couldn't care less for those guys. It's freakin' insanity what's happening right now in the world. What I'm saying is that taxes merely shift the control elsewhere. If you have to tax, those are the guys to be taxed. My problem with taxes is that it accomplishes nothing really. This general position against "the rich" is also slightly biased, but completely understandable given the current events. Dude, I am absolutely disgusted by the stuff those guys are doing! It's mind blowing to me the level of insanity we have reached. Now, are you going to ask the government to help you out, when they are essentially the enemy? I don't get it. Also, are we gonna add to the chaos and make it worse, or are we actually gonna shift out of a destructive mindset and try to clearly identify problems and find solutions? It's just that revenge taxing the rich will essentially accomplish nothing beyond satisfying the egos of a few people.

Pointless topics! So you don’t actually care about fighting the rich at all.

I don't, not directly. I care about addressing the real problems, the core issues. For example, the fact that the rich and the powerful seem to be above the law. This is why I believe the decentralization of power is a fundamental mechanism in the fight against corruption. A central body of power will always be corrupt.

path: 0 26106511 26116655 26126632 26126826 26127742, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 2
kingkong 0 points 11 days ago

all i want is the removal of all income taxes and do land value taxes the taxes have to come from those at the top that own everything 5000 sqft exemption and the ones using properties as rent they can go bankrupt i dont care use it or lose it. no one cares.

production lower inflation else you deserve bankruptcy.

path: 0 26116314, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 0
mechoman444 0 points 11 days ago

This is the second time this exact meme has been posted to this sub, so I suppose this is the second time I have to say this.

Socialism does not inherently guarantee collective worker protections, nor was socialism itself designed specifically to provide them.

At its most basic level, socialism is an economic and political framework centered on social or public ownership and control of the means of production. Worker protections, labor rights, workplace safety regulations, unions, minimum wages, and social welfare programs are separate policy choices. They can exist under socialist, capitalist, and mixed economic systems.

More importantly, there is very little historical basis for claiming that socialism, simply by virtue of being socialism, guarantees the protections this meme is describing. In fact, many governments that have implemented socialist economic systems have had extensive records of suppressing independent labor organizations, restricting worker autonomy, and disregarding individual civil and political rights.

You can argue for those protections. You can argue for socialism. But conflating the two doesn't make the historical or economic argument any stronger.

path: 0 26106816, hotness: undefined, score: 0, children: 2
UiUiUiUiUi 5 points 11 days ago

Depends who you read, Marx, Lenin? Rosa Luxemburg? Robert Owen? Anton Pannekoek?

I think the word definition socialism depends on your country’s current and past local proponents.

path: 0 26106816 26107320, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 1
DrunkenDuckling 2 points 11 days ago
path: 0 26106816 26107320 26108780, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 0
TheFonz -2 points 11 days ago

Ok

path: 0 26113750, hotness: undefined, score: -2, children: 0
teslasaur -3 points 12 days ago

Frankly, hearing the leader of the left party speak makes me dislike socialism. At least here in Sweden.

Something about the "fuck you, i'm right. But i wont explain why" attitude doesn't sit right. Casually making comments like "there aren't any insert opposition party in the town I come from" is frankly laughable. She just latched on to the first and apparently only dichotomy available in her surrounding and never thought about it again.

path: 0 26088866, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 3
Vrag 6 points 12 days ago

The point is collectivism in general. If you're that easily dissuaded from it by actions, or behaviour, or even just words of a random politician, you're the perfect rube to be exploted to keep the exploitative system chugging along

path: 0 26088866 26093110, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 2
ayyy 3 points 12 days ago

Yea the person your replying to is just a pig looking for an excuse to validate his asshole feelings. He also says shit like this.

path: 0 26088866 26093110 26093953, hotness: undefined, score: 3, children: 0
teslasaur -1 points 11 days ago

So if i'm disuaded by the actions of others that try to push an idea on me, then i'm the tool? Cool.

path: 0 26088866 26093110 26105687, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
Scaramanga -28 points 13 days ago

This isn't true. People hate socialism because it has never worked. People end up worst off under collectivism.

path: 0 26084057, hotness: undefined, score: -28, children: 43
rockSlayer 15 points 13 days ago

Gr8 b8 m8 I r8 8/8

path: 0 26084057 26084352, hotness: undefined, score: 15, children: 0
QueenHawlSera 13 points 12 days ago

Yeah because every man for himself and the glorification of selfishness has done wonders for society. Get bent.

path: 0 26084057 26084887, hotness: undefined, score: 13, children: 0
Cowbee 11 points 12 days ago

Socialism always works, and has always dramatically improved the lives of the people as compared to what came before.

path: 0 26084057 26084835, hotness: undefined, score: 11, children: 28
Scaramanga -9 points 12 days ago

Where has it worked ? It didn't work out too well for my family in Eastern Europe.

path: 0 26084057 26084835 26085721, hotness: undefined, score: -9, children: 27
Cowbee 5 points 12 days ago

Life expectancy doubled in Russia, literacy rates went from 20-30% (depending on the region) to 99.9% within the span of decades. Healthcare was made free and high quality, same as education. Famine was gradually eliminated in a region where Tsarist agriculture made that a common affair. Homes were dramatically upgraded from wooden shacks in rural areas to decent apartments for everyone. I don't know where in Eastern Europe your family is from, but the great majority of society saw dramatic improvements compared to semi-feudalism before it. Aristocrats and capitalists definitely lost out, and the transition wasn't bloodless, but the vast majority of society pulled ahead.

path: 0 26084057 26084835 26085721 26088932, hotness: undefined, score: 5, children: 26
Tja -5 points 12 days ago

Compared to feudalism. Low bar, huh?

Plus lol@famines. Ukraine wants a word.

path: 0 26084057 26084835 26085721 26088932 26091134, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 25
Tja 6 points 12 days ago

You are right, only 39 of the top 40 economies have socialist policies like universal education, Healthcare or workers rights. Total failure.

path: 0 26084057 26088687, hotness: undefined, score: 6, children: 9
Cowbee -3 points 12 days ago

Welfare isn't socialism, this isn't the gotcha you think it is.

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26089658, hotness: undefined, score: -3, children: 4
Tja 2 points 12 days ago

No true Scotsman

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26089658 26091112, hotness: undefined, score: 2, children: 3
Mulligrubs 1 point 11 days ago

Okay, then all of those socialist governments you list are capitalist. They are all certainly as capitalist as they are socialist. no exceptions.

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26089658 26091112 26116785, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
Cowbee -1 points 12 days ago

No? Socialism is a mode of production and distribution, not something as simple as a social safety net operating within the bounds of capitalism. This isn't a purity test, it's a definitional distinction.

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26089658 26091112 26091338, hotness: undefined, score: -1, children: 0
glibg10b -5 points 12 days ago

You're making the common mistake of confusing social welfare and socialism

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26090944, hotness: undefined, score: -5, children: 3
Tja 4 points 12 days ago

No true Scotsman

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26090944 26091113, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 2
Mulligrubs 1 point 11 days ago

Okay then, I guess that means you love capitalism since all of those 40 economies are capitalist.

100%. If they qualify as socialist, they certainly are also capitalist. All of them.

path: 0 26084057 26088687 26090944 26091113 26116759, hotness: undefined, score: 1, children: 1
prole 4 points 12 days ago

Read a book

path: 0 26084057 26091627, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
TeamSports_or_CuckPorn 4 points 12 days ago

Team sports

path: 0 26084057 26084680, hotness: undefined, score: 4, children: 0
workreform
workreform

@lemmy.world

login for more options
17806
1699
6876

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

  • All workers must be paid a living wage for their labor.
  • Income inequality is the main cause of lower living standards.
  • Workers must join together and fight back for what is rightfully theirs.
  • We must not be divided and conquered. Workers gain the most when they focus on unifying issues.

Our Goals

  • Higher wages for underpaid workers.
  • Better worker representation, including but not limited to unions.
  • Better and fewer working hours.
  • Stimulating a massive wave of worker organizing in the United States and beyond.
  • Organizing and supporting political causes and campaigns that put workers first.

go to feed...